Article (Scientific journals)
Environmental assessment of CO2 mineralisation for sustainable construction materials
Di Maria, Andrea; Snellings, Ruben; Alaert, Luc et al.
2020In International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 93, p. 102882
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Di Maria 2020_Environmental assessment of CO2 mineralisation for sustainable.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.6 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
CO2 capture and utilisation; Life cycle assessment; Mineral carbonation; Stainless steel slag; CO2 capture; Conventional concrete; Environmental assessment; Environmental benefits; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Policy recommendations; Sustainable construction; Pollution; Energy (all); Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; General Energy
Abstract :
[en] Mineral carbonation is a carbon utilisation technology in which an alkaline material reacts with carbon dioxide forming stable carbonates that can have different further uses, for instance as construction material. The alkaline material can be a residue from industrial activities (e.g. metallurgic slags) while CO2 can be recovered from industrial flue gasses. Mineral carbonation presents several potential environmental advantages: (i) industrial residues valorisation, (ii) CO2 sequestration and (iii) substitution of conventional concrete based on Portland cement (PC). However, both the carbonation and the CO2 recovery processes require energy. To understand the trade-off between the environmental benefits and drawbacks of CO2 recovery and mineral carbonation, this study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) of carbonated construction blocks from mineral carbonation of stainless steel slags. The carbonated blocks are compared to traditional PC-based concrete blocks with similar properties. The results of the LCA analysis show that the carbonated blocks present lower environmental impacts in most of the analysed impact categories. The key finding is that the carbonated blocks present a negative carbon footprint. Nonetheless, the energy required represents the main environmental hotspot. An increase in the energy efficiency of the mineral carbonation process and a CO2 valorisation network are among the suggestions to further lower the environmental impacts of carbonated blocks production. Finally, the LCA results can promote the development of policy recommendations to support the implementation of mineral carbonation technology. Further research should enable the use of mineral carbonation on a broader range and large volume of alkaline residues.
Disciplines :
Materials science & engineering
Author, co-author :
Di Maria, Andrea  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Biosystems Dynamics and Exchanges (BIODYNE) ; Sustainability Assessment of Material Life Cycle, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium
Snellings, Ruben;  Sustainable Materials Unit, Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), Mol, Belgium
Alaert, Luc;  Sustainability Assessment of Material Life Cycle, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium
Quaghebeur, Mieke;  Sustainable Materials Unit, Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), Mol, Belgium
Van Acker, Karel;  Sustainability Assessment of Material Life Cycle, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium ; Center for Economics and Corporate Sustainability (CEDON), KU Leuven, Brussels, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Environmental assessment of CO2 mineralisation for sustainable construction materials
Publication date :
February 2020
Journal title :
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
ISSN :
1750-5836
eISSN :
1878-0148
Publisher :
Elsevier Ltd
Volume :
93
Pages :
102882
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Flemish administration via the Steunpunt Circulaire Economie
Funding text :
All authors are very grateful for financial support received from the Flemish administration via the Steunpunt Circulaire Economie (Policy Research Centre Circular Economy). This publication contains the opinions of the authors, not that of the Flemish administration. The Flemish administration will not carry any liability with respect to the use that can be made of the produced data or conclusions.All authors are very grateful for financial support received from the Flemish administration via the Steunpunt Circulaire Economie (Policy Research Centre Circular Economy) . This publication contains the opinions of the authors, not that of the Flemish administration. The Flemish administration will not carry any liability with respect to the use that can be made of the produced data or conclusions.
Available on ORBi :
since 28 December 2022

Statistics


Number of views
16 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
189 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
53
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
52
OpenCitations
 
41

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi