Article (Scientific journals)
Periodontal screening and referral behaviour of general dental practitioners in Flanders.
Meers, E; Dekeyser, C; Favril, C et al.
2018In Clinical Oral Investigations, 22 (3), p. 1167-1173
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Meers - Quirynen 2017.docx
Author postprint (23.71 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Belgium; Consensus; General Practice, Dental; Humans; Periodontal Diseases/diagnosis; Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data; Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data; Surveys and Questionnaires; Dutch periodontal screening index (DPSI); Periodontitis; Referral behaviour; Screening
Abstract :
[en] OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the screening and referral behaviour of Flemish dentists concerning periodontitis and more specific, the use of the Dutch Periodontal Screening Index (DPSI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was electronically distributed through the different professional dental societies. It consisted of two parts: the first aimed at describing the profile of the dentist. The second part inquired the screening method, when this was applied, periodontal risk factors and referral behaviour. RESULTS: One thousand fifty dentists attended to the questionnaire. One hundred fifty-nine questionnaires were excluded since they did not match the target audience. Sixty-four percent of Flemish dentists used DPSI as a periodontal screening method, 28% screened based on probing pocket depth, 4% used solely radiographs and 4% had no screening method at all. The usage of DPSI is influenced by the year of graduation: the longer the dentists were graduated, the less they used DPSI. No influence of sex, education centre and location was found. Referral behaviour is influenced by different patient- and dentist-related factors. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding the screening behaviour, there seems a consensus among Flemish dentists that a periodontal probe should be used. For referral, there is no consensus about if and when to refer to a specialist. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is encouraging that 92% of the Flemish general dental practitioners use a probe when screening for periodontitis. However, DPSI is mainly used by younger dentists. An effort should be made to encourage all dentists to use this, so that in every patient, periodontitis can be detected timely, securing the best treatment outcome.
Research center :
d‐BRU - Dental Biomaterials Research Unit - ULiège [BE]
Disciplines :
Dentistry & oral medicine
Author, co-author :
Meers, E;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and
Dekeyser, C;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and
Favril, C;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and
Teughels, W;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and
Quirynen, M;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and
Laleman, Isabelle  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire ; Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven
Language :
English
Title :
Periodontal screening and referral behaviour of general dental practitioners in Flanders.
Publication date :
April 2018
Journal title :
Clinical Oral Investigations
ISSN :
1432-6981
eISSN :
1436-3771
Publisher :
Springer, United States - Delaware
Volume :
22
Issue :
3
Pages :
1167-1173
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 17 March 2023

Statistics


Number of views
38 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
18 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
2
OpenCitations
 
2

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi