Article (Scientific journals)
Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.
Hiligsmann, Mickaël; Silverman, Stuart L; Singer, Andrea J et al.
2024In Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 36 (1), p. 14
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sequential treament with abaloparatide in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.pdf
Author postprint (698.26 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Abaloparatide; Alendronate; Cost-effectiveness; Gender; Osteoporosis; Sequential; abaloparatide; Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein; Female; Humans; Male; Alendronate/therapeutic use; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control; Spinal Fractures; Osteoporotic Fractures; Aging; Geriatrics and Gerontology
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic-related fractures represent an increasing burden to patients, health care systems and society. AIMS: This study estimated cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide (ABL) followed by alendronate (ALN) compared to relevant alternative strategies in US men and women aged 50 to 80 years at very high fracture risk (bone mineral density T-score ≤  - 2.5 and a recent fracture). METHODS: A lifetime Markov-based microsimulation model was used to estimate healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Comparators were sequential treatment with unbranded teriparatide (TPTD)/ALN, generic ALN monotherapy, and no treatment. Analyses were conducted based on initial fracture site (hip, vertebral, or any fracture) and treatment efficacy data (derived from clinical trials or a recent network meta-analysis). RESULTS: From all analyses completed, sequential ABL/ALN demonstrated more QALYs for lower healthcare costs versus unbranded TPTD/ALN. No treatment was dominated (higher costs for less QALYs) versus ALN monotherapy. Sequential ABL/ALN resulted in favorable cost-effectiveness (at US threshold of $150,000/QALY) versus generic ALN monotherapy in men aged ≥ 50 years with any fracture type, women aged ≥ 65 years with any fracture type, and women aged ≥ 55 years having a hip or vertebral fracture. DISCUSSION: Similar cost-effectiveness of sequential ABL/ALN versus unbranded TPTD/ALN, ALN monotherapy, and no treatment was observed in both US men and women at very high fracture risk, with a moderate improvement in cost-effectiveness in men versus women and in patients with a hip or vertebral fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential therapy with ABL/ALN was cost-effective in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Hiligsmann, Mickaël  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé ; Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.hiligsmann@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Silverman, Stuart L ;  Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles and the OMC Clinical Research Center, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
Singer, Andrea J ;  MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
Pearman, Leny ;  Radius Health, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
Wang, Yamei ;  Radius Health, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
Caminis, John ;  Radius Health, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique ; World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Liège, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with abaloparatide in US men and women at very high risk of fractures.
Publication date :
30 January 2024
Journal title :
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
ISSN :
1594-0667
eISSN :
1720-8319
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Germany
Volume :
36
Issue :
1
Pages :
14
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Radius Health
Funding text :
All listed authors meet the criteria for authorship set forth by the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors. The sponsor, Radius Health, Inc., was involved in the design of the study, review of the protocol, and review and author approval of the manuscript. The sponsor had no role in the final selection of data and assumptions, execution and analysis of the model, and the interpretation of the results. Medical editorial support and graphic services were provided by AOIC, LLC and were funded by Radius. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as Language Learning Models, chatbots, and image creators were not used in the production of this work.
Available on ORBi :
since 23 February 2024

Statistics


Number of views
23 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
10 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
3

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi