Ethical considerations for the design and implementation of child injury prevention interventions: the example of delivering and installing safety equipment into the home.
child; home; implementation / translation; program evaluation; public health; Accident Prevention/instrumentation; Accident Prevention/methods; Accidents, Home/prevention & control; Beneficence; Child; Child Health Services/ethics; Evidence-Based Medicine; Health Education; Health Plan Implementation/ethics; Humans; Protective Devices; Socioeconomic Factors; Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control; Health Promotion/economics; Health Promotion/ethics; Health Promotion/methods; Public Health/ethics; implementation; translation; Accident Prevention; Accidents, Home; Child Health Services; Health Plan Implementation; Health Promotion; Wounds and Injuries; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract :
[en] [en] INTRODUCTION: Public health ethics is a growing field of academic interest but ethical discussion of injury prevention seems to have received limited attention. Interventions that promise to be effective are not necessarily-without explicit justification-'good' and 'right' interventions in every sense. This paper explores public health ethics in the context of child injury prevention with the objective to initiate interdisciplinary dialogue on the ethics of child safety interventions.
METHOD: A framework of seven public health ethics principles (non-maleficence, health maximisation, beneficence, respect for autonomy, justice, efficiency and proportionality) were applied to an intervention to promote child safety in the home.
RESULTS: Preventing child injury in the home is ethically challenging due to the requirement for the state to intervene in the private sphere. Non-maleficence and beneficence are difficult to judge within this intervention as these are likely to be highly dependent on the nature of intervention delivery, in particular, the quality of communication. Respect for autonomy is challenged by an intervention occurring in the home. The socioeconomic gradient in child injury risk is an important factor but a nuanced approach could help to avoid exacerbating inequalities or stigmatisation. Equally, a nuanced approach may be necessary to accommodate the principles of proportionality and efficiency within the local context.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that this intervention is justifiable from an ethical perspective but that this type of reflection loop is helpful to identify the impact of interventions beyond effectiveness.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services Philosophy & ethics
Author, co-author :
Scholtes, Béatrice ; Department of International Health, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Schröder-Bäck, Peter; Department of International Health, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ; Faculty for Human Sciences & Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Language :
English
Title :
Ethical considerations for the design and implementation of child injury prevention interventions: the example of delivering and installing safety equipment into the home.
Runyan CW. Using the Haddon matrix: Introducing the third dimension. Inj Prev 1998;4:302-7.
Elvebakk B. Paternalism and acceptability in road safety work. Saf Sci 2015;79:298-304.
Jones MM, Bayer R. Paternalism and its discontents: Motorcycle helmet laws, libertarian values, public health. Am J Public Health 2007;97:208-17.
Miles SH, Prasad S. Medical ethics and school football. Am J Bioeth 2016;16:6-10.
Bachynski KE. Playing hockey, riding motorcycles, the ethics of protection. Am J Public Health 2012;102:2214-20.
Scholtes B, Schröder-Bäck P, Förster K, et al. Multi-sectoral action for child safety-a European study exploring implicated sectors. Eur J Public Health 2017;27:512-8.
Devaney J, Spratt T. Child abuse as a complex and wicked problem: Reflecting on policy developments in the United Kingdom in working with children and families with multiple problems. Child Youth Serv Rev 2009;31:635-41.
Simpson J, Fougere G, McGee R. A wicked problem: Early childhood safety in the dynamic, interactive environment of home. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:1647-64.
Roberts N. Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. Int Public Manag Rev 2000;1:1-19.
Schröder-Bäck P, Duncan P, Sherlaw W, et al. Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: Towards a curriculum for a short course on ethics in public health programmes. BMC Med Ethics 2014;15:73.
Public Health England. Reducing unintentional in juries in and around the home among children under five years. London (UK: Public Health England, 2014.
Watson M, Kendrick D, Coupland C, et al. Providing child safety equipment to prevent injuries: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;330:178.
Kendrick D, Young B, Mason-Jones AJ, et al. Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention (Review). Evid Based Child Health 2013;8:761-939.
Sethi D, Towner E, Vincenten J, et al. European report on child injury prevention. Copenhagen (Denmark): WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2008.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Unintentional injuries in the home: Interventions for under 15s. London (UK): NICE, 2010.
ten Have M, de Beaufort ID, Mackenbach JP, et al. An overview of ethical frameworks in public health: Can they be supportive in the evaluation of programs to prevent overweight BMC Public Health 2010;10:638.
Lo B, Connell MEO. Ethical considerations for housing related health hazards involving children. 1st ed. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2005.
Damashek A, Peterson L. Unintentional injury prevention efforts for young children: Levels, methods, types, targets. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2002;23:443-55.
Ablewhite J, Peel I, McDaid L, et al. Parental perceptions of barriers and facilitators to preventing child unintentional injuries within the home: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2015;15:280.
Ablewhite J, Kendrick D, Watson M, et al. The other side of the story-maternal perceptions of safety advice and information: A qualitative approach. Child Care Health Dev 2015;41:1106-13.
Dimatteo MR. The role of effective communication with children and their families in fostering adherence to pediatric regimens. Patient Educ Couns 2004;55:339-44.
Kass NE. An ethics framework for public health. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1776-82.
Christensen P, Mikkelsen MR. Jumping off and being careful: Children's strategies of risk management in everyday life. Sociol Health Illn 2008;30:112-30.
Roberts H. Qualitative research methods in interventions in injury. Arch Dis Child 1997;76:487-9.
Lyons RA, Finch CF, McClure R, et al. The injury List of All Deficits (LOAD) Frameworkconceptualizing the full range of deficits and adverse outcomes following injury and violence. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2010;17:145-59.
Scholtes B, Schröder-Bäck P, Mackay M, et al. A practical and applied approach to assessing the cross cutting nature of child injury prevention as a basis for policy making at the local level. South East Eur J Public Heal 2014.
Cowley S, Whittaker K, Malone M, et al. Why health visiting Examining the potential public health benefits from health visiting practice within a universal service: A narrative review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2015;52:465-80.
Laflamme L, Burrows S, Hasselberg M. Socioeconomic differences in injury risks: A review of findings and a discussion of potential countermeasures. Copenhagen: WHO Reg Off Eur, 2009.
Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 1985;14:32-8.
Farley C, Laflamme L, Vaez M. Bicycle helmet campaigns and head injuries among children. Does poverty matter J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:668-72.
Ingram JC, Deave T, Towner E, et al. Identifying facilitators and barriers for home injury prevention interventions for pre-school children: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Health Educ Res 2012;27:258-68.
Hambidge SJ, Phibbs SL, Chandramouli V, et al. A stepped intervention increases well-child care and immunization rates in a disadvantaged population. Pediatrics 2009;124:455-64.
Marmot M, Society F, Lives H. The marmot review final report. London (UK): University College London, 2010.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50.
Dixey R. Keeping children safe: The effect on parents' daily lives and psychological well-being. J Health Psychol 1999;4:45-57.
Valentine G. A safe place to grow up Parenting, perceptions of children's safety and the rural idyll. J Rural Stud 1997;13:137-48.
Bessell S. Perceptions of risk and safety in public spaces: Towards a child standpoint. Risk, protection, provision and policy. Singapore: Springer, 2015:1-18.
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. J Am Inst Plann 1969;35:216-24.
McKee M. Grenfell Tower fire: Why we cannot ignore the political determinants of health. BMJ 2017;357:j2966.
Duncan P. Values ethics and healthcare. London (UK): Sage, 2010.