Article (Scientific journals)
Conflits fémoro-acétabulaires, options de traitement et rééducation: une revue narrative (partie 2)
Leroy, Raphaël; Thirion, Thierry; Kaux, Jean-François et al.
In pressIn Journal de Traumatologie du Sport
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
FAIS_Part2.pdf
Author preprint (1.37 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Femoroacetabular impingement; Rehabilitation; Sports; Treatment options; Surgery; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Abstract :
[en] Introduction: The femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is responsible for over 50% of cases of secondary hip osteoarthritis. Appropriate management is therefore essential. In that sense, two main therapeutic approaches are conceivable: the surgical approach aimed at correcting the biomechanical conflict, and the conservative approach. The purpose of this article is to summarise the evidence available in the literature on the description and comparison of the various treatment options, both surgical and conservative, as well as the main lines of management of FAIS. Material and methods: Searches were conducted in the “Pubmed” database. The terms “femoroacetabular impingement AND treatment” were applied in the search engine in order to target the problematic studied. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses were retained, as these correspond to the highest level of scientific value. Results: The research identified 181 systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of FAIS. Nine of them were selected to meet our objective. In terms of surgical approach, the techniques developed to treat FAIS are numerous and have evolved rapidly. Arthroscopic surgery has become widely prevalent and is proving to be the interventional option of choice. In contrast, the conservative approach (strengthening, mobility, pain relief, education) has been slower to develop, although it is now offering very encouraging results. Currently, arthroscopic surgery appears to offer better results than the conservative approach when comparing the scores obtained from the iHOT-33 and EQ-5D-5L index questionnaires. Conclusion: Both treatment approaches (conservative and surgical) show interesting improvements in patients suffering from FAIS. In the future, it would make sense to combine them rather than confront them, as they address different treatment axes that are in no way in opposition.
Disciplines :
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine
Author, co-author :
Leroy, Raphaël  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Thirion, Thierry  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Anatomie de l'appareil locomoteur et chirurgie de l'appareil locomoteur
Kaux, Jean-François  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation > Médecine physique, réadaptation et traumatologie du sport
Dunand, Xavier ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Croisier, Jean-Louis  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Dellatte, Julien ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation
Delvaux, François  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation
Language :
French
Title :
Conflits fémoro-acétabulaires, options de traitement et rééducation: une revue narrative (partie 2)
Alternative titles :
[en] Femoroacetabular impingement, treatment options and rehabilitation : a narrative review (part 2)
Publication date :
In press
Journal title :
Journal de Traumatologie du Sport
ISSN :
0762-915X
eISSN :
1773-0465
Publisher :
Elsevier Masson s.r.l.
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBi :
since 01 August 2024

Statistics


Number of views
80 (13 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
53 (5 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi