[en] We investigate the impact of dissipation, including energy relaxation and decoherence, on weak measurements. While weak measurements have been successful in signal amplification, dissipation can compromise their usefulness. More precisely, we show that in systems with a unique steady state, weak values always converge to an expectation value of the measured observable as dissipation time tends to infinity, in contrast to systems with multiple steady states, where the weak values can remain anomalous, i.e. outside the range of eigenvalues of the observable, even in the limit of an infinite dissipation time. In addition, we propose a method for extracting information about the dissipative dynamics of a system using weak values at short dissipation times. Specifically, we explore the amplification of the dissipation rate in a two-level system and the use of weak values to differentiate between Markovian and non-Markovian dissipative dynamics. We also find that weak measurements operating around a weak atom-cavity coupling can probe the atom dissipation through the weak value of non-Hermitian operators within the rotating-wave approximation of the weak interaction.
Disciplines :
Physics
Author, co-author :
Ballesteros Ferraz, Lorena
Martin, John ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de physique
Caudano, Yves
Language :
English
Title :
On the relevance of weak measurements in dissipative quantum systems
Xu L Liu Z Datta A Knee G C Lundeen J S Lu Y-Q Zhang L 2020 Approaching quantum-limited metrology with imperfect detectors by using weak-value amplification Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 080501 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.080501
Hosten O Kwiat P 2008 Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements Science 319 787 90 787-90 10.1126/science.1152697
Brunner N Simon C 2010 Measuring small longitudinal phase shifts: weak measurements or standard interferometry? Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 010405 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.010405
Lundeen J S Sutherland B Patel A Stewart C Bamber C 2011 Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction Nature 474 188 91 188-91 10.1038/nature10120
Pati A K Singh U Sinha U 2015 Measuring non-Hermitian operators via weak values Phys. Rev. A 92 052120 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052120
Breuer H P et al 2002 The Theory of Open Quantum Systems Oxford University Press on Demand
De Vega I Alonso D 2017 Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 015001 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001
Aharonov Y Albert D Z Vaidman L 1988 How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1351 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351
Mello P A 2014 The von Neumann model of measurement in quantum mechanics AIP Conf. Proc. 1575 136 65 136-65 10.1063/1.4861702
Svensson B E 2013 Pedagogical review of quantum measurement theory with an emphasis on weak measurements Quanta 2 18 49 18-49 10.12743/quanta.v2i1.12
Jordan A N Martínez-Rincón J Howell J C 2014 Technical advantages for weak-value amplification: when less is more Phys. Rev. X 4 011031 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011031
Dixon P B Starling D J Jordan A N Howell J C 2009 Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 173601 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.173601
Harris J Boyd R W Lundeen J S 2017 Weak value amplification can outperform conventional measurement in the presence of detector saturation Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 070802 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.070802
Kofman A G Ashhab S Nori F 2012 Nonperturbative theory of weak pre-and post-selected measurements Phys. Rep. 520 43 133 43-133 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.07.001
Rivas A Huelga S F 2012 Open Quantum Systems vol 10 Springer
Rotter I Bird J P 2015 A review of progress in the physics of open quantum systems: theory and experiment Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 114001 10.1088/0034-4885/78/11/114001
Merkli M 2022 Dynamics of open quantum systems II, Markovian approximation Quantum 6 616 10.22331/q-2022-01-03-616
Wiseman H M Milburn G J 2009 Quantum Measurement and Control Cambridge University Press
Knee G C Briggs G A D Benjamin S C Gauger E M 2013 Quantum sensors based on weak-value amplification cannot overcome decoherence Phys. Rev. A 87 012115 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012115
Shikano Y Hosoya A 2009 Weak values with decoherence J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 025304 10.1088/1751-8113/43/2/025304
Ban M 2013 Weak values influenced by environment J. Mod. Phys. 4 1 8 1-8 10.4236/jmp.2013.411A1001
Abe M Ban M 2015 Decoherence of weak values in a pure dephasing process Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 2 23 36 23-36 10.1007/s40509-015-0028-8
Ban M 2017 Weak measurement on a quantum system in contact with a thermal reservoir: projection operator method Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 4 339 55 339-55 10.1007/s40509-017-0109-y
Abe M Ban M 2016 Decoherence of a weak value influenced by a non-Markovian environment Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 3 313 26 313-26 10.1007/s40509-016-0079-5
Manzano D 2020 A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation AIP Adv. 10 025106 10.1063/1.5115323
Wiseman H 2002 Weak values, quantum trajectories and the cavity-QED experiment on wave-particle correlation Phys. Rev. A 65 032111 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032111
Cormann M Remy M Kolaric B Caudano Y 2016 Revealing geometric phases in modular and weak values with a quantum eraser Phys. Rev. A 93 042124 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.042124
Cormann M Caudano Y 2017 Geometric description of modular and weak values in discrete quantum systems using the Majorana representation J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 305302 10.1088/1751-8121/aa7639
Ballesteros Ferraz L Lambert D L Caudano Y 2022 Geometrical interpretation of the argument of weak values of general observables in N-level quantum systems Quantum Sci. Technol. 7 045028 10.1088/2058-9565/ac8bf1
Winczewski M Alicki R 2023 Renormalization in the theory of open quantum systems via the self-consistency condition (arXiv: 2112.11962v4 [quant-ph])
Lidar D A 2014 Review of decoherence-free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and dynamical decoupling Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry Wiley pp 295 354 pp 295-354
Haroche S 2013 Nobel lecture: controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1083 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1083
Burgarth D Facchi P Hillier R Ligabò M 2024 Taming the rotating wave approximation Quantum 8 1262 10.22331/q-2024-02-21-1262
Rivas A Huelga S F Plenio M B 2014 Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 094001 10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001
Tang J S Li C F Li Y L Zou X B Guo G C Breuer H P Laine E M Piilo J 2012 Measuring non-Markovianity of processes with controllable system-environment interaction Europhys. Lett. 97 10002 10.1209/0295-5075/97/10002
Bernardes N K Cuevas A Orieux A Monken C H Mataloni P Sciarrino F Santos M F 2015 Experimental observation of weak non-Markovianity Sci. Rep. 5 17520 10.1038/srep17520
Liu B H Li L Huang Y F Li C F Guo G C Laine E M Breuer H P Piilo J 2011 Experimental control of the transition from markovian to non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems Nat. Phys. 7 931 4 931-4 10.1038/nphys2085
Gessner M Ramm M Pruttivarasin T Buchleitner A Breuer H P Häffner H 2014 Local detection of quantum correlations with a single trapped ion Nat. Phys. 10 105 9 105-9 10.1038/nphys2829
Wittemer M Clos G Breuer H P Warring U Schaetz T 2018 Measurement of quantum memory effects and its fundamental limitations Phys. Rev. A 97 020102 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.020102
Lu Y N Zhang Y R Liu G Q Nori F Fan H Pan X Y 2020 Observing information backflow from controllable non-Markovian multichannels in diamond Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 210502 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.210502
White G A L Hill C D Pollock F A Hollenberg L C L Modi K 2020 Demonstration of non-Markovian process characterisation and control on a quantum processor Nat. Commun. 11 6301 10.1038/s41467-020-20113-3
Breuer H P Laine E M Piilo J 2009 Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 210401 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401
Haikka P Goold J McEndoo S Plastina F Maniscalco S 2012 Non-Markovianity, loschmidt echo and criticality: a unified picture Phys. Rev. A 85 060101(R) 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.060101
Pusey M F 2014 Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 200401 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.200401
Kunjwal R Lostaglio M Pusey M F 2019 Anomalous weak values and contextuality: robustness, tightness and imaginary parts Phys. Rev. A 100 042116 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.042116
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.