Article (Scientific journals)
Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.
Reintam Blaser, Annika; Preiser, Jean-Charles; Fruhwald, Sonja et al.
2020In Critical Care, 24 (1), p. 224
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
s13054-020-02889-4.pdf
Author postprint (920.08 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Critically ill; Gastrointestinal dysfunction; Gastrointestinal failure; Gastrointestinal function; Intensive care; Monitoring; Critical Care/methods; Critical Care/trends; Critical Illness/epidemiology; Critical Illness/therapy; Diagnostic Imaging/methods; Europe/epidemiology; Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis; Gastrointestinal Diseases/physiopathology; Humans; Nutritional Status/drug effects; Nutritional Status/physiology; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Diagnostic Imaging; Europe; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Nutritional Status; Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is frequent in the critically ill but can be overlooked as a result of the lack of standardization of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We aimed to develop a research agenda for GI dysfunction for future research. We systematically reviewed the current knowledge on a broad range of subtopics from a specific viewpoint of GI dysfunction, highlighting the remaining areas of uncertainty and suggesting future studies. METHODS: This systematic scoping review and research agenda was conducted following successive steps: (1) identify clinically important subtopics within the field of GI function which warrant further research; (2) systematically review the literature for each subtopic using PubMed, CENTRAL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; (3) summarize evidence for each subtopic; (4) identify areas of uncertainty; (5) formulate and refine study proposals that address these subtopics; and (6) prioritize study proposals via sequential voting rounds. RESULTS: Five major themes were identified: (1) monitoring, (2) associations between GI function and outcome, (3) GI function and nutrition, (4) management of GI dysfunction and (5) pathophysiological mechanisms. Searches on 17 subtopics were performed and evidence summarized. Several areas of uncertainty were identified, six of them needing consensus process. Study proposals ranked among the first ten included: prevention and management of diarrhoea; management of upper and lower feeding intolerance, including indications for post-pyloric feeding and opioid antagonists; acute gastrointestinal injury grading as a bedside tool; the role of intra-abdominal hypertension in the development and monitoring of GI dysfunction and in the development of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia; and the effect of proton pump inhibitors on the microbiome in critical illness. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence on GI dysfunction is scarce, partially due to the lack of precise definitions. The use of core sets of monitoring and outcomes are required to improve the consistency of future studies. We propose several areas for consensus process and outline future study projects.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Reintam Blaser, Annika;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. annika.reintam.blaser@ut.ee ; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland. annika.reintam.blaser@ut.ee
Preiser, Jean-Charles ;  Université de Liège - ULiège ; Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Fruhwald, Sonja;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology for Cardiovascular Surgery and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
Wilmer, Alexander;  Department of Medical Intensive Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Wernerman, Jan;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Benstoem, Carina;  Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ; Cardiovascular Critical Care & Anesthesia Research and Evaluation (3CARE), Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Casaer, Michael P;  Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Starkopf, Joel;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
van Zanten, Arthur;  Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
Rooyackers, Olav;  Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Jakob, Stephan M;  Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland ; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Loudet, Cecilia I;  Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos General San Martín, La Plata, Argentina
Bear, Danielle E;  Departments of Critical Care and Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK ; Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
Elke, Gunnar;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Kott, Matthias;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Lautenschläger, Ingmar;  Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Schäper, Jörn;  Department of Anaesthesiology, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Gunst, Jan;  Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Stoppe, Christian;  Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Nobile, Leda;  Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Fuhrmann, Valentin;  Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany ; Department of Medicine B, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
Berger, Mette M;  Service of Adult Intensive Care Medicine and Burns, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
Oudemans-van Straaten, Heleen M;  Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Arabi, Yaseen M;  College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Deane, Adam M;  The University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia
Working Group on Gastrointestinal Function within the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition (MEN Section) of ESICM
More authors (16 more) Less
Other collaborator :
Rousseau, Anne-Françoise  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
Language :
English
Title :
Gastrointestinal dysfunction in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.
Publication date :
15 May 2020
Journal title :
Critical Care
ISSN :
1364-8535
eISSN :
1466-609X
Publisher :
NLM (Medline), England
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Pages :
224
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 12 January 2024

Statistics


Number of views
6 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
6 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
102
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
79
OpenCitations
 
79

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi