How does soil water retention change over time? A three‐year field study under several production systems

agricultural practices, crop differentiation, field monitoring, food resilience, sensors, soil structure, soil water retention curve, water stress, weed management

Abstract :

[en] Agricultural practices and meteorological conditions affect soil structure and soil hydraulic properties. However, their temporal evolution is rarely studied, and even less in the field. Thus, their dynamics are rarely taken into account in models, often leading to inconsistent results and poor decision making. In this study, the temporal evolution of water retention properties and soil structure was monitored over a 3‐year period under several contrasting production systems. Soil Water Retention Curves (SWRCs) obtained directly in the field (with soil water content and potential sensors) were compared with theoretical SWRCs predicted by pedotransfer functions (PTFs) and laboratory SWRCs measured on undisturbed samples. Bulk densities were measured every 2 months. Results indicate a high degree of variability in SWRCs over time and between production systems. The results suggest that variations in the soil water retention behaviour can be induced by crop differentiation, weed control, crop residue management, compaction during harvest, or the introduction of temporary grassland. Contrasting climatic conditions between 2021 (water excess), 2022 (severe drought) and 2023 (intermediate) provided a unique opportunity to study the resilience of the crop systems to extreme climatic conditions. Different soil drying dynamics were observed and some agricultural practices were identified as influencing the soil water retention behaviour for at least 2 years. Comparison of SWRCs showed that the theoretical curves obtained from PTFs are not a good representation of the field SWRCs, especially for less conventional agricultural practices. The laboratory curves are closer with similar trends. However, these SWRCs are not optimal for investigating the temporal evolution of water retention properties. This research also shows that agricultural practices and crops can be levers for contributing to greater food resilience against future climatic conditions. Therefore, to assess the relevance of production systems for tomorrow's needs, studies should focus on the impact of multi‐cropping systems on water retention dynamics in the field.

Research Center/Unit :

TERRA Research Centre. Echanges Eau - Sol - Plantes - ULiège

Disciplines :

Agriculture & agronomy

Author, co-author :

Pirlot, Clémence ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre

Renard, Anne-Catherine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Echanges Eau - Sol - Plantes

De Clerck, Caroline ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Plant Sciences

Degré, Aurore ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Echanges Eau - Sol - Plantes

Language :

English

Title :

How does soil water retention change over time? A three‐year field study under several production systems

Publication date :

July 2024

Journal title :

European Journal of Soil Science

ISSN :

1351-0754

eISSN :

1365-2389

Publisher :

Wiley

Volume :

Issue :

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Name of the research project :

AIL4WaterQuality

Funders :

SPGE - Société Publique de Gestion de l'Eau

Available on ORBi :

since 10 September 2024

Statistics

Number of views

38 (18 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

35 (7 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Ahmed, A., Alam, J. B., Pandey, P., & Hossain, S. (2021). Estimation of unsaturated flow parameters and hysteresis curve from field instrumentation. MATEC Web of Conferences, 337, 8.
Ajayi, A. E., Horn, R., Rostek, J., Uteau, D., & Peth, S. (2019). Evaluation of temporal changes in hydrostructural properties of regenerating permanent grassland soils based on shrinkage properties and μCT analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 185, 102–112.
Alletto, L., Pot, V., Giuliano, S., Costes, M., Perdrieux, F., & Justes, E. (2015). Temporal variation in soil physical properties improves the water dynamics modeling in a conventionally-tilled soil. Geoderma, 243–244, 18–28.
Alskaf, K., Mooney, S. J., Sparkes, D. L., Wilson, P., & Sjögersten, S. (2021). Short-term impacts of different tillage practices and plant residue retention on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil and Tillage Research, 206, 1–12.
Bacq-Labreuil, A., Neal, A. L., Crawford, J., Mooney, S. J., Akkari, E., Zhang, X., Clark, I., & Ritz, K. (2021). Significant structural evolution of a long-term fallow soil in response to agricultural management practices requires at least 10 years after conversion. European Journal of Soil Science, 72, 829–841.
Ball, B. C., Bingham, I., Rees, R. M., Watson, C. A., & Litterick, A. (2005). The role of crop rotations in determining soil structure and crop growth conditions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 85, 557–577.
Basile, A., Ciollaro, G., & Coppola, A. (2003). Hysteresis in soil water characteristics as a key to interpreting comparisons of laboratory and field measured hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research, 39, 1–12.
Blanco-Canqui, H., & Wortmann, C. S. (2020). Does occasional tillage undo the ecosystem services gained with no-till? A review. Soil and Tillage Research, 198, 104534.
Bordoni, M., Bittelli, M., Valentino, R., Chersich, S., & Meisina, C. (2017). Improving the estimation of complete field soil water characteristic curves through field monitoring data. Journal of Hydrology, 552, 283–305.
Chandrasekhar, P., Kreiselmeier, J., Schwen, A., Weninger, T., Julich, S., Feger, K. H., & Schwärzel, K. (2018). Why we should include soil structural dynamics of agricultural soils in hydrological models. Water, 10, 1–18.
Ciocca, F., Lunati, I., & Parlange, M. B. (2014). Effects of the water retention curve on evaporation from arid soils. Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 3110–3116.
Dashtaki, S. G., Homaee, M., & Khodaverdiloo, H. (2010). Derivation and validation of pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water retention curve using a variety of soil data. Soil Use and Management, 26, 68–74.
Dey, P., Sundriyal, P., & Sahoo, S. K. (2017). Science of lagging behind-hysteresis in soil moisture characteristic curve – A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6, 151–156.
Eat Lancet Commission. (2019). Healthy diets from sustainable food systems: Summary.
FAO. (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014 – International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps.
Geris, J., Verrot, L., Gao, L., Peng, X., Oyesiku-Blakemore, J., Smith, J. U., Hodson, M. E., McKenzie, B. M., Zhang, G., & Hallett, P. D. (2021). Importance of short-term temporal variability in soil physical properties for soil water modelling under different tillage practices. Soil and Tillage Research, 213, 105132.
Gozubuyuk, Z., Sahin, U., Cemal, M., & Ozturk, I. (2015). The influence of different tillage practices on water content of soil and crop yield in vetch – Winter wheat rotation compared to fallow – Winter wheat rotation in a high altitude and cool climate. Agricultural Water Management, 160, 84–97.
Guillaume, B., Aroui Boukbida, H., Bakker, G., Bieganowski, A., Brostaux, Y., Cornelis, W., Durner, W., Hartmann, C., Iversen, B. V., Javaux, M., Ingwersen, J., Lamorski, K., Lamparter, A., Makó, A., Mingot Soriano, A. M., Messing, I., Nemes, A., Pomes-Bordedebat, A., Van Der Ploeg, M., … Degré, A. (2023). Reproducibility of the wet part of the soil water retention curve: A European interlaboratory comparison. The Soil, 9, 365–379.
Hannes, M., Wollschlager, U., Wohling, T., & Vogel, H.-J. (2016). Revisiting hydraulic hysteresis based on long-term monitoring of hydraulic states in lysimeters. Water Resources Research, 52, 3847–3865.
Hedayati, M., Ahmed, A., Hossain, M. S., Hossain, J., & Sapkota, A. (2020). Transportation geotechnics evaluation and comparison of in-situ soil water characteristics curve with laboratory SWCC curve. Transportation Geotechnics, 23, 100351.
Heitman, J. L., Kool, D., & Carvalho, H. D. R. (2023). Soil management considerations for water resiliency in a changing climate. Agronomy Journal, 115, 2127–2139.
Herbrich, M., & Gerke, H. H. (2017). Scales of water retention dynamics observed in eroded luvisols from an arable postglacial soil landscape. Vadose Zone Journal, 16, 1–17.
Hu, W., Tabley, F., Beare, M., Tregurtha, C., Gillespie, R., Qiu, W., & Gosden, P. (2018). Short-term dynamics of soil physical properties as affected by compaction and tillage in a silt loam soil. Vadose Zone Journal, 17, 1–13.
Huang, X., Wang, H., Zhang, M., Horn, R., & Ren, T. (2021). Soil water retention dynamics in a Mollisol during a maize growing season under contrasting tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 209, 104953.
Iiyama, I. (2016). Differences between field-monitored and laboratory-measured soil moisture characteristics. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 62, 416–422.
Jarvis, N., Groh, J., Lewan, E., Meurer, K. H. E., Durka, W., Baessler, C., Pütz, T., Rufullayev, E., & Vereecken, H. (2022). Coupled modelling of hydrological processes and grassland production in two contrasting climates. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26, 2277–2299.
Jensen, J. L., Schjønning, P., Watts, C. W., Christensen, B. T., & Munkholm, L. J. (2020). Short-term changes in soil pore size distribution: Impact of land use. Soil and Tillage Research, 199, 104597.
Jensen, J. L., Watts, C. W., Christensen, B. T., & Munkholm, L. J. (2019). Soil water retention: Uni-modal models of pore-size distribution neglect impacts of soil management. Soil Physics & Hydrology, 83, 18–26.
Jirků, V., Kodešová, R., Nikodem, A., Mühlhanselová, M., & Žigová, A. (2013). Temporal variability of structure and hydraulic properties of topsoil of three soil types. Geoderma, 204–205, 43–58.
Keller, T., Colombi, T., Ruiz, S., Schymanski, S. J., Weisskopf, P., Koestel, J., Sommer, M., Stadelmann, V., Breitenstein, D., Kirchgessner, N., Walter, A., & Or, D. (2021). Soil structure recovery following compaction: Short-term evolution of soil physical properties in a loamy soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 85, 1002–1020.
Kool, D., Tong, B., Tian, Z., Heitman, J. L., Sauer, T. J., & Horton, R. (2019). Soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity dynamics following tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 193, 95–100.
Lourenço, S. D. N., Jones, N., Morley, C., Doerr, S. H., & Bryant, R. (2015). Hysteresis in the soil water retention of a sand–clay mixture with contact angles lower than ninety degrees. Vadose Zone Journal, 14, 1–8.
Lu, J., Zhang, Q., Werner, A. D., Li, Y., Jiang, S., & Tan, Z. (2020). Root-induced changes of soil hydraulic properties – A review. Journal of Hydrology, 589, 1–13.
McDaniel, M. D., Tiemann, L. K., & Grandy, A. S. (2014). Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecological Applications, 24, 560–570.
Meurer, K., Barron, J., Chenu, C., Coucheney, E., Fielding, M., Hallett, P., Herrmann, A. M., Keller, T., Koestel, J., Larsbo, M., Lewan, E., Or, D., Parsons, D., Parvin, N., Taylor, A., Vereecken, H., & Jarvis, N. (2020). A framework for modelling soil structure dynamics induced by biological activity. Global Change Biology, 26, 5382–5403.
Meurer, K. H. E., Chenu, C., Coucheney, E., Herrmann, A. M., Keller, T., Kätterer, T., Svensson, D. N., & Jarvis, N. (2020). Modelling dynamic interactions between soil structure and the storage and turnover of soil organic matter. Biogeosciences, 17, 5025–5042.
Pečan, U., Pintar, M., & Kastelec, D. (2023). Variability of in situ soil water retention curves under different tillage systems and growing seasons. Soil and Tillage Research, 233, 1–13.
Piñeiro, V., Arias, J., Dürr, J., Elverdin, P., Ibáñez, A. M., Kinengyere, A., Opazo, C. M., Owoo, N., Page, J. R., Prager, S. D., & Torero, M. (2020). A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nature Sustainability, 3, 809–820.
Pires, L. F., Borges, J. A. R., Rosa, J. A., Cooper, M., Heck, R. J., Passoni, S., & Roque, W. L. (2017). Soil structure changes induced by tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 165, 66–79.
Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlüter, S., & Vogel, H. J. (2018). Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma, 314, 122–137.
Sandin, M., Koestel, J., Jarvis, N., & Larsbo, M. (2017). Post-tillage evolution of structural pore space and saturated and near-saturated hydraulic conductivity in a clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 165, 161–168.
Schwärzel, K., Carrick, S., Wahren, A., Feger, K.-H., Bodner, G., & Buchan, G. (2011). Soil hydraulic properties of recently tilled soil under cropping rotation compared with two-year pasture. Vadose Zone Journal, 10, 354–366.
Schwen, A., Bodner, G., Scholl, P., Buchan, G. D., & Loiskandl, W. (2011). Temporal dynamics of soil hydraulic properties and the water-conducting porosity under different tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 113, 89–98.
Strudley, M. W., Green, T. R., & Ascough, J. C. (2008). Tillage effects on soil hydraulic properties in space and time: State of the science. Soil and Tillage Research, 99, 4–48.
Tian, Z., Chen, J., Cai, C., Gao, W., Ren, T., Heitman, J. L., & Horton, R. (2021). New pedotransfer functions for soil water retention curves that better account for bulk density effects. Soil and Tillage Research, 205, 1–40.
Tifafi, M., Bouzouidja, R., Leguédois, S., Ouvrard, S., & Séré, G. (2017). How lysimetric monitoring of Technosols can contribute to understand the temporal dynamics of the soil porosity. Geoderma, 296, 60–68.
Tóth, B., Weynants, M., Nemes, A., Makó, A., Bilas, G., & Tóth, G. (2015). New generation of hydraulic pedotransfer functions for Europe. European Journal of Soil Science, 66, 226–238.
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44, 892–898.
Vogel, H. J., Gerke, H. H., Mietrach, R., Zahl, R., & Wöhling, T. (2023). Soil hydraulic conductivity in the state of nonequilibrium. Vadose Zone Journal, 22, 1–12.
Wahren, A., Feger, K. H., Schwärzel, K., & Münch, A. (2009). Land-use effects on flood generation - considering soil hydraulic measurements in modelling. Advances in Geosciences, 21, 99–107.
Weynants, M., Montanarella, L., Tóth, G., Strauss, P., Feichtinger, F., Cornelis, W., Javaux, M., Matula, S., Daroussin, J., Hennings, V., Schindler, U., Bilas, G., Makó, A., Tóth, B., Romano, N., Iovino, M., Morari, F., Kværnø, S., Nemes, A., … Anaya-Romero, M. (2013). European HYdropedological Data Inventory.
Whalley, W. R., Ober, E. S., & Jenkins, M. (2013). Measurement of the matric potential of soil water in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 3951–3963.
Zhang, M., Lu, Y., Heitman, J., Horton, R., & Ren, T. (2017). Temporal changes of soil water retention behavior as affected by wetting and drying following tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81, 1288–1295.
Zhang, M., Lu, Y., Horton, R., & Ren, T. (2018). Temporal changes of soil water retention behavior as affected by wetting and drying following tillage. Soil Physics & Hydrology, 81, 1288–1295.
Zhao, Y., Wen, T., Shao, L., Chen, R., Sun, X., Huang, L., & Chen, X. (2020). Predicting hysteresis loops of the soil water characteristic curve from initial drying. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 84, 1642–1649.