Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck implants in the posterior maxilla: Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Hurtgen, Alexandre; Seidel, Laurence; Manni, Lou Li; Liegeois, Lemmy; Lecloux, Geoffrey; Lambert, France

doi:10.1111/clr.14082

Article (Scientific journals)

Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck implants in the posterior maxilla: Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Hurtgen, Alexandre; Seidel, Laurence; Manni, Lou Li et al.

2023 • In Clinical Oral Implants Research

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/304565

DOI
10.1111/clr.14082

PubMed
37183773

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

2023 - Hurtgen - Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular - Clinical Oral Implants Res.pdf

Publisher postprint (1.19 MB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

RCT; dental implants; hard tissue; implant design; soft tissue; stability; Oral Surgery

Abstract :

[en] [en] OBJECTIVES: Dental implants with a triangular neck design have been developed in order to maintain peri-implant bone. The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to assess after 5 years the peri-implant bone stability and the peri-implant soft tissue conditions with this new triangular implant neck design compared to a conventional round neck implant design. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a secondary evaluation of a RCT including 34 patients. Patients were recalled after 1, 3, and finally 5 years to assess implant survival and peri-implant bone levels using standardized radiographs. Peri-implant soft tissue health was also evaluated by recording probing depth, plaque index and Bleeding on Probing. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and the Pink Esthetic Score were also assessed. RESULTS: No implant loss occurred during the 5-year follow up period. The mean ± SD proximal bone remodeling after 5 years reached 0.38 ± 0.39 mm for the circular design and 0.29 ± 0.58 mm for the triangular design (p = .49). Peri-implant soft tissue health parameters and PROMs were found to be comparable. Altogether, 80% of implants presented peri-implant mucositis whereas one implant (4%) displayed sings of peri-implantitis. CONCLUSION: The 5-year evaluation of the triangular neck implants showed similar results to the circular neck implants.

Research Center/Unit :

d‐BRU - Dental Biomaterials Research Unit - ULiège

Disciplines :

Dentistry & oral medicine

Author, co-author :

Hurtgen, Alexandre ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire

Seidel, Laurence ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des informations médico économiques (SIME)

Manni, Lou Li; Department of Periodontology, Oro-dental and Implant Surgery, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium

Liegeois, Lemmy ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire

Lecloux, Geoffrey ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire

Lambert, France ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire

Language :

English

Title :

Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck implants in the posterior maxilla: Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

Publication date :

15 May 2023

Journal title :

Clinical Oral Implants Research

ISSN :

0905-7161

eISSN :

1600-0501

Publisher :

John Wiley and Sons Inc, Denmark

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/clr.14082

Available on ORBi :

since 27 June 2023

Statistics

Number of views

78 (5 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

119 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Afshari, Z., Yaghini, J., & Naseri, R. (2022). Levels of smoking and peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 22(3), 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101721
Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila-Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., Chen, S., Cochran, D., Derks, J., Figuero, E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Heitz-Mayfield, L. J. A., Huynh-Ba, G., Iacono, V., Koo, K.-T., Lambert, F., McCauley, L., Quirynen, M., Renvert, S., … Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(Suppl 20), S286–S291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12957
Caricasulo, R., Malchiodi, L., Ghensi, P., Fantozzi, G., & Cucchi, A. (2018). The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 20(4), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12620
Chackartchi, T., Romanos, G. E., & Sculean, A. (2019). Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontology 2000, 81(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12287
D'Avenia, F., Del Fabbro, M., Karanxha, L., Weinstein, T., Corbella, S., Fumagalli, D., Francetti, L., & Taschieri, S. (2019). Hard and soft tissue changes in the rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla with triangular shape neck implants: A retrospective clinical study with a one-year follow up. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, 33(6 Suppl 2), 13–21 Dental supplement.
De Bruyn, H., Raes, S., Matthys, C., & Cosyn, J. (2015). The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(Suppl 11), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12634
Eshkol-Yogev, I., Tandlich, M., & Shapira, L. (2019). Effect of implant neck design on primary and secondary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: A prospective randomized controlled study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(12), 1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13535
Fürhauser, R., Florescu, D., Benesch, T., Haas, R., Mailath, G., & Watzek, G. (2005). Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: The pink esthetic score. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 16(6), 639–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x
Garib, D. G., Calil, L. R., Leal, C. R., & Janson, G. (2014). Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics? Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 19(5), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.136-149.sar
Heitz-Mayfield, L. J. A., & Salvi, G. E. (2018). Peri-implant mucositis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(Suppl 20), S237–S245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12953
Hollender, L., & Rockler, B. (1980). Radiographic evaluation of osseointegrated implants of the jaws. Experimental study of the influence of radiographic techniques on the measurement of the relation between the implant and bone. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology, 9(2), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.1980.0019
Insua, A., Monje, A., Wang, H.-L., & Miron, R. J. (2017). Basis of bone metabolism around dental implants during osseointegration and peri-implant bone loss. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 105(7), 2075–2089. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36060
Karoussis, I. K., Salvi, G. E., Heitz-Mayfield, L. J. A., Brägger, U., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Lang, N. P. (2003). Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: A 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI dental implant system. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x
Li Manni, L., Lecloux, G., Rompen, E., Aouini, W., Shapira, L., & Lambert, F. (2020). Clinical and radiographic assessment of circular versus triangular cross-section neck implants in the posterior maxilla: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(9), 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13624
Mombelli, A., Müller, N., & Cionca, N. (2012). The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(Suppl 6), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02541.x
Mombelli, A., van Oosten, M. A., Schurch, E., & Land, N. P. (1987). The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiology and Immunology, 2(4), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x
Nevins, M., Benfenati, S. P., Galletti, P., Sava, C., Sava, C., Trifan, M., Muñoz, F., Chen, C.-Y., & Kim, D. M. (2020). Human histologic evaluations of implants with a unique triangular neck design. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 40(5), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4982
O'Leary, T. J., Drake, R. B., & Naylor, J. E. (1972). The plaque control record. Journal of Periodontology, 43(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38
Pérez-Albacete Martínez, M. Á., Pérez-Albacete Martínez, C., Maté Sánchez De Val, J. E., Ramos Oltra, M. L., Fernández Domínguez, M., & Calvo Guirado, J. L. (2018). Evaluation of a new dental implant cervical Design in Comparison with a conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 11(4), E462. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462
Roccuzzo, M., Layton, D. M., Roccuzzo, A., & Heitz-Mayfield, L. J. (2018). Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treatment and supportive care: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(Suppl 16), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13287
Sanz-Martin, I., Vignoletti, F., Nuñez, J., Permuy, M., Muñoz, F., Sanz-Esporrín, J., Fierravanti, L., Shapira, L., & Sanz, M. (2017). Hard and soft tissue integration of immediate and delayed implants with a modified coronal macrodesign: Histological, micro-CT and volumetric soft tissue changes from a pre-clinical in vivo study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 44(8), 842–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12747
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., Tinevez, J.-Y., White, D. J., Hartenstein, V., Eliceiri, K., Tomancak, P., & Cardona, A. (2012). Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schulze, R. K., & d'Hoedt, B. (2001). Mathematical analysis of projection errors in “paralleling technique” with respect to implant geometry. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 12(4), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012004364.x
Schwarz, F., Derks, J., Monje, A., & Wang, H.-L. (2018). Peri-implantitis. Journal of Periodontology, 89(Suppl 1), S267–S290. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.16-0350
Sewerin, I. P. (1990). Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 98(5), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00994.x
Tokuc, B., & Kan, B. (2021). The effect of triangular cross-section neck design on crestal bone stability in the anterior mandible: A randomized, controlled, split-mouth clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32, 1241–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13821
Zanatta, L. C. S., Dib, L. L., & Gehrke, S. A. (2014). Photoelastic stress analysis surrounding different implant designs under simulated static loading. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(3), 1068–1071. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000829