BGOG; Elderly; Endometrial cancer; Minimally-invasive surgery; Obese; Robot-assisted surgery; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Belgium; Conversion to Open Surgery; Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality; Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology; Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy/methods; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Obesity/complications; Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods; Survival Rate; Endometrial Neoplasms; Hysterectomy; Length of Stay; Obesity; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Surgery; Oncology; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] [en] OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients treated by robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer within the Belgium Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG).
STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of women with clinically Stage I endometrial cancer who underwent surgical treatment from 2007 to 2018 in five institutions of the BGOG group.
RESULTS: A total of 598 consecutive women were identified. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was low (0.8%). The mean postoperative Complication Common Comprehensive Index (CCI) score was 3.4. The rate of perioperative complications did not differ between age groups, however the disease-free survival was significantly lower in patients over 75 years compared to patients under 65 years of age (p=0.008). Per-operative complications, conversion to laparotomy rate, post-operative hospital stay, CCI score and disease-free survival were not impacted by increasing BMI.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgery for the surgical treatment of patients suffering from early-stage endometrial cancer is associated with favourable surgical and oncologic outcomes, particularly for unfavourable groups such as elderly and obese women, thus permitting a low morbidity minimally-invasive surgical approach for the majority of patients in expert centres.
Disciplines :
Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics)
Author, co-author :
Kakkos, Athanasios ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de gynécologie-obstétrique
Ver Eecke, C; Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
ONGARO, Sarah ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de gynécologie-obstétrique
Traen, K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
Peeters, F; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, General Hospital Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
Van Trappen, Ph; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, General Hospital Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium
Laenen, A; Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Despierre, E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
Van Nieuwenhuysen, E; Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Vergote, I; Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Goffin, Frédéric ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de gynécologie-obstétrique (CHR)
Language :
English
Title :
Robot-assisted surgery for women with endometrial cancer: Surgical and oncologic outcomes within a Belgium gynaecological oncology group cohort.
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A., Jemal, A., Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca - Cancer J Clin 68 (2018), 394–424, 10.3322/caac.21492.
Morice, P., Leary, A., Creutzberg, C., Abu-rustum, N., Darai, E., Vi, P., Endometrial cancer. Lancet 387 (2016), 1094–1108, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0.
Mahdi, H., Jernigan, A.M., Aljebori, Q., Lockhart, D., Moslemi-Kebria, M., The impact of obesity on the 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery for endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22 (2015), 94–102, 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.014.
Wise, J., Number of “oldest old” has doubled in the past 25 years. BMJ, 340, 2010, c3057, 10.1136/bmj.c3057 c3057.
Wright, J.D., Lewin, S.N., Barrena Medel, N.I., Sun, X., Burke, W.M., Deutsch, I., et al. Morbidity and mortality of surgery for endometrial cancer in the oldest old. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205 (2011), 66.e1–66.e8, 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.067.
Colombo, N., Creutzberg, C., Amant, F., Bosse, T., González-Martín, A., Ledermann, J., et al. No title. Radiother Oncol 117 (2015), 559–581, 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.013.
Walker, J.L., Piedmonte, M.R., Spirtos, N.M., Eisenkop, S.M., Schlaerth, J.B., Mannel, R.S., et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27 (2009), 5331–5336, 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248.
Janda, M., Gebski, V., Davies, L.C., Forder, P., Brand, A., Hogg, R., et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage i endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 317 (2017), 1224–1233, 10.1001/jama.2017.2068.
Lindfors, A., Heshar, H., Adok, C., Sundfeldt, K., Dahm-Kähler, P., Long-term survival in obese patients after robotic or open surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 158 (2020), 673–680, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.684.
Walker, J.L., Piedmonte, M.R., Spirtos, N.M., Eisenkop, S.M., Schlaerth, J.B., Mannel, R.S., et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 study. J Clin Oncol 30 (2012), 695–700, 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645.
Kornblith, A.B., Huang, H.Q., Walker, J.L., Spirtos, N.M., Rotmensch, J., Cella, D., Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic International Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 27 (2009), 5337–5342, 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3529.
Mourits, M.J.E., Bijen, C.B., Arts, H.J., ter Brugge, H.G., van der Sijde, R., Paulsen, L., et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11 (2010), 763–771, 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70143-1.
Obermair, A., Janda, M., Baker, J., Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, S., Brand, A., Hogg, R., et al. Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Canc 48 (2012), 1147–1153, 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.055.
Park, D.A., Lee, D.H., Kim, S.W., Lee, S.H., Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42 (2016), 1303–1314, 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400.
Galaal, K., Bryant, A., Fisher, A.D., Al-Khaduri, M., Kew, F., Lopes, A.D., Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Galaal, K., (eds.) Cochrane database syst. Rev., 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
Monterossi, G., Ghezzi, F., Vizza, E., Zannoni, G.F., Uccella, S., Corrado, G., et al. Minimally invasive approach in type II endometrial cancer: is it wise and safe?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24 (2017), 438–445, 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.022.
Grieco, D.L., Anzellotti, G.M., Russo, A., Bongiovanni, F., Costantini, B., D'Indinosante, M., et al. Airway closure during surgical pneumoperitoneum in obese patients. Anesthesiology 131 (2019), 58–73, 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002662.
EFFECT General feedback 2015 n.d.
Gallotta, V., Federico, A., Gaballa, K., D'Indinosante, M., Conte, C., Giudice, M.T., et al. The role of robotic aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer: surgical and oncological outcome in a single institution experience. J Surg Oncol, 119, 2018, 25335, 10.1002/jso.25335.
Gallotta, V., Giudice, M.T., Conte, C., Sarandeses, A.V., D'Indinosante, M., Federico, A., et al. Minimally invasive salvage lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer patients: a single institution series. Eur J Surg Oncol 44 (2018), 1568–1572, 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.006.
Population par âge − Tableaux de l’Économie Française | Insee. n.d https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/1373645?sommaire=1373710 accessed September 18, 2019.
L’évaluation gériatrique en cancérologie - oncogériatrie, 2019 n.d https://www.e-cancer.fr/Professionnels-de-sante/L-organisation-de-l-offre-de-soins/Oncogeriatrie/L-evaluation-geriatrique-en-cancerologie accessed October 1, 2019.
Slankamenac, K., Graf, R., Barkun, J., Puhan, M.A., Clavien, P.A., The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258 (2013), 1–7, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732.
Bregar, A.J., Melamed, A., Diver, E., Clemmer, J.T., Uppal, S., Schorge, J.O., et al. Minimally invasive staging surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: analysis of the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol 24 (2017), 1677–1687, 10.1245/s10434-016-5752-8.
Larouzée, E., Phelippeau, J., Roberti, E., Koskas, M., Evaluation of the French medical practices in endometrial cancer management by using quality indicators. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 236 (2019), 198–204, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.014.
Van den Bosch, A., Mertens, H., Implementation of laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: work in progress. Facts, Views Vis ObGyn 8 (2016), 23–30.
Lim, P.C., Kang, E., Park, D.H., Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17 (2010), 739–748, 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
Cardenas-Goicoechea, J., Soto, E., Chuang, L., Gretz, H., Randall, T.C., Integration of robotics into two established programs of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer appears to decrease surgical complications. J Gynecol Oncol 24 (2012), 21–28, 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.21.
Mäenpää, M.M., Nieminen, K., Tomás, E.I., Laurila, M., Luukkaala, T.H., Ju, Mäenpää, Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215 (2016), 588.e1–588.e7, 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005.
Magrina, J.F., Zanagnolo, V., Giles, D., Noble, B.N., Kho, R.M.C., Magtibay, P.M., Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 32 (2011), 476–480.
Seamon, L.G., Cohn, D.E., Henretta, M.S., Kim, K.H., Carlson, M.J., Phillips, G.S., et al. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy?. Gynecol Oncol 113 (2009), 36–41, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.005.
Ind, T., Laios, A., Hacking | Matthew, Nobbenhuis, M., A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2017. 2017, 10.1002/rcs.1851.
Balasubramani, L., Milliken, D.A., Shepherd, J.H., Thomas, •, Ind, E.J., Differences in hand movements and task completion times between laparoscopic, robotically assisted, and open surgery: an in vitro study. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0248-9 n.d.
Somashekhar, S.P., Jaka, R.C., Zaveri, S.S., Prospective randomized study comparing robotic-assisted hysterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy with traditional laparotomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma –initial Indian experience. Indian J Surg Oncol 5 (2014), 217–223, 10.1007/s13193-014-0321-8.
Corrado, G., Cutillo, G., Pomati, G., Mancini, E., Sperduti, I., Patrizi, L., et al. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 41 (2015), 1074–1081, 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.020.
Xie, W., Cao, D., Yang, J., Shen, K., Zhao, L., Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Canc Res Clin Oncol 142 (2016), 2173–2183, 10.1007/s00432-016-2180-x.
Nevis, I.F., Vali, B., Higgins, C., Dhalla, I., Urbach, D., Bernardini, M.Q., Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review. J Robot Surg, 11, 2017, 10.1007/s11701-016-0621-9.
Elsahwi, K.S., Hooper, C., De Leon, M.C., Gallo, T.N., Ratner, E., Silasi, D.A., et al. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 124 (2012), 260–264, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.038.
Mok, Z.W., Yong, E.L., Low, J.J.H., Ng, J.S.Y., Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics. Int J Gynecol Canc 22 (2012), 819–825, 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31824c5cd2.
Barrie, A., Freeman, A.H., Lyon, L., Garcia, C., Conell, C., Abbott, L.H., et al. Classification of postoperative complications in robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23 (2016), 1181–1188, 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.832 Elsevier B.V.
Barlin, J.N., Khoury-Collado, F., Kim, C.H., Leitao, M.M., Chi, D.S., Sonoda, Y., et al. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol 125 (2012), 531–535, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.021.
Eriksson, A.G.Z., Ducie, J., Ali, N., McGree, M.E., Weaver, A.L., Bogani, G., et al. Comparison of a sentinel lymph node and a selective lymphadenectomy algorithm in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and limited myometrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol 140 (2016), 394–399, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.028.
Ballester, M., Dubernard, G., Lécuru, F., Heitz, D., Mathevet, P., Marret, H., et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol 12 (2011), 469–476, 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5.
Galaal, K., Donkers, H., Bryant, A., Lopes, A.D., Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 2018, 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.
Moss, E.L., Arbyn, M., Dollery, E., Leeson, S., Petry, K.U., Nieminen, P., et al. European Federation of Colposcopy quality standards Delphi consultation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170 (2013), 255–258, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.032.
Brijt, J.M., Hollema, H., Reesink, N., Aalders, J.G., Mourits, M.J.E., Ten Hoor, K.A., et al. Lymphvascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. 2004, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.033.
Reich, O., Pickel, H., Lahousen, M., Tamussino, K., Winter, R., Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol 97 (2001), 428–430, 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01174-1.
Mendivil, A.A., Rettenmaier, M.A., Abaid, L.N., Brown, J.V. Iii, Micha, J.P., Lopez, K.L., et al. A comparison of open surgery, robotic-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients. 2015, 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00001.
Coronado, P.J., Herraiz, M.A., Magrina, J.F., Fasero, M., Vidart, J.A., Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165 (2012), 289–294, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006.
Jung, Y.W., Lee, D.W., Kim, S.W., Nam, E.J., Kim, J.H., Kim, J.W., et al. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101 (2010), 116–121, 10.1002/jso.21436.
Bernardini, M.Q., Gien, L.T., Tipping, H., Murphy, J., Rosen, B.P., Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy. Int J Gynecol Canc 22 (2012), 76–81, 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182353371.
Göçmen, A., Şanlikan, F., Uçar, M.G., Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282 (2010), 539–545, 10.1007/s00404-010-1593-z.
Frey, M.K., Ihnow, S.B., Worley, M.J., Heyman, K.P., Kessler, R., Slomovitz, B.M., et al. Minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer is feasible and safe in elderly women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18 (2011), 200–204, 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.12.003.
Siesto, G., Uccella, S., Ghezzi, F., Cromi, A., Zefiro, F., Serati, M., et al. Surgical and survival outcomes in older women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopy. Menopause 17 (2010), 539–544, 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181c4e9f5.
Bishop, E.A., Java, J.J., Moore, K.N., Spirtos, N.M., Pearl, M.L., Zivanovic, O., et al. Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218 (2018), 109.e1–109.e11, 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.026.
Gallotta, V., Conte, C., D'Indinosante, M., Federico, A., Biscione, A., Vizzielli, G., et al. Robotic surgery in elderly and very elderly gynecologic cancer patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25 (2018), 872–877, 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.007.
Zeng, X.Z., Lavoue, V., Lau, S., Press, J.Z., Abitbol, J., Gotlieb, R., et al. Outcome of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer as a function of patient age. Int J Gynecol Canc 25 (2015), 637–644, 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000411.
Vaknin, Z., Perri, T., Lau, S., Deland, C., Drummond, N., Rosberger, Z., et al. Outcome and quality of life in a prospective cohort of the first 100 robotic surgeries for endometrial cancer, with focus on elderly patients. Int J Gynecol Canc, 20, 2010, 17, 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f2950a.
Arc F. Brochure Personnes âgées et cancer n.d.
Cusimano, M.C., Simpson, A.N., Dossa, F., Liani, V., Kaur, Y., Acuna, S.A., et al. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 221:5 (2019), 410–428, 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.004 e19. Epub 2019 May 10. PMID: 31082383.
Corrado, G., Vizza, E., Cela, V., Mereu, L., Bogliolo, S., Legge, F., et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 44 (2018), 1935–1941, 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.021.