Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract :
[en] Background/objective
The holistic concept of physical literacy (PL) embraces different person-centered qualities (physical, cognitive, affective/psychological) necessary to lead physically active lifestyles. PL has recently gained increasing attention globally and Europe is no exception. However, scientific endeavors summarizing the current state of PL in Europe are lacking. Therefore, the goal of this study was to comprehensively assess and compare the implementation of PL in research, policy, and practice across the continent.
Methods
We assembled a panel of experts representing 25 European countries. Employing a complementary mixed-methods design, the experts first prepared reviews about the current state of PL in their countries (categories: research, practice/policy). The reviews underwent comparative document analysis, ensuring a transnational four-eyes principle. For re-validation purposes, the representatives completed a quantitative survey with questions reflecting the inductive themes from the document analysis.
Results
The document analysis resulted in ten disjunct themes (related to “concept”, “research”, “practice/policy”, “future/prospect”) and yielded a heterogenous PL situation in Europe. The implementation state was strongly linked to conceptual discussions (e.g., existence of competing approaches), linguistic issues (e.g., translations), and country-specific traditions. Despite growing scholarly attention, PL hesitantly permeates practice and policy in most countries. Nevertheless, the experts largely anticipate increasing popularity of PL for the future.
Conclusion
Despite the heterogeneous situation across Europe, the analysis has uncovered similarities among the countries, such as the presence of established yet not identical concepts. Research should intensify academic activities (conceptual-linguistic elaborations, empirical work) before PL may gain further access into practical and political spheres in the long term.
Research Center/Unit :
RUCHE - Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health & Education - ULiège
Disciplines :
Education & instruction
Author, co-author :
Carl, J.
Bryant, A.
Edwards, L.C.
Bartle, G.
Birch, J.
Christodoulides, E.
Emeljanovas, A.
Fröberg, A.
Gandrieau, J.
Gilic, B.
van Hilvoorde, I.M.
Holler, P.
Iconomescu, T.M.
Jaunig, J.
Laudanska-Krzeminska, I.
Lundvall, S.
De Martelaer, K.
Martins, J.
Mieziene, B.
Mendoza-Muñoz, M.
Mouton, Alexandre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Intervention et gestion en activités physiques et sportives
Guthold, R., Stevens, G.A., Riley, L.M., Bull, F.C., Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Global Health 6:10 (2018), e1077–e1086, 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7.
The Lancet Physical Activity Series. A sporting chance: physical activity as part of everyday life. Lancet, 398(10298), 2021, 365, 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01652-4.
Carl, J., Barratt, J., Töpfer, C., Cairney, J., Pfeifer, K., How are physical literacy interventions conceptualized? – a systematic review on intervention design and content. Psychol Sport Exerc, 58, 2022, 102091, 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102091.
Young, L., O'Connor, J., Alfrey, L., Physical literacy: a concept analysis. Sport Educ Soc 25:8 (2020), 946–959, 10.1080/13573322.2019.1677586.
Shearer, C., Goss, H.R., Edwards, L.C., et al. How is physical literacy defined? A contemporary update. J Teach Phys Educ 37:3 (2018), 237–245, 10.1123/jtpe.2018-0136.
Martins, J., Onofre, M., Mota, J., et al. International approaches to the definition, philosophical tenets, and core elements of physical literacy: a scoping review. Prospects, 2020, 10.1007/s11125-020-09466-1.
Gunnell, K.E., Longmuir, P.E., Barnes, J.D., Belanger, K., Tremblay, M.S., Refining the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy based on theory and factor analyses. BMC Publ Health, 18(S2), 2018, 436, 10.1186/s12889-018-5899-2.
Elsborg, P., Heinze, C., Melby, P.S., Nielsen, G., Bentsen, P., Ryom, K., Associations between previous sport and exercise experience and physical literacy elements among physically inactive Danes. BMC Publ Health, 21(1), 2021, 1248, 10.1186/s12889-021-11299-2.
Durden-Myers, E.J., Meloche, E.S., Dhillon, K.K., The embodied nature of physical literacy: interconnectedness of lived experience and meaning. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance 91:3 (2020), 8–16.
Pot, N., Whitehead, M.E., Durden-Myers, E.J., Physical literacy from philosophy to practice. J Teach Phys Educ 37:3 (2018), 246–251, 10.1123/jtpe.2018-0133.
Edwards, L.C., Bryant, A.S., Keegan, R.J., Morgan, K., Jones, A.M., Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: a systematic review. Sports Med 47 (2017), 113–126, 10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7.
Li, M.H., Whitehead, M., Green, N., et al. Operationally defining physical literacy in Chinese culture: results of a meta-narrative synthesis and the Panel's recommendations. J Exerc Sci Fit 20:3 (2022), 236–248, 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.04.003.
Bailey, R., Defining physical literacy: making sense of a promiscuous concept. Sport Soc 65:4 (2020), 1–18, 10.1080/17430437.2020.1777104.
Jean de Dieu, H., Zhou, K., Physical literacy assessment tools: a systematic literature review for why, what, who, and how. Int J Environ Res Publ Health, 18(15), 2021, 10.3390/ijerph18157954.
Ryom, K., Hargaard, A.-S., Melby, P.S., et al. Self-reported measurements of physical literacy in adults: a scoping review. BMJ Open, 12(9), 2022, e058351.
Essiet, I.A., Lander, N.J., Salmon, J., et al. A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ, 18(1), 2021, 131, 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
Cornish, K., Fox, G., Fyfe, T., Koopmans, E., Pousette, A., Pelletier, C.A., Understanding physical literacy in the context of health: a rapid scoping review. BMC Publ Health, 20(1), 2020, 1569, 10.1186/s12889-020-09583-8.
Carl, J., Barratt, J., Wanner, P., Töpfer, C., Cairney, J., Pfeifer, K., The effectiveness of physical literacy interventions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med(52), 2022, 2965–2999, 10.1007/s40279-022-01738-4.
Edwards, L.C., Bryant, A.S., Keegan, R.J., Morgan, K., Cooper, S.-M., Jones, A.M., ‘Measuring’ physical literacy and related constructs: a systematic review of empirical findings. Sports Med 48:3 (2018), 659–682, 10.1007/s40279-017-0817-9.
Pushkarenko, K., Causgrove Dunn, J., Wohlers, B., Physical literacy and inclusion: a scoping review of the physical literacy literature inclusive of individuals experiencing disability. Prospects, 7(16), 2020, 68, 10.1007/s11125-020-09497-8.
Saxena, S., Shikako-Thomas, K., Physical literacy programs for children with disabilities: a realist review. Leisure/Loisir. 44:2 (2020), 199–224.
Petrusevski, C., Morgan, A., MacDermid, J., Wilson, M., Richardson, J., Framing physical literacy for aging adults: an integrative review. Disabil Rehabil, 2021, 1–12, 10.1080/09638288.2021.2012841.
World Health Organization. More Active People for a Healthier World: Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030. 2018, World Health Organization, Geneva.
UNESCO. Quality physical education (QPE): guidelines for policy-makers. https://en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/sites/default/files/learning/document/2017/1/231101E.pdf.
Dudley, D., Cairney, J., Physical literacy: answering the call for quality education and sustainable development. Prospects, 2020, 10.1007/s11125-020-09512-y.
Sport for Life. Physical literacy instuctor program. https://sportforlife.ca/physical-literacy-instructor-program/. Accessed October 15, 2021.
Shape America. Physical literacy. http://www.shapeamerica.org/events/physicalliteracy. Accessed June 9, 2021.
Bopp, T., Vadeboncoeur, J.D., Roetert, E.P., Stellefson, M., Physical literacy research in the United States: a systematic review of academic literature. Am J Health Educ 53:5 (2022), 282–296, 10.1080/19325037.2022.2100524.
Keegan, R.J., Barnett, L.M., Dudley, D.A., et al. Defining physical literacy for application in Australia: a modified delphi method. J Teach Phys Educ 38:2 (2019), 105–118, 10.1123/jtpe.2018-0264.
Sport Australia. The Australian physical literacy framework. https://www.sportaus.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/710173/35455_Physical-Literacy-Framework_access.pdf.
Whitehead, M., (eds.) Physical Literacy across the World, 2019, Routledge, New York.
Hughes, H., Physical literacy development in Wales. Whitehead, M., (eds.) Physical Literacy across the World, 2019, Routledge, New York.
Topping, C., Kopela, J., Gibson, I., Whitelaw, S., Physical and food literacy: a holistic approach to public health in Scotland. Whitehead, M., (eds.) Physical Literacy across the World, 2019, Routledge, New York, 181–199.
Koekoek, J., Pot, N., Walinga, W., van Hilvoorde, I., Perspectives on physical literacy in continental Europe. Whitehead, M., (eds.) Physical Literacy across the World, 2019, Routledge, New York, 143–155.
Budescu, D.V., Rantilla, A.K., Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta Psychol 104:3 (2000), 371–398.
Rowe, G., Wright, G., Expert opinions in forecasting: the role of the delphi technique. Armstrong, J.S., (eds.) Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, 2001, Springer US, Boston, MA, 125–144.
Quennerstedt, M., McCuaig, L., Mårdh, A., The fantasmatic logics of physical literacy. Sport Educ Soc 26:8 (2021), 846–861, 10.1080/13573322.2020.1791065.
Young, L., O'Connor, J., Alfrey, L., Mapping the physical literacy controversy: an analysis of key actors within scholarly literature. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog 18:2 (2021), 1–17, 10.1080/17408989.2021.2014437.
Dalglish, S.L., Khalid, H., McMahon, S.A., Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Pol Plann 35:10 (2021), 1424–1431, 10.1093/heapol/czaa064.
Bowen, G.A., Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J, 9(2), 2009, 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
O'Connell, S., Mc Carthy, V.J.C., Savage, E., Frameworks for self-management support for chronic disease: a cross-country comparative document analysis. BMC Health Serv Res, 18(1), 2018, 583, 10.1186/s12913-018-3387-0.
Anderson, J.E., Aase, K., Bal, R., et al. Multilevel influences on resilient healthcare in six countries: an international comparative study protocol. BMJ Open, 10(12), 2020, e039158, 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039158.
Cameron, R., A sequential mixed model research design: design, analytical and display issues. Int J Mult Res Approaches, 3(2), 2009.
Vingdal, I.M., Fysisk Aktiv Læring. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk. 2014, Gyldendal Akademisk, Oslo.
Mota, J., Martins, J., Onofre, M., Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) for adolescents (15–18 years) from grades 10–12: development, content validation and pilot testing. BMC Publ Health 21:1 (2021), 1–22, 10.1186/s12889-021-12230-5.
Jefferies, P., Bremer, E., Kozera, T., Cairney, J., Kriellaars, D., Psychometric properties and construct validity of PLAYself: a self-reported measure of physical literacy for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metabol 46:6 (2021), 579–588.
Geral da Saúde, Direção, Programa Nacional Para a Promoção da Actividada Física [Nacional program for promoting physical activity]. https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/38883/1/i027383.pdf, December 2020.
Instituto Português do Desporto e Juventude. Europe in action – TAFISA. https://beactiveportugal.ipdj.pt/europe-in-action-tafisa/#. Accessed December 6, 2022.
Holler, P., Jaunig, J., Moser, O., et al. Primary care and physical literacy: a non-randomized controlled pilot study to combat the high prevalence of physically inactive adults in Austria. IJERPH, 18(16), 2021, 8593, 10.3390/ijerph18168593.
Hurter, L., Essiet, I., Duncan, M., et al. Physical Literacy Consensus for England: Evidence Review. 2022, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool.
Durden-Myers, E.J., Bartle, G., Whitehead, M.E., Dhillon, K.K., Exploring the notion of literacy within physical literacy: a discussion paper. Front Sports Act Living, 4, 2022, 853247, 10.3389/fspor.2022.853247.
Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1970, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Töpfer, C., Jaunig, J., Carl, J., Physical Literacy – to be discussed: eine Perspektive aus Sicht der deutschsprachigen Sportwissenschaft. German J Exerc Sport Res 52 (2022), 186–192, 10.1007/s12662-021-00754-2.
Piggott, B., Müller, S., Chivers, P., Papaluca, C., Hoyne, G., Is sports science answering the call for interdisciplinary research? A systematic review. Eur J Sport Sci 19:3 (2019), 267–286, 10.1080/17461391.2018.1508506.
John, J.M., Haug, V., Thiel, A., Physical activity behavior from a transdisciplinary biopsychosocial perspective: a scoping review. Sports Med Open, 6(1), 2020, 49, 10.1186/s40798-020-00279-2.
Ramanadhan, S., Revette, A.C., Lee, R.M., Aveling, E.L., Pragmatic approaches to analyzing qualitative data for implementation science: an introduction. Implement Sci Commun 2:1 (2021), 1–10.
Waggoner, J., Carline, J.D., Durning, S.J., Is there a consensus on consensus methodology? Descriptions and recommendations for future consensus research. Acad Med 91:5 (2016), 663–668, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092.