anoestrus; breeding season; Buck effect; goat; Animal Science and Zoology
Abstract :
[en] The response to buck effect (BE) was studied in Beni Arouss goats during anoestrus (AS) and breeding season (BS). Prior to AS, bucks were exposed to artificial long days during 75 days followed by a natural photoperiod. Goats of group 1 were treated for 11 days with 20 mg of fluorogestone acetate (FGA) combined to 300 IU of eCG and 50 µg of cloprostenol injected 48 h prior to FGA-removal. Goats of group 2 and 3 were subjected to the same treatments, but eCG injection was replaced by a sexually active buck introduced 0 (group 2) or 48 hours (group 3) before FGA-removal. During the AS, 77% of goats induced by the BE showed an oestrus at [60–74] hr following FGA-removal for group 3 and [71–77] hr for group 2 (p <.05). In group 1, 77% of goats displayed an LH surge [24–40] hr after FGA-removal and 67% developed a luteal phase, but no LH surge or luteal response was detected in groups 2 and 3. During the BS, oestrus response reached 100% in goats synchronised with the BE ([22–68] hr in groups 2 and 3). In all groups, 84% of the goats displayed an LH surge at [30–70] hr post-treatment and 69% displayed luteal phase within 3–8 days post-treatment. After 11–15 days, the occurrence of ovulations followed by normal luteal phase was raised in all groups (91%). It was concluded that photostimulated bucks failed to induce and synchronise ovulation in goats previously treated with 20 mg of FGA and 50 µg of cloprostenol during anoestrus.Highlights The response to the buck effect was studied in Beni Arouss goats during anoestrus and breeding season. The use of sexually active bucks to induce and to synchronise oestrus and ovulation in goats treated with 20 mg of FGA and cloprostenol during the anoestrus season is not efficient in comparison with an hormonal treatment based on administration of FGA, eCG and cloprostenol. The same protocol appears as an adequate alternative for oestrus and ovulation synchronisation during the breeding season.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
El Kadili, Sara ; Department of Animal Production, Ecole Nationale d’Agriculture de Meknès, Meknès, Morocco ; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Integrated Veterinary Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Chentouf, Mouad; Regional Center of Tangier, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Tangier, Morocco
Raes, Marianne; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Integrated Veterinary Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Bister, Jean-Loup; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Integrated Veterinary Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Beckers, Jean-François ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences fonctionnelles (DSF)
Amzati, Gaston; Department of Veterinary Medicine, Integrated Veterinary Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Faculty of Sciences, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Madani, Ilham; Department of Biology, Meknes Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismail University, Meknès, Morocco
Archa, Bouchaib; Department of Animal Production, Ecole Nationale d’Agriculture de Meknès, Meknès, Morocco
Kirschvink, Nathalie; Department of Medicine, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Response to the sexually active buck effect in Beni Arouss goats primed with progestagens during the anoestrus and breeding seasons
ARES - Académie de Recherche et d'Enseignement Supérieur
Funding text :
This work was supported by the Académie de recherche et d'enseignement supérieur. This research was conducted at INRA, Regional Center of Tangier. The authors gratefully acknowledge staff of this center for their assistance with animal handling and care during experimentations.
Chasles M, Chesneau D, Moussu C, Delgadillo JA, Chemineau P, Keller M. 2016. Sexually active bucks are efficient to stimulate female ovulatory activity during the anestrous season also under temperate latitudes. Anim Reprod Sci. 168: 86–91.
Chemineau P, Malpaux B, Pelletier J, Leboeuf B, Delgadillo JA, Deletang F, Pobel T, Brice G. 1996. Use of melatonin implants and photoperiodic treatments to control seasonal reproduction in sheep and goats. INRA Prod Anim. 9 (1): 45–60.
Chemineau P, Martin GB, Saumande J, Normant E. 1988. Seasonal and hormonal control of pulsatile LH secretion in the dairy goat (Capra hircus). J Reprod Fertil. 83 (1): 91–98.
Chemineau P, Normant E, Ravault JP, Thimonier J. 1986. Induction and persistence of pituitary and ovarian activity in out-of-season lactating dairy goat after a treatment combining skeleton photoperiod, melatonin and the male effect. J Reprod Fertil. 78 (2): 497–504.
Chemineau P, Pellicer-Rubio M, Lassoued N, Khaldi G, Monniaux D. 2006. Male-induced short oestrous and ovarian cycles in sheep and goats: a working hypothesis. Reprod Nutr Dev. 46 (4): 417–429.
Chemineau P. 1985. Effects of a progestagen on buckinduced short ovarian cycles in the Creole meat goat. Anim Reprod Sci. 9 (1): 87–94.
Chentouf M, Bister JL, Boulanouar B. 2011. Reproduction characteristics of North Moroccan indigenous goats. Small Rumin Res. 98 (1-3): 185–188.
Chentouf M, Bister JL. 2011. Light treated bucks induce a well synchronized estrus and LH peak during anestrous season by male effect in North Moroccan goats. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of European Association of Animal Production; Aug 29–Sep 2; Stavanger, Norway.
Delgadillo JA, Chemineau P, Keller M. 2017. Using Socio-Sexual Stimulations for sustainable goat production under subtropical latitudes. In: Simões J, GCe, editor. Sustainable goat production in adverse environments, Volume I. Cham: Springer.
Delgadillo JA, Flores JA, Véliz FG, Hernández HF, Duarte G, Vielma J, Poindron P, Chemineau P, Malpaux B. 2002. Induction of sexual activity in lactating anovulatory female goats using male goats treated only with artificially long days. J Anim Sci. 80 (11): 2780–2786.
Delgadillo JA, Vélez LI. 2010. Stimulation of reproductive activity in anovulatory Alpine goats exposed to bucks treated only with artificially long days. Animal. 4 (12): 2012–2016.
Diaz Delfa C, Gonzalez A, Haba E, Guirao J, Lobera J, Urrutia B, Carrizosa JA, Lopez-Sebastian A. 2002. Inducción y sincronización de ovulaciones en cabras de raza Murciano-Granadina mediante la utilización del efecto macho y progesterona. SEOC. 27: 1017–1021.
Drion PV, Furtoss V, Baril G, Manfredi E, Bouvier F, Pougnard JL, Bernelas D, Caugnon P, McNamara EM, Remy B, et al. 2001. Four years of induction/sinchronization of estrus in dairy goats: effect on the evolution of eCG binding rate in relation with the parameters of reproduction. Reprod Nutr Dev. 41 (5): 401–412.
El Kadili S, Raes M, Bister JL, Archa B, Chentouf M, Kirschvink N. 2019a. Effect of season on sexual behavior, testicular measurements and seminal characteristics in "Beni arouss" North Moroccan bucks. Anim Reprod Sci. 201: 41–54.
El Kadili S, Raes M, Bister JL, Beckers JF, Amzati G, Archa B, Chentouf M, Kirschvink N. 2019b. Evaluation of different hormonal treatments on oestral and ovarian responses in Moroccan Beni Arouss goats during anoestrus and breeding season. Reprod Domest Anim. 54 (7): 1003–1009.
FAO. 2007. Global plan of action for animal genetic resources and the Interlaken Declaration. Rome; [accessed 2007]. www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1404e/a1404e00.htm.
Flores JA, Véliz FG, Pérez-Villanueva JA, Martínez de la Escalera G, Chemineau P, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo J. 2000. Male reproductive condition is the limiting factor of efficiency in the male effect during seasonal anestrus in female goats. Biol Reprod. 62 (5): 1409–1414.
Jarrige ER. 1988. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Paris, France: INRA France; p. 150–153.
Lassoued N, Khaldi G, Cognié Y, Chemineau P, Thimonier J. 1995. Effet de la progestérone sur le taux d’ovulation et la durée du cycle ovarien induits par effet mâle chez la brebis Barbarine et la chèvre locale tunisienne [Effect of progesterone on ovulation rate and oestrus cycle length induced by the male effect in the Barbarine ewe and Tunisian local goat. Reprod Nutr Dev. 35 (4): 415–426. French.
Leboeuf B, Forgerit Y, Bernelas D, Pougnard JL, Senty E, Driancourt MA. 2003. Efficacy of two types of vaginal sponges to control onset of oestrus, time of preovulatory LH peak and kidding rate in goats inseminated with variable numbers of spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 60 (7): 1371–1378.
Lopez-Sebastian A, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Carrizosa JA, Urrutia B, Diaz-Delfa C, Santiago-Moreno J, Gomez-Brunet A. 2007. New estrus synchronization and artificial insemination protocol for goats based on male exposure, progesterone and cloprostenol during the non-breeding season. Theriogenology. 68 (8): 1081–1087.
Luna-Orozco JR, Guillen-Muñoz JM, De Santiago-Miramontes MA, García JE, Rodríguez-Martínez R, Meza-Herrera CA, Mellado M, Véliz FG. 2012. Influence of sexually inactive bucks subjected to long photoperiod or testosterone on the induction of estrus in anovulatory goats. Trop Anim Health Prod. 44 (1): 71–75.
Martin GB, Milton JTB, Davidson RH, Banchero Hunzicker GE, Lindsay DR, Blache D. 2004. Natural methods for increasing reproductive efficiency in small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci. 82-83: 231–246.
Noakes DE, Parkinson DJ, England GCW. 2009. Pregnancy and parturition. Arthurs veterinary reproduction and obstetrics. Edinburgh: Saunders.
Pellicer-Rubio M-T, Boissard K, Forgerit Y, Pougnard JL, Bonné JL, Leboeuf B. 2016. Evaluation of hor- mone-free protocols based on the “male effect” for artificial insemination in lactating goats during seasonal anestrus. Theriogenology. 85 (5): 960–969.
Pellicer-Rubio MT, Boissard K, Grizelj J, Vince S, Fréret S, Fatet A, López-Sebastián A. 2019. Vers une maîtrise de la reproduction sans hormones chez les petits ruminants [Reproduction mastering without hormones in small ruminants]. INRA Prod Anim. 32 (1): 51–66. French.
Pellicer-Rubio MT, Leboeuf B, Bernelas D, Forgerit Y, Pougnard JL, Bonne JL, Senty E, Chemineau P. 2007. Highly synchronous and fertile reproductive activity induced by the male effect during deep anoestrus in lactating goats subjected to treatment with artificially long days followed by a natural photoperiod. Anim Reprod Sci. 98 (3–4): 241–258.
Pellicer-Rubio MT, Leboeuf B, Bernelas D, Forgerit Y, Pougnard JL, Bonné JL, Senty E, Breton S, Brun F, Chemineau P. 2008. High fertility using artificial insemination during deep anoestrus after induction and synchronisation of ovulatory activity by the “male effect” in lactating goats subjected to treatment with artificial long days and progestagens. Anim Reprod Sci. 109 (1–4): 172–188.
Perkins A, Fitzgerald JA. 1994. The behavioral component of the ram effect: the influence of ram sexual behavior on the induction of estrus in anovulatory ewes. J Anim Sci. 72 (1): 51–55.
Rekik M, Ben Salem I, Lassoued N. 2012. Reproductive efficiency for increased meat production in goats. In Mahgoub O, Kadim IT, Webb E, editors. Goat Meat Production and Quality. Wallingford Oxfordshire (UK): CABI International; p. 119–160.
Rekik M, Ben-Othmane H, Lassoued N, Sakly C. 2014. Efficiency of oestrous synchronization by GnRH, prostaglandins and socio-sexual cues in the North African Maure goats. Reprod Dom Anim. 49 (3): 499–504.
Ritar AJ, Maxwell WMC, Salamon S. 1984. Ovulation and LH secretion in the goat after intravaginal progestagen sponge PMSG treatment. J Reprod Fertil. 72 (2): 559–563.
Roy F, Maurel MC, Combes B, Vaiman D, Cribiu EP, Lantier I, Pobel T, Deletang F, Combarnous Y, Guillou F. 1999. The negative effect of repeated equine chorionic gonadotropin treatment on subsequent fertility in Alpine goats is due to a humoral immune response involving the major histocompatibility complex. Biol Reprod. 60 (4): 805–813.
Sun S, Liu S, Luo J, Chen Z, Li C, Loor JJ, Cao Y. 2019. Repeated pregnant mare serum gonadotropin‐mediated oestrous synchronization alters gene expression in the ovaries and reduces reproductive performance in dairy goats. Reprod Dom Anim. 54 (6): 873–881.
Thimonier J, Cognie Y, Lassoued N, Khaldi G. 2000. The ram effect: an up-to-date method for the control of oestrus and ovulation in sheep. INRA Prod Anim. 13 (4): 223–231.
Ungerfeld R, Ramos MA, Gonzalez-Pensado SP. 2008. Ram effect: adult rams induce a greater reproductive response in anestrous ewes than yearling rams. Anim Reprod Sci. 103 (3–4): 271–277.
Veliz FG, Poindron P, Malpaux B, Delgadillo JA. 2006. Maintaining contact with bucks does not induce refractoriness to the male effect in seasonally anestrous female goats. Anim Reprod Sci. 92 (3–4): 300–309.
Viñoles C, Forsberg M, Banchero G, Rubianes E. 2001. Effect of long-term and short-term progestagen treatment on follicular development and pregnancy rate in cyclic ewes. Theriogenology. 55 (4): 993–1004.
Viñoles C, Meikle A, Forsberg M, Rubianes E. 1999. The effect of subluteal leves of exogenous progesterone on follicular dynamics and endocrine patterns during the early luteal phase of the ewe. Theriogenology. 51 (7): 1351–1361.
Walkden-Brown SW, Martin GB, Restall BJ. 1999. Role of male–female interaction in regulating reproduction in sheep and goats. J Reprod Fertil. Suppl. 52: 243–257.
Walkden-Brown SW, Restall BJ. 1993. The male effect in the Australian cashmere goat. 3. Enhancement with buck nutrition and use of oestrous females. Anim Reprod Sci. 32 (1–2): 69–84.
Zarazaga LA, Gatica MC, Gallego-Calvo L, Celi I, Guzman JL. 2014. The timing of oestrus, the preovulatory LH surge and ovulation in Blanca Andaluza goats synchronised by intravaginal progestagen sponge treatment is modified by season but not by body condition score. Anim Reprod Sci. 146 (3–4): 170–175.
Zarazaga LA, Gatica MC, Hernández H, Chemineau P, Delgadillo JA, Guzmán JL. 2019. Photoperiod-treated bucks are equal to melatonin-treated bucks for inducingreproductive behaviour and physiological functions via the “male effect” in Mediterranean goats. Anim Reprod Sci. 202: 58–64.
