Low back pain; multidisciplinary treatment; return to work; sickness absence; subacute; Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation
Abstract :
[en] [en] OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to examine pain, functional status and return to work after a multidisciplinary intervention, with or without additional workplace intervention, for (sub)acute low back pain among adults.
DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was completed (November 2022) in six electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, CENTRAL and Scopus) and in the reference list of all identified studies.
REVIEW METHODS: The search results were screened against predefined eligibility criteria by two independent researchers. Included articles were systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials examining the effect of a multidisciplinary intervention, with or without workplace intervention, in working adults with (sub)acute low back pain. Relevant information was summarized and clustered, and the methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed respectively using the RoB 2-tool, the ROBIS tool and the GRADE criteria.
RESULTS: The search resulted in a total of 3020 articles. After the screening process, 12 studies remained (11 randomized controlled trials and 1 systematic review), which studied overall 2751 patients, with a follow-up period of at least 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary intervention is favorable compared to usual care for pain intensity and functional status but this is less clear for return to work. Comparable work-related effects were found when comparing a multidisciplinary intervention with a less extensive intervention, whereas uncertainties exist regarding outcomes of pain intensity and functional status. Furthermore, adding a workplace intervention to usual care and subdividing patients based on work-related characteristics seems beneficial for return to work.
Disciplines :
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Bernaers, Lisa ; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium ; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Cnockaert, Elise; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium ; Pain in Motion International Research Group, Ghent, Belgium
Braeckman, Lutgart; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Mairiaux, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique ; Federal Agency for Occupational Risks, Brussels, Belgium
Willems, Tine Marieke; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Disability and return to work after a multidisciplinary intervention for (sub)acute low back pain: A systematic review.
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and publication of this article: This work was supported by the Federal Agency for Occupational Risks.
Wu A March L Zheng X, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8: 299–299.
Jordan KP Kadam UT Hayward R, et al. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 144–144.
Bardin LD King P Maher CG. Diagnostic triage for low back pain: a practical approach for primary care. Med J Aust 2017; 206: 268–273
Hoy D Bain C Williams G, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 2028–2037.
Maher C Underwood M Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2017; 389: 736–747
Koes BW van Tulder M Lin C-WC, et al. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 2075–2094.
Dieleman JL Baral R Birger M, et al. US Spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013. JAMA 2016; 316: 2627–2646.
Nielens H Van Zundert J Mairiaux P, et al. Chronic Low Back Pain. Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Report no. 48A, 2006. Brussels: Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center (KCE).
Coggon D Ntani G Vargas-Prada S, et al. International variation in absence from work attributed to musculoskeletal illness: findings from the CUPID study. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 75.
Maher CG. A systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Aust J Physiother 2000; 46: 259–269. 2001/10/26.
Almeida M Saragiotto B Richards B, et al. Primary care management of non-specific low back pain: key messages from recent clinical guidelines. Med J Aust 2018; 208: 272–275. 2018/04/05.
da C Menezes Costa L Maher CG,, et al. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2012; 184: E613–E624. 2012/05/14.
O’Connell NE Cook CE Wand BM, et al. Clinical guidelines for low back pain: a critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across three major guidelines. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016; 30: 968–980. 2017/11/07.
Fritz JM Magel JS McFadden M, et al. Early physical therapy vs usual care in patients with recent-onset low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Jama 2015; 314: 1459–1467. 2015/10/16.
van Vilsteren M van Oostrom SH de Vet HC, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 10: Cd006955. 2015/10/06. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub3
Carroll C Rick J Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 607–621. 2010/03/09.
Franche R-L Baril R Shaw W, et al. Workplace-Based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 525–542.
Haugli L Maeland S Magnussen LH. What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 2011; 21: 573–581.
Lambeek LC van Mechelen W Knol DL, et al. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. Br Med J 2010; 340: c1035.
Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J 2021; n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
Prospero. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (accessed 04 July 2022).
Clarivate. Endnote, https://endnote.com/ (accessed 18 January 2022).
Inc. RS. Rayyan. https://www.rayyan.ai (accessed 18 January 2022).
Sterne JAC Savović J Page MJ, et al. Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J 2019; 366: l4898. 2019/08/30.
Sterne JA Hernán MA Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J 2016; 355: i4919. 2016/10/14.
Ryan RaH S. How to GRADE the Quality of the Evidence. Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group., https://colorectal.cochrane.org/sites/colorectal.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/how_to_grade.pdf (2016, accessed 13/05/2022).
Marin TJ Van Eerd D Irvin E, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6: Cd002193. 2017/06/29.
Eisenberg DM Buring JE Hrbek AL, et al. A model of integrative care for low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med 2012; 18: 354–362. 2012/03/28.
Hagen EM Ødelien KH Lie SA, et al. Adding a physical exercise programme to brief intervention for low back pain patients did not increase return to work. Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 731–738. 2010/09/08.
Jensen C Jensen OK Nielsen CV. Sustainability of return to work in sick-listed employees with low-back pain. Two-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 156. 2012/08/28.
Mas RR López-Jiménez T Pujol-Ribera E, et al. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL intervention for non-specific SUBACUTE low back pain in a working population: a cluster randomized clinical trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 962. 2019/12/14.
Monticone M Ambrosini E Portoghese I, et al. Multidisciplinary program based on early management of psychological factors reduces disability of patients with subacute low back pain. Results of a randomised controlled study with one year follow-up. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57(6): 959–967. DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.21.06696-x
Pedersen P Nielsen CV Jensen OK, et al. Employment status five years after a randomised controlled trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention in employees on sick leave due to low back pain. Scand J Public Health 2018; 46: 383–388. 2017/08/03.
Rogerson MD Gatchel RJ Bierner SM. A cost utility analysis of interdisciplinary early intervention versus treatment as usual for high-risk acute low back pain patients. Pain Pract 2010; 10: 382–395. 2010/04/14.
Schultz IZ Crook JM Berkowitz J, et al. Early intervention with compensated lower back-injured workers at risk for work disability: fixed versus flexible approach. Psychol Inj Law 2013; 6: 258–276.
Stapelfeldt CM Christiansen DH Jensen OK, et al. Subgroup analyses on return to work in sick-listed employees with low back pain in a randomised trial comparing brief and multidisciplinary intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 112. 2011/05/27.
Steenstra IA Anema JR van Tulder MW, et al. Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006; 16: 557–578. 2006/11/07.
Steenstra IA Knol DL Bongers PM, et al. What works best for whom? An exploratory, subgroup analysis in a randomized, controlled trial on the effectiveness of a workplace intervention in low back pain patients on return to work. Spine 2009; 34: 1243–1249. 2009/05/05.
Hagen EM Eriksen HR Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine 2000; 25: 1973–1976. 2000/07/26.
Jensen C Jensen OK Christiansen DH, et al. One-year follow-up in employees sick-listed because of low back pain: randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention. Spine 2011; 36: 1180–1189. 2011/01/11.
Schultz IZ Crook J Berkowitz J, et al. Predicting return to work after low back injury using the psychosocial risk for occupational disability instrument: a validation study. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 365–376. 2005/08/27.
Ilmarinen J Past Tuomi K., Present and future of work ability. People Work Res Rep 2004; 65: 1–25.
Hruschak V Cochran G. Psychosocial predictors in the transition from acute to chronic pain: a systematic review. Psychol Health Med 2018; 23: 1151–1167. 2018/03/02.
Ikemoto T Miki K Matsubara T, et al. Psychological treatment strategy for chronic low back pain. Spine Surg Relat Res 2019; 3: 199–206. 2019/08/24.
Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 2000; 25: 1148–1156. 2000/05/02.
Nicholas MK Linton SJ Watson PJ, et al. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 737–753. 2011/04/01.
Mariano TY Urman RD Hutchison CA, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for subacute low back pain: a systematic review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2018; 22: 15. 2018/02/25.
Sveinsdottir V Eriksen HR Reme SE. Assessing the role of cognitive behavioral therapy in the management of chronic nonspecific back pain. J Pain Res 2012; 5: 371–380. 2012/10/24.
van Tulder M Becker A Bekkering T, et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: S169–S191. 2006/03/22.
Indahl A Velund L Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 1995; 20: 473–477. 1995/02/15.
van Oostrom SH Driessen MT de Vet HCW, et al. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub2
Russo F Papalia GF Vadalà G, et al. The effects of workplace interventions on low back pain in workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 12614.
Vargas-Prada S Demou E Lalloo D, et al. Effectiveness of very early workplace interventions to reduce sickness absence: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 2016; 42: 261–272. 2016/06/09.
Viikari-Juntura E Kausto J Shiri R, et al. Return to work after early part-time sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012; 38: 134–143. 2011/10/29.
Waddell G Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London, UK: The Stationery Office, 2006, 246.
Buchner M Neubauer E Zahlten-Hinguranage A, et al. Age as a predicting factor in the therapy outcome of multidisciplinary treatment of patients with chronic low back pain—a prospective longitudinal clinical study in 405 patients. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 385–392. 2006/07/26.
Hayashi K Arai Y-CP Ikemoto T, et al. Predictive factors for the outcome of multidisciplinary treatments in chronic low back pain at the first multidisciplinary pain center of Japan. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 2901–2905. 2015/09/30.
van Hooff ML Spruit M O’Dowd JK, et al. Predictive factors for successful clinical outcome 1 year after an intensive combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2014; 23: 102–112. 2013/06/19.
Marois E Durand MJ. Does participation in interdisciplinary work rehabilitation programme influence return to work obstacles and predictive factors? Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 994–1007. 2008/11/28.
