Network analysis; Sex differences; Song diversity; Syllable sequences; Testosterone; Animals; Female; Male; Sex Characteristics; Vocalization, Animal; Learning; Testosterone/pharmacology; Canaries; Gender Studies; Endocrinology
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Behavioral sex differences are widespread in the animal world. These differences can be qualitative (i.e., behavior present in one sex but not the other, a true sex dimorphism) or quantitative (behavior is present at a higher rate or quality in one sex compared to the other). Singing in oscine songbirds is associated with both types of differences. In canaries, female rarely sing spontaneously but they can be induced to do so by treatments with steroids. Song in these females is, however, not fully masculinized and exhibits relatively subtle differences in quality as compared with male song. We analyzed here sex differences in syllable content and syllable use between singing male and female canaries.
METHODS: Songs were recorded from three groups of castrated male and three groups of photoregressed female canaries that had received Silastic™ implants filled with testosterone (T), with T plus estradiol (E2), or left empty (control). After 6 weeks of hormone treatment, 30 songs were recorded from each of the 47 subjects. Songs were segmented and each syllable was annotated. Various metrics of syllable diversity were extracted and network analysis was employed to characterize syllable sequences.
RESULTS: Male and female songs were characterized by marked sex differences related to syllable use. Compared to females, males had a larger syllable-type repertoire and their songs contained more syllable types. Network analysis of syllable sequences showed that males follow more fixed patterns of syllable transitions than females. Both sexes, however, produced song of the same duration containing the same number of syllables produced at similar rates (numbers per second).
CONCLUSIONS: Under the influence of T, canaries of both sexes are able to produce generally similar vocalizations that nevertheless differ in specific ways. The development of song during ontogeny appears to be a very sophisticated process that is presumably based on genetic and endocrine mechanisms but also on specific learning processes. These data highlight the importance of detailed behavioral analyses to identify the many dimensions of a behavior that can differ between males and females. [en] Male canaries normally sing complex songs at high rate while females only rarely sing very simple songs. Testosterone induces active singing in both male and female canaries, but female song is still not fully masculinized by these treatments even if song duration does not differ between the sexes. We analyzed the syllable repertoire and the sequence of use for different syllables in canaries of both sexes treated with testosterone or testosterone supplemented with estradiol. Compared to females, males had a larger syllable-type repertoire and their songs contained more syllable types. Syllable transitions were also more fixed in males. Sex differences in adult singing of canaries are thus a complex mixture of differences that result from the different endocrine condition of males and females (and are thus partially reversed by administration of exogenous testosterone) and of more stable differences that presumably develop during the ontogenetic process under the influence of endocrine and genetic differences and of differential learning processes. Canary song thus represents an outstanding model system to analyze the interaction between nature and nurture in the acquisition of a sophisticated learned behavior as well as the mechanisms controlling sex differences in vocal learning and production.
Research center :
GIGA Neurosciences-Neuroendocrinology - ULiège
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Dos Santos, Ednei B; Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroendocrinology, GIGA Neurosciences, University of Liege, 15 Avenue Hippocrate (Bat. B36), Sart Tilman, 4000, Liège 1, Belgium
Ball, Gregory F; Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Logue, David M; Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Cornil, Charlotte ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques
Balthazart, Jacques ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques
Language :
English
Title :
Sex differences in song syntax and syllable diversity in testosterone-induced songs of adult male and female canaries.
NINDS - National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [US-MD] F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
Funding text :
This work was supported by a Grant from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant RO1NS104008 (to G.F.B., J.B., and C.A.C.). C.A.C. is F.R.S.-FNRS Research Director.
Nottebohm F. Brain pathways for vocal learning in birds: á review of the first 10 years. In: Sprague JM, Epstein AN, editors. Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1980. p. 85–214.
Doupe AJ, Kuhl PK. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:567–631. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567
Bolhuis JJ, Okanoya K, Scharff C. Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(11):747–59. 10.1038/nrn2931. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2931
Brainard MS, Doupe AJ. What songbirds teach us about learning. Nature. 2002;417(6886):351–8. 10.1038/417351a. DOI: 10.1038/417351a
Fee MS, Scharff C. The songbird as a model for the generation and learning of complex sequential behaviors. ILAR J. 2010;51(4):362–77. 10.1093/ilar.51.4.362. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.51.4.362
Balthazart J, Ball GF. Endocrine and social regulation of adult neurogenesis in songbirds. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2016;41:3–22. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.03.003. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2016.03.003
Balthazart J, Arnold AP, Adkins-Regan E. Sexual differentiation of brain and behavior in birds. In: Pfaff D, Joels M, editors. Hormones, brain and behavior. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2017. p. 185–224. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803592-4.00101-2
Andersson M. Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1994. DOI: 10.1515/9780691207278
Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. Bird song: biological themes and variations. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 1991;350:33–8. DOI: 10.1038/350033a0
Duffy DL, Ball GF. Song predicts immunocompetence in male European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc Biol Sci. 2002;269(1493):847–52. 10.1098/rspb.2002.1956. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1956
Kroodsma DE. Reproductive development in a female song bird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science. 1976;192:574–5. DOI: 10.1126/science.192.4239.574
Vallet E, Beme II, Kreutzer M. Two-note syllables in canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display. Anim Behav. 1998;55(2):291–7. 10.1006/anbe.1997.0631. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0631
Leitner S, Voigt C, Metzdorf R, Catchpole CK. Immediate early gene (ZENK, Arc) expression in the auditory forebrain of female canaries varies in response to male song quality. J Neurobiol. 2005;64(3):275–84. 10.1002/neu.20135. DOI: 10.1002/neu.20135
Rose EM, Haakenson CM, Stennette K, Patel AD, Gaind S, Shank BD, et al. Neuroendocrine and behavioral response to testosterone-induced female song in canaries (Serinus canaria). Physiol Behav. 2023;250: 113782. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113782
Der PE. Einfluss von Kastration und Testosteronsubstitution auf das Verhalten manlicher Zebrafinken. J Ornithol. 1974;115:338–47. DOI: 10.1007/BF01644328
Arnold AP. The effects of castration and androgen replacement on song courtship, and aggression in zebra finches (Poephila guttata). J Exp Zool. 1975;191:309–26. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401910302
Riebel K, Hall ML, Langmore NE. Female songbirds still struggling to be heard. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20(8):419–20. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.024. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.024
Odom KJ, Hall ML, Riebel K, Omland KE, Langmore NE. Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–6. 10.1038/ncomms4379. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4379
Ko MC, Van Meir V, Vellema M, Gahr M. Characteristics of song, brain-anatomy and blood androgen levels in spontaneously singing female canaries. Horm Behav. 2020;117: 104614. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104614. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104614
Madison FN, Rouse ML Jr, Balthazart J, Ball GF. Reversing song behavior phenotype: testosterone driven induction of singing and measures of song quality in adult male and female canaries (Serinus canaria). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015;215:61–75. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.09.008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.09.008
Dos Santos EB, Ball GF, Cornil CA, Balthazart J. Treatment with androgens plus estrogens cannot reverse sex differences in song and the song control nuclei in adult canaries. Horm Behav. 2022;143: 105197. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105197. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105197
Ball GF, Balthazart J. The neuroendocrinology and neurochemistry of birdsong. In: Handbook of neurochemistry and molecular neurobiology: behavioral neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and molecular neurobiology. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 419–57. 10.1007/978-0-387-30405-2_10. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-30405-2_10
Schlinger BA, Brenowitz EA. Neural and hormonal control of birdsong. In: Pfaff DW, Arnold AP, Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT, editors. Hormones, brain and behavior. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002. p. 799–839. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012532104-4/50035-4
Dos Santos EB, Logue DM, Ball GF, Cornil CA, Balthazart J. Does the syrinx, a peripheral structure, constrain effects of sex steroids on behavioral sex reversal in adult canaries? Horm Behav. 2023;154:105394. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105394 DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105394
Sasahara K, Cody ML, Cohen D, Taylor CE. Structural design principles of complex bird songs: a network-based approach. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9): e44436. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044436. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044436
Weiss M, Hultsch H, Adam I, Scharff C, Kipper S. The use of network analysis to study complex animal communication systems: a study on nightingale song. Proc Biol Sci. 2014;281(1785):20140460. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0460. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0460
Hedley RW. Composition and sequential organization of song repertoires in Cassin’s Vireo (Vireo cassinii). J Ornithol. 2016;157:13–22. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1238-x
Kaluthota C, Logue D, Rendall D. Conventional and network analyses of song organization and complexity in northern House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon parkmanii). J Field Ornithol. 2020;91:375–92. DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12347
Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJ. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998;7(8):1071–5. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x
Hartog TE, Dittrich F, Pieneman AW, Jansen RF, Frankl-Vilches C, Lessmann V, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in the HVC is required for testosterone-induced song of female canaries. J Neurosci. 2009;29(49):15511–9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2564-09.2009. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2564-09.2009
Fusani L, Metzdorf R, Hutchison JB, Gahr M. Aromatase inhibition affects testosterone-induced masculinization of song and the neural song system in female canaries. J Neurobiol. 2003;54(2):370–9. DOI: 10.1002/neu.10141
Fusani L, Gahr M. Hormonal influence on song structure and organization: the role of estrogen. Neuroscience. 2006;138(3):939–46. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.041. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.041
Harding CF. Hormonal modulation of singing behavior: methodology and principles of hormone action. In: Zeigler HP, Marler P, editors. Neuroscience of birdsong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 305–19.
Yamamura T, Barker JM, Balthazart J, Ball GF. Androgens and estrogens synergistically regulate the expression of doublecortin and enhance neuronal recruitment in the song system of adult female canaries. J Neurosci. 2011;31(26):9649–57. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0088-11.2011. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0088-11.2011
Horne BV. Assessing vocal variety in the winter wren, a bird with a complex repertoire. Condor. 1995;97:39–49. DOI: 10.2307/1368981
dos Santos EB, Llambias PE, Rendall D. The structure and organization of song in Southern House Wrens (Troglodytes aedon chilensis). J Ornithol. 2016;157:289–301. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1277-3
Gil D, Slater P. Multiple song repertoire characteristics in the willow warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus): correlations with female choice and offspring viability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2000;47:319–26. DOI: 10.1007/s002650050672
Dos Santos EB, L’lambias PE, Rendall D. Male song diversity and its relation to breeding success in southern house wrens Troglodytes aedon chilensis. J Avian Biol. 2018;49: e01606.
Tougaard J, Eriksen N. Analysing differences among animal songs quantitatively by means of the Levenshtein distance measure. Behaviour. 2006;143:239–52. DOI: 10.1163/156853906775900685
Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJ Complex Syst. 2006;1695:1–9.
Nottebohm F. The neural basis of birdsong. PLoS Biol. 2005;3(5): e164. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030164
Cornez G, Collignon C, Muller W, Cornil CA, Ball GF, Balthazart J. Development of perineuronal nets during ontogeny correlates with sensorimotor vocal learning in canaries. eNeuro. 2020;7:2. 10.1523/ENEURO.0361-19.2020. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0361-19.2020
Roselli CE. Sex differences in androgen receptors and aromatase activity in microdissected regions of the rat brain. Endocrinology. 1991;128:1310–6. DOI: 10.1210/endo-128-3-1310
Schumacher M, Balthazart J. Testosterone-induced brain aromatase is sexually dimorphic. Brain Res. 1986;370:285–93. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90483-X
Alward BA, de Bournonville C, Chan TT, Balthazart J, Cornil CA, Ball GF. Aromatase inhibition rapidly affects in a reversible manner distinct features of birdsong. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32344. 10.1038/srep32344. DOI: 10.1038/srep32344
Vallet E, Kreutzer M, Gahr M. Testosterone induces sexual release quality in the song of female canaries. Ethology. 1996;102:617–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01153.x
Nottebohm F, Kasparian S, Pandazis C. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 1981;213(1):99–109. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91250-6
Leitner S, Catchpole CK. Syllable repertoire and the size of the song control system in captive canaries (Serinus canaria). J Neurobiol. 2004;60(1):21–7. DOI: 10.1002/neu.10331
Bernard DJ, Eens M, Ball GF. Age- and behavior-related variation in volumes of song control nuclei in male European starlings. J Neurobiol. 1996;30:329–39. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199607)30:3<329::AID-NEU2>3.0.CO;2-6
Alvarez-Borda B, Nottebohm F. Gonads and singing play separate, additive roles in new neuron recruitment in adult canary brain. J Neurosci. 2002;22(19):8684–90. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08684.2002
Li XC, Jarvis ED, Alvarez-Borda B, Lim DA, Nottebohm F. A relationship between behavior, neurotrophin expression, and new neuron survival. PNAS. 2000;97:8584–9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.140222497
Rasika S, Alvarez-Buylla A, Nottebohm F. BDNF mediates the effects of testosterone on the survival of new neurons in an adult brain. Neuron. 1999;22(1):53–62. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80678-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80678-9
Rasika S, Nottebohm F, Alvarez-Buylla A. Testosterone increases the recruitment and/or survival of new high vocal center neurons in adult female canaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:7854–8. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7854
Alward BA, Madison FN, Parker SE, Balthazart J, Ball GF. Pleiotropic control by testosterone of a learned vocal behavior and its underlying neuroplasticity. eNeuro. 2016;3:1. 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-15.2016. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0145-15.2016
Adkins-Regan E, Ascenzi M. Social and sexual behaviour of male and female zebra finches treated with oestradiol during the nestling period. Anim Behav. 1987;35:1100–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80167-7
Gurney ME, Konishi M. Hormone-induced sexual differentiation of brain and behavior in zebra finches. Science. 1980;208:1380–3. DOI: 10.1126/science.208.4450.1380
Holloway CC, Clayton DE. Estrogen synthesis in the male brain triggers development of the avian song control pathway in vitro. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4(2):170–5. DOI: 10.1038/84001
Agate RJ, Grisham W, Wade J, Mann S, Wingfield J, Schanen C, et al. Neural, not gonadal, origin of brain sex differences in a gynandromorphic finch. PNAS. 2003;100(8):4873–8. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0636925100
MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Ball GF. Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:432–6. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01434-4
Ko MC, Frankl-Vilches C, Bakker A, Gahr M. The gene expression profile of the song control nucleus HVC shows sex specificity, hormone responsiveness, and species specificity among songbirds. Front Neurosci. 2021;15: 680530. 10.3389/fnins.2021.680530. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.680530
Friedrich SR, Nevue AA, Andrade ALP, Velho TAF, Mello CV. Emergence of sex-specific transcriptomes in a sexually dimorphic brain nucleus. Cell Rep. 2022;40(5): 111152. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111152. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111152
Ellegren H, Hultin-Rosenberg L, Brunstrom B, Dencker L, Kultima K, Scholz B. Faced with inequality: chicken do not have a general dosage compensation of sex-linked genes. BMC Biol. 2007;5:40. 10.1186/1741-7007-5-40. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-40
Itoh Y, Melamed E, Yang X, Kampf K, Wang S, Yehya N, et al. Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. J Biol. 2007;6(1):2. 10.1186/jbiol53. DOI: 10.1186/jbiol53
Itoh Y, Replogle K, Kim YH, Wade J, Clayton DF, Arnold AP. Sex bias and dosage compensation in the zebra finch versus chicken genomes: general and specialized patterns among birds. Genome Res. 2010;20(4):512–8. 10.1101/gr.102343.109. DOI: 10.1101/gr.102343.109
Rose EM, Prior NH, Ball GF. The singing question: re-conceptualizing birdsong. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022;97(1):326–42. 10.1111/brv.12800. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12800
Fujii TG, Coulter A, Lawley KS, Prather JF, Okanoya K. Song preference in female and juvenile songbirds: proximate and ultimate questions. Front Physiol. 2022;13: 876205. 10.3389/fphys.2022.876205. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.876205
Chen Y, Matheson LE, Sakata JT. Mechanisms underlying the social enhancement of vocal learning in songbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(24):6641–6. 10.1073/pnas.1522306113. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1522306113
von Uexkühll J. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer; 1921. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-24819-5
