Functional Perspectives on Lithic Standardization

[en] Functional data accumulated over the recent decades confirm that tool use mechanics, working edge maintenance, and hafting are important factors determining stone tool form. Yet such data are rarely considered in studies on lithic standardization, and tool hafting has entered the discussion mostly in the form of untested hypotheses. In this paper, we examine the effects of tool use, resharpening, and hafting on lithic standardization by drawing on recent use-wear data on Paleolithic domestic tools and projectiles. We evaluate morphological constraints posed by different tool use tasks and hafting systems, and the effects of these on blank selection. We conclude that the concept of standardization can be useful in making sense of lithic assemblage patterning, but it needs to be redefined to accommodate functional considerations. We advise shifting the focus from stone tool form to working edge qualities and hafted tool design, which drastically alters the perspective on inter-assemblage variability.

Disciplines :

Archaeology

Author, co-author :

Taipale, Noora ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Art, Archéologie et Patrimoine (AAP) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences historiques > TraceoLab

Rots, Veerle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Art, Archéologie et Patrimoine (AAP) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences historiques > TraceoLab

Language :

English

Title :

Functional Perspectives on Lithic Standardization

Publication date :

2023

Journal title :

Lithic Technology

ISSN :

0197-7261

eISSN :

2051-6185

Publisher :

Informa UK Limited

Special issue title :

Standardization in the Stone Age

Pages :

1-24

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01977261.2023.2190670

European Projects :

FP7 - 312283 - EVO-HAFT - Evolution of stone tool hafting in the Palaeolithic

Funders :

ERC - European Research Council [BE]
Kone Foundation [FI]
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fund for Scientific Research [BE]
Union Européenne [BE]

Funding number :

312283; 088817; J.0172.16

Funding text :

This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme(FP7/2007–2013, ERC Grant Agreement No. 312283, EVO-HAFT, Veerle Rots), by the Kone Foundation under Grant 088817 (Noora Taipale), and by the Fund for Scientific Research(F.R.S.-FNRS). A part of NT’s travel costs were covered by the ECOPRAT project funded by the Fund for Scientific Research(F.R.S.-FNRS) under Grant J.0172.16.

Available on ORBi :

since 24 March 2023

Statistics

Number of views

69 (8 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

3 (3 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Akerman, K. (1978). Notes on the Kimberley stone-tipped spear focusing on the point hafting mechanism. Mankind, 11 (4), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.1978.tb01190.x
Akerman, K., Fullagar, R., & van Gijn, A. (2002). Weapons and wunan: Production, function and exchange of Kimberley points. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2002 (1), 13–42. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.594391190349745
Antoine, P., Auguste, P., Munaut, A.-V., Frechen, M., Englemann, A., & Michel, V. (2002). Etudes géologiques, environnementales et datations. In J.-L. Locht (Ed.), Bettencourt-Saint-Ouen (Somme), cinq occupations paléolithiques au début de la dernière glaciation (pp. 15–55). Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Archer, W., & Braun, D. R. (2010). Variability in bifacial technology at Elandsfontein, Western cape, South Africa: A geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37 (1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.033
Barham, L. (2013). From hand to handle: The first industrial revolution. Oxford University Press.
Bar-Yosef, O., & Kuhn, S. L. (1999). The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution. American Anthropologist, 101 (2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.2.322
Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability–The Mousterian and the “Functional” argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory (pp. 254–277). Duckworth.
Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian Facies of Levallois. American Anthropologist, 68 (2), 238–295. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030
Bisson, M. S. (2001). Interview with a Neanderthal: An experimental approach for reconstructing scraper production rules, and their implications for imposed form in Middle Palaeolithic tools. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11 (2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000099
Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: Maintainability or reliability. American Antiquity, 51 (4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/280862
Bordes, F. (1953). Essai de Classification des industries “moustériennes”. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 50 (7–8), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1953.5156
Bordes, F. (1967). Considérations sur la Typologie et les techniques dans le Paléolithique. Quartär, 18, 25–55.
Bordes, F. (1981). Vingt-cinq ans après : le complexe moustérien revisité. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique Française, 78 (3), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1981.5336
Bordes, F., & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1970). The significance of variability in Palaeolithic assemblages. World Archaeology, 2 (1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1970.9979464
Bordes, F., Rigaud, J.-P., & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1972). Des buts, problèmes et limites de l’archéologie paléolithique. Quaternaria, 16 (1), 15–34.
Bricker, H. M. (1995). Le paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne): les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr. Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Bricker, H. M., & David, N. (1984). Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne): The Périgordian VI (Level 3) Assemblage. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.
Bricker, H. M., & David, N. (1995). Le Périgordian VI de l’abri Pataud niveau 3. In H. M. Bricker (Ed.), Le Paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne) : les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr. (pp. 89–104). Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Buchanan, B., Andrews, B., O’Brien, M. J., & Eren, M. I. (2018). An assessment of stone weapon tip standardization during the Clovis-Folsom transition in the western United States. American Antiquity, 83 (4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2018.53
Buisson, D. (1991). Le Périgordien du Blot (Cerzat, Haute-Loire) [Note préliminaire]. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 88 (4), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1991.9465
Callahan, E., Forsberg, L., Knutsson, K., & Lindgren, C. (1992). Frakturbilder. Kulturhistoriska kommentarer till det säregna sönderfallet vid bearbetning av kvarts. Tor, 24, 27–63.
Cattelain, P. (1997). Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: bow, spearthrower, or both? In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile Technology (pp. 213–240). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1851-2
Cattelain, P., & Perpère, M. (1993). Tir expérimental de sagaies et de flèches emmanchées de pointes de la Gravette. Archéo-Situla, 17–20, 5–28.
Chase, P. G. (1991). Symbols and Paleolithic artifacts: Style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10 (3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(91)90013-N
Chazan, M. (1995). The language hypothesis for the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition: An examination based on a multiregional lithic analysis. Current Anthropology, 36 (5), 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1086/204430
Chesnaux, L. (2014). Réflexion sur le microlithisme en France au cours du premier Mésolithique Xe-VIIIe millénaires avant J.-C.: approches technologique, expérimentale et fonctionelle. Université de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Chiotti, L., Nespoulet, R., & Henry-Gambier, D. (2015). Occupations and status of the Abri Pataud (Dordogne, France) during the Final Gravettian. Quaternary International, 359–360, 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.08.060
Chiotti, L., Nespoulet, R., Morala, A., & Guillermin, P. (2013). Données typo-technologiques de l’industrie lithique. In R. Nespoulet, L. Chiotti, & D. Henry-Gambier (Eds.), Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne, France) : Fouilles et études 2005-2009. BAR International Series 2458 (pp. 111–126). Archaeopress.
Clark, J. D. (1970). The Prehistory of Africa. Thames & Hudson.
Clark, J. E. (1987). Politics, prismatic blades, and Mesoamerican civilization. In J. K. Johnson, & C. A. Morrow (Eds.), The Organization of Core Technology (pp. 259–284). Westview Press.
Clarkson, C., Hiscock, P., Mackay, A., & Shipton, C. (2018). Small, sharp, and standardized: Global convergence in backed-microlith technology. In M. J. O’Brien, B. Buchanan, & M. I. Eren (Eds.), Convergent Evolution in Stone-Tool Technology (pp. 175–199). MIT Press.
Clay, R. B. (1995). Le Protomagdalénien de l’abri Pataud niveau 2. In H. M. Bricker (Ed.), Le Paléolithique supérieur de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne): les fouilles de H. L. Movius Jr. (pp. 67–87). Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Coppe, J. (2020). Sur les traces de l’armement préhistorique : mise au point d’une méthode pour reconstruire les modes d’emmanchement et de propulsion des armatures lithiques par une approche expérimentale, mécanique et balistique [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Liège.
Coppe, J., Lepers, C., Clarenne, V., Delaunois, E., Pirlot, M., & Rots, V. (2019). Ballistic study tackles kinetic energy values of Palaeolithic weaponry. Archaeometry, 61 (4), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12452
Coppe, J., Lepers, C., & Rots, V. (2022). Projectiles under a new angle: A ballistic analysis provides an important building block to grasp Paleolithic weapon technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 29, 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09551-z.
Coppe, J., & Rots, V. (2017). Focus on the target. The importance of a transparent fracture terminology for understanding projectile points and projecting modes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.010
Corbey, R., Jagich, A., Vaesen, K., & Collard, M. (2016). The Acheulean handaxe: More like a bird’s song than a Beatles’ tune? Evolutionary Anthropology, 25 (1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21467
Cormarèche, E. (2020). Les comportements techniques au Gravettien récent. Réflexions sur la diversité de l’équipement cynégétique lithique [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université Paris Nanterre.
Crombé, P., Perdaen, Y., Sergant, J., & Caspar, J. (2001). Wear analysis on Early Mesolithic microliths from the Verrebroek Site, East Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Field Archaeology, 28 (3–4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1179/jfa.2001.28.3-4.253
de Heinzelin, J. (1973). L’industrie du site paléolithique de Maisières-Canal. Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique.
de la Peña, P., Taipale, N., Wadley, L., & Rots, V. (2018). A techno-functional perspective on quartz micro-notches in Sibudu’s Howiesons Poort reveals the use of barbs in hunting technology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 93, 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.001
de Lombera Hermida, A. (2009). The scar identification of lithic quartz industries. In F. Sternke, L. Eigeland, & L.-J. Costa (Eds.), Non-flint raw material use in prehistory. Old prejudices and New directions, BAR international series 1939 (pp. 5–12). Archaeopress.
de Lombera-Hermida, A., & Rodríguez-Rellán, C. (2016). Quartzes matter. Understanding the technological and behavioural complexity in quartz lithic assemblages. Quaternary International, 424, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.11.039
Dibble, H. L. (1984). Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style, or sequence of reduction? Journal of Field Archaeology, 11 (4), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.2307/529322
Dibble, H. L. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 52 (1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/281062
Dibble, H. L. (1989). The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Lower and Middle Paleolithic. In P. Mellars, & C. Stringer (Eds.), The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans (pp. 415–432). Edinburgh University Press.
Dibble, H. L. (1991). Mousterian assemblage variability on an interregional scale. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47 (2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.47.2.3630327
Dibble, H. L. (1995). Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2 (4), 299–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229003
Domanski, M., Webb, J., & Boland, J. (1994). Mechanical properties of stone artefact materials and the effect of heat treatment. Archaeometry, 36 (2), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1994.tb00963.x
Douka, K., Chiotti, L., Nespoulet, R., & Higham, T. (2020). A refined chronology for the Gravettian sequence of Abri Pataud. Journal of Human Evolution, 141, 102730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102730
Driscoll, K. (2010). Understanding quartz technology in early prehistoric Ireland [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University College Dublin.
Driscoll, K. (2011a). Identifying and classifying vein quartz artefacts: An experiment conducted at the World Archaeological Congress, 2008. Archaeometry, 53 (6), 1280–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00600.x
Driscoll, K. (2011b). Vein quartz in lithic traditions: An analysis based on experimental archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38 (3), 734–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.027
Ellis, C. J. (1997). Factors influencing the use of stone projectile tips: An ethnographic perspective. In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile technology (pp. 37–78). Plenum Press.
Enloe, J. G., & Audouze, F. (2010). The Magdalenian site of Verberie (Le Buisson Campin): An overview. In E. Zubrow, F. Audouze, & J. G. Enloe (Eds.), The Magdalenian household: Unraveling domesticity (pp. 15–21). State University of New York Press.
Finlay, N. (2008). Blank concerns: Issues of skill and consistency in the replication of Scottish Later Mesolithic blades. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 15 (1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-007-9048-y
Friis-Hansen, J. (1990). Mesolithic cutting arrows: Functional analysis of arrows used in the hunting of large game. Antiquity, 64 (244), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0007839X
Frison, G. C. (1968). A functional analysis of certain chipped stone tools. American Antiquity, 33 (2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/278516
Gaillard, Y., Chesnaux, L., Girard, M., Burr, A., Darque-Ceretti, E., Felder, E., Mazuy, A., & Regert, M. (2015). Assessing hafting adhesive efficiency in the experimental shooting of projectile points: A new device for instrumented and ballistic experiments. Archaeometry, 58 (3), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12175
Guillermin, P. (2011). La fin du Gravettien dans le sud-ouest de la France : à la recherche de l’identité protomagdalénienne …. In N. Goutas, L. Klaric, D. Pesesse, & P. Guillermin (Eds.), À la recherche des identités gravettiennes : actualités, questionnements et perspectives. Actes de la table ronde sur le Gravettien en France et dans les pays limitrophes, Aix-en-Provence (6-8 octobre 2008) (Mémoire LII de la Société préhistorique française) (pp. 129–144). Société préhistorique française.
Guipert, G., de Lumley, M. A., Tuffreau, A., & Mafart, B. (2011). A late Middle Pleistocene hominid: Biache-Saint-Vaast 2, North France. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 10 (1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2010.10.006
Haesaerts, P., & Damblon, F. (2004). Les dates radiocarbone de Maisières-Canal. In R. Miller, P. Haesaerts, & M. Otte (Eds.), L’atelier de taille aurigacien de Maisières-Canal (Belgique). ERAUL 110 (pp. 27–28). Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège.
Harrold, F. B. (1993). Variability and function among Gravette points from Southwestern France. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 4 (1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1993.4.1.69
Hiscock, P., Clarkson, C., & Mackay, A. (2011). Big debates over little tools: Ongoing disputes over microliths on three continents. World Archaeology, 43 (4), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2011.624755
Hoggard, C. S., McNabb, J., & Cole, J. N. (2019). The application of elliptic Fourier analysis in understanding biface shape and symmetry through the British Acheulean. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 2 (2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-019-00024-6
Holloway, R. L. (1969). Culture: A human domain. Current Anthropology, 10 (4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1086/201036
Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H., & Tixier, J. (1999). Technology and terminology of knapped stone. Cercle de Recherches et d’Etudes Préhistoriques.
Iovita, R. (2011). Shape variation in Aterian tanged tools and the origins of projectile technology: A morphometric perspective on stone tool function. PLoS ONE, 6 (12), e29029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029029
Iovita, R., & McPherron, S. P. (2011). The handaxe reloaded: A morphometric reassessment of Acheulian and Middle Paleolithic handaxes. Journal of Human Evolution, 61 (1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.007
Jacobi, R. M., Higham, T. F. G., Haesaerts, P., Jadin, I., & Basell, L. S. (2010). Radiocarbon chronology for the early Gravettian of Northern Europe: New AMS determinations for Maisières-Canal, Belgium. Antiquity, 84 (July), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00099749
Jardón Giner, P., & Sacchi, D. (1994). Traces d’usage et indices de réaffûtages et d’emmanchements sur des grattoirs magdaleniens de la Grotte Gazel à Sallèles-Cabardes (Aude, France). L’Anthropologie, 98 (2–3), 427–446.
Kamminga, J. (1982). Over the edge: Functional analysis of Australian stone tools. University of Queensland.
Kimball, L. R. (1989). Planning and functional variability in the Upper Palaeolithic: Microwear analysis of Upper Perigordian tools from Le Flageolet I (Dordogne). Northwestern University.
Klaric, L. (2006). Des armatures aux burins : des critères de distinction techniques et culturels à partir des productions lamellaires de quelques sites du gravettien moyen et récent (France). In M. de Araujo Igreja, J.-P. Bracco, & F. Le Brun-Ricalens (Eds.), Burins prehistoriques : formes, fonctionnements, fonctions. Actes de la table-ronde d’Aix-en-Provence (3–5 mars 2003) (pp. 199–223). Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art.
Klaric, L. (2018). The prehistoric apprentice: Investigating apprenticeship, know-how and expertise in prehistoric technologies - L’apprenti préhistorique : Appréhender l’apprentissage, les savoir-faire et l’expertise à travers les productions techniques des sociétés préhistoriques. The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology.
Klaric, L., Guillermin, P., & Aubry, T. (2009). Des armatures variées et des modes de productions variables : Réflexions à partir de quelques exemples issus du Gravettien d’Europe occidentale (France, Portugal, Allemagne). Gallia Préhistoire, 51, 113–154. https://doi.org/10.3406/galip.2009.2476
Knecht, H. (1997). Projectile Technology. Plenum Press.
Knutsson, H., Knutsson, K., Molin, F., & Zetterlund, P. (2016). From flint to quartz: Organization of lithic technology in relation to raw material availability during the pioneer process of Scandinavia. Quaternary International, 424, 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.062
Knutsson, H., Knutsson, K., Taipale, N., Tallavaara, M., & Darmark, K. (2015). How shattered flakes were used: Micro-wear analysis of quartz flake fragments. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2, 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.04.008
Kohn, M., & Mithen, S. (1999). Handaxes: Products of sexual selection? Antiquity, 73 (281), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00065078
Kong-Cho, S. (1997). Étude de l’industrie lithique de la couche 2 dite protomagdalenienne de l’abri Pataud (Les Eyzies, Dorgodne) : etude technologique et typologique. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle.
Kuhn, S. L. (1992). Blank form and reduction as determinants of Mousterian scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 57 (1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694838
Kuhn, S. L., & Shimelmitz, R. (2022). From hafting to retooling: Miniaturization as tolerance control in Paleolithic and Neolithic blade production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-022-09575-5
Lassen, R., & Williams, T. (2015). Variation in flintknapping skill among Folsom-era projectile point types: A quantitative approach. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 4, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.09.007
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1971). L’homme et la matière. Éditions Albin Michel. (Original work published 1943).
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1973). Milieu et techniques. Éditions Albin Michel. (Original work published 1945).
Lindgren, C. (1998). Shapes of quartz and shapes of minds. In L. Holm, & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Proceedings from the Third Flint Alternatives Conference at Uppsala, Sweden, October 18-20, 1996. Occasional Papers in Archaeology 16 (pp. 95–103). Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
Macdonald, D. A., Bartkowiak, T., & Stemp, W. J. (2020). 3D multiscale curvature analysis of tool edges as an indicator of cereal harvesting intensity. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 33 (July), 102523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102523
Manninen, M. A. (2016). The effect of raw material properties on flake and flake-tool dimensions: A comparison between quartz and chert. Quaternary International, 424 (7), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.096.
Manninen, M. A., & Knutsson, K. (2011). Northern inland oblique point sites–a new look into the late mesolithic oblique point tradition in eastern fennoscandia. In T. Rankama (Ed.), Mesolithic interfaces. Variability in lithic technologies in Eastern Fennoscandia. Monographs of the Archaeological Society of Finland (Vol. 1, pp. 142–175). Archaeological Society of Finland.
Manninen, M. A., & Tallavaara, M. (2011). Descent history of mesolithic oblique points in eastern fennoscandia–a technological comparison between two artefact populations. In T. Rankama (Ed.), Mesolithic interfaces. Variability in lithic technologies in Eastern Fennoscandia (Vol. 1, pp. 176–211). Archaeological Society of Finland.
Marchand, H., & Aymé, A. (1935). Recherches stratigraphiques sur l’Atérien. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle d’Afrique du Nord, XXVI (9), 333–343.
Marks, A., Hietala, H. J., & Williams, J. K. (2001). Tool Standardization in the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic: a Closer Look (with comments). Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11 (1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774301000026
McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39 (5), 453–563. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2000.0435
McCall, G. S., & Thomas, J. T. (2012). Still Bay and Howiesons Poort foraging strategies: Recent research and models of culture change. African Archaeological Review, 29 (1), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-012-9107-y
McClure, H. A. (1994). A new Arabian stone tool assemblage and notes on the Aterian industry of North Africa. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy, 5 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0471.1994.tb00052.x
McNabb, J., Binyon, F., & Hazelwood, L. (2004). The large cutting tools from the South African Acheulean and the question of social traditions. Current Anthropology, 45 (5), 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/423973
Mellars, P. (1989). Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Current Anthropology, 30 (3), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/203755
Mellars, P. (1991). Cognitive changes and the emergence of modern humans in Europe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 1 (1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300000251
Mellars, P. (1996). The Neanderthal legacy: An Archaeological perspective from Western Europe. Princeton University Press.
Monnier, G. (2006). Testing retouched flake tool standardization during the Middle Paleolithic. In E. Hovers, & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions Before the Transition: Evolution and Stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 57–83). Springer.
Montoya, C. (2002). Les pointes à dos épigravettiennes de Saint-Antoine-Vitrolles (Hautes-Alpes): diversité typologique ou homogénéité conceptuelle ? Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 99 (2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2002.12657
Moreau, L., Brandl, M., Filzmoser, P., Hauzenberger, C., Goemaere, É, Jadin, I., Collet, H., Hauzeur, A., & Schmitz, R. W. (2016). Geochemical sourcing of flint artifacts from Western Belgium and the German Rhineland: Testing hypotheses on Gravettian period mobility and raw material economy. Geoarchaeology, 31 (3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21564
Moreau, L., Hauzeur, A., & Jadin, I. (2013). La gestion des ressources lithiques dans l’ensemble gravettien de Maisières-Canal (Bassin de Mons, Hainaut, B): Nouvelles perspectives. Notae Praehistoricae, 33 (2013), 105–126.
Moss, E. H. (1983). Some comments on edge damage as a factor in functional analysis of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science, 10 (3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4403(83)90006-7
Moss, E. H., & Newcomer, M. H. (1982). Reconstruction of tool use at Pincevent: Microwear and experiments. In D. Cahen (Ed.), Tailler! Pourquoi faire: Préhistoire et technologie lithique II, Recent Progress in Microwear Studies (pp. 289–312). Studia Praehistorica Belgica Leuven.
Mourre, V. (1996). Les industries en quartz au Paléolithique. Terminologie, méthodologie et technologie. Paléo, 8 (1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1996.1160
Movius, H. L. J. (1975). Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne). Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.
Movius, H. L. J. (1977). Excavation of the Abri Pataud, Les Eyzies (Dordogne): Stratigraphy. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.
Muller, A., Shipton, C., & Clarkson, C. (2022). Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09914-2
Nelson, M. C. (1991). The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory, 3 (1991), 57–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/20170213
Nespoulet, R. (1996). Le Périgordien VI de l’abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne. L’étude technologique et typologique de l’industrie lithique de la couche 3 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Muséum national d’histoire naturelle.
Nespoulet, R. (2000). Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac, Dordogne : Nouvelles données technologiques et typologiques sur l’industrie lithique provenant du niveau 3. L’Anthropologie, 104 (1), 63–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-5521(00)90004-9
Nespoulet, R., Chiotti, L., & Henry-Gambier, D. (2013). Le Gravettien final de l’abri Pataud (Dordogne, France): Fouilles et études 2005-2009. BAR International Series 2458, Archaeopress.
Nicoud, É. (2011). Le Phénomène Acheuléen en Europe occidentale : approche chronologique, technologie lithique et implications culturelles [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Aix-Marseille Université / Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”.
Nicoud, É. (2013a). Le paradoxe acheuléen. CTHS.
Nicoud, É. (2013b). Complexité des stratigraphies régionales et nouveau modèle d’apparition et de diffusion du phénomène acheuléen en Europe de l’ouest. Quaternaire, 24 (4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.4000/quaternaire.6790
Nonaka, T., Bril, B., & Rein, R. (2010). How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution, 59 (2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006
Nuzhnyj, D. (1989). L’utilisation des microlithes géométriques et non géométriques comme armatures de projectiles. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 86 (3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1989.9368
Odell, G. H. (1980). Butchering with stone tools: Some experimental results. Lithic Technology, 9 (2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1980.11754469
Odell, G. H. (1981). The Morphological Express at Function Junction: Searching for Meaning in Lithic Tool Types. Journal of Anthropological Research, 37 (4), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.2307/3629831
O’Farrell, M. (1996). Approche technologique et fonctionnelle des pointes de la Gravette : une analyse archéologique et expérimentale appliquée à la collection de Corbiac (Dordogne) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Université de Bordeaux I.
O’Farrell, M. (2004). Les pointes de La Gravette de Corbiac (Dordogne) et considérations sur la chasse au Paléolithique supérieur ancien. In P. Bodu, & C. Constantin (Eds.), Approches fonctionnelles en préhistoire. Actes du XXVe Congrès Préhistorique de France, Nanterre 24-26 novembre 2000 (pp. 121–138). Société préhistorique française.
Otte, M. (1979). Documentation archéologique. In P. Haesaerts, & J. de Heinzelin (Eds.), Le site paléolithique de Maisières-Canal (pp. 69–89). De Tempel.
Pargeter, J., Chen, C., Buchanan, B., Fisch, M., Bebber, M., & Eren, M. I. (2022). Stone tool backing and adhesion in hunting weaponry: First results of an experimental program. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 45, 103639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103639
Pelegrin, J. (2000). Les techniques de débitage laminaire au Tardiglaciaire: critères de diagnose et quelques réflexions. In B. Valentin, P. Bodu, & M. Christensen (Eds.), L’europe centrale et septentrionale au Tardiglaciaire. Table-ronde de Nemours 13-16 mai 1997 (pp. 73–86). Éd. APRAIF.
Pelegrin, J. (2006). Long blade technology in the Old World: An experimental approach and some archaeological results. In J. Apel, & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled production and social reproduction: Aspects of traditional stone-tool technologies. Proceedings of a symposium in Uppsala, August 20-24, 2003 (pp. 37–68). Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis & The Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
Pelegrin, J. (2021). Sur la motivation des tailleurs experts du Paléolithique supérieur. Paléo, Hors-série (Décembre 2021), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.4000/paleo.6895
Perpère, M. (2000). Les points de La Gravette de la couche 5 de l’abri Pataud : Réflexion sur les armes de pierre dans les outillages périgordiens. Anthropologie et Préhistoire, 111, 19–27.
Pesesse, D., & Flas, D. (2012). The Maisierian, at the edge of the Gravettian. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 78, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00027122
Pétillon, J.-M., Bignon, O., Bodu, P., Cattelain, P., Debout, G., Langlais, M., Laroulandie, V., Plisson, H., & Valentin, B. (2011). Hard core and cutting edge: Experimental manufacture and use of Magdalenian composite projectile tips. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38 (6), 1266–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.002
Pigeot, N. (1987). Magdaléniens d’Étiolles. Economie de débitage et organisation sociale (l’unité d’habitation U5) (XXVe supplément à Gallia Préhistoire). Éditions du CNRS.
Plisson, H. (2006). Un burin ne sert pas à buriner mais en burinant … In M. de Araujo Igreja, J.-P. Bracco, & F. Le Brun-Ricalens (Eds.), Burins prehistoriques : formes, fonctionnements, fonctions. Actes de la table-ronde d’Aix-en-Provence (3–5 mars 2003) (Vol. 2, pp. 23–33). Musée National d’Histoire et d’Art.
Plisson, H., & Beyries, S. (1998). Pointes ou outils triangulaires ? Données fonctionnelles dans le Moustérien levantin [suivi des] Commentaires de J. Shea, A. Marks, J-M Geneste et de la réponse des auteurs. Paléorient, 24 (1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3406/paleo.1998.4666
Rankama, T. (2002). Analyses of the quartz assemblages of houses 34 and 35 at Kauvonkangas in Tervola. In H. Ranta (Ed.), Huts and Houses. Stone Age and Early Metal Age Buildings in Finland (pp. 79–108). National Board of Antiquities.
Rankama, T., Manninen, M. A., Hertell, E., & Tallavaara, M. (2006). Simple production and social strategies: Do they meet? Social dimensions in Eastern Fennoscandian quartz technologies. In J. Apel, & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled production and social reproduction: Aspects of traditional stone-tool technologies. Proceedings of a symposium in Uppsala, August 20-24, 2003 (pp. 245–261). Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis & The Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
Rodríguez-Rellán, C. (2016). Variability of the rebound hardness as a proxy for detecting the levels of continuity and isotropy in archaeological quartz. Quaternary International, 424, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.085
Rolland, N., & Dibble, H. L. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity, 55 (3), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/281279
Rots, V. (2002a). Are tangs morphological adaptations in view of hafting? Macro- and microscopic wear analysis on a selection of tanged burins from Maisières-Canal. Notae Praehistoricae, 22 (2002), 61–69.
Rots, V. (2002b). Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: Possibilities and Limitations of Macro- and Microscopic Approaches [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Rots, V. (2002c). Bright spots and the question of hafting. Anthropologica et Praehistorica, 113, 61–72.
Rots, V. (2003). Towards an understanding of hafting. Antiquity, 77 (298), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00061743
Rots, V. (2005). Wear traces and the interpretation of stone tools. Journal of Field Archaeology, 30 (1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346905791072404
Rots, V. (2008). Hafting and raw materials from animals. Guide to the identification of hafting traces on stone tools. Anthropozoologica, 43 (1), 43–66.
Rots, V. (2009). The functional analysis of the Mousterian and Micoquian assemblages of Sesselfelsgrotte, Germany: Aspects of tool use and hafting in the European Late Middle Palaeolithic. Quartär, 56 (2009), 37–66. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/230551.
Rots, V. (2010). Prehension and hafting traces on flint tools: A methodology. Universitaire Pers Leuven.
Rots, V. (2013). Insights into early middle palaeolithic tool use and hafting in Western Europe. The functional analysis of level IIa of the early middle palaeolithic site of Biache-Saint-Vaast (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40 (1), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.042
Rots, V. (2015). Hafting and site function in the European Middle Paleolithic. In N. J. Conard, & A. Delagnes (Eds.), Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age: Vol. IV (pp. 383–410). Kerns Verlag.
Rots, V., Coppe, J., & Conard, N. J. (2021). A leaf point documents hunting with spears in the Middle Paleolithic at Hohle Fels, Germany. Mitteilungen Der Gesellschaft Für Urgeschichte, 2021 (30), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.51315/mgfu.2021.30004
Rots, V., Hayes, E., Akerman, K., Green, P., Clarkson, C., Lepers, C., Bordes, L., McAdams, C., Foley, E., & Fullagar, R. (2020). Hafted tool-use experiments with Australian aboriginal plant adhesives: Triodia Spinifex, Xanthorrhoea grass tree and Lechenaultia divaricata Mindrie. EXARC Journal, 2020 (1), 1–10.
Rots, V., Lentfer, C., Schmid, V. C., Porraz, G., & Conard, N. J. (2017). Pressure flaking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa). PLoS ONE, 12 (4), e0175151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175151
Rots, V., Pirnay, L., Pirson, P., & Baudoux, O. (2006). Blind tests shed light on possibilities and limitations for identifying stone tool prehension and hafting. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33 (7), 935–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.018
Rots, V., & Plisson, H. (2014). Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact. Journal of Archaeological Science, 48 (1), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.027
Rots, V., & Van Peer, P. (2006). Early evidence of complexity in lithic economy: Core-axe production, hafting and use at late Middle Pleistocene site 8-B-11, Sai Island (Sudan). Journal of Archaeological Science, 33 (3), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.002
Rots, V., Van Peer, P., & Vermeersch, P. M. (2011). Aspects of tool production, use, and hafting in Palaeolithic assemblages from Northeast Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 60 (5), 637–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.001
Rots, V., & Williamson, B. S. (2004). Microwear and residue analyses in perspective: The contribution of ethnoarchaeological evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31 (9), 1287–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2004.02.009
Scerri, E. M. L. (2013). On the spatial and technological organisation of hafting modifications in the North African Middle Stone Age. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40 (12), 4234–4248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.011
Schlanger, N. (1996). Understanding Levallois: Lithic technology and cognitive archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 6 (2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001724
Sealy, J. (2016). Cultural change, demography, and the archaeology of the last 100 kyr in Southern Africa. In S. C. Jones & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Africa from MIS 6-2: Population Dynamics and Paleoenvironments (pp. 65–75). Springer.
Semenov, S. A. (1964). Prehistoric technology: An experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts from traces of manufacture and wear. Adams & Dart.
Shott, M. J., & Weedman, K. J. (2007). Measuring reduction in stone tools: An ethnoarchaeological study of gamo hidescrapers from Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34 (7), 1016–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.009
Soriano, S. (1998). Les microgravettes du Périgordien de Rabier à Lanquais (Dordogne) : analyse technologique fonctionnelle. Gallia Préhistoire, 40 (1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.3406/galip.1998.2158
Soriano, S., Villa, P., Delagnes, A., Degano, I., Pollarolo, L., Lucejko, J. J., Henshilwood, C., & Wadley, L. (2015). The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort at Sibudu and Blombos: Understanding Middle Stone Age Technologies. PloS One, 10 (7), e0131127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131127
Sternke, F., & Sørensen, M. (2009). The identification of children’s flint knapping products in Mesolithic Scandinavia. In S. McCartan, R. Schulting, G. Warren, & P. Woodman (Eds.), Mesolithic Horizons: Papers Presented at the Seventh International Conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Belfast 2005 (pp. 720–729). Oxbow Books.
Stordeur, D. (1987). Manches et emmanchements préhistoriques : quelques propositions préliminaires. In D. Stordeur (Ed.), La main et l’outil. Manches et emmanchements préhistoriques (pp. 11–34). Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen.
Taipale, N. (2020). Hafting as a flexible strategy: variability in stone tool use and hafting at three European Upper Palaeolithic sites [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université de Liège.
Taipale, N., Chiotti, L., & Rots, V. (2022). Why did hunting weapon design change at Abri Pataud? Lithic use-wear data on armature use and hafting around 24,000–22,000 BP. PLOS ONE, 17 (1), e0262185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262185
Taipale, N., Coppe, J., Touzé, O., & Rots, V. (2017). The weapon system behind the point: Early gravettian hunting technologies at Maisières-Canal [Abstract]. PESHE, 6 (2017), 193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2011.556516
Taipale, N., & Rots, V. (2020). Revisiting Maisières-Canal (Hainaut, BE): New results on tool use and hafting. Notae Praehistoricae, 40 (2020), 105–127.
Taipale, N., & Rots, V. (2021). Every hunter needs a knife: Hafted butchering knives from Maisières-Canal and their effect on lithic assemblage characteristics. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 36, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102874
Tallavaara, M., Manninen, M. A., Hertell, E., & Rankama, T. (2010). How flakes shatter: A critical evaluation of quartz fracture analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37 (10), 2442–2448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.005
Tardy, N., Vosges, J., & Varoutsikos, B. (2016). Micro-blade production on hyaline quartz during the Late Neolithic of northern Greece (5400–4600 cal. B.C.): examples from Dikili Tash and Promachonas-Topolniča. Quaternary International, 424, 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.139
Tomasso, A., Rots, V., Purdue, L., Beyries, S., Buckley, M., Cheval, C., Cnuts, D., Coppe, J., Julien, M. A., Grenet, M., Lepers, C., M’hamdi, M., Simon, P., Sorin, S., & Porraz, G. (2018). Gravettian weaponry: 23,500-year-old evidence of a composite barbed point from Les Prés de Laure (France). Journal of Archaeological Science, 100, 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2018.05.003
Tomasso, S. (2021). What is new in the Aterian? A functional view on tool use, hafted stone tool technologies and assemblage variability at Ifri n’Ammar within the context of the Northwest African Middle Stone Age [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université de Liège.
Tomasso, S., Cnuts, D., Mikdad, A., & Rots, V. (2020). Changes in hafting practices during the Middle Stone Age at Ifri n’ Ammar. Quaternary International, 555 (March), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.026
Tomasso, S., & Rots, V. (2018). What is the use of shaping a tang? Tool use and hafting of tanged tools in the Aterian of Northern Africa. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10 (6), 1389–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0448-3
Touzé, O. (2018). Aux prémices du Gravettien dans le Nord-Ouest européen. Étude de la production des pointes lithiques à Maisières-Canal (province de Hainaut, Belgique). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 115 (3), 455–495. https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2018.14920
Touzé, O. (2019). D’une tradition à l’autre, les débuts de la période gravettienne. Trajectoire technique des sociétés des chasseurs-cueilleurs d’Europe nord-occidentale [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université de Liège / Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Tydgadt, L., & Rots, V. (2022). Stick to it! Mechanical performance tests to explore the resilience of prehistoric glues in hafting. Archaeometry, January, 1252–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12779
Villa, P., & Roebroeks, W. (2014). Neandertal demise: An archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS ONE, 9 (4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096424
Way, A. M., de la Peña, P., de la Peña, E., & Wadley, L. (2022). Howiesons Poort backed artifacts provide evidence for social connectivity across Southern Africa during the Final Pleistocene. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12677-5
Weedman, K. J. (2006). An ethnoarchaeological study of hafting and stone tool diversity among the Gamo of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13 (3), 188–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-006-9010-4
White, M. J. (1998). On the significance of Acheulean biface variability in southern Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 64, 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00002164
Wierer, U. (2013). Variability and standardization: The early Gravettian lithic complex of Grotta Paglicci, Southern Italy. Quaternary International, 288, 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.04.043
Wynn, T. (1988). Tools and the evolution of human intelligence. In R. Byrne, & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans (pp. 271–284). Oxford University Press.