Article (Scientific journals)
Examining the effect of post-depositional processes on the preservation and identification of stone tool residues from temperate environments: an experimental approach
Cnuts, Dries; Rots, Veerle
2024In PLoS ONE
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
journal.pone.0309060-1.pdf
Publisher postprint (22.91 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Studying taphonomy is crucial for understanding how post-depositional processes impact archaeological remains. This knowledge is pivotal for accurately interpreting the archaeological record. Although taphonomy has a long tradition in archaeology, it is less developed in the analysis of stone tool residues compared to other subdisciplines. To address this gap, our study aims to further develop our understanding of the preservation potential of stone tool residues in temperate environments through actualist experiments. To achieve this, we develop a multidimensional experimental program that features the first biweekly monitoring of weathering processes on residues over a one-year cycle, aiming to understand the short-term effects of weathering immediately after tool discard. Additionally, the program involves the study of longer-term burial and weathering visual effects on different residue types within various previously unexplored depositional environments. This approach allows us to observe the visual effects of both weathering and burial processes and to improve our understanding of the different mechanisms involved in the diagenesis of stone tool residues. While known factors such as microbial activity and soil acidity play a primary role in residue decay, specific stone tool-related factors also prove important, underscoring the need to develop further a specific branch of taphonomy related to stone tool residues. Moreover, our results show that certain residue types may survive within these environments that are often considered as being hostile. A residue analysis of stone tools from temperate contexts may thus contribute unique data that can improve our understanding of past human behaviour. Future research with more diverse residue types and depositional conditions will permit further refinement of our understanding of how taphonomy affects residue preservation and enhance the reliability of residue identifications. As such, stone tool residue analysis will become firmly rooted within broader functional approaches to address how humans use stone tools and how this affects stone tool variability.
Disciplines :
Archaeology
Author, co-author :
Cnuts, Dries  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Art, Archéologie et Patrimoine (AAP) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences historiques > TraceoLab
Rots, Veerle  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences historiques ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Art, Archéologie et Patrimoine (AAP) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences historiques > TraceoLab
Language :
English
Title :
Examining the effect of post-depositional processes on the preservation and identification of stone tool residues from temperate environments: an experimental approach
Publication date :
21 October 2024
Journal title :
PLoS ONE
eISSN :
1932-6203
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, United States - California
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
Evohaft
Funders :
ERC - European Research Council
Funding number :
312283
Funding text :
This research was funded by the European Research Council under the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) in the context of a starting grant (“EVO-HAFT”) attributed to Veerle Rots (ERC Grant Agreement no. 312283). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Available on ORBi :
since 11 September 2024

Statistics


Number of views
53 (22 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
6 (4 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi