Circadian rhythms; Interventions; Light; Non-visual effects of light; Reporting guidelines; Sleep; Enlight; United States; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Consensus; Checklist; Research Design; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all); General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology.
METHODS: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts.
FINDINGS: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&E document.
INTERPRETATION: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies.
FUNDING: Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020-09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002).
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Spitschan, Manuel; TUM School of Medicine & Health, Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, TUM Institute for Advanced Study (TUM-IAS), Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Research Group Translational Sensory & Circadian Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany, TUMCREATE, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: manuel.spitschan@tum.de
Kervezee, Laura; Laboratory for Neurophysiology, Department of Cellular and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. Electronic address: L.Kervezee@lumc.nl
Lok, Renske; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. Electronic address: rlok@stanford.edu
McGlashan, Elise; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, School of Psychological Science and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: elise.mcglashan@unimelb.edu.au
Najjar, Raymond P; Department of Ophthalmology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Center for Innovation & Precision Eye Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: rpnajjar@nus.edu.sg
ENLIGHT Consortium
Vandewalle, Gilles ; Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA CRC In vivo Imaging - Sleep and chronobiology
Language :
English
Title :
ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans.
Wellcome Trust NUS - National University of Singapore NRF - National Research Foundation Singapore ZonMw - Nederlandse Organisatie voor Gezondheidsonderzoek en Zorginnovatie USDOD - United States Department of Defense
Funding text :
This project is supported by the Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme. During parts of this work, M.S. was supported by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship ( Wellcome Trust , 204686/Z/16/Z). L.K. is supported by a VENI fellowship from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ( ZonMw , 2020–09150161910128). R.L. is supported by a U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223). R.P.N is supported by the NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08 grant from the National University of Singapore . M.S. and R.P.N. are supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.We thank all participants of the consensus exercise, not all of whom completed all rounds and/or agreed to be named co-authors in the group membership model. We thank Markus Canazei, Jan de Zeeuw, Jan-Frieder Harmsen, Roelof Hut, Martine Knoop, Anastasi Kosmadopoulos, Siobhan Rockcastle, Juliëtte van Duijnhoven, Katharina Wulff and two anonymous participants for completing the independent pilot testing phase. This work was facilitated by participation in the NETIAS (Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme. We would like to thank Zukunftskolleg Konstanz, Aarhus Institute of Advanced Institute, Wissenschaftskolleg Berlin and the Montpellier Advanced Knowledge Institute on Transitions (MAK'IT) for organizing our visits and hosting us. This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore, under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme.Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020–09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002).This project is supported by the Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme. During parts of this work, M.S. was supported by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z). L.K. is supported by a VENI fellowship from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, 2020–09150161910128). R.L. is supported by a U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223). R.P.N is supported by the NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08 grant from the National University of Singapore. M.S. and R.P.N. are supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank all participants of the consensus exercise, not all of whom completed all rounds and/or agreed to be named co-authors in the group membership model. We thank Markus Canazei, Jan de Zeeuw, Jan-Frieder Harmsen, Roelof Hut, Martine Knoop, Anastasi Kosmadopoulos, Siobhan Rockcastle, Juliëtte van Duijnhoven, Katharina Wulff and two anonymous participants for completing the independent pilot testing phase. This work was facilitated by participation in the NETIAS (Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme. We would like to thank Zukunftskolleg Konstanz, Aarhus Institute of Advanced Institute, Wissenschaftskolleg Berlin and the Montpellier Advanced Knowledge Institute on Transitions (MAK'IT) for organizing our visits and hosting us.
Vetter, C., Pattison, P.M., Houser, K., Herf, M., Phillips, A.J.K., Wright, K.P., et al. A review of human physiological responses to light: implications for the development of integrative lighting solutions. Leukos 18:3 (2022), 387–414.
Blume, C., Garbazza, C., Spitschan, M., Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood. Somnologie 23:3 (2019), 147–156.
Duffy, J.F., Czeisler, C.A., Effect of light on human circadian physiology. Sleep Med Clin 4:2 (2009), 165–177.
Lok, R., Smolders, K.C.H.J., Beersma, D.G.M., de Kort, Y.A.W., Light, alertness, and alerting effects of white light: a literature overview. J Biol Rhythms 33:6 (2018), 589–601.
Cajochen, C., Zeitzer, J.M., Czeisler, C.A., Dijk, D.J., Dose-response relationship for light intensity and ocular and electroencephalographic correlates of human alertness. Behav Brain Res 115:1 (2000), 75–83.
Vandewalle, G., Maquet, P., Dijk, D.-J., Light as a modulator of cognitive brain function. Trends Cogn Sci 13:10 (2009), 429–438.
Chellappa, S.L., Individual differences in light sensitivity affect sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep, 44(2), 2021, zsaa214.
Spitschan, M., Santhi, N., Individual differences and diversity in human physiological responses to light. eBioMedicine, 75, 2022, 103640.
Phillips, A.J.K., Vidafar, P., Burns, A.C., McGlashan, E.M., Anderson, C., Rajaratnam, S.M.W., et al. High sensitivity and interindividual variability in the response of the human circadian system to evening light. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:24 (2019), 12019–12024.
Brown, T.M., Melanopic illuminance defines the magnitude of human circadian light responses under a wide range of conditions. J Pineal Res, 69(1), 2020, e12655.
Logullo, P., MacCarthy, A., Kirtley, S., Collins, G.S., Reporting guideline checklists are not quality evaluation forms: they are guidance for writing. Health Sci Rep, 3(2), 2020, e165.
Veitch, J.A., Knoop, M., CIE TN 011:2020 what to document and report in studies of ipRGC-influenced responses to light. 2020, International commission on illumination (CIE).
Spitschan, M., Stefani, O., Blattner, P., Gronfier, C., Lockley, S., Lucas, R., How to report light exposure in human chronobiology and sleep research experiments. Clocks Sleep 1:3 (2019), 280–289.
Remé, C., Menozzi, M., Krueger, H., Standards for specifying parameters of bright light stimulation for therapeutic applications: a proposal. Bull Soc Light Treatment Biol Rhythm 3:4 (1991), 40–43.
Knoop, M., Broszio, K., Diakite, A., Liedtke, C., Niedling, M., Rothert, I., et al. Methods to describe and measure lighting conditions in experiments on non-image-forming aspects. Leukos 15:2–3 (2019), 163–179.
Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D., The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag 42:1 (2004), 15–29.
Diamond, I.R., Grant, R.C., Feldman, B.M., Pencharz, P.B., Ling, S.C., Moore, A.M., et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol 67:4 (2014), 401–409.
Carpenter, J.S., Robillard, R., Lee, R.S.C., Hermens, D.F., Naismith, S.L., White, D., et al. The relationship between sleep-wake cycle and cognitive functioning in young people with affective disorders. PLoS One, 10(4), 2015, e0124710.
Lewy, A.J., Lefler, B.J., Emens, J.S., Bauer, V.K., The circadian basis of winter depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19 (2006), 7414–7419.
Haus, E.L., Smolensky, M.H., Shift work and cancer risk: potential mechanistic roles of circadian disruption, light at night, and sleep deprivation. Sleep Med Rev 17:4 (2013), 273–284.
Kervezee, L., Kosmadopoulos, A., Boivin, D.B., Metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of shift work: the role of circadian disruption and sleep disturbances. Eur J Neurosci 51:1 (2020), 396–412.
Fishbein, A.B., Knutson, K.L., Zee, P.C., Circadian disruption and human health. J Clin Invest, 131(19), 2021, e148286.
Reutrakul, S., Knutson, K.L., Consequences of circadian disruption on cardiometabolic health. Sleep Med Clin 10:4 (2015), 455–468.
Aranda, M.L., Schmidt, T.M., Diversity of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells: circuits and functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 78:3 (2021), 889–907.
Do, M.T.H., Melanopsin and the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells: biophysics to behavior. Neuron 104:2 (2019), 205–226.
Mure, L.S., Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells of the human retina. Front Neurol, 12, 2021, 636330.
Schmidt, T.M., Chen, S.-K., Hattar, S., Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells: many subtypes, diverse functions. Trends Neurosci 34:11 (2011), 572–580.
Hannibal, J., Hindersson, P., Østergaard, J., Georg, B., Heegaard, S., Larsen, P.J., et al. Melanopsin Is expressed in PACAP-containing retinal ganglion cells of the human retinohypothalamic tract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 45(11), 2004, 4202.
Lucas, R.J., Peirson, S.N., Berson, D.M., Brown, T.M., Cooper, H.M., Czeisler, C.A., et al. Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age. Trends Neurosci 37:1 (2014), 1–9.
Spitschan, M., Melanopsin contributions to non-visual and visual function. Current Opin Behavioral Sci 30 (2019), 67–72.
Rollag, M.D., Berson, D.M., Provencio, I., Melanopsin, ganglion-cell photoreceptors, and mammalian photoentrainment. J Biol Rhythms 18:3 (2003), 227–234.
Prayag, A.S., Jost, S., Avouac, P., Dumortier, D., Gronfier, C., Dynamics of non-visual responses in humans: as fast as lightning?. Front Neurosci, 13, 2019, 126.
Prayag, A.S., Najjar, R.P., Gronfier, C., Melatonin suppression is exquisitely sensitive to light and primarily driven by melanopsin in humans. J Pineal Res, 66(4), 2019, e12562.
