[en] [en] INTRODUCTION: Assessment of glucose exposure via glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has limitations for interpretation in individuals with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The glucose management indicator (GMI) derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data could be an alternative. However, the concordance between HbA1c measured in laboratory and GMI (HbA1c-GMI) is uncertain in individuals with CKD. The purpose of this study is to analyze this discrepancy.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: We performed a multicentric, retrospective, observational study. A group of individuals with diabetes and CKD (n = 170) was compared with a group of individuals with diabetes without CKD (n = 185). All individuals used an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM). A comparison of 14-day and 90-day glucose data recorded by the isCGM was performed to calculate GMI and the discordance between lab HbA1c and GMI was analyzed by a Bland-Altman method and linear regression.
RESULTS: HbA1c-GMI discordance was significantly higher in the CKD group versus without CKD group (0.78 ± 0.57 [0.66-0.90] vs 0.59 ± 0.44 [0.50-0.66]%, P < .005). An absolute difference >0.5% was found in 68.2% of individuals with CKD versus 42.2% of individuals without CKD. We suggest a new specific formula to estimate HbA1c from the linear regression between HbA1c and mean glucose CGM, namely CKD-GMI = 0.0261 × 90-day mean glucose (mg/L) + 3.5579 (r2 = 0.59).
CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c-GMI discordance is frequent and usually in favor of an HbA1c level higher than the GMI value, which can lead to errors in changes in glucose-lowering therapy, especially for individuals with CKD. This latter population should benefit from the CGM to measure their glucose exposure more precisely.
Disciplines :
Endocrinology, metabolism & nutrition
Author, co-author :
Oriot, Philippe ; Service de diabétologie et endocrinologie, Centre Hospitalier de Mouscron, Mouscron, Belgium
Viry, Claire; Service d'endocrinologie, diabète et maladies métaboliques, CHU de Rouen, Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France
Vandelaer, Antoine ; Département de médecine interne > Service de cardiologie
Grigioni, Sébastien; Service de nutrition, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France ; Normandy University, Rouen, France ; Centre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France
Roy, Malanie; Service d'endocrinologie, diabète et maladies métaboliques, CHU de Rouen, Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France
Philips, Jean-Christophe ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de diabétologie, nutrition, maladies métaboliques
Prévost, Gaëtan; Service d'endocrinologie, diabète et maladies métaboliques, CHU de Rouen, Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France ; Centre d'Investigation Clinique, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France
Language :
English
Title :
Discordance Between Glycated Hemoglobin A1c and the Glucose Management Indicator in People With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM Genuth S, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986. doi:10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837-853.
Speeckaert M Van Biesen W Delanghe J, et al. Are there better alternatives than haemoglobin A1c to estimate glycaemic control in the chronic kidney disease population? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(12):2167-2177. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfu006.
Galindo RJ Beck RW Scioscia MF Umpierrez GE Tuttle KR. Glycemic monitoring and management in advanced chronic kidney disease. Endocr Rev. 2020;41(5):756-774. doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa017.
Ford ES Cowie CC Li C Handelsman Y Bloomgarden ZT. Iron-deficiency anemia, non-iron-deficiency anemia and HbA1c among adults in the US. J Diabetes. 2011;3(1):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2010.00100.x.
Ng JM Cooke M Bhandari S Atkin SL Kilpatrick ES. The effect of iron and erythropoietin treatment on the A1C of patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2310-2323. doi:10.2337/dc10-0917.
Clarke SF Foster JR. A history of blood glucose meters and their role in self-monitoring of diabetes mellitus. Br J Biomed Sci. 2012;69(2):83-93.
Cappon G Vettoretti M Sparacino G Facchinetti A. Continuous glucose monitoring sensors for diabetes management: a review of technologies and applications. Diabetes Metab J. 2019;43(4):383-397. doi:10.4093/dmj.2019.0121.
Rodbard D. Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of recent studies demonstrating improved glycemic outcomes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S25-S37. doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0035.
Bergenstal RM Beck RW Close KL, et al. Glucose management indicator (GMI): a new term for estimating A1C from continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(11):2275-2280. doi:10.2337/dc18-1581.
Gomez-Peralta F Choudhary P Cosson E Irace C Rami-Merhar B Seibold A. Understanding the clinical implications of differences between glucose management indicator and glycated haemoglobin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;1-10. doi:10.1111/dom.14638.
Danne T Nimri R Battelino T, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1631-1640. doi:10.2337/dc17-1600.
Riddlesworth TD Beck RW Gal RL, et al. Optimal sampling duration for continuous glucose monitoring to determine longterm glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(4):314-316.
Blanc B Finch CA Hallberg L, et al. Nutritional anaemias [Report of a WHO Scientific Group]. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1968;405:1-40.
Lok CE Huber TS Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4 suppl 2):S1-S164.
Perlman JE Gooley TA McNulty B Meyers J Hirsch IB. HbA1c and glucose management indicator discordance: a real-world analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021;23(4):253-258. doi:10.1089/dia.2020.0501.
Toschi E Slyne C Sifre K, et al. The relationship between CGM-derived metrics, A1C, and risk of hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. Oct. 2020;43(10):234954.
Campbell L Pepper T Shipman K. HbA1c: a review of non-glycaemic variables. J Clin Pathol. 2019;72(1):129.
Guo W Zhou Q Jia Y Xu J. Increased levels of glycated hemoglobin A1c and iron deficiency anemia: a review. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:83718.
Leelarathna L Beck RW Bergenstal RM, et al. Glucose Management Indicator (GMI): insights and validation using guardian 3 and navigator 2 sensor data. Diabetes Care. Avr. 2019;42(4):e601.
Pleus S Kamecke U Waldenmaier D, et al. Time in specific glucose ranges, glucose management indicator, and glycemic variability: impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System Model and Sensor on CGM Metrics. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;15(5):110410.
Hempe JM Liu S Myers L McCarter RJ Buse JB Fonseca V. The hemoglobin glycation index identifies subpopulations with harms or benefits from intensive treatment in the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care. Juin. 2015;38(6):106774.
Yajima T Takahashi H Yasuda K. Comparison of interstitial fluid glucose levels obtained by continuous glucose monitoring and flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020;14:1088-1094.
Presswala LHS Harris Y Romao I, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and CKD. Kidney Med. 2019;1(5):281-287.
Monzon AD Patton SR Clements M. An examination of the glucose management indicator in young children with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;193229682110231.
Xu Y Dunn TC Ajjan RA. A kinetic model for glucose levels and hemoglobin A1c provides a novel tool for individualized diabetes management. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021;15(2):294-302.
Sacks DB Nathan DM Lachin JM. Gaps in the glycation gap hypothesis. Clin Chem. 2011;57(2):150-152. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.158071.