Article (Scientific journals)
Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Fizazi, Karim; Piulats, Josep M; Reaume, M Neil et al.
2023In New England Journal of Medicine, 388 (8), p. 719 - 732
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
TRITON 3 NEJM 2023.pdf
Publisher postprint (671.42 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
rucaparib; Indoles; Male; Humans; Indoles/therapeutic use; Progression-Free Survival; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy; Physicians; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: In a phase 2 study, rucaparib, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), showed a high level of activity in patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a deleterious BRCA alteration. Data are needed to confirm and expand on the findings of the phase 2 study. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration and who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). We randomly assigned the patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or a physician's choice control (docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI [abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide]). The primary outcome was the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival according to independent review. RESULTS: Of the 4855 patients who had undergone prescreening or screening, 270 were assigned to receive rucaparib and 135 to receive a control medication (intention-to-treat population); in the two groups, 201 patients and 101 patients, respectively, had a BRCA alteration. At 62 months, the duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (median, 11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.69) and in the intention-to-treat group (median, 10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001 for both comparisons). In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was 8.1 months in the rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.52). The most frequent adverse events with rucaparib were fatigue and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer with rucaparib than with a control medication among patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA alteration. (Funded by Clovis Oncology; TRITON3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02975934.).
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Fizazi, Karim;  Gustave Roussy Institute, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
Piulats, Josep M;  Institut Català d'Oncologia-Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research -CiberOnc, Barcelona, Spain
Reaume, M Neil;  The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada,
Ostler, Peter;  Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood (P.O.), United Kingdom
McDermott, Ray;  St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
Gingerich, Joel R;  CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Pintus, Elias;  Guy's Hospital, United Kingdom
Sridhar, Srikala S;  Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada
Bambury, Richard M;  Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Ireland
Emmenegger, Urban;  Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
Lindberg, Henriette;  Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Morris, David;  Urology Associates, Nashville
Nolè, Franco;  European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Staffurth, John;  Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff , United Kingdom
Redfern, Charles;  Sharp HealthCare, San Diego, CA
Sáez, María I;  Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
Abida, Wassim;  Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Daugaard, Gedske;  Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Heidenreich, Axel;  Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
Krieger, Laurence;  Genesis Care, North Shore, Sydney
Sautois, Brieuc  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'oncologie médicale
Loehr, Andrea;  Clovis Oncology, Boulder, CO
Despain, Darrin;  Clovis Oncology, Boulder, CO
Heyes, Catherine A;  Clovis Oncology UK, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Watkins, Simon P ;  Clovis Oncology UK, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Chowdhury, Simon;  Guy's Hospital and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
Ryan, Charles J;  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Bryce, Alan H ;  Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
TRITON3 Investigators
More authors (19 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Publication date :
23 February 2023
Journal title :
New England Journal of Medicine
ISSN :
0028-4793
eISSN :
1533-4406
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, United States
Volume :
388
Issue :
8
Pages :
719 - 732
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Clovis Oncology [US-CO] [US-CO]
NCI - National Cancer Institute [US-MD] [US-MD]
Available on ORBi :
since 27 February 2023

Statistics


Number of views
69 (6 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
9 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
112
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
103
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi