Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Uterus; Uterine Hemorrhage; Pelvic Pain/complications; Pelvic Pain/pathology; Cicatrix/diagnostic imaging; Cicatrix/etiology; Infertility; Cicatrix; Pelvic Pain; Medicine (all); General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] [en] IMPORTANCE: Approximately 60% of women develop a uterine niche after a cesarean delivery (CD). A niche is associated with various gynecological symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, pain, and infertility, but there is little consensus in the literature on the distinction between the sonographic finding of a niche and the constellation of associated symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: To achieve consensus on defining the clinical condition that constitutes a symptomatic uterine niche and agree upon diagnostic criteria and uniform nomenclature for this condition.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A consensus based modified electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study, with a predefined Rate of Agreement (RoA) of 70% or higher. Experts were selected according to their expertise with niche-related consultations, publications, and participation in expert groups and received online questionnaires between November 2021 and May 2022.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Definition, nomenclature, symptoms, conditions to exclude, and diagnostic criteria of an illness caused by a symptomatic uterine niche.
RESULTS: In total, 31 of the 60 invited experts (51.7%) participated, of whom the majority worked in university-affiliated hospitals (28 of 31 [90.3%]), specialized in benign gynecology (20 of 31 [64.5%]), and worked in Europe (24 of 31 [77.4%]). Three rounds were required to achieve consensus on all items. All participants underlined the relevance of a new term for a condition caused by a symptomatic niche and its differentiation from a sonographic finding only. Experts agreed to name this condition cesarean scar disorder, defined as a uterine niche in combination with at least 1 primary or 2 secondary symptoms (RoA, 77.8%). Defined primary symptoms were postmenstrual spotting, pain during uterine bleeding, technical issues with catheter insertion during embryo transfer, and secondary unexplained infertility combined with intrauterine fluid. Secondary symptoms were dyspareunia, abnormal vaginal discharge, chronic pelvic pain, avoiding sexual intercourse, odor associated with abnormal blood loss, secondary unexplained infertility, secondary infertility despite assisted reproductive technology, negative self-image, and discomfort during participation in leisure activities. Consensus was also achieved on certain criteria that should be met and conditions that should be excluded before making the diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this modified Delphi study, a panel of 31 international niche experts reached consensus for the constellation of symptoms secondary to a uterine niche and named it cesarean scar disorder.
Disciplines :
Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics)
Author, co-author :
Klein Meuleman, Saskia J M; Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Murji, Ally; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
van den Bosch, Thierry; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Belgium
Grimbizis, Grigoris; 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Saridogan, Ertan; Reproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, NW1 2BU London, United Kingdom
Chantraine, Frédéric ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de gynécologie-obstétrique (CHR)
Bourne, Tom; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Belgium ; Institute for Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
Timmerman, Dirk; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Belgium
Huirne, Judith A F; Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
de Leeuw, Robert A; Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
CSDi Study Group
Language :
English
Title :
Definition and Criteria for Diagnosing Cesarean Scar Disorder.
Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. StatPearls; 2022.
Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53 (1): 107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049 29536581
van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014; 121 (2): 236-244. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12542 24373597
Stegwee SI, Jordans IPM, van der Voet LF, Single-versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development-the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19 (1): 85. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2221-y 30832681
Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43 (4): 372-382. doi: 10.1002/uog.13199 23996650
Wang L, Wang J, Lu N, Liu J, Diao F. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of patients with prior cesarean section after a single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI: a retrospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13: 851213. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.851213 35677716
Vissers J, Sluckin TC, van Driel-Delprat CCR, Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35 (3): 595-604. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez295 32142117
Stegwee SI, Hehenkamp WJK, de Leeuw RA, de Groot CJM, Huirne JAF. Improved health-related quality of life in the first year after laparoscopic niche resection: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 245: 174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.003 31927472
Stegwee SI, Beij A, de Leeuw RA, Mokkink LB, van der Voet LF, Huirne JAF. Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature. Qual Life Res. 2020; 29 (4): 1013-1025. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02376-6 31845165
Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113 (4): 704-716. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.037 32228874
Vitale SG, Ludwin A, Vilos GA, From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301 (1): 33-52. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05438-0 31989288
Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32 (4): 1008-1015. 11095242
Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995; 311 (7001): 376-380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376 7640549
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014; 89 (9): 1245-1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 24979285
Niche of niche zwangerschap. 2022. Accessed October 5, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1315558241877808
Jordans IPM, Verberkt C, De Leeuw RA, Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 59 (4): 437-449. doi: 10.1002/uog.24815 34779085
Janssen PF, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA. Recommendations to prevent urinary tract injuries during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic Delphi procedure among experts. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18 (3): 314-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.007 21411377
Sadi J, Torchia E, Faber KJ, Posterior shoulder instability classification, assessment, and management: an international delphi study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020; 50 (7): 373-380. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9225 32349639
Vervoort A, van der Voet LF, Hehenkamp W, Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2018; 125 (3): 326-334. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14733 28504857
Verberkt C, Klein Meuleman SJM, Ket JCF, Fertility and pregnancy outcomes after a uterine niche resection in women with and without infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F S Rev. 2022; 3 (3): 174-189. doi: 10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.05.003
Huirne JAF. LAPRESS study. February 20, 2017. Updated August 18, 2022. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://www.clinicaltrialregister.nl/nl/trial/28650
Huirne JAF. Symptomatic niches for laparoscopic niche resection, a randomized clinical trial. June 11, 2021. Accessed February 23, 2023. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9534
Abdou AM, Ammar IMM. Role of hysteroscopic repair of cesarean scar defect in women with secondary infertility. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2018; 23 (4): 505-509. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2018.06.005
Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 60 (1): 118-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786 34587658
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean birth (NICE guideline 192). Accessed February 16, 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192/chapter/Recommendations#benefits-and-risks-of-caesarean-and-vaginal-birth
Tsuji S, Takahashi A, Higuchi A, Pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic surgery in women with cesarean scar syndrome. PLoS One. 2020; 15 (12): e0243421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243421 33270754
Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34 (1): 85-89. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405 19565535
Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med. 1999; 18 (1): 13-16. doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13 9952074
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81 (1): 19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004 14711538