education; histology; learning analytics; virtual microscopy; Embryology; General Medicine; Anatomy
Abstract :
[en] As a part of modern technological environments, virtual microscopy enriches histological learning, with support from large institutional investments. However, existing literature does not supply empirical evidence of its role in improving pedagogy. Virtual microscopy provides fresh opportunities for investigating user behavior during the histology learning process, through digitized histological slides. This study establishes how students' perceptions and user behavior data can be processed and analyzed using machine learning algorithms. These also provide predictive data called learning analytics that enable predicting students' performance and behavior favorable for academic success. This information can be interpreted and used for validating instructional designs. Data on the perceptions, performances, and user behavior of 552 students enrolled in a histology course were collected from the virtual microscope, Cytomine®. These data were analyzed using an ensemble of machine learning algorithms, the extra-tree regression method, and predictive statistics. The predictive algorithms identified the most pertinent histological slides and descriptive tags, alongside 10 types of student behavior conducive to academic success. We used these data to validate our instructional design, and align the educational purpose, learning outcomes, and evaluation methods of digitized histological slides on Cytomine®. This model also predicts students' examination scores, with an error margin of <0.5 out of 20 points. The results empirically demonstrate the value of a digital learning environment for both students and teachers of histology.
Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 1996;32(3):347–364.
Biggs J, Tang C. Constructive alignment: an outcomes-based approach to teaching anatomy. In: Chan LK, Pawlina W, editors. Teaching anatomy: a practical guide. 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 31–38.
Brown JS. Growing up: digital: how the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Chang Mag High Learn. 2000;32(2):11–20.
Camp CL, Gregory JK, Lachman N, Chen LP, Juskewitch JE, Pawlina W. Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism. Anat Sci Ed. 2010;3(2):64–72.
Chimmalgi M, Hortsch M. Teaching histology using self-directed learning modules (SDLMs) in a blended approach. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(6):1455–1464.
Cirigliano MM, Guthrie CD, Pusic MV. Click-level learning analytics in an online medical education learning platform. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(4):410–421.
Cytomine Community Documentation. Cytomine community documentation site. 2023 [cited May 2023]. Available from: http://www.cytomine.org/
Defaweux V, Delbrassine D, Dozo BO, Etienne AM, Centi V, D'Anna V, et al. To combine a MOOC to a regular face-to-face course-a study of three blended pedagogical patterns. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2019;2356(2017):210–217.
Eng-Tat A, Liu P, Lian WQD, Huppertz B, Khamuani M, Minarcik JR. The challenges of histology education. Clinical Anatomy. 2023;36(2):308–314.
García M, Victory N, Navarro-Sempere A, Segovia Y. Students' views on difficulties in learning histology. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12:541–549.
Gatumu MK, Macmillan FM, Langton PD, Headley PM, Harris JR. Evaluation of usage of virtual microscopy for the study of histology in the medical, dental, and veterinary undergraduate programs of a UK University. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;7(5):389–398.
Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L. Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn. 2006;63(1):3–42.
Gribbin W, Wilson EA, McTaggart S, Hortsch M. Histology education in an integrated, time-restricted medical curriculum: academic outcomes and students' study adaptations. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(4):671–684.
Hausman M, Dancot J, Pétré B, Guillaume M, Detroz P. ‘I don't know if people realize the impact of their words’: how does feedback during internship impact nursing student learning? Assess Eval High Educ. 2023;48(6):777–789.
Herodotou C, Aristeidou M, Scanlon E, Kelley S. Virtual microscopes and online learning: exploring the perceptions of 12 teachers about pedagogy. Open Learn: J Open Distance e-Learn. 2022;1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2022.2112661
Herodotou C, Muirhead DK, Aristeidou M, Hole MJ, Kelley S, Scanlon E, et al. Blended and online learning: a comparative study of virtual microscopy in higher education. Interact Learn Environ. 2020;28(6):713–728.
Hortsch M. The Michigan histology website as an example of a free anatomical resource serving learners and educators worldwide. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(3):363–371.
Hortsch M, Koney NK, Oommen AM, Yohannan DG, Li Y, de Melo Leite ACR, et al. Virtual microscopy goes global: the images are virtual and the problems are real. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1421:79–124.
Hortsch M, Mangrulkar RS. When students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: a strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(5):478–483.
Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD, Braun MW. Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy. Anat Sci Ed. 2009;2(5):218–226.
Hussein I, Raad M, Safa R, Jurjus RA, Jurjus A. Once upon a microscopic slide: the story of histology. J Cytol Histol. 2015;6(6):1–4.
Kaliannan M, Chandran SD. Empowering students through outcome-based education (OBE). Res Educ. 2012;87:50–63.
Kolachalama VB, Garg PS. Machine learning and medical education. Npj Digit Med. 2018;1(1):2–4.
Kulik JA, Kulik CLC. Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1987;12(3):222–230.
Kusunose K, Haga A, Abe T, Sata M. Utilization of artificial intelligence in echocardiography. Circ J. 2019;83(8):1623–1629.
Lee LMJ, Goldman HM, Hortsch M. The virtual microscopy database—sharing digital microscope images for research and education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11:510–515.
Lim LA, Gentili S, Pardo A, Kovanović V, Whitelock-Wainwright A, Gašević D, et al. What changes, and for whom? A study of the impact of learning analytics-based process feedback in a large course. Learn Instr. 2021;72:101202.
Maity S, Nauhria S, Nayak N, Nauhria S, Coffin T, Wray J, et al. Virtual versus light microscopy usage among students: a systematic review and meta-analytic evidence in medical education. Diagnostics. 2023;13(3):558.
Marée R, Rollus L, Stévens B, Hoyoux R, Louppe G, Vandaele R, et al. Collaborative analysis of multi-gigapixel imaging data using Cytomine. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:1395–1401.
Marée R, Vanhee L, Rubens U, Weatherspoon A, Pesesse L, Quatresooz P, et al. New Cytomine modules for user behavior analytics in digital pathology. J Pathol Inform. 2019;10:68–70.
Mcbride JM, Drake RL. National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;14:7–14.
Mione S, Valcke M, Cornelissen M. Evaluation of virtual microscopy in medical histology teaching: virtual microscopy in histology teaching. Anat Sci Ed. 2013;6(5):307–315.
Multon S, Pesesse L, Weatherspoon A, Florquin S, Van de Poel J-F, Martin P, et al. A Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on pratical histology: a goal, a tool, a large public! Return on a first experience. Ann Pathol. 2018;38(2):76–84.
Multon S, Weatherspoon A, Schaffer P, Quatresooz P, Defaweux V. Practical histology in tune with the times. Med Educ. 2015;49(11):1166–1167.
Namoun A, Alshanqiti A. Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analytics techniques: a systematic literature review. Appl Sci. 2021;11(1):1–28.
Pecaric M, Boutis K, Beckstead J, Pusic M. A big data and learning analytics approach to process-level feedback in cognitive simulations. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):175–184.
Pesesse L, Dozo BO, Quatresooz P, Weatherspoon A, Multon S, Pirotte M, et al. Designing a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in face-to-face sessions. A blended design to teach practical histology. Morphologie. 2023. Online ahead of print.
Premalatha K. Course and program outcomes assessment methods in outcome-based education: a review. J Educ. 2019;199(3):111–127.
Rienties B, Køhler Simonsen H, Herodotou C. Defining the boundaries between artificial intelligence in education, computer-supported collaborative learning, educational data mining, and learning analytics: a need for coherence. Front Educ. 2020;5:128.
Russell K, Weinberger E, Stone A. Preserving digital scholarship: the future is now. Learn Publ. 1999;12(4):271–280.
Shmueli G. To explain or to predict? Statist Sci. 2010;25(3):289–310.
Sin K, Muthu L. Application of big data in education data mining and learning analytics—a literature review. ICTACT J Soft Comput. 2015;5(4):1035–1049.
van der Niet AG, Bleakley A. Where medical education meets artificial intelligence: ‘does technology care?’. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):30–36.
Vanhee L, Hoyoux R. Learning analytics scripts. GitHub; 2022. Available from: https://github.com/geektortoise/Master-Thesis
Verbert K, Govaerts S, Duval E, Santos JL, Van Assche F, Parra G, et al. Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2014;18:1499–1514.
Viberg O, Hatakka M, Bälter O, Mavroudi A. The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;89:98–110.
Wu YH, Chiang CP. Comparison of virtual microscopy and real microscopy for learning oral histology laboratory course among dental students. J Dent Sci. 2022;17(3):1201–1205.
Youdas JW, Krause DA, Hellyer NJ, Rindflesch AB, Hollman JH. Use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy course for enhancing professional behaviors in doctor of physical therapy students: use of individual feedback during human gross anatomy. Anat Sci Ed. 2013;6(5):324–331.
Zaidi NB, Hwang C, Scott S, Stallard S, Purkiss J, Hortsch M. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: lessons from a graduate histology course: Bloom's taxonomy histology tool. Anat Sci Ed. 2017;10(5):456–464.
