dishonor; emasculation; gender; polygamy; rape survivors; reintegration; Strategy; Health Professions (miscellaneous); Clinical Psychology; Psychiatry and Mental Health
Abstract :
[en] Stereotypical beliefs about male honor often impede the social reintegration of rape victims. We conducted a qualitative study in Kalehe territory in the province of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, to understand strategies that facilitate the continuity of married life despite dishonor due to the rape of their wife. We interviewed men and women in eight couples separately. Our respondents implemented marital survival mechanisms that had not been thought out or planned. These strategies mainly involved a symbolic acceptance of women after rape. In our sample, some men remained in their marriages despite the perceived economic, sexual, and identity-related emasculation that made them less than men. Others engaged in polygamy. The presence of children born of rape made it difficult to their mothers for social reintegration. However, female children born from rape seemed to better reintegration than boys because of house chores, and marriage, from which their stepfather would benefit a bride price. The boys, on the other hand, were considered as herders and a potential danger associated with their biological fathers. In conclusion, our study shows that, although women reintegrated their matrimonial homes, they experience violence due to the hegemonic masculine socialization and patriarchal foundations.
Baaz, M. E., & Stern, M. (2009). Why do soldiers rape? Masculinity, violence, and sexuality in the armed forces in the Congo (DRC). International Studies Quarterly, 53 (2), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00543.x
Benghozi, P. (1994). La violence n’est pas l’agressivité: Une perspective psychanalytique de liens [Violence is not aggression: A psychoanalytical perspective on connections]. Revue de Psychothérapie Psychanalytique de Groupe, 55, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.3917/rppg.055.0041
Bereni, L., Chauvin, S., Jaunait, A., & Revillard, A. (2008). Introduction aux études sur le genre [Introduction to gender studies]. De Boeck.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine [Male domination]. Éditions du Seuil.
Branche, R., & Virgili, F. (2011). Viols en temps de guerre [Rape in wartime]. Payot.
Brown, C. (2012). Rape as weapon of war in the Democratic Republic of Congo. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1046&context=socssp
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19 (6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Delphy, C. (2000). Patriarcat (théories du) [Patriarchy (theories of)]. In H. Hirata, F. Laborie, H. Le Doaré, & D. Senotier (Eds.), Dictionnaire critique du féminisme (pp. 154–160). Presses Universitaires de France.
Dunia, J. (2017). Centre pour l’Education, Animation et Défenses des Droits de l’Homme (CEADH) and International Peace Information System, Mai 2017. CEADHO and IPIS. https://ipisresearch.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Voices-CEADHO.pdf
Duroch, F. (2004). Le viol, arme de guerre: L’humanitaire en désarroi [Rape as a weapon of war: Humanitarianism at a loss]. Les Temps Modernes, 2 (627), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.3917/ltm.627.0138
Dworkin, A., & Dufresne, M. (2006). Le pouvoir [Power]. Nouvelles Questions Féministes, 3 (25), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.3917/nqf.253.0094
Finnbakk, I., & Nordås, R. (2018). Community perspectives and pathways to reintegration of survivors of sexual violence in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Human Rights Quarterly, 41 (2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0026
Foussiakda, A. C., & Kasherwa, A. C. (2020). The challenges affecting foster care in a “failed-state” context: Case of the SEDI child protection network in South-Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105217. Article 105217.
Gottschall, J. (2004). Explaining Wartime Rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 41 (2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552221
Guinamard, L. (2010). SURVIVANTES: Femmes violées dans la guerre en République démocratique du Congo, p. 184. Paris: Ed.de L'Atélier.
Kakassa, A. M. (2018). Féminité et marginalité dans la prose postcoloniale: Essai de réflexion sur la polygamie et le mariage arrangé dans Celles qui attendent de Fatou Diome [Femininity and marginality in postcolonial prose: Reflection on polygamy and arranged marriage in Celles qui attendent by Fatou Diome]. L’Ull crític, 21–22, 153–168. ISSN 1138-457. https://doi.org/10.21001/luc.21.22.10
Kaufman, M. (1999). The seven P’s of men’s violence. http://www.michaelkaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/kaufman-7-ps-of-mens-violence.pdf
Kelly, J. T., Betancourt, T. S., Mukwege, D., Lipton, R., & Van Rooyen, M. J. (2011). Experiences of female survivors of sexual violence in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: A mixed-methods study. Conflict and Health, 5 (1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1505-5-25
Koudou, O., Zady, C., & Djokouebi, V. E. (2016). Traumatisme, réinsertion psychosociale et résilience chez des femmes victimes de viol pendant les conflits armés en Côte d’Ivoire [Trauma, psychosocial reintegration, and resilience in women who were victims of rape during the armed conflicts in Côte d’Ivoire]. Rivista di Criminologia, Victimologia e Sicurezza, 10 (1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.14664/rcvs/611
Mahano, B., & Kangami, N. M. (2018). Les femmes violées en République Démocratique du Congo: La résilience dans la résignation [Women raped in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Resilience in resignation]. L’autre, 19 (2), 208–217. ISSN 1626-5378. https://doi.org/10.3917/lautr.056.0208
Mouflet, V. (2008). Le paradigme du viol comme arme de guerre à l’Est de la République Démocratique du Congo. De Boek Supérieur, Afrique Contemporaine (French), 3 (227), 119–133. ISSN 0002-0478. https://doi.org/10.3917/afco.227.0119
Moureau, A. (2017). Le viol, conséquences et réaction sociale: une question d’honneur ou de dignité? Analyse comparée de récits d’hommes et de femmes en France [Rape, consequences and social reaction: A question of honor or dignity? Comparative analysis of the stories of men and women in France] [Unpublished master’s thesis, Université catholique de Louvain]. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/thesis:11642
Muhayisa, A., Dachet, A., Mukarusanga, I., & Duret, I. (2016). Que deviennent les enfants nés du viol vingt ans après le génocide au Rwanda [What has become of children born of rape twenty years after the Rwandan genocide]? Thérapie familiale, 37 (2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.3917/tf.162.0151
Nelson, B. D., Collins, L., VanRooyen, M. J., Joyce, N., Mukwege, D., & Bartels, S. (2011). Impact of sexual violence on children in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Medicine, Conflict, and Survival, 27 (4), 2011–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13623699.2011.645148
Northcott, M (2013). A survey of survivors of sexual violence. In Milhorean S., MacLean A., Bourgon K.M. & Jenner M (Eds.), The Victims of Crime Research Digest, 6, (pp. 12–20). 1929-9990.
Pambè, M. W., & Sawadogo, N. (2017). Dépasser le patriarcat pour mieux définir le féminisme africain [Moving beyond patriarchy to better define African feminism]. La découverte, travail genre et sociétés, 2 (38), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.3917/tgs.038.0187
Saucier, D. A., Strain, M. L., Hockett, J. M., & McManus, J. L. (2015). Stereotypic beliefs about masculine honor are associated with perceptions of rape and women who have been raped. Social Psychology, 46 (4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000240
Sivakumaran, S. (2007). Sexual violence against men in armed conflict. The European Journal of International Law, 18 (2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm013
Skjelsbæk, I. (2006). Victim and survivor: Narrated social identities of women who experienced rape during the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Feminism & Psychology, 16 (4), 373–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353506068746
