Article (Scientific journals)
Evaluating erosion risk models in a Scottish catchment using organic carbon fingerprinting
Wiltshire, C.; Meersmans, Jeroen; Waine, T.W. et al.
2024In Journal of Soils and Sediments, 24 (8), p. 3132 - 3147
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Wiltshire et al 2024 Journal of Soils and Sediments.pdf
Author postprint (1.75 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Erosion risk; Organic carbon loss modelling; RUSLE factor calibration; Sediment fingerprinting; Terrestrial-to-aquatic fluxes; Earth-Surface Processes; Stratigraphy
Abstract :
[en] Purpose: Identification of hotspots of accelerated erosion of soil and organic carbon (OC) is critical to the targeting of soil conservation and sediment management measures. The erosion risk map (ERM) developed by Lilly and Baggaley (Soil erosion risk map of Scotland, 2018) for Scotland estimates erosion risk for the specific soil conditions in the region. However, the ERM provides no soil erosion rates. Erosion rates can be estimated by empirical models such as the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Yet, RUSLE was not developed specifically for the soil conditions in Scotland. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of these two erosion models to determine whether RUSLE erosion rate estimates could be used to quantify the amount of soil eroded from high-risk areas identified in the ERM. Methods: The study was conducted in the catchment of Loch Davan, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Organic carbon loss models were constructed to compare land use specific OC yields based on RUSLE and ERM using OC fingerprinting as a benchmark. The estimated soil erosion rates in this study were also compared with recently published estimates in Scotland (Rickson et al. in Developing a method to estimate the costs of soil erosion in high-risk Scottish catchments, 2019). Results: The region-specific ERM most closely approximated the relative land use OC yields in streambed sediment however, the results of RUSLE were very similar, suggesting that, in this catchment, RUSLE erosion rate estimates could be used to quantify the amount of soil eroded from the high-risk areas identified by ERM. The RUSLE estimates of soil erosion for this catchment were comparable to the soil erosion rates per land use estimated by Rickson et al. (Developing a method to estimate the costs of soil erosion in high-risk Scottish catchments, 2019) in Scottish soils except in the case of pasture/grassland likely due to the pastures in this catchment being grass ley where periods of surface vegetation cover/root network absence are likely to have generated higher rates of erosion. Conclusion: Selection of suitable erosion risk models can be improved by the combined use of two sediment origin techniques—erosion risk modelling and OC sediment fingerprinting. These methods could, ultimately, support the development of targeted sediment management strategies to maintain healthy soils within the EU and beyond.
Disciplines :
Earth sciences & physical geography
Agriculture & agronomy
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Wiltshire, C. ;  School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, United Kingdom
Meersmans, Jeroen  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Echanges Eau - Sol - Plantes
Waine, T.W.;  School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, United Kingdom
Grabowski, R.C.;  School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Bedford, United Kingdom
Thornton, B.;  The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Addy, S.;  The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Glendell, M.;  The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Language :
English
Title :
Evaluating erosion risk models in a Scottish catchment using organic carbon fingerprinting
Publication date :
August 2024
Journal title :
Journal of Soils and Sediments
ISSN :
1439-0108
eISSN :
1614-7480
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Volume :
24
Issue :
8
Pages :
3132 - 3147
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
NERC - Natural Environment Research Council
Funding text :
This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Grant number NE/ M009106/1) through a studentship award to CW by STARS (Soils Training And Research Studentships) Centre for Doctoral Training and Research Programme. The authors thank the CASE funder for this work Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA). We thank Nikki Baggaley from The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK for providing access to the soil erosion risk maps. We also thank the reviewers whose comments helped focus and strengthen the manuscript.
Available on ORBi :
since 08 October 2024

Statistics


Number of views
12 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
3 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi