Nose surgery; primary care; sinus surgery; SNOT-22; telemedicine; Otorhinolaryngology; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] Objective: Developing reliable and easy-to-use telemedicine tools is essential in primary care. We sought whether Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 could predict the need for surgery and localize pathology of rhinology patients and healthy volunteers solely based on the pattern of the baseline Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22. Methods: Baseline Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 from 66 healthy volunteers and 383 rhinology patients was collected blindly prior to diagnosis. Participants were then categorized into 4 groups according to their diagnosis: control, no surgery (i.e. medical condition), functional nose surgery, and sinus surgery. The difference between groups was assessed by a multinomial logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, asthma, tobacco, history of nose surgery, and trauma. Results: The 22 items of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test differed significantly among the 4 groups (P < .05). Control subjects showed the lowest Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores for all items. Patients requiring sinus surgery and those listed for nose surgery exhibited a specific pattern of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 score. Nasal and extranasal rhinology symptoms were more specific to the diagnosis than psychological or sleep dysfunction domains. Conclusion: Distinct Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 patterns were associated with subjects’ diagnosis. SNOT-22 was not only able to score severity but could also localize the disease, orientate the diagnosis, and predict the need for surgical treatment. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 may be the easy telemedicine tool the primary care needs for a better referral pattern.
Disciplines :
Otolaryngology
Author, co-author :
Pottier, Laurence ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
De Dorlodot, Clotilde; Department of ENT, ULG University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium
Ansari, Edward; Department of ENT, ULG University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium
Horoi, Mihaela; Department of ENT, ULB Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Liege, Belgium
Rogister, Florence ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Dardenne, Nadia ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Donneau, Anne-Françoise ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Lefèbvre, Philippe ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Eloy, Philippe; Department of ENT, UCL University Hospital Namur, Liege, Belgium
Poirrier, Anne-Lise ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Language :
English
Title :
Is Baseline SNOT-22 Able to Predict the Need for Nose or Sinus Surgery? A Prospective Multicenter Study
Publication date :
July 2022
Journal title :
B-ENT
ISSN :
1781-782X
eISSN :
2684-4907
Publisher :
Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor ORL Gelaat en Halschirugie
Volume :
18
Issue :
3
Pages :
154 - 161
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
Funding: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
DeConde AS, Soler ZM. Chronic rhinosinusitis: epidemiology and burden of disease. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(2):134-139. [CrossRef]
Bhattacharyya N, Villeneuve S, Joish VN, et al. Cost burden and resource utilization in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(9):1969-1975. [CrossRef]
Hopkins C, Hettige R, Soni-Jaiswal A, et al. CHronic Rhinosinusitis Outcome MEasures (CHROME), developing a core outcome set for trials of interventions in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2018;56(1):22-32. [CrossRef]
Tait SD, Kallogjeri D, Chidambaram S, Schneider J, Piccirillo JF. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the modified 25-item sino-nasal outcome test. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;33(5):577-585. [CrossRef]
Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126(1):41-47. [CrossRef]
Sindwani R, Han JK, Soteres DF, et al. NAVIGATE I: randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the exhalation delivery system With fluticasone for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;33(1):69-82. [CrossRef]
Poirrier AL, Ahluwalia S, Goodson A, Ellis M, Bentley M, Andrews P. Is the sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 a suitable evaluation for septorhinoplasty? Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):76-81. [CrossRef]
Leong SC, Webb CJ. Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 quality-of-life patterns in patients presenting with nasal septal perforation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(2):604-608. [CrossRef]
De Dorlodot C, Horoi M, Lefebvre PP, et al. French adaptation and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test-22: a prospective cohort study on quality of life among 422 subjects. Clin Otolaryngol. 2015;40(1):29-35. [CrossRef]
DeConde AS, Bodner TE, Mace JC, Smith TL. Response shift in quality of life after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(8):712-719. [CrossRef]
Kennedy JL, Hubbard MA, Huyett P, Patrie JT, Borish L, Payne SC. Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22): a predictor of postsurgical improvement in patients with chronic sinusitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;111(4):246-251.e2. [CrossRef]
Hopkins C, Rudmik L, Lund VJ. The predictive value of the preoperative sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(8):1779-1784. [CrossRef]
DeConde AS, Mace JC, Alt JA, Soler ZM, Orlandi RR, Smith TL. Investigation of change in cardinal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis after surgical or ongoing medical management. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(1):36-45. [CrossRef]
Alakärppä AI, Koskenkorva TJ, Koivunen PT, Alho OP. Predictive factors of a beneficial quality of life outcome in patients undergoing primary sinonasal surgery: A population-based prospective cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(5):1139-1147. [CrossRef]
Soler ZM, Jones R, Le P, et al. Sino-nasal outcome test-22 outcomes after sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(3):581-592. [CrossRef]
Marambaia PP, Lima MG, Guimarães MB, et al. Can we use the questionnaire SNOT-22 as a predictor for the indication of surgical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;83(4):451-456. [CrossRef]
Erskine S, Hopkins C, Kumar N, et al. A cross sectional analysis of a case-control study about quality of life in CRS in the UK; a comparison between CRS subtypes. Rhinology. 2016;54(4):311-315. [CrossRef]
Lal D, Hopkins C, Divekar RD. SNOT-22–based clusters in chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis exhibit distinct endotypic andprognosticdifferences.IntForumAllergyRhinol.2018;8(7):797-805. [CrossRef]
Browne JP, Hopkins C, Slack R, Cano SJ. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT): can we make it more clinically meaningful? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(5):736-741. [CrossRef]
Sedaghat AR, Gray ST, Caradonna SD, Caradonna DS. Clustering of chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology reveals novel associations with objective clinical and demographic characteristics. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015;29(2):100-105. [CrossRef]
Sedaghat AR, Hoehle LP, Gray ST. Chronic rhinosinusitis control from the patient and physician perspectives. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018;3(6):419-433. [CrossRef]
DeConde AS, Mace JC, Bodner T, et al. SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(12):972-979. [CrossRef]
Baumann I, Blumenstock G, Zalaman IM, et al. Impact of gender, age and co-morbidities on quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2007;45(4):268-272.
Erskine SE, Hopkins C, Clark A, et al. SNOT-22 in a control population. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(1):81-85. [CrossRef]
Alt JA, Smith TL, Mace JC, Soler ZM. Sleep quality and disease severity in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(10):2364-2370. [CrossRef]
Chowdhury NI, Mace JC, Smith TL, Rudmik L. What drives productivity loss in chronic rhinosinusitis? A SNOT-22 subdomain analysis. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(1):23-30. [CrossRef]
Sukato DC, Abramowitz JM, Boruk M, Goldstein NA, Rosenfeld RM. Endoscopic sinus surgery improves sleep quality in chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(2):249-256. [CrossRef]
Alt JA, DeConde AS, Mace JC, Steele TO, Orlandi RR, Smith TL. Quality of life in patients With chronic rhinosinusitis and sleep dysfunction undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: A pilot investigation of comorbid obstructive sleep apnea. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(10):873-881. [CrossRef]
Thamboo A, Santos RC, Naidoo L, Rahmanian R, Chilvers MA, Chadha NK. Use of the SNOT-22 and UPSIT to appropriately select pediatric patients With cystic fibrosis who should be referred to an otolaryngologist: cross-sectional study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(10):934-939. [CrossRef]