Cytomegalovirus infection management in solid organ transplant recipients across European centers in the time of molecular diagnostics: An ESGICH survey.
[en] BACKGROUND: Scant information is available about how transplant centers are managing their use of quantitative molecular testing (QNAT) assays for active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection monitoring in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The current study was aimed at gathering information on current practices in the management of CMV infection across European centers in the era of molecular testing assays. METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey study was conducted by the European Study Group of Infections in Immunocompromised Hosts (ESGICH) of the Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). The invitation and a weekly reminder with a personal link to an Internet service provider (https://es.surveymonkey.com/) was sent to transplant physicians, transplant infectious diseases specialists, and clinical virologists working at 340 European transplant centers. RESULTS: Of the 1181 specialists surveyed, a total of 173 responded (14.8%): 73 transplant physicians, 57 transplant infectious diseases specialists, and 43 virologists from 173 institutions located at 23 different countries. The majority of centers used QNAT assays for active CMV infection monitoring. Most centers preferred commercially available real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays over laboratory-developed procedures for quantifying CMV DNA load in whole blood or plasma. Use of a wide variety of DNA extraction platforms and RT-PCR assays was reported. All programs used antiviral prophylaxis, preemptive therapy, or both, according to current guidelines. However, the centers used different criteria for starting preemptive antiviral treatment, for monitoring systemic CMV DNA load, and for requesting genotypic assays to detect emerging CMV-resistant variants. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in CMV infection management in SOT recipients still remains across European centers in the era of molecular testing. International multicenter studies are required to achieve commutability of CMV testing and antiviral management procedures.
Disciplines :
Surgery Immunology & infectious disease
Author, co-author :
Navarro, David ; Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research ; Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia
San-Juan, Rafael; Unit of Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre
Manuel, Oriol; Transplantation Center and Service of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of
Giménez, Estela; Microbiology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Institute for Research
Fernández-Ruiz, Mario ; Unit of Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre
Hirsch, Hans H; Transplantation & Clinical Virology, Department Biomedicine, University of Basel, ; Infectious Diseases & Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel,
Grossi, Paolo Antonio; National Centre for Transplantation, Department of Medicine and Surgery,
Aguado, José María; Unit of Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre
ESGICH CMV Survey Study Group, on behalf of the European Study Group of
Other collaborator :
Abram, Maja
Abramowicz, Daniel
Álamo, José-María
Alp, Sehnaz
Andres-Belmonte, Amado
Anne-Catherine, Pouleur
Antonelli, Barbara
Arnol, Miha
Arslan, Ayse Hande
Asderakis, Argiris
Baldanti, Fausto
Beneyto-Castello, Isabel
Benoit, Kabamba Mukadi
Blanes, Marino
Boggian, Katia
Bonofiglio, Renzo
Bubonja-Sonje, Marina
Caillard, Sophie
Calvo, Jorge
Capone, Alessandro
Cappelli, Gianni
Carmellini, Mario
Casafont, Fernando
Beatriz Castro-Hernandez, M
Catalan, Pilar
Celine, Bressollette-Bodin
Christoph, Berger
Cordero, Elisa
Costa, Cristina
Coussement, Julien
Cuervas-Mons, Valentin
David, Miruna
de la Torre Cisneros, Julián
Delgado, Juan F
Dello Strologo, Luca
Detry, Olivier ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de chirurgie abdo, sénologique, endocrine et de transplantation
Cytomegalovirus infection management in solid organ transplant recipients across European centers in the time of molecular diagnostics: An ESGICH survey.
Publication date :
December 2017
Journal title :
Transplant Infectious Disease
ISSN :
1398-2273
eISSN :
1399-3062
Volume :
19
Issue :
6
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Funding number :
G0701652/MRC_/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom
Fisher RA. Cytomegalovirus infection and disease in the new era of immunosuppression following solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2009;11:195-202.
Navarro D. Expanding role of cytomegalovirus as a human pathogen. J Med Virol. 2016;88:1103-1301.
Florescu DF, Qiu F, Schmidt CM, Kalil AC. A direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis on the efficacy of cytomegalovirus preventive strategies in solid organ transplant. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:785-803.
Mumtaz K, Faisal N, Husain S, Morillo A, Renner EL, Shah PS. Universal prophylaxis or preemptive strategy for cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:472-481.
Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. Updated international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2013;96:333-360.
Andrews PA, Emery VC, Newstead C. Summary of the British Transplantation Society Guidelines for the prevention and management of CMV disease after solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2011;92:1181-1187.
Torre-Cisneros J, Aguado JM, Caston JJ, et al. Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: SET/GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI recommendations. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2016;30:119-143.
Razonable RR, Hayden RT. Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26:703-727.
Dioverti MV, Razonable RR. Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus viral load in solid organ transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28:317-322.
Fryer JF, Heath AB, Anderson R, Minor PD, and the Collaborative Study Group. Collaborative study to evaluate the proposed 1st WHO international standard for human cytomegalovirus for nucleic acid amplification-based assays. WHO/BS/10.2138, pp 1-40. Geneva, Switzerland, 18–22 October 2010.
Hirsch HH, Lautenschlager I, Pinsky BA, et al. An international multicenter performance analysis of cytomegalovirus load tests. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:367-373.
Preiksaitis JK, Hayden RT, Tong Y, et al. Are we there yet? Impact of the First International Standard for cytomegalovirus DNA on the harmonization of results reported on plasma samples. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:583-589.
Vinuesa V, Giménez E, Solano C, Gimeno C, Navarro D; Spanish Society for Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Quality Control Study Group. Would kinetic analyses of plasma cytomegalovirus DNA load help to reach consensus criteria for triggering the initiation of preemptive antiviral therapy in transplant recipients? Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:1533-1535.
Hayden RT, Sun Y, Tang L, et al. Progress in quantitative viral load testing: Variability and impact of the WHO Quantitative International Standards. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:423-430.
Le Page AK, Jager MM, Kotton CN, Simoons-Smit A, Rawlinson WD. International survey of cytomegalovirus management in solid organ transplantation after the publication of consensus guidelines. Transplantation. 2013;95:1455-1460.
San-Juan R, Manuel O, Hirsch HH, et al. Current preventive strategies and management of Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in solid organ transplantation in Europe. Results of the ESGICH Questionnaire-based Cross-sectional Survey. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:604 e1-9.
Pape L, Tonshoff B, Hirsch HH; Members of the Working Group ‘Transplantation’ of the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology. Perception, diagnosis and management of BK polyomavirus replication and disease in paediatric kidney transplant recipients in Europe. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:842-847.
Pang XL, Fox JD, Fenton JM, Miller GG, Caliendo AM, Preiksaitis JK. Interlaboratory comparison of cytomegalovirus viral load assays. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:258-268.
Bravo D, Clari MÁ, Costa E, et al. Comparative evaluation of three automated systems for DNA extraction in conjunction with three commercially available RT-PCR assays for quantitation of plasma cytomegalovirus DNAemia in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2899-2904.
Tong Y, Pang XL, Mabilangan C, Preiksaitis JK. Determination of the biological form of human cytomegalovirus DNA in the plasma of solid-organ transplant recipients. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:1094-1011.
Fernández-Ruiz M, Arias M, Campistol JM, et al. Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies in seropositive kidney transplant recipients: An insight into current clinical practice. Transpl Int. 2015;28:1042-1054.
Atabani SF, Smith C, Atkinson C, et al. Cytomegalovirus replication kinetics in solid organ transplant recipients managed by preemptive therapy. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2457-2464.
Atabani SF, Emery VC, Smith C, Harber M, Thorburn D, Griffiths PD. Response to letter regarding “Cytomegalovirus replication kinetics in solid organ transplant recipients managed by preemptive therapy”. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2859-2860.
Le Page AK, Jager MM, Iwasenko JM, Scott GM, Alain S, Rawlinson WD. Clinical aspects of cytomegalovirus antiviral resistance in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1018-1029.
Boivin G, Goyette N, Rollag H, et al. Cytomegalovirus resistance in solid organ transplant recipients treated with intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir. Antivir Ther. 2009;14:697-704.
Hantz S, Garnier-Geoffroy F, Mazeron MC, et al. Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients: A French cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:2628-2640.
Chou S. Approach to drug-resistant cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28:293-299.
Pulcini C, Leibovici L; CMI Editorial Office. CMI guidance for authors of surveys. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:901-902.
Eysenbach G, Wyatt J. Using the internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4:e13.
Bennett C, Khangura S, Brehaut JC, et al. Reporting guidelines for survey research: An analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med. 2010;8:e1001069.