Characteristics of Mid-Term Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Patients Attending a Follow-Up Clinic: A Prospective Comparison Between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Survivors.
COVID-19; critical illness; outcome assessment; post-intensive care syndrome; survivors; Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Abstract :
[en] ("[en] UNLABELLED: At present, it is not clear if critically ill COVID-19 survivors have different needs in terms of follow-up compared with other critically ill survivors, and thus if duplicated post-ICU trajectories are mandatory.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome and non-COVID-19 (NC) survivors referred to a follow-up clinic at 3 months (M3) after ICU discharge.
DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults who survived an ICU stay greater than or equal to 7 days and attended the M3 consultation were included in this observational study performed in a post-ICU follow-up clinic of a single tertiary hospital.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients underwent a standardized assessment, addressing health-related quality of life (3-level version of EQ-5D), sleep disorders (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]), physical status (Barthel index, handgrip and quadriceps strengths), mental health disorders (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-Revised [IES-R]), and cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]).
RESULTS: A total of 143 survivors (86 COVID and 57 NC) attended the M3 consultation. Their median age and severity scores were similar. NC patients had a shorter ICU stay (10 d [8-17.2 d]) compared with COVID group (18 d [10.8-30 d]) (p = 0.001). M3 outcomes were similar in the two groups, except for a higher PSQI (p = 0.038) in the COVID group (6 [3-9.5]) versus NC group (4 [2-7]), and a slightly lower Barthel index in the NC group (100 [100-100]) than in the COVID group (100 [85-100]) (p = 0.026). However, the proportion of patients with abnormal values at each score was similar in the two groups. Health-related quality of life was similar in the two groups. The three MoCA (≥ 26), IES-R (<33), and Barthel (=100) were normal in 58 of 143 patients (40.6%). In contrast, 68.5% (98/143) had not returned to their baseline level of daily activities.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In our follow-up clinic at 3 months after discharge, the proportion of patients presenting alterations in the main PICS domains was similar whether they survived a COVID-19 or another critical illness, despite longer ICU stay in COVID group. Cognition and sleep were the two most affected PICS domains.","[en] ","")
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Rousseau, Anne-Françoise ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
COLSON, Camille ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Soins intensifs chirurgie (+1D)
MINGUET, Pauline ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Soins intensifs chirurgie (+1C)
Kellens, Isabelle ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
COLLARD, Maxine ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
Vancraybex, Camille ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
Guiot, Julien ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de pneumologie - allergologie
Lambermont, Bernard ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
Misset, Benoît ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
Language :
English
Title :
Characteristics of Mid-Term Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in Patients Attending a Follow-Up Clinic: A Prospective Comparison Between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Survivors.
Publication date :
January 2023
Journal title :
Critical Care Explorations
eISSN :
2639-8028
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), United States
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al: Improving longterm outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: Report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:502-509
Rousseau AF, Prescott HC, Brett SJ, et al: Long-term outcomes after critical illness: Recent insights. Crit Care 2021; 25:108
Cuthbertson BH, Roughton S, Jenkinson D, et al: Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: A cohort study. Crit Care 2010; 14:R6
Lambermont B, Rousseau AF, Seidel L, et al: Outcome improvement between the first two waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in a single tertiary-care hospital in Belgium. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0438
Martillo MA, Dangayach NS, Tabacof L, et al: Postintensive care syndrome in survivors of critical illness related to coronavirus disease 2019: Cohort study from a New York City critical care recovery clinic. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:1427-1438
Van Aerde N, Van den Berghe G, Hermans G: Weakness in the ICU: The right weight on the right scale. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:137-138
Morin L, Savale L, et al; Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group: Four-month clinical status of a cohort of patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. JAMA 2021; 325:1525-1534
Valent A, Dudoignon E, Ressaire Q, et al: Three-month quality of life in survivors of ARDS due to COVID-19: A preliminary report from a French academic centre. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:740-741
Gamberini L, Mazzoli CA, Sintonen H, et al: Quality of life of COVID-19 critically ill survivors after ICU discharge: 90 days follow-up. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:2805-2817
Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al: 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: A cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-232
Latronico N, Peli E, Calza S, et al: Physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes in 1-year survivors of COVID-19-associated ARDS. Thorax 2022; 77:300-303
Darcis G, Bouquegneau A, Maes N, et al: Long-term clinical follow-up of patients suffering from moderate-to-severe COVID-19 infection: A monocentric prospective observational cohort study. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 109:209-216
Nakanishi N, Liu K, Kawakami D, et al: Post-intensive care syndrome and its new challenges in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A review of recent advances and perspectives. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3870
Vijayaraghavan BKT, Willaert X, Cuthbertson BH: Should ICU clinicians follow patients after ICU discharge? No. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:1542-1544
Meyer J, Brett SJ, Waldmann C: Should ICU clinicians follow patients after ICU discharge? Yes. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:1539-1541
Rosa RG, Ferreira GE, Viola TW, et al: Effects of post-ICU follow-up on subject outcomes: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Crit Care 2019; 52:115-125
Rousseau AF, Preiser JC: To critically ill survivors: LIFE-UP!. J Crit Care 2021; 64:139-140
Van Der Schaaf M, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Van Der Steen M, et al: Recommendations for intensive care follow-up clinics; report from a survey and conference of Dutch intensive cares. Minerva Anestesiol 2015; 81:135-144
Rovere Querini P, De Lorenzo R, Conte C, et al: Post-COVID-19 follow-up clinic: Depicting chronicity of a new disease. Acta Biomed 2020; 91:22-28
Walter K: An inside look at a post-COVID-19 clinic. JAMA 2021; 325:2036-2037
Rasulo FA, Piva S, Latronico N: Long-term complications of COVID-19 in ICU survivors: What do we know? Minerva Anestesiol 2022; 88:72-79
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:695-699
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67:361-370
Weiss D, Marmar C: The impact of event scale-revised. In: Assessing Pschycological Trauma and PTSD. Wilson J, Keane T (Eds). New York, NY, Guilford, 1997, pp 399-411
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, et al: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989; 28:193-213
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965; 14:61-65
Spies C, Krampe H, Paul N, et al: Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings-results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test. J Intensice Care Soc 2021; 22:159-174
Rousseau AF, Kellens I, Freycenon G, et al: Highly standardized quadriceps dynamometry of critically ill adults at bedside: A step towards individualized rehabilitation. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2018; 69:159-164
Rabin R, de Charro F: EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med 2001; 33:337-343
Hodgson CL, Higgins AM, Bailey MJ, et al: Comparison of 6-month outcomes of survivors of COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 critical illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 205:1159-1168
Altman MT, Knauert MP, Pisani MA: Sleep disturbance after hospitalization and critical illness: A systematic review. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14:1457-1468
Goyal A, Saxena K, Kar A, et al: Sleep EEG signatures in COVID-19 survivors. Sleep Vigil 2021; 1:8
Banerjee D, Viswanath B: Neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 and possible pathogenic mechanisms: Insights from other coronaviruses. Asian J Psychiatr 2020; 54:102350
Lambermont B, Davenne E, Maclot F, et al: SARS-CoV-2 in carotid body. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:342-343
Mazza MG, De Lorenzo R, Conte C, et al: Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors. Brain Behav Immun 2020; 89:594-600
Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al: COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020; 395:1033-1034
Matschke J, Lutgehetmann M, Hagel C, et al: Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: A post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19:919-929
Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020; 395:912-920
Shen B, Yi X, Sun Y, et al: Proteomic and metabolomic characterization of COVID-19 patient sera. Cell 2020; 182:59-72. e15
Lorente JA, Nin N, Villa P, et al: Metabolomic diferences between COVID-19 and H1N1 influenza induced ARDS. Crit Care 2021; 25:390
Bein T, Weber-Carstens S, Apfelbacher C: Long-term outcome after the acute respiratory distress syndrome: Different from general critical illness? Curr Opin Crit Care 2018; 24:35-40
Jutte JE, Erb CT, Jackson JC: Physical, cognitive, and psychological disability following critical illness: What is the risk? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 36:943-958
Herridge MS, Batt J, Hopkins RO: The pathophysiology of long-term neuromuscular and cognitive outcomes following critical illness. Crit Care Clin 2008; 24:179-199
Griffith DM, Lewis S, Rossi AG, et al: Systemic inflammation after critical illness: Relationship with physical recovery and exploration of potential mechanisms. Thorax 2016; 71:820-829
Griffith DM, Vale ME, Campbell C, et al: Persistent inflammation and recovery after intensive care: A systematic review. J Crit Care 2016; 33:192-199
Geense WW, Zegers M, Peters MAA, et al: New physical, mental, and cognitive problems 1 year after ICU admission: A prospective multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203:1512-1521
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
