3D acquisition; Computer vision; Plant phenotyping; Point cloud processing; Segmentation; Skeletonization; Plant Science; Genetics; Biotechnology
Abstract :
[en] Computer vision technology is moving more and more towards a three-dimensional approach, and plant phenotyping is following this trend. However, despite its potential, the complexity of the analysis of 3D representations has been the main bottleneck hindering the wider deployment of 3D plant phenotyping. In this review we provide an overview of typical steps for the processing and analysis of 3D representations of plants, to offer potential users of 3D phenotyping a first gateway into its application, and to stimulate its further development. We focus on plant phenotyping applications where the goal is to measure characteristics of single plants or crop canopies on a small scale in research settings, as opposed to large scale crop monitoring in the field.
Precision for document type :
Review article
Disciplines :
Biotechnology Life sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Harandi, Negin ✱; Center for Biosystems and Biotech Data Science, Ghent University Global Campus, 119 Songdomunhwa-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, South Korea ; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S9, Ghent, Belgium
Vandenberghe, Breght ✱; BASF Innovation Center, Technologiepark 101, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
Vankerschaver, Joris; Center for Biosystems and Biotech Data Science, Ghent University Global Campus, 119 Songdomunhwa-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, South Korea ; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, S9, Ghent, Belgium
Depuydt, Stephen ✱; Erasmus Applied University of Sciences and Arts, Campus Kaai, Nijverheidskaai 170, Anderlecht, Belgium
Van Messem, Arnout ✱; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de mathématique > Statistique appliquée aux sciences
✱ These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Language :
English
Title :
How to make sense of 3D representations for plant phenotyping: a compendium of processing and analysis techniques.
Ubbens J, Cieslak M, Prusinkiewicz P, Stavness I. The use of plant models in deep learning: an application to leaf counting in rosette plants. Plant Methods. 2018;14(1):6. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0273-z
Shi W, van de Zedde R, Jiang H, Kootstra G. Plant-part segmentation using deep learning and multi-view vision. Biosyst Eng. 2019;187:81–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.08.014
Vázquez-Arellano M, Griepentrog HW, Reiser D, Paraforos DS. 3-D imaging systems for agricultural applications—a review. Sensors. 2016;16(5):618. 10.3390/s16050618. DOI: 10.3390/s16050618
King A. The future of agriculture. Nature. 2017;544(7651):21–3. 10.1038/544S21a. DOI: 10.1038/544S21a
Kumar A, Pathak RK, Gupta SM, Gaur VS, Pandey D. Systems biology for smart crops and agricultural innovation: filling the gaps between genotype and phenotype for complex traits linked with robust agricultural productivity and sustainability. OMICS J Integr Biol. 2015;19(10):581–601. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2015.0106
Santos F, Borém A, Caldas C. Sugarcane: agricultural production, bioenergy and ethanol. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2015.
Kolhar S, Jagtap J. Plant trait estimation and classification studies in plant phenotyping using machine vision—a review. Inform Process Agric. 2021. 10.1016/j.inpa.2021.02.006. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpa.2021.02.006
Lou L, Liu Y, Shen M, Han J, Corke F, Doonan JH. Estimation of branch angle from 3D point cloud of plants. In: 2015 International Conference on 3D Vision. 2015; 554–561. IEEE.
Dornbusch T, Lorrain S, Kuznetsov D, Fortier A, Liechti R, Xenarios I, Fankhauser C. Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in Arabidopsis - a novel phenotyping approach using laser scanning. Funct Plant Biol. 2012;39(11):860–9. 10.1071/FP12018. DOI: 10.1071/FP12018
Paturkar A, Gupta GS, Bailey D. 3D reconstruction of plants under outdoor conditions using image-based computer vision. In: International Conference on Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. 2018; 284–297. Springer.
Smith LN, Zhang W, Hansen MF, Hales IJ, Smith ML. Innovative 3D and 2D machine vision methods for analysis of plants and crops in the field. Comput Ind. 2018;97:122–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2018.02.002
Martinez-Guanter J, Ribeiro Á, Peteinatos GG, Pérez-Ruiz M, Gerhards R, Bengochea-Guevara JM, Machleb J, Andújar D. Low-cost three-dimensional modeling of crop plants. Sensors. 2019;19(13):2883. DOI: 10.3390/s19132883
Cao W, Zhou J, Yuan Y, Ye H, Nguyen HT, Chen J, Zhou J. Quantifying variation in soybean due to flood using a low-cost 3D imaging system. Sensors. 2019;19(12):2682. DOI: 10.3390/s19122682
Sampaio GS, Silva LAd, Marengoni M. 3D reconstruction of non-rigid plants and sensor data fusion for agriculture phenotyping. Sensors. 2021;21(12):4115. DOI: 10.3390/s21124115
Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R. Image processing, analysis, and machine vision. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2014.
Bernotas G, Scorza LC, Hansen MF, Hales IJ, Halliday KJ, Smith LN, Smith ML, McCormick AJ. A photometric stereo-based 3D imaging system using computer vision and deep learning for tracking plant growth. GigaScience. 2019;8(5):056. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz056
Paulus S. Measuring crops in 3D: using geometry for plant phenotyping. Plant Methods. 2019;15(1):103. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0490-0
Mada SK, Smith ML, Smith LN, Midha PS. Overview of passive and active vision techniques for hand-held 3D data acquisition. In: Opto-Ireland 2002: Optical Metrology, Imaging, and Machine Vision, 2003; 4877: 16–27. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Li Z, Guo R, Li M, Chen Y, Li G. A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;176: 105672. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672
Siudak M, Rokita P. A survey of passive 3D reconstruction methods on the basis of more than one image. Mach Gr Vis. 2014;23(3/4):57–117.
Remondino F, El-Hakim S. Image-based 3D modelling: a review. Photogramm Rec. 2006;21(115):269–91. 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00383.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00383.x
Schwartze R, Heinol H, Buxbaum B, Ringbeck T, Xu Z, Hartmann K. 18 principles of three-dimensional imaging techniques. Handb Comput Vis Appl. 1999;1:463–84.
Beltran D, Basañez L. A Comparison between active and passive 3D vision sensors: BumblebeeXB3 and Microsoft Kinect. In: Robot2013: First Iberian Robotics Conference. 2014; 725–734. Springer.
Ando R, Ozasa Y, Guo W. Robust surface reconstruction of plant leaves from 3D point clouds. Plant Phenomics. 2021. 10.34133/2021/3184185. DOI: 10.34133/2021/3184185
Nguyen TT, Slaughter DC, Max N, Maloof JN, Sinha N. Structured light-based 3D reconstruction system for plants. Sensors. 2015;15(8):18587–612. 10.3390/s150818587. DOI: 10.3390/s150818587
Paulus S, Schumann H, Kuhlmann H, Léon J. High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants. Biosyst Eng. 2014;121:1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.01.010
Dornbusch T, Michaud O, Xenarios I, Fankhauser C. Differentially phased leaf growth and movements in Arabidopsis depend on coordinated circadian and light regulation. Plant Cell. 2014;26(10):3911–21. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.129031
Dupuis J, Kuhlmann H. High-precision surface inspection: uncertainty evaluation within an accuracy range of 15 μ m with triangulation-based laser line scanners. J Appl Geod. 2014;8(2):109–18.
Paulus S, Dupuis J, Riedel S, Kuhlmann H. Automated analysis of barley organs using 3D laser scanning: an approach for high throughput phenotyping. Sensors. 2014;14(7):12670–86. 10.3390/s140712670. DOI: 10.3390/s140712670
Virlet N, Sabermanesh K, Sadeghi-Tehran P, Hawkesford MJ. Field Scanalyzer: an automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring. Funct Plant Biol. 2016;44(1):143–53. DOI: 10.1071/FP16163
Kjaer KH, Ottosen C-O. 3D laser triangulation for plant phenotyping in challenging environments. Sensors. 2015;15(6):13533–47. 10.3390/s150613533. DOI: 10.3390/s150613533
Teng X, Zhou G, Wu Y, Huang C, Dong W, Xu S. Three-dimensional reconstruction method of rapeseed plants in the whole growth period using RGB-D camera. Sensors. 2021;21(14):4628. DOI: 10.3390/s21144628
Chebrolu N, Magistri F, Läbe T, Stachniss C. Registration of spatio-temporal point clouds of plants for phenotyping. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(2):0247243. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247243
Paulus S, Dupuis J, Mahlein A-K, Kuhlmann H. Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14(1):238. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-238. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-238
Paulus S, Behmann J, Mahlein A-K, Plümer L, Kuhlmann H. Low-cost 3D systems: suitable tools for plant phenotyping. Sensors. 2014;14(2):3001–18. 10.3390/s140203001. DOI: 10.3390/s140203001
Oguchi T, Yuichi SH, Wasklewicz T. Data sources. Dev Earth Surf Process. 2011;15:189–224. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53446-0.00007-0
Chaivivatrakul S, Tang L, Dailey MN, Nakarmi AD. Automatic morphological trait characterization for corn plants via 3D holographic reconstruction. Comput Electron Agric. 2014;109:109–23. 10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.005. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.005
Baharav T, Bariya M, Zakhor A. In situ height and width estimation of sorghum plants from 2.5d infrared images. Electron Imaging. 2017;2017(17):122–35. 10.2352/ISSN.24701173.2017.17.COIMG-435. DOI: 10.2352/ISSN.24701173.2017.17.COIMG-435
Kazmi W, Foix S, Alenyà G, Andersen HJ. Indoor and outdoor depth imaging of leaves with time-of-flight and stereo vision sensors: analysis and comparison. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2014;88:128–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.11.012
Izadi S, Kim D, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Newcombe R, Kohli P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Freeman D, Davison A, et al. KinectFusion: Real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2011; 559–568.
Newcombe RA, Izadi S, Hilliges O, Molyneaux D, Kim D, Davison AJ, Kohi P, Shotton J, Hodges S, Fitzgibbon A. KinectFusion: real-time dense surface mapping and tracking. In: 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 2011; 127–136. IEEE.
Ma X, Zhu K, Guan H, Feng J, Yu S, Liu G. High-throughput phenotyping analysis of potted soybean plants using colorized depth images based on a proximal platform. Remote Sens. 2019;11(9):1085. DOI: 10.3390/rs11091085
Wang L, Zheng L, Wang M. 3D point cloud instance segmentation of lettuce based on PartNet. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2022; 1647–1655.
González-Barbosa J-J, Ramírez-Pedraza A, Ornelas-Rodríguez F-J, Cordova-Esparza D-M, González-Barbosa E-A. Dynamic measurement of portos tomato seedling growth using the kinect 2.0 Sensor. Agriculture. 2022;12(4):449. 10.3390/agriculture12040449. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture12040449
Zhang M, Xu S, Huang Y, Bie Z, Notaguchi M, Zhou J, Wan X, Wang Y, Dong W. Non-destructive measurement of the pumpkin rootstock root phenotype using AZURE KINECT. Plants. 2022;11(9):1144. 10.3390/plants11091144. DOI: 10.3390/plants11091144
Zhang K, Chen H, Wu H, Zhao X, Zhou C. Point cloud registration method for maize plants based on conical surface fitting-ICP. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–15. 10.1038/s41598-022-10921-6. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10921-6
Li Y, Fan X, Mitra NJ, Chamovitz D, Cohen-Or D, Chen B. Analyzing growing plants from 4D point cloud data. ACM Trans Gr. 2013;32(6):157. 10.1145/2508363.2508368. DOI: 10.1145/2508363.2508368
Zhang S. High-speed 3D shape measurement with structured light methods: a review. Opt Lasers Eng. 2018;106:119–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.02.017
Woodham RJ. Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images. Opt Eng. 1980;19(1): 191139. DOI: 10.1117/12.7972479
Horn BK. Shape from shading: a method for obtaining the shape of a smooth opaque object from one view; 1970.
Geng J. Structured-light 3D surface imaging: a tutorial. Adv Opt Photonics. 2011;3(2):128–60. DOI: 10.1364/AOP.3.000128
Basri R, Jacobs D, Kemelmacher I. Photometric stereo with general, unknown lighting. Int J Comput Vis. 2007;72(3):239–57. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-006-8815-7
Treuille A, Hertzmann A, Seitz SM. Example-based stereo with general BRDFs. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. 2004; 457–469. Springer.
Higo T, Matsushita Y, Joshi N, Ikeuchi K. A hand-held photometric stereo camera for 3-D modeling. In: 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009; 1234–1241. IEEE.
Dowd T, McInturf S, Li M, Topp CN. Rated-M for mesocosm: allowing the multimodal analysis of mature root systems in 3D. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021;5(2):249. DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20200278
Jones DH, Atkinson BS, Ware A, Sturrock CJ, Bishopp A, Wells DM. Preparation, scanning and analysis of duckweed using x-ray computed microtomography. Front Plant Sci. 2021;11:2140. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.617830
Phalempin M, Lippold E, Vetterlein D, Schlüter S. An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v. 2. Plant Methods. 2021;17(1):1–19. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-021-00735-4
Gerth S, Claußen J, Eggert A, Wörlein N, Waininger M, Wittenberg T, Uhlmann N. Semiautomated 3D root segmentation and evaluation based on X-Ray CT imagery. Plant Phenomics. 2021. 10.34133/2021/8747930. DOI: 10.34133/2021/8747930
Teramoto S, Tanabata T, Uga Y. RSAtrace3D: robust vectorization software for measuring monocot root system architecture. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03161-9
Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy SR, Sturrock C, Bennett M, Mooney SJ, Pridmore T. RooTrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-Ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(2):561–9. 10.1104/pp.111.186221. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.186221
Metzner R, Eggert A, van Dusschoten D, Pflugfelder D, Gerth S, Schurr U, Uhlmann N, Jahnke S. Direct comparison of MRI and X-ray CT technologies for 3D imaging of root systems in soil: potential and challenges for root trait quantification. Plant Methods. 2015;11(1):17. 10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z
Schulz H, Postma JA, van Dusschoten D, Scharr H, Behnke S. Plant root system analysis from MRI images. In: Computer vision, imaging and computer graphics. Theory and application. Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 2013; p. 411–25.
Flavel RJ, Guppy CN, Rabbi SMR, Young IM. An image processing and analysis tool for identifying and analysing complex plant root systems in 3D soil using non-destructive analysis: root1. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(5):1–18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176433. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176433
Herrero-Huerta M, Raumonen P, Gonzalez-Aguilera D. 4DRoot: root phenotyping software for temporal 3D scans by X-ray computed tomography; 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.986856.
Krzyzaniak Y, Cointault F, Loupiac C, Bernaud E, Ott F, Salon C, Laybros A, Han S, Héloir M-C, Adrian M, et al. In situ phenotyping of grapevine root system architecture by 2D or 3D imaging: advantages and limits of three cultivation methods. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: 638688. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.638688
Clark T, Burca G, Boardman R, Blumensath T. Correlative X-ray and neutron tomography of root systems using cadmium fiducial markers. J Microsc. 2020;277(3):170–8. DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12831
Moradi AB, Carminati A, Vetterlein D, Vontobel P, Lehmann E, Weller U, Hopmans JW, Vogel H-J, Oswald SE. Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of water content in the rhizosphere. New Phytol. 2011;192(3):653–63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03826.x
Menon M, Robinson B, Oswald SE, Kaestner A, Abbaspour KC, Lehmann E, Schulin R. Visualization of root growth in heterogeneously contaminated soil using neutron radiography. Eur J Soil Sci. 2007;58(3):802–10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00870.x
Matsushima U, Herppich W, Kardjilov N, Graf W, Hilger A, Manke I. Estimation of water flow velocity in small plants using cold neutron imaging with D2O tracer. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrom Detect Assoc Equip. 2009;605(1–2):146–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.187
Warren JM, Bilheux H, Kang M, Voisin S, Cheng C-L, Horita J, Perfect E. Neutron imaging reveals internal plant water dynamics. Plant Soil. 2013;366(1):683–93. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1579-7
Zarebanadkouki M, Kim YX, Carminati A. Where do roots take up water? Neutron radiography of water flow into the roots of transpiring plants growing in soil. New Phytol. 2013;199(4):1034–44. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12330
Tötzke C, Kardjilov N, Manke I, Oswald SE. Capturing 3D water flow in rooted soil by ultra-fast neutron tomography. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06046-w
Pound MP, French AP, Fozard JA, Murchie EH, Pridmore TP. A patch-based approach to 3D plant shoot phenotyping. Mach Vis Appl. 2016;27(5):767–79. DOI: 10.1007/s00138-016-0756-8
Pound MP, French AP, Murchie EH, Pridmore TP. Automated recovery of three-dimensional models of plant shoots from multiple color images. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(4):1688–98. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.248971
Biskup B, Scharr H, Schurr U, Rascher U. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30(10):1299–308. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01702.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01702.x
Burgess AJ, Retkute R, Pound MP, Mayes S, Murchie EH. Image-based 3D canopy reconstruction to determine potential productivity in complex multi-species crop systems. Ann Bot. 2017;119(4):517–32.
Jay S, Rabatel G, Hadoux X, Moura D, Gorretta N. In-field crop row phenotyping from 3D modeling performed using structure from motion. Comput Electron Agric. 2015;110:70–7. 10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.021. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.021
Apelt F, Breuer D, Nikoloski Z, Stitt M, Kragler F. Phytotyping4D: a light-field imaging system for non-invasive and accurate monitoring of spatio-temporal plant growth. Plant J. 2015;82(4):693–706. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12833
Gibbs JA, Pound M, French AP, Wells DM, Murchie E, Pridmore T. Plant phenotyping: an active vision cell for three-dimensional plant shoot reconstruction. Plant Physiol. 2018;178(2):524–34. DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.00664
Zermas D, Morellas V, Mulla D, Papanikolopoulos N. 3D model processing for high throughput phenotype extraction-the case of corn. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;172: 105047. 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105047. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105047
Santos TT, Koenigkan LV, Barbedo JGA, Rodrigues GC. 3D plant modeling: localization, mapping and segmentation for plant phenotyping using a single hand-held camera. In: Agapito L, Bronstein MM, Rother C, editors. Computer vision—ECCV 2014 workshops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 247–63. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16220-1_18
Zhou J, Fu X, Zhou S, Zhou J, Ye H, Nguyen HT. Automated segmentation of soybean plants from 3D point cloud using machine learning. Comput Electron Agric. 2019;162:143–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.014
Rose JC, Paulus S, Kuhlmann H. Accuracy analysis of a multi-view stereo approach for phenotyping of tomato plants at the organ level. Sensors. 2015;15(5):9651–65. 10.3390/s150509651. DOI: 10.3390/s150509651
Wolff K, Kim C, Zimmer H, Schroers C, Botsch M, Sorkine-Hornung O, Sorkine-Hornung A. Point Cloud Noise and Outlier Removal for Image-Based 3D Reconstruction. In: Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). 2016; 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DV.2016.20. IEEE.
Marr D, Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc Royal Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 1979;204(1156):301–28.
Xiong J, He Z, Lin R, Liu Z, Bu R, Yang Z, Peng H, Zou X. Visual positioning technology of picking robots for dynamic litchi clusters with disturbance. Comput Electron Agric. 2018;151:226–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.007
Xiong X, Yu L, Yang W, Liu M, Jiang N, Wu D, Chen G, Xiong L, Liu K, Liu Q. A high-throughput stereo-imaging system for quantifying rape leaf traits during the seedling stage. Plant Methods. 2017;13(1):1–17. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0157-7
Chen M, Tang Y, Zou X, Huang K, Huang Z, Zhou H, Wang C, Lian G. Three-dimensional perception of orchard banana central stock enhanced by adaptive multi-vision technology. Comput Electron Agric. 2020;174: 105508. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105508
Iglhaut J, Cabo C, Puliti S, Piermattei L, O’Connor J, Rosette J. Structure from motion photogrammetry in forestry: a Review. Curr For Rep. 2019;5(3):155–68.
Lou L, Liu Y, Sheng M, Han J, Doonan JH. A Cost-Effective Automatic 3D reconstruction pipeline for plants using multi-view images. In: Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. 2014; 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10401-0_20. Springer.
Tomasi C, Kanade T. Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method. Int J Comput Vis. 1992;9(2):137–54. 10.1007/BF00129684. DOI: 10.1007/BF00129684
Quan L, Tan P, Zeng G, Yuan L, Wang J, Kang SB. Image-based plant modeling. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers, 2006:599–604. https://doi.org/10.1145/1179352.1141929.
Liu S, Barrow CS, Hanlon M, Lynch JP, Bucksch A. DIRT/3D: 3D root phenotyping for field-grown maize (Zea mays). Plant Physiol. 2021;187(2):739–57. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab311
Baker S, Kanade T, et al. Shape-from-silhouette across time part I: theory and algorithms. Int J Comput Vis. 2005;62(3):221–47. DOI: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000011205.11775.fd
Seitz SM, Dyer CR. Photorealistic scene reconstruction by voxel coloring. Int J Comput Vis. 1999;35(2):151–73. 10.1023/A:1008176507526. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008176507526
Kutulakos KN, Seitz SM. A theory of shape by space carving. Int J Comput Vis. 2000;38(3):199–218. 10.1023/A:1008191222954. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008191222954
Choudhury SD, Maturu S, Samal A, Stoerger V, Awada T. Leveraging image analysis to compute 3D plant phenotypes based on voxel-grid plant reconstruction. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11: 521431. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.521431
Szeliski R. Computer: vision algorithms and applications. Seattle, Washington: Springer International Publishing; 2022. 10.1007/978-3-030-34372-9. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34372-9
Golbach F, Kootstra G, Damjanovic S, Otten G, van de Zedde R. Validation of plant part measurements using a 3D reconstruction method suitable for high-throughput seedling phenotyping. Mach Vis Appl. 2016;27(5):663–80. 10.1007/s00138-015-0727-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00138-015-0727-5
Koenderink N, Wigham M, Golbach F, Otten G, Gerlich R, van de Zedde H. MARVIN: high speed 3D imaging for seedling classification. In: Precision Agriculture’09: Papers Presented at the 7th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 6-8, 2009, 2009:279–286. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-664-9.
Klodt M, Cremers D. High-resolution plant shape measurements from multi-view stereo reconstruction. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, 2014;pp. 174–184. Springer.
Scharr H, Briese C, Embgenbroich P, Fischbach A, Fiorani F, Müller-Linow M. Fast high resolution volume carving for 3D plant shoot reconstruction. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1680. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01680
Gaillard M, Miao C, Schnable JC, Benes B. Voxel carving-based 3D reconstruction of sorghum identifies genetic determinants of light interception efficiency. Plant Direct. 2020;4(10):00255. 10.1002/pld3.255. DOI: 10.1002/pld3.255
Polder G, Hofstee JW. Phenotyping large tomato plants in the greenhouse using a 3D light-field camera. In: 2014 Montreal, Quebec Canada July 13–July 16, 2014, p. 1 (2014). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Ivanov N, Boissard P, Chapron M, Andrieu B. Computer stereo plotting for 3-D reconstruction of a maize canopy. Agric For Meteorol. 1995;75(1–3):85–102. 10.1016/0168-1923(94)02204-W. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(94)02204-W
Müller-Linow M, Pinto-Espinosa F, Scharr H, Rascher U. The leaf angle distribution of natural plant populations: assessing the canopy with a novel software tool. Plant Methods. 2015;11(1):11. 10.1186/s13007-015-0052-z. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-015-0052-z
Xia C, Wang L, Chung B-K, Lee J-M. In situ 3D segmentation of individual plant leaves using a RGB-D camera for agricultural automation. Sensors. 2015;15(8):20463–79. 10.3390/s150820463. DOI: 10.3390/s150820463
Chéné Y, Rousseau D, Lucidarme P, Bertheloot J, Caffier V, Morel P, Belin É, Chapeau-Blondeau F. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Comput Electron Agric. 2012;82:122–7. 10.1016/j.compag.2011.12.007. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2011.12.007
Li D, Cao Y, Shi G, Cai X, Chen Y, Wang S, Yan S. An overlapping-free leaf segmentation method for plant point clouds. IEEE Access. 2019;7:129054–70. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940385
Besl PJ, McKay ND. Method for registration of 3-D shapes. In: Sensor Fusion IV: Control Paradigms and Data Structures, 1992;1611:586–607. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.57955. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Javaheri A, Brites C, Pereira F, Ascenso J. Subjective and objective quality evaluation of 3D point cloud denoising algorithms. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2017:1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEW.2017.8026263. IEEE.
Rakotosaona M-J, La Barbera V, Guerrero P, Mitra NJ, Ovsjanikov M. POINTCLEANNET: learning to denoise and remove outliers from dense point clouds. Comput Gr Forum. 2020;39:185–203. 10.1111/cgf.13753. DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13753
Xie Y, Tian J, Zhu XX. Linking points with labels in 3D: a review of point cloud semantic segmentation. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag. 2020;8(4):38–59. DOI: 10.1109/MGRS.2019.2937630
Haque SM, Govindu VM. Robust feature-preserving denoising of 3D point clouds. In: 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), 2016:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DV.2016.17. IEEE.
Thapa S, Zhu F, Walia H, Yu H, Ge Y. A novel LiDAR-based instrument for high-throughput, 3D measurement of morphological traits in maize and sorghum. Sensors. 2018;18(4):1187. DOI: 10.3390/s18041187
Baumgart BG. Geometric modeling for computer vision. PhD thesis; 1974.
Culbertson WB, Malzbender T, Slabaugh G. Generalized voxel coloring. In: Triggs B, Zisserman A, Szeliski R, editors. Vision algorithms theory and practice. Berlin: Springer; 1999. p. 100–15.
Dyer CR, Davis LS. Volumetric scene reconstruction from multiple views. Boston, MA: Springer; 2001. p. 469–89. 10.1007/978-1-4615-1529-6-16. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1529-6-16
Kumar P, Connor J, Mikiavcic S. High-throughput 3D reconstruction of plant shoots for phenotyping. In: 2014 13th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV), 2014:211–216.https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARCV.2014.7064306. IEEE.
Phattaralerphong J, Sinoquet H. A method for 3D reconstruction of tree crown volume from photographs: assessment with 3D-digitized plants. Tree Physiol. 2005;25(10):1229–42. 10.1093/treephys/25.10.1229. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.10.1229
Kumar P, Cai J, Miklavcic S. 3D reconstruction, modelling and analysis of in situ root system architecture. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013), 2013:517–523.
Han X-F, Jin JS, Wang M-J, Jiang W, Gao L, Xiao L. A review of algorithms for filtering the 3D point cloud. Signal Process Image Commun. 2017;57:103–12. 10.1016/j.image.2017.05.009. DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2017.05.009
Ma Z, Sun D, Xu H, Zhu Y, He Y, Cen H. Optimization of 3d point clouds of oilseed rape plants based on time-of-flight cameras. Sensors. 2021;21(2):664. DOI: 10.3390/s21020664
Fang W, Feng H, Yang W, Duan L, Chen G, Xiong L, Liu Q. High-throughput volumetric reconstruction for 3D wheat plant architecture studies. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2016;9(05):1650037. DOI: 10.1142/S1793545816500371
Butkiewicz T. Low-cost coastal mapping using Kinect v2 time-of-flight cameras. In: 2014 Oceans-St. John’s, 2014:1–9. IEEE.
Fischler MA, Bolles RC. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM. 1981;24(6):381–95. 10.1145/358669.358692. DOI: 10.1145/358669.358692
Garrido M, Paraforos DS, Reiser D, Vázquez Arellano M, Griepentrog HW, Valero C. 3D maize plant reconstruction based on georeferenced overlapping LiDAR point clouds. Remote Sens. 2015;7(12):17077–96. 10.3390/rs71215870. DOI: 10.3390/rs71215870
Liu F, Song Q, Zhao J, Mao L, Bu H, Hu Y, Zhu X-G. Canopy occupation volume as an indicator of canopy photosynthetic capacity. New Phytol. 2021;232:941. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17611
Lancaster P, Salkauskas K. Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math Comput. 1981;37(155):141–58. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1981-0616367-1. DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1981-0616367-1
Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X, et al. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: KDD, 1996;96:226–231.
Wu S, Wen W, Wang Y, Fan J, Wang C, Gou W, Guo X. MVS-Pheno: a portable and low-cost phenotyping platform for maize shoots using multiview stereo 3D reconstruction. Plant Phenomics. 2020. 10.34133/2020/1848437. DOI: 10.34133/2020/1848437
Hu F, Zhao Y, Wang W, Huang X. Discrete point cloud filtering and searching based on VGSO algorithm. In: Proceedings 27th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation. 2013; 850–856.
Straub J, Reiser D, Griepentrog HW. Approach for modeling single branches of meadow orchard trees with 3D point clouds. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2021. DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-916-9_88
Cook RL. Stochastic sampling in computer graphics. ACM Trans Gr (TOG). 1986;5(1):51–72. 10.1145/7529.8927. DOI: 10.1145/7529.8927
Rosli NAIM, Ramli A. Mapping bootstrap error for bilateral smoothing on point set. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014;1605:149–154. American Institute of Physics.
Lindner M, Schiller I, Kolb A, Koch R. Time-of-flight sensor calibration for accurate range sensing. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2010;114(12):1318–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2009.11.002
Hussmann S, Knoll F, Edeler T. Modulation method including noise model for minimizing the wiggling error of tof cameras. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2013;63(5):1127–36. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2013.2286932
Lefloch D, Nair R, Lenzen F, Schäfer H, Streeter L, Cree MJ, Koch R, Kolb A. Technical foundation and calibration methods for time-of-flight cameras. In: Grzegorzek M, Theobalt C, Koch R, Kolb A, editors. Time-of-flight and depth imaging. Sensors, algorithms, and applications. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 3–24. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-44964-2_1
He Y, Chen S. Error correction of depth images for multiview time-of-flight vision sensors. Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2020;17(4):1729881420942379. DOI: 10.1177/1729881420942379
Tomasi C, Manduchi R. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In: Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No. 98CH36271), 1998:839–846. IEEE.
Hua K-L, Lo K-H, Wang Y-CFF. Extended guided filtering for depth map upsampling. IEEE MultiMedia. 2015;23(2):72–83. DOI: 10.1109/MMUL.2015.52
Wang L, Fei M, Wang H, Ji Z, Yang A. Distance overestimation error correction method (DOEC) of time of flight camera based on pinhole model. In: Intelligent Computing and Internet of Things, pp. 281–290. Springer; 2018.
Rabbani T, Dijkman S, van den Heuvel F, Vosselman G. An integrated approach for modelling and global registration of point clouds. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2007;61(6):355–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.09.006
Chui H, Rangarajan A. A feature registration framework using mixture models. In: Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. MMBIA-2000 (Cat. No. PR00737), 2000:190–197. IEEE.
Tsin Y, Kanade T. A correlation-based approach to robust point set registration. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, 2004:558–569. Springer.
Zhang J, Huan Z, Xiong W. An adaptive gaussian mixture model for non-rigid image registration. J Math Imaging Vis. 2012;44(3):282–94. DOI: 10.1007/s10851-012-0326-2
Somayajula S, Joshi AA, Leahy RM. Non-rigid Image Registration Using Gaussian Mixture Models. In: International Workshop on Biomedical Image Registration, 2012:286–295. Springer.
Chaudhury A, Barron JL. 3D Phenotyping of Plants. In: 3D Imaging, Analysis and Applications. Berlin: Springer; 2020. p. 699–732.
Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling. 2001; 145–152. IEEE.
Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1987;5:698–700. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767965
Henry P, Krainin M, Herbst E, Ren X, Fox D. RGB-D mapping: using Kinect-style depth cameras for dense 3D modeling of indoor environments. Int J Robot Res. 2012;31(5):647–63. DOI: 10.1177/0278364911434148
Huang X, Hu M. 3D reconstruction based on model registration using RANSAC-ICP algorithm. In: Pan Z, Cheok AD, Mueller W, Zhang M, editors. Transactions on edutainment XI. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 46–51. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48247-6_4
Wang Y, Chen Y. Non-destructive measurement of three-dimensional plants based on point cloud. Plants. 2020;9(5):571. DOI: 10.3390/plants9050571
Chaudhury A, Ward C, Talasaz A, Ivanov AG, Brophy M, Grodzinski B, Hüner NP, Patel RV, Barron JL. Machine vision system for 3D plant phenotyping. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018;16(6):2009–22. DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2824814
Jian B, Vemuri BC. Robust point set registration using gaussian mixture models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2010;33(8):1633–45. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.223
Jian B, Vemuri BC. A robust algorithm for point set registration using mixture of Gaussians. In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05) Volume 1, 2005; 2: 1246–1251. IEEE.
Myronenko A, Song X. Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2010;32(12):2262–75. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.46
Schunck D, Magistri F, Rosu RA, Cornelißen A, Chebrolu N, Paulus S, Léon J, Behnke S, Stachniss C, Kuhlmann H, et al. Pheno4d: a spatio-temporal dataset of maize and tomato plant point clouds for phenotyping and advanced plant analysis. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(8):0256340. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256340
Magistri F, Chebrolu N, Stachniss C. Segmentation-based 4D registration of plants point clouds for phenotyping. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2020:2433–2439. IEEE.
Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. SIGGRAPH ’87, 1987;21:163–169. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/37401.37422
Edelsbrunner H, Mücke EP. Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Trans Gr. 1994;13(1):43–72. 10.1145/174462.156635. DOI: 10.1145/174462.156635
Paproki A, Sirault X, Berry S, Furbank R, Fripp J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12(1):63. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-63. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-63
Meagher DJR. Octree encoding: a new technique for the representation, manipulation and display of arbitrary 3-D objects by computer. Technical Report IPL-TR-80-111, Image Processing Laboratory, Electrical and Systems Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; 1980.
Bucksch A, Lindenbergh R. CAMPINO—A skeletonization method for point cloud processing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2008;63(1):115–27. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.10.004. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.10.004
Bucksch A, Lindenbergh R, Menenti M. SkelTre - fast skeletonisation for imperfect point cloud data of botanic trees. Vis Comput. 2010;26(10):1283–300. DOI: 10.1007/s00371-010-0520-4
Duan T, Chapman SC, Holland E, Rebetzke GJ, Guo Y, Zheng B. Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(15):4523–34. 10.1093/jxb/erw227. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw227
Zhu R, Sun K, Yan Z, Yan X, Yu J, Shi J, Hu Z, Jiang H, Xin D, Zhang Z, et al. Analysing the phenotype development of soybean plants using low-cost 3D reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–17.
Dijkstra EW. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik. 1959;1(1):269–71. 10.1007/BF01386390. DOI: 10.1007/BF01386390
Prim RC. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell Syst Tech J. 1957;36(6):1389–401. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1957.tb01515.x. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1957.tb01515.x
Shi J, Malik J. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000;22(8):888–905. 10.1109/34.868688. DOI: 10.1109/34.868688
Hétroy-Wheeler F, Casella E, Boltcheva D. Segmentation of tree seedling point clouds into elementary units. Int J Remote Sens. 2016;37(13):2881–907. 10.1080/01431161.2016.1190988. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2016.1190988
Bucksch A. A practical introduction to skeletons for the plant sciences. Appl Plant Sci. 2014;2(8):1400005. 10.3732/apps.1400005. DOI: 10.3732/apps.1400005
Cornea ND, Silver D, Min P. Curve-skeleton properties, applications, and algorithms. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr. 2007;13(3):530–48. 10.1109/TVCG.2007.1002. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2007.1002
Livny Y, Yan F, Olson M, Chen B, Zhang H, El-Sana J. Automatic reconstruction of tree skeletal structures from point clouds. ACM Trans Gr. 2010;29(6):151. 10.1145/1882261.1866177. DOI: 10.1145/1882261.1866177
Mei J, Zhang L, Wu S, Wang Z, Zhang L. 3D tree modeling from incomplete point clouds via optimization and L1-MST. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2017;31(5):999–1021. 10.1080/13658816.2016.1264075. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1264075
Bucksch A, Fleck S. Automated detection of branch dimensions in woody skeletons of fruit tree canopies. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 2011;77(3):229–40. 10.14358/PERS.77.3.229. DOI: 10.14358/PERS.77.3.229
Côté J-F, Widlowski J-L, Fournier RA, Verstraete MM. The structural and radiative consistency of three-dimensional tree reconstructions from terrestrial lidar. Remote Sens Environ. 2009;113(5):1067–81. 10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.017
Verroust A, Lazarus F. Extracting skeletal curves from 3D scattered data. In: Proceedings Shape Modeling International’99. International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, 1999:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMA.1999.749340. IEEE.
Delagrange S, Jauvin C, Rochon P. PypeTree: a tool for reconstructing tree perennial tissues from point clouds. Sensors. 2014;14(3):4271–89. 10.3390/s140304271. DOI: 10.3390/s140304271
Ziamtsov I, Navlakha S. Machine learning approaches to improve three basic plant phenotyping tasks using three-dimensional point clouds. Plant Physiol. 2019;181(4):1425–40. DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00524
Cao J, Tagliasacchi A, Olson M, Zhang H, Su Z. Point cloud skeletons via laplacian based contraction. In: 2010 Shape Modeling International Conference, 2010:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMI.2010.25. IEEE.
Chaudhury A, Godin C. Skeletonization of plant point cloud data using stochastic optimization framework. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:773. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00773
Wu S, Wen W, Xiao B, Guo X, Du J, Wang C, Wang Y. An accurate skeleton extraction approach from 3D point clouds of maize plants. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:248. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00248
Clark RT, MacCurdy RB, Jung JK, Shaff JE, McCouch SR, Aneshansley DJ, Kochian LV. Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant physiol. 2011;156(2):455–65. DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.169102
Kaur D, Kaur Y. Various image segmentation techniques: a review. Int J Comput Sci Mob Comput. 2014;3(5):809–14.
Castillo E, Liang J, Zhao H. Point cloud segmentation and denoising via constrained nonlinear least squares normal estimates. In: Breub M, Bruckstein A, Maragos P, editors. Innovations for shape analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 283–99. 10.1007/978-3-642-34141-0_13. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34141-0_13
Kulwa F, Li C, Zhao X, Cai B, Xu N, Qi S, Chen S, Teng Y. A state-of-the-art survey for microorganism image segmentation methods and future potential. IEEE Access. 2019;7:100243–69. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930111
Ge Y, Bai G, Stoerger V, Schnable JC. Temporal dynamics of maize plant growth, water use, and leaf water content using automated high throughput RGB and hyperspectral imaging. Comput Electron Agric. 2016;127:625–32. 10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.028. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.028
Das Choudhury S, Bashyam S, Qiu Y, Samal A, Awada T. Holistic and component plant phenotyping using temporal image sequence. Plant Methods. 2018;14(1):1–21. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0303-x
Minervini M, Abdelsamea MM, Tsaftaris SA. Image-based plant phenotyping with incremental learning and active contours. Ecol Inform. 2014;23:35–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.07.004
Bosilj P, Duckett T, Cielniak G. Connected attribute morphology for unified vegetation segmentation and classification in precision agriculture. Comput Ind. 2018;98:226–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2018.02.003
Uchiyama H, Sakurai S, Mishima M, Arita D, Okayasu T, Shimada A, Taniguchi R-I. Easy-to-setup 3D phenotyping platform for KOMATSUNA dataset. In: The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops, 2017:2038–2045. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.239. IEEE.
Minervini M, Fischbach A, Scharr H, Tsaftaris SA. Finely-grained annotated datasets for image-based plant phenotyping. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2016;81:80–9. 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.10.013. DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.10.013
Rabbani T, Van Den Heuvel F, Vosselmann G. Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci. 2006;36(5):248–53.
Grilli E, Menna F, Remondino F. A review of point clouds segmentation and classification algorithms. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci. 2017;42:339. 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-339-2017. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-339-2017
Lomte S, Janwale A. Plant leaves image segmentation techniques: a review. Artic Int J Comput Sci Eng. 2017;5:147–50.
Bell J, Dee HM. Leaf segmentation through the classification of edges. arXiv Preprint. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.03124.
Thendral R, Suhasini A, Senthil N. A comparative analysis of edge and color based segmentation for orange fruit recognition. In: 2014 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, 2014:463–466. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2014.6949884. IEEE.
Noble SD, Brown RB. Selection and testing of spectral bands for edge-based leaf segmentation. In: 2006 ASAE Annual Meeting, 2006:1. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Miao T, Wen W, Li Y, Wu S, Zhu C, Guo X. Label3DMaize: toolkit for 3D point cloud data annotation of maize shoots. GigaScience. 2021;10(5):031. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab031
Jin S, Su Y, Wu F, Pang S, Gao S, Hu T, Liu J, Guo Q. Stem-leaf segmentation and phenotypic trait extraction of individual maize using terrestrial LiDAR data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2018;57(3):1336–46. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2866056
Huang X, Zheng S, Gui L. Automatic measurement of morphological traits of typical leaf samples. Sensors. 2021;21(6):2247. DOI: 10.3390/s21062247
Attene M, Falcidieno B, Spagnuolo M. Hierarchical mesh segmentation based on fitting primitives. Vis Comput. 2006;22(3):181–93. 10.1007/s00371-006-0375-x. DOI: 10.1007/s00371-006-0375-x
Shamir A. A survey on mesh segmentation techniques. Comput Gra Forum. 2008;27(6):1539–56. 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01103.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01103.x
Vieira M, Shimada K. Surface mesh segmentation and smooth surface extraction through region growing. Comput Aided Geom Des. 2005;22(8):771–92. 10.1016/j.cagd.2005.03.006. DOI: 10.1016/j.cagd.2005.03.006
Nguyen CV, Fripp J, Lovell DR, Furbank R, Kuffner P, Daily H, Sirault X. 3D scanning system for automatic high-resolution plant phenotyping. In: 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2016.7796984. IEEE.
Bali A, Singh SN. A review on the strategies and techniques of image segmentation. In: 2015 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, 2015:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCT.2015.63. IEEE.
Narkhede H. Review of image segmentation techniques. Int J Sci Mod Eng. 2013;1(8):54–61.
Miao T, Zhu C, Xu T, Yang T, Li N, Zhou Y, Deng H. Automatic stem-leaf segmentation of maize shoots using three-dimensional point cloud. Comput Electron Agric. 2021;187: 106310. 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106310. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106310
Fukunaga K, Hostetler L. The estimation of the gradient of a density function, with applications in pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 1975;21(1):32–40. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1975.1055330
Cheng Y. Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1995;17(8):790–9. DOI: 10.1109/34.400568
Comaniciu D, Meer P. Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2002;24(5):603–19. DOI: 10.1109/34.1000236
Zhou H, Yuan Y, Shi C. Object tracking using SIFT features and mean shift. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2009;113(3):345–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2008.08.006
Donath WE, Hoffman AJ. Lower bounds for the partitioning of graphs. In: Selected Papers Of Alan J Hoffman: With Commentary. 2003; 437–442. World Scientific, ???. 10.1142/9789812796936_0044.
von Luxburg U. A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat Comput. 2007;17(4):395–416. 10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z. DOI: 10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z
Boltcheva D, Casella E, Cumont R, Hétroy F. A spectral clustering approach of vegetation components for describing plant topology and geometry from terrestrial waveform LiDAR data. In: Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Godin C, Lintunen A, Nygren P, editors. 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM2013). Finland: Saariselkä; 2013.
Liu R, Zhang H. Segmentation of 3D meshes through spectral clustering. In: 12th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2004. PG 2004. Proceedings, 2004. PG 2004. proceedings., 2004:298–305. 10.1109/PCCGA.2004.1348360. IEEE.
Dey D, Mummert L, Sukthankar R. Classification of plant structures from uncalibrated image sequences. In: 2012 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2012:329–336. 10.1109/WACV.2012.6163017. IEEE.
Snavely N, Seitz SM, Szeliski R. Photo tourism: exploring photo collections in 3D. ACM Trans Gr (TOG). 2006;25:835–46. DOI: 10.1145/1141911.1141964
Moriondo M, Leolini L, Staglianò N, Argenti G, Trombi G, Brilli L, Dibari C, Leolini C, Bindi M. Use of digital images to disclose canopy architecture in olive tree. Scientia Horticulturae. 2016;209:1–13. 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.05.021. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.05.021
Rusu RB, Blodow N, Marton ZC, Beetz M. Aligning point cloud views using persistent feature histograms. In: 2008 IEEE/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008:3384–3391. 10.1109/IROS.2008.4650967. IEEE.
Rusu RB, Blodow N, Beetz M. Fast point feature histograms (FPFH) for 3D registration. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2009; 3212–3217. 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152473. IEEE.
Wahabzada M, Paulus S, Kersting K, Mahlein A-K. Automated interpretation of 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant organ segmentation. BMC Bioinform. 2015;16(1):248. 10.1186/s12859-015-0665-2. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0665-2
Sodhi P, Vijayarangan S, Wettergreen D. In-field segmentation and identification of plant structures using 3D imaging. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2017; 5180–5187.
Krähenbühl P, Koltun V. Efficient inference in fully connected CRFs with Gaussian edge potentials. In: Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Bartlett PL, Pereira F, Weinberger KQ, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 24. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc; 2011. p. 109–17.
Zhu F, Thapa S, Gao T, Ge Y, Walia H, Yu H. 3D reconstruction of plant leaves for high-throughput phenotyping. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). 2018; 4285–4293. 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622428. IEEE.
Plass M, Stone M. Curve-fitting with piecewise parametric cubics. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 2018; 229–239.
Pratt V. Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Gr. 1987;21(4):145–52. DOI: 10.1145/37402.37420
Fleishman S, Cohen-Or D, Silva CT. Robust moving least-squares fitting with sharp features. ACM Trans Gr (TOG). 2005;24(3):544–52. DOI: 10.1145/1073204.1073227
Cohen-Steiner D, Da F. A greedy Delaunay-based surface reconstruction algorithm. Vis Comput. 2004;20(1):4–16. DOI: 10.1007/s00371-003-0217-z
Da TKF, Cohen-Steiner D. Advancing front surface reconstruction. CGAL User and Reference Manual; CGAL, 2020;5. https://doc.cgal.org/latest/Advancing_front_surface:reconstruction/index.html.
Field DA. Laplacian smoothing and Delaunay triangulations. Commun Appl Numer Methods. 1988;4(6):709–12. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1630040603
Tiller W. Rational B-splines for curve and surface representation. IEEE Comput Gr Appl. 1983;3(6):61–9. 10.1109/MCG.1983.263244. DOI: 10.1109/MCG.1983.263244
Wang W, Pottmann H, Liu Y. Fitting B-spline curves to point clouds by curvature-based squared distance minimization. ACM Trans Gr. 2006;25(2):214–38. 10.1145/1138450.1138453. DOI: 10.1145/1138450.1138453
Santos T, Ueda J. Automatic 3D plant reconstruction from photographies, segmentation and classification of leaves and internodes using clustering. In: Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Godin C, Lintunen A, Nygren P, editors. 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM2013). Saariselkä: Finland; 2013. p. 95–7.
Gélard W, Burger P, Casadebaig P, Langlade N, Debaeke P, Devy M, Herbulot A. 3D plant phenotyping in sunflower using architecture-based organ segmentation from 3d point clouds. In: 5th International Workshop on Image Analysis Methods for the Plant Sciences, Angers, France; 2016.
Gélard W, Devy M, Herbulot A, Burger P. Model-based segmentation of 3D point clouds for phenotyping sunflower plants. In: 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISAPP 2017), vol. 4. Porto, Portugal, 2017:459–467. 10.5220/0006126404590467.
Pfeifer N, Gorte B, Winterhalder D, et al. Automatic reconstruction of single trees from terrestrial laser scanner data. In: Proceedings of 20th ISPRS Congress, vol. XXXV, 2004:114–119. Istanbul, Turkey.
Ziamtsov I, Navlakha S. Plant 3D (P3D): a plant phenotyping toolkit for 3D point clouds. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(12):3949–50. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa220
Mathan J, Bhattacharya J, Ranjan A. Enhancing crop yield by optimizing plant developmental features. Development. 2016;143(18):3283–94. DOI: 10.1242/dev.134072
Sievänen R, Godin C, DeJong TM, Nikinmaa E. Functional-structural plant models: a growing paradigm for plant studies. Ann Bot. 2014;114(4):599–603. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcu175
Topp CN, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Anderson JT, Lee C-R, Zurek PR, Symonova O, Zheng Y, Bucksch A, Mileyko Y, Galkovskyi T, Moore BT, Harer J, Edelsbrunner H, Mitchell-Olds T, Weitz JS, Benfey PN. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(18):1695–704. 10.1073/pnas.1304354110. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304354110
Zhang C, Chen T. Efficient feature extraction for 2D/3D objects in mesh representation. In: Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205), 2001;3:935–938. 10.1109/ICIP.2001.958278. IEEE.
Balfer J, Schöler F, Steinhage V. Semantic skeletonization for structural plant analysis. In: Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Godin C, Lintunen A, Nygren P, editors. 7th International Conference on Functional-Structural Plant Models (FSPM2013). Saariselkä: Finland; 2013. p. 42–4.
Sodhi P. In-field plant phenotyping using model-free and model-based methods. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA; 2017.
Anderson MC, Denmead O. Short wave radiation on inclined surfaces in model plant communities 1. Agron J. 1969;61(6):867–72. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100060012x
Duncan W, Loomis R, Williams W, Hanau R, et al. A model for simulating photosynthesis in plant communities. Hilgardia. 1967;38(4):181–205. DOI: 10.3733/hilg.v38n04p181
Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ. Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies: Lidar, an emerging remote sensing technology that directly measures the three-dimensional distribution of plant canopies, can accurately estimate vegetation structural attributes and should be of particular interest to forest, landscape, and global ecologists. Bioscience. 2002;52(1):19–30. 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO;2. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO;2
Omasa K, Hosoi F, Konishi A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(4):881–98. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl142
Hosoi F, Omasa K. Estimation of vertical plant area density profiles in a rice canopy at different growth stages by high-resolution portable scanning lidar with a lightweight mirror. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2012;74:11–9. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.08.001. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.08.001
Hosoi F, Omasa K. Voxel-Based 3-D modeling of individual trees for estimating leaf area density using high-resolution portable scanning lidar. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2006;44(12):3610–8. 10.1109/TGRS.2006.881743. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.881743
Cabrera-Bosquet L, Fournier C, Brichet N, Welcker C, Suard B, Tardieu F. High-throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation-use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform. New Phytol. 2016;212(1):269–81. 10.1111/nph.14027. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14027
Pound MP, Atkinson JA, Wells DM, Pridmore TP, French AP. Deep learning for multi-task plant phenotyping. In: The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops, 2017:2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW.2017.241. IEEE.
van Dijk ADJ, Kootstra G, Kruijer W, de Ridder D. 2020 Machine learning in plant science and plant breeding. Iscience. 2020;24: 101890. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101890
Singh A, Ganapathysubramanian B, Singh AK, Sarkar S. Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21(2):110–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015
Jiang Y, Li C. Convolutional neural networks for image-based high-throughput plant phenotyping: a review. Plant Phenomics. 2020. 10.34133/2020/4152816. DOI: 10.34133/2020/4152816
Seo H, Badiei Khuzani M, Vasudevan V, Huang C, Ren H, Xiao R, Jia X, Xing L. Machine learning techniques for biomedical image segmentation: An overview of technical aspects and introduction to state-of-art applications. Med Phys. 2020;47(5):148–67. 10.1002/mp.13649. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13649
Connor M, Kumar P. Fast construction of k-nearest neighbor graphs for point clouds. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr. 2010;16(4):599–608. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.9
Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Dutagaci H, Rasti P, Galopin G, Rousseau D. ROSE-X: an annotated data set for evaluation of 3D plant organ segmentation methods. Plant Methods. 2020;16(1):1–14. 10.1186/s13007-020-00573-w. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-020-00573-w
Kohonen T. The self-organizing map. Proc IEEE. 1990;78(9):1464–80. 10.1109/5.58325. DOI: 10.1109/5.58325
Rabiner LR. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE. 1989;77(2):257–86. 10.1109/5.18626. DOI: 10.1109/5.18626
Garcia-Garcia A, Orts-Escolano S, Oprea S, Villena-Martinez V, Garcia-Rodriguez J. A review on deep learning techniques applied to semantic segmentation. arXiv Preprint. 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.06857.
Garcia-Garcia A, Orts-Escolano S, Oprea S, Villena-Martinez V, Martinez-Gonzalez P, Garcia-Rodriguez J. A survey on deep learning techniques for image and video semantic segmentation. Appl Soft Comput. 2018;70:41–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.018
Lateef F, Ruichek Y. Survey on semantic segmentation using deep learning techniques. Neurocomputing. 2019;338:321–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.003
Lawin FJ, Danelljan M, Tosteberg P, Bhat G, Khan FS, Felsberg M. Deep projective 3D semantic segmentation. In: International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, 2017:95–107. Springer.
Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully connected CRFs. arXiv Preprint. 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.7062.
Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. Deeplab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017;40(4):834–48. 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184
Bhagat S, Kokare M, Haswani V, Hambarde P, Kamble R. Eff-UNet++: a novel architecture for plant leaf segmentation and counting. Ecol Inform. 2022. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101583. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101583
Carneiro GA, Magalhães R, Neto A, Sousa JJ, Cunha A. Grapevine segmentation in rgb images using deep learning. Proc Comput Sci. 2022;196:101–6. 10.1016/j.procs.2021.11.078. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.11.078
Wu W, Qi Z, Fuxin L. PointConv: deep convolutional networks on 3D point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019:9621–9630. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00985
Li D, Shi G, Li J, Chen Y, Zhang S, Xiang S, Jin S. PlantNet: a dual-function point cloud segmentation network for multiple plant species. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2022;184:243–63. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.01.007. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.01.007
Murtiyoso A, Pellis E, Grussenmeyer P, Landes T, Masiero A. Towards semantic photogrammetry: generating semantically rich point clouds from architectural close-range photogrammetry. Sensors. 2022;22(3):966. 10.3390/s22030966. DOI: 10.3390/s22030966
Jhaldiyal A, Chaudhary N. Semantic segmentation of 3D LiDAR data using deep learning: a review of projection-based methods. Appl Intell. 2022. 10.1007/s10489-022-03930-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03930-5
Li S, Chen X, Liu Y, Dai D, Stachniss C, Gall J. Multi-scale interaction for real-time LiDAR data segmentation on an embedded platform. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2021;7(2):738–45. 10.1109/LRA.2021.3132059. DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3132059
Ahn P, Yang J, Yi E, Lee C, Kim J. Projection-based point convolution for efficient point cloud segmentation. IEEE Access. 2022;10:15348–58. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144449. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144449
Iandola FN, Han S, Moskewicz MW, Ashraf K, Dally WJ, Keutzer K. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50X fewer parameters and < 0.5MB model size. arXiv Preprint. 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.07360.
Su H, Maji S, Kalogerakis E, Learned-Miller E. Multi-view convolutional neural networks for 3D shape recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015; 945–953.
Boulch A, Guerry J, Le Saux B, Audebert N. SnapNet: 3D point cloud semantic labeling with 2D deep segmentation networks. Comput Gr. 2018;71:189–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2017.11.010
Jin S, Su Y, Gao S, Wu F, Hu T, Liu J, Li W, Wang D, Chen S, Jiang Y, et al. Deep learning: individual maize segmentation from terrestrial lidar data using faster r-cnn and regional growth algorithms. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:866. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00866. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00866
Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv Preprint. 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556.
Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2015; 3431–3440.
He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, Girshick R. Mask R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2017; 2961–2969.
Maturana D, Scherer S. VoxNet: a 3D convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2015; 922–928. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353481. IEEE.
Riegler G, Osman Ulusoy A, Geiger A. OctNet: learning deep 3D representations at high resolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2017; 3577–3586. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.05009.
Tchapmi L, Choy C, Armeni I, Gwak J, Savarese S. SEGCloud: semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds. In: 2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). 2017; 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DV.2017.00067. IEEE.
Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp SS, Brox T, Ronneberger O. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2016; 424–432. Springer.
Su H, Jampani V, Sun D, Maji S, Kalogerakis E, Yang M-H, Kautz J. SPLATNet: sparse lattice networks for point cloud processing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018; 530–2539. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.08275.
Rosu RA, Schütt P, Quenzel J, Behnke S. LatticeNet: fast point cloud segmentation using permutohedral lattices. arXiv Preprint. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.05905.
Choy C, Gwak J, Savarese S. 4D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: minkowski sonvolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019; 3075–3084. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00319.
Rosu RA, Schütt P, Quenzel J, Behnke S. LatticeNet: fast spatio-temporal point cloud segmentation using permutohedral lattices. Auton Robots. 2021;46:1–16.
Wang Y, Sun Y, Liu Z, Sarma SE, Bronstein MM, Solomon JM. Dynamic graph CNN for learning on point clouds. ACM Trans Gr (tog). 2019;38(5):1–12. 10.1145/3326362. DOI: 10.1145/3326362
Turgut K, Dutagaci H, Galopin G, Rousseau D. Segmentation of structural parts of rosebush plants with 3D point-based deep learning methods. arXiv Preprint. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.11489.
Qi CR, Su H, Mo K, Guibas LJ. PointNet: deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017:652–660. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.16.
Li Y, Wen W, Miao T, Wu S, Yu Z, Wang X, Guo X, Zhao C. Automatic organ-level point cloud segmentation of maize shoots by integrating high-throughput data acquisition and deep learning. Comput Electron Agric. 2022;193: 106702. 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106702. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106702
Qi CR, Yi L, Su H, Guibas LJ. PointNet++: deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. arXiv preprint. 2017. arXiv:1706.02413.
Heiwolt K, Duckett T, Cielniak G. Deep semantic segmentation of 3D plant point clouds. In: Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, 2021:36–45. Springer.
Jiang M, Wu Y, Zhao T, Zhao Z, Lu C. PointSIFT: a SIFT-like network module for 3D point cloud semantic segmentation. arXiv Preprint. 2018. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.00652.
Wang W, Yu R, Huang Q, Neumann U. SGPN: similarity group proposal network for 3D point cloud instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018:2569–2578.
Zhang K, Hao M, Wang J, de Silva CW, Fu C. Linked dynamic graph CNN: learning on point cloud via linking hierarchical features. arxiv Preprint. 2019. 10.48550/arXiv.1904.10014.
Duan Y, Zheng Y, Lu J, Zhou J, Tian Q. Structural relational reasoning of point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019:949–958. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00104
Wang X, Liu S, Shen X, Shen C, Jia J. Associatively segmenting instances and semantics in point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019; 4096–4105. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00422.
Ma Y, Guo Y, Liu H, Lei Y, Wen G. Global context reasoning for semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2020:2931–2940. 10.1109/WACV45572.2020.9093411.
Lu Q, Chen C, Xie W, Luo Y. PointNGCNN: Deep Convolutional Networks on 3D Point Clouds with Neighborhood Graph Filters. Computers & Graphics. 2020;86:42–51. 10.1016/j.cag.2019.11.005. DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2019.11.005
Li Y, Bu R, Sun M, Wu W, Di X, Chen B. PointCNN: convolution on X-transformed points. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst. 2018;31.
Ao Z, Wu F, Hu S, Sun Y, Su Y, Guo Q, Xin Q. Automatic segmentation of stem and leaf components and individual maize plants in field terrestrial LiDAR data using convolutional neural networks. Crop J. 2021. 10.1016/j.cj.2021.10.010. DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2021.10.010
Gong L, Du X, Zhu K, Lin K, Lou Q, Yuan Z, Huang G, Liu C. Panicle-3D: efficient phenotyping tool for precise semantic segmentation of rice panicle point cloud. Plant Phenomics. 2021. 10.34133/2021/9838929. DOI: 10.34133/2021/9838929
Chen L-C, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018:801–818. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.02611.
Jin S, Su Y, Gao S, Wu F, Ma Q, Xu K, Hu T, Liu J, Pang S, Guan H, et al. Separating the structural components of maize for field phenotyping using terrestrial LiDAR data and deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2019;58(4):2644–58. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2953092. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2953092
Liu F, Li S, Zhang L, Zhou C, Ye R, Wang Y, Lu J. 3DCNN-DQN-RNN: a deep reinforcement learning framework for semantic parsing of large-scale 3D point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017:5678–5687. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.605.
Socher R, Perelygin A, Wu J, Chuang J, Manning CD, Ng AY, Potts C. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2013; 1631–1642.
Yu F, Liu K, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Xu K. Partnet: a recursive part decomposition network for fine-grained and hierarchical shape segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2019; 9491–9500
Santos TT, De Oliveira AA. Image-based 3d digitizing for plant architecture analysis and phenotyping. In: Embrapa Inform´atica Agropecu´aria-Artigo em Anais de congresso (ALICE) (2012). In: CONFERENCE ON GRAPHICS, PATTERNS AND IMAGES, 25., 2012, Ouro Preto..
Chaudhury A, Boudon F, Godin C. 3D plant phenotyping: all you need is labelled point cloud data. In: European conference on computer vision. 2020; 244–260. Springer
Khanna R, Schmid L, Walter A, Nieto J, Siegwart R, Liebisch F. A spatio temporal spectral framework for plant stress phenotyping. Plant methods. 2019;15(1):1–18. 10.1186/s13007-019-0398-8. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0398-8
Cruz JA, Yin X, Liu X, Imran SM, Morris DD, Kramer DM, Chen J. Multi-modality imagery database for plant phenotyping. Mach Vis Appl. 2016;27(5):735–49. 10.1007/s00138-015-0734-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00138-015-0734-6
Aich S, Stavness I. Leaf Counting with Deep Convolutional and Deconvolutional Networks; 2017. CoRR abs/1708.07570. arXiv:1708.07570.
Romera-Paredes B, Torr PHS. Recurrent instance segmentation. In: Leibe B, Matas J, Sebe N, Welling M, editors. Computer vision - ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 312–29. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_19
De Brabandere B, Neven D, Van Gool L. Semantic instance segmentation with a discriminative loss function. arXiv Preprint. 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.02551.
Ren M, Zemel RS. 2017 End-to-end instance segmentation and counting with recurrent attention. 2017; CoRR abs/1605.09410. arXiv:1605.09410.
Ubbens JR, Stavness I. Deep plant phenomics: a deep learning platform for complex plant phenotyping tasks. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1190. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01190. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01190
Tapas A. Transfer learning for image classification and plant phenotyping. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol (IJARCET). 2016;5(11):2664–9.
Wei H, Xu E, Zhang J, Meng Y, Wei J, Dong Z, Li Z. BushNet: effective semantic segmentation of bush in large-scale point clouds. Comput Electron Agric. 2022;193: 106653. 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106653. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106653
Kar S, Garin V, Kholová J, Vadez V, Durbha SS, Tanaka R, Iwata H, Urban MO, Adinarayana J. SpaTemHTP: a data analysis pipeline for efficient processing and utilization of temporal high-throughput phenotyping data. Front Plant Sci. 2020. 10.3389/fpls.2020.552509. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.552509
Mack J, Rist F, Herzog K, Töpfer R, Steinhage V. Constraint-based automated reconstruction of grape bunches from 3D range data for high-throughput phenotyping. Biosyst Eng. 2020;197:285–305. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.004. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.07.004
Wang Y, Wen W, Wu S, Wang C, Yu Z, Guo X, Zhao C. Maize plant Phenotyping: comparing 3D laser scanning, multi-view stereo reconstruction, and 3D digitizing estimates. Remote Sens. 2019;11(1):63. DOI: 10.3390/rs11010063
Su Y, Wu F, Ao Z, Jin S, Qin F, Liu B, Pang S, Liu L, Guo Q. Evaluating maize phenotype dynamics under drought stress using terrestrial lidar. Plant Methods. 2019;15(1):1–16. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0396-x
Iqbal J, Xu R, Halloran H, Li C. Development of a multi-purpose autonomous differential drive mobile robot for plant phenotyping and soil sensing. Electronics. 2020;9(9):1550. 10.3390/electronics9091550. DOI: 10.3390/electronics9091550
Briglia N, Williams K, Wu D, Li Y, Tao S, Corke F, Montanaro G, Petrozza A, Amato D, Cellini F, et al. Image-based assessment of drought response in grapevines. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:595. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00595
Zhu B, Liu F, Xie Z, Guo Y, Li B, Ma Y. Quantification of light interception within image-based 3-d reconstruction of sole and intercropped canopies over the entire growth season. Ann Bot. 2020;126(4):701–12. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa046
Anke B, Olaf H, Volker R, Ulas Y. A benchmark dataset for performance evaluation of shape-from-x algorithms. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci. 2008;16:26.
Liang X, Zhou F, Chen H, Liang B, Xu X, Yang W. Three-dimensional maize plants reconstruction and traits extraction based on structure from motion. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach. 2020;51:209–19.
Galli G, Sabadin F, Costa-Neto GMF, Fritsche-Neto R. A novel way to validate UAS-based high-throughput phenotyping protocols using in silico experiments for plant breeding purposes. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134(2):715–30. 10.1007/s00122-020-03726-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03726-6
Rossi R, Leolini C, Costafreda-Aumedes S, Leolini L, Bindi M, Zaldei A, Moriondo M. Performances evaluation of a low-cost platform for high-resolution plant phenotyping. Sensors. 2020;20(11):3150. 10.3390/s20113150. DOI: 10.3390/s20113150
Herrero-Huerta M, Bucksch A, Puttonen E, Rainey KM. Canopy roughness: a new phenotypic trait to estimate aboveground biomass from unmanned aerial system. Plant Phenomics. 2020. 10.34133/2020/6735967. DOI: 10.34133/2020/6735967
Pinto F, M, G Melo A, M Honório L, LM Marcato A, GS Conceição A, O Timotheo A. Deep learning applied to vegetation identification and removal using multidimensional aerial data. Sensors. 2020;20(21):6187. DOI: 10.3390/s20216187
Gené-Mola J, Llorens J, Rosell-Polo JR, Gregorio E, Arnó J, Solanelles F, Martínez-Casasnovas JA, et al. Assessing the performance of RGB-D sensors for 3D fruit crop canopy characterization under different operating and lighting conditions. Sensors. 2020;20(24):7072. DOI: 10.3390/s20247072
Hsu H-C, Chou W-C, Kuo Y-F. 3D revelation of phenotypic variation, evolutionary allometry, and ancestral states of corolla shape: a case study of clade Corytholoma (subtribe Ligeriinae, family Gesneriaceae). GigaScience. 2020;9(1):155. 10.1093/gigascience/giz155. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giz155
Li M, Shao M-R, Zeng D, Ju T, Kellogg EA, Topp CN. Comprehensive 3D phenotyping reveals continuous morphological variation across genetically diverse sorghum inflorescences. New Phytol. 2020;226(6):1873–85. 10.1111/nph.16533. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16533
Théroux-Rancourt G, Jenkins MR, Brodersen CR, McElrone A, Forrestel EJ, Earles JM. Digitally deconstructing leaves in 3D using X-ray microcomputed tomography and machine learning. Appl Plant Sci. 2020;8(7):11380. 10.1002/aps3.11380. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11380
Boerckel JD, Mason DE, McDermott AM, Alsberg E. Microcomputed tomography: approaches and applications in bioengineering. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5(6):1–12. DOI: 10.1186/scrt534
Xia C, Shi Y, Yin W, et al. Obtaining and denoising method of three-dimensional point cloud data of plants based on tof depth sensor. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2018;34(6):168–74.
Choi S, Kim T, Yu W. Performance evaluation of RANSAC family. J Comput Vis. 1997;24(3):271–300. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007927408552
Loch BI. Surface fitting for the modelling of plant leaves. PhD thesis, University of Queensland Australia; 2004.
