Article (Scientific journals)
The OralChroma(TM) CHM-2: a comparison with the OralChroma(TM) CHM-1.
Laleman, Isabelle; Dekeyser, C; Wylleman, A et al.
2020In Clinical Oral Investigations, 24 (8), p. 2829-2836
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
The OralChromaTM CHM-2 a comparison with the OralChromaTM CHM-1.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.11 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; CHM protein, human; Sulfur Compounds; YY9FVM7NSN (Hydrogen Sulfide); Breath Tests; Halitosis; Humans; Hydrogen Sulfide; Bad breath; Diagnosis; Oral malodor
Abstract :
[en] OBJECTIVES: Already decades ago, the diagnosis of halitosis was facilitated with the arrival of chair-side instruments to score the breath odor. These devices are used for a more objective assessment of halitosis compared with organoleptic scoring, but these too have their disadvantages. To overcome some of the drawbacks of the original model of the OralChroma(TM) (CHM-1), few years ago a second generation of this machine (CHM-2) was introduced. This study compared both devices in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All records of the patients visiting a specialized halitosis consultation over a period of 5 years (2012-2017) were examined. The correlations of the OralChroma(TM) CHM-1 and CHM-2 with the organoleptic and Halimeter® measurements were analyzed. Additionally the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predicted values were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 581 data points were included (CHM-1: 292, CHM-2: 289). The correlations between both models with the organoleptic measurements were not statistically significant different. The CHM-2 seemed superior to the CHM-1 in the quantification of dimethyl sulfide with a detection rate of 95% and 61%, respectively. Additionally, the CHM-2 was significantly more sensitive for dimethyl sulfide than the CHM-1. However the latter showed in turn a better sensitivity for hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan. CONCLUSION: The CHM-2 showed a better sensitivity for dimethyl sulfide than its predecessor. However, its sensitivity for hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan was worse. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dimethyl sulfide is the main volatile implicated in extra-oral blood-borne halitosis, this makes the OralChroma(TM) CHM-2 the instrument of choice when this is suspected.
Research center :
d‐BRU - Dental Biomaterials Research Unit - ULiège [BE]
Disciplines :
Dentistry & oral medicine
Author, co-author :
Laleman, Isabelle  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire ; Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven
Dekeyser, C;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven &
Wylleman, A;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven &
Teughels, W;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven &
Quirynen, M;  Section of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven &
Language :
English
Title :
The OralChroma(TM) CHM-2: a comparison with the OralChroma(TM) CHM-1.
Publication date :
August 2020
Journal title :
Clinical Oral Investigations
ISSN :
1432-6981
eISSN :
1436-3771
Publisher :
Springer, United States - Delaware
Volume :
24
Issue :
8
Pages :
2829-2836
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 17 March 2023

Statistics


Number of views
7 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
10
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
10
OpenCitations
 
6

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi