Overview of substitutes for bone replacement: Natural and synthetic products

Somers, Nicolas; Lasgorceix, Marie

doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-818542-1.00052-7

No full text

Contribution to encyclopedias, dictionaries... (Parts of books)

Overview of substitutes for bone replacement: Natural and synthetic products

Somers, Nicolas; Lasgorceix, Marie

2021 • In Encyclopedia of Materials: Technical Ceramics and Glasses

Editorial reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/313709

DOI
10.1016/B978-0-12-818542-1.00052-7

Files (0)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

No document available.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Bone replacement; Natural products; Synthetic products; Engineering (all); Materials Science (all)

Abstract :

[en] This review provides an overview of materials from natural and synthetic origin, specifically in the field of bioceramics and bioglasses, applied to bone substitution. The different developmental approaches currently considered to improve the biological performance of these bone implants, mainly the chemical composition, the implants architecture and the functionalization, are also reported. This overview details all the advantages but also the current limits of each tissue engineering technology and thus makes it possible to highlight future oriented strategies.

Disciplines :

Chemistry

Author, co-author :

Somers, Nicolas ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Complex and Entangled Systems from Atoms to Materials (CESAM) ; University Polytechnic Hauts-de-France, Valenciennes, France

Lasgorceix, Marie; University Polytechnic Hauts-de-France, Valenciennes, France

Language :

English

Title :

Overview of substitutes for bone replacement: Natural and synthetic products

Publication date :

24 May 2021

Main work title :

Encyclopedia of Materials: Technical Ceramics and Glasses

Publisher :

Elsevier

ISBN/EAN :

978-0-12-822233-1
978-0-12-818542-1

Peer reviewed :

Editorial reviewed

Additional URL :

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:B9780128185421000527?httpAccept=text/xml

Available on ORBi :

since 27 February 2024

Statistics

Number of views

7 (0 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

Bibliography

Adzila, S., Murad, M., Sopyan, I., 2012. Doping metalinto calcium phosphate phase for better performance of bone implant materials. Recent Patents on Materials Science 5 (January), 18-47. Available at: http://www.eurekaselect.com/openurl/content.php?genre=article&issn=1874-4648&volume=5&issue=1&spage=18.
Alaribe, F.N., et al., 2016. Scaffolds from biomaterials advantages and limitations in bone and tissue engineering. Biologia 71 (4).
Bagherifard, S., 2017. Mediating bone regeneration by means of drug eluting implants: from passive to smart strategies. Materials Science and Engineering C 71,1241-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.011.
Boanini, E., Gazzano, M., Bigi, A., 2010. Ionic substitutions in calcium phosphates synthesized at low temperature. Acta Biomaterialia 6 (6), 1882-1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.041.
Bohner, M., 2010. Resorbable biomaterials as bone graft substitutes. Materials Today 13 (1-2), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70014-6.
Bohner, M., 2014. Bone Substitute Materials, third ed. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.00224-5.
Bohner, M., Galea, L., Doebelin, N., 2012. Calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes: Failures and hopes. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 32 (11), 2663-2671.
Bongio, M., et al., 2010. Development of bone substitute materials: From "biocompatible" to "instructive". Journal of Materials Chemistry 20 (40), 8747-8759.
Boyce, T., Edwards, J., Scarborough, N., 1999. Allograft bone: The influence of processing on safety and performance. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 30 (4), 571-581.
Calori, I.R., et al., 2020. Polymer scaffolds as drug delivery systems. European Polymer Journal 129.109621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109621.
Campana, V., et al., 2014. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: From basic science to clinical practice. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 25 (10), 2445-2461.
Canillas, M., et al., 2017a. Calcium phosphates for biomedical applications. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Cerámica y Vidrio 56 (3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2017.05.001.
Canillas, M., et al., 2017b. Processing of hydroxyapatite obtained by combustion synthesis. Boletin de la Sociedad Espanola de Ceramica y Vidrio 56 (5), 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2017.05.002.
Cao, W., Hench, L.L., 1996. Bioactive materials. Ceramics International 22 (6), 493-507.
Carrodeguas, R.G., De Aza, S., 2011. a-Tricalcium phosphate: Synthesis, properties and biomedicalapplications. Acta Biomaterialia 7 (10), 3536-3546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.019.
Champion, E., 2013. Sintering of calcium phosphate bioceramics. Acta Biomaterialia 9 (4), 5855-5875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.029.
Champion, E., et al., 2017. Chapter 14 - Advanced processing techniques for customized ceramic medicaldevices. In: Palmero, P., Cambier, F., Barra, E. De (Eds.), Advances in Ceramic Biomaterials. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 433-468.
Chartier, T., et al., 2015. Additive manufacturing to produce complex 3D ceramic parts. Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology 6, 95-104.
Chindamo, G., et al., 2020. Bone diseases: Current approach and future perspectives in drug delivery systems for bone targeted therapeutics. Nanomaterials 10.
Connolly, J.F., 1995. Injectable bone marrow preparations to stimulate osteogenic repair. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 313.
de Grado, G.F., et al., 2018. Bone substitutes: A review of their characteristics, clinicaluse, and perspectives for large bone defects management. Journal of Tissue Engineering 9. 2041731418776819.
Demir, M.M., et al., 2002. Electrospinning of polyurethane fibers. Polymer 43 (11), 3303-3309.
Diaz-Rodriguez, P., Sánchez, M., Landin, M., 2018. Drug-loaded biomimetic ceramics for tissue engineering. Pharmaceutics 10, 1-20.
Dorati, R., et al., 2017. Biodegradable scaffolds for bone regeneration combined with drug-delivery systems in osteomyelitis therapy. Pharmaceuticals 10.
Eliaz, N., Metoki, N., 2017. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: A review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications. Materials 10.
Ferracini, R., et al., 2019. Composite Xenohybrid bovine bone-derived scaffold as bone substitute for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Applied Sciences 9 (13), 2675.
Garvie, R.C., Hannink, R.H., Pascoe, R.T., 1975. Ceramic steel? Nature 258, 703-704.
Giannoudis, P.V., et al., 2008. The diamond concept - Open questions. Injury 39 (Suppl. 2), S5-S8.
Giannoudis, P.V., Einhorn, T.A., Marsh, D., 2007. Fracture healing: The diamond concept. Injury 38 (Suppl. 4), S3-S6.
Goldberg, V.M., Akhavan, S., 2005. Biology of bone grafts. In: Lieberman, J.R., Friedlaender, G.E. (Eds.), Bone Regeneration and Repair: Biology and Clinical Applications. Springer, pp. 57-65.
Grøndahl, L., Jack, K.S., Goonasekera, C.S., 2017. Composite Materials for Bone Repair, second ed. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100752-5.00005-6.
Habraken, W., et al., 2016. Calcium phosphates in biomedicalapplications: Materials for the future? Materials Today 19 (2), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.008.
Haugen, H.J., et al., 2020. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? Journal of Clinical Periodontology 46, 92-102.
Hench, L.L., 1991. Bioceramics: From concept to clinic. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 74 (7).
Ho-shui-ling, A., et al., 2019. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells Current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials. 143-162.
Hsu, Y.H., Turner, I.G., Miles, A.W., 2007. Fabrication and mechanical testing of porous calcium phosphate bioceramic granules. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 1931-1937.
Jones, J.R., 2013. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomaterialia 9 (1), 4457-4486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023.
Kashirina, A., et al., 2019. Biopolymers for bone substitutes: A review. Biomaterials Science 7, 3961-3983.
Kinney, R.C., et al., 2010. Demineralized bone matrix for fracture healing: Fact or fiction? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 24 (3), 52-55.
Kwong, F.N.K., Harris, M.B., 2008. Recent developments in the biology of fracture repair. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 16 (11), 619-625.
Lawson, A.C., Czernuszka, J.T., 1998. Collagen-calcium phosphate composites. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 212, 413-425.
Li, J., Hastings, G.W., 2016. Chapter 5 - Oxide bioceramics: Inert ceramic materials in medicine and dentistry. In: Murphy, W., Black, J., Hastings, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Biomaterial Properties. Springer, pp. 339-352.
Lin, K., et al., 2019. 3D printing of bioceramic scaffolds-barriers to the clinicaltranslation: From promise to reality, and future perspectives. Materials 12.
Mahony, O., Jones, J.R., 2008. Porous bioactive nanostructured scaffolds for bone regeneration: A sol-gel solution. Nanomedicine 3 (2), 233-245.
Melchels, F.P.W., Feijen, J., Grijpma, D.W., 2010. Biomaterials A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials 31 (24), 6121-6130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050.
Mourin, V., Boccaccini, A.R., 2010. Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: Controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7 (43), 209-227.
Murphy, S.V., Atala, A., 2014. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology 32 (8), 773-785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958.
Pieske, O., et al., 2009. Autologous bone graft versus demineralized bone matrix in internalfixation of ununited long bones. Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes 3,1-8.
Pina, S., et al., 2017. Biofunctional ionic-doped calcium phosphates: Silk fibroin composites for bone tissue engineering scaffolding. Cells Tissues Organs 204 (3-1), 150-163.
Prakasam, M., et al., 2017. Biodegradable materials and metallic implants - A review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 8 (4), 44. http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/8/4/44.
Pryor, L.S., et al., 2009. Review of bone substitutes. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 2 (3), 151-160.
Rahamana, M.N., et al., 2011. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia 7 (6), 2355-2373.
Ratner, B.D., et al., 2013. Introduction - Biomaterials science: An evolving, multidisciplinary endeavor. In: Ratner, B.D., Schoen, F.J., Hoffman, A.S., Lemons, J.E. (Eds.), Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine, third ed. Academic Press, pp. xxv-xxxix.
Roberts, T.T., Rosenbaum, A.J., 2012. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics. Organogenesis 8 (4), 114-124.
Roseti, L., et al., 2017. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. Materials Science and Engineering C 78, 1246-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017.
Sabir, M.I., Xu, X., Li, L., 2009. A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications. Journal of Materials Science 44, 5713-5724.
Sadat-Shojai, M., et al., 2013. Synthesis methods for nanosized hydroxyapatite with diverse structures. Acta Biomaterialia 9 (8), 7591-7621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.012.
Schallenberger, M.A., et al., 2014. Comparison of the osteogenic potentialof osteoselect demineralized bone matrix putty to novabone calcium-phosphosilicate synthetic putty in a cranial defect model. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 25 (2), 657-661.
Sheikh, Z., et al., 2019. Natural and synthetic bone replacement graft materials for dental and maxillofacial applications. Advanced Dental Biomaterials. 347-376.
Shin, S.Y., et al., 2015. Periodontal Regeneration: Current Therapies. Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-397157-9.00040-0.
Thavornyutikarn, B., et al., 2014. Bone tissue engineering scaffolding: Computer-aided scaffolding techniques. Progress in Biomaterials 3, 61-102.
Thomas, T., Martin, A., Lafage-Proust, M.-H., 2008. Physiologie du tissu osseux. /data/traites/ap/14-40315/.
Tite, T., et al., 2018. Cationic substitutions in hydroxyapatite: Current status of the derived biofunctional effects and their in vitro interrogation methods. Materials 11, 1-62.
Turnbull, G., et al., 2018. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioactive Materials 3, 278-314.
Vallet-regí, M., 2010. Evolution of bioceramics within the field of biomaterials. Comptes Rendus Chimie 13,174-185.
Wang, W., Yeung, K.W.K., 2017a. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioactive Materials 2 (4), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007.
Wang, W., Yeung, K.W.K., 2017b. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioactive Materials 2 (4), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007.
Williams, D.F. (Ed.), 1987. Definitions in biomaterials: Proceedings of a Consensus Conference of the European Society for Biomaterials, Chester, England. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier. [March 3-5, 1986].
Zimmermann, G., Moghaddam, A., 2011. Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury 42, S16-S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.199.
Zocca, A., et al., 2015. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: Issues, potentialities, and opportunities. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 98 (7), 1983-2001.