Geology; Ocean Engineering; Water Science and Technology
Abstract :
[en] Abstract
The subsurface provides multiple resources of which the exploitation has a lasting impact on future potential provision. Establishing sustainability in terms of fundamental principles, and fitting these principles into a practical framework, is an ongoing endeavour focused mainly on surface activities. The principles of ecological economics lead to six challenges that summarize the current limitations of implementing science-based sustainable management of geological resources in the medium to deep subsurface: integrating value pluralism, defining sustainable scale, evaluating interferences in the subsurface, guaranteeing environmental justice, optimising environmental and economic efficiency, and handling uncertainties. Assessing and managing geological reservoirs is particularly intriguing because of slow resource regeneration, complex spatial and temporal interactions, concealment, and naturally dictated opportunities. In answer to the challenges, visions are proposed that outline how an indicator framework is needed for guidance, how indicators require reservoir models with extended spatial and temporal scope, how environmental inequity of social values are to be considered, and how real option games combined with life cycle assessment can be used for optimising efficiency. These individual solutions are different facets of the same problem, and can be integrated into one overarching solution that takes the form of dynamic multi-criteria decision analysis.
Disciplines :
Geological, petroleum & mining engineering
Author, co-author :
Compernolle, T.; Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium ; Geological Survey of Belgium, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Jennerstraat 13, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Eswaran, A.; Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Welkenhuysen, K.; Geological Survey of Belgium, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Jennerstraat 13, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Hermans, T.; Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 - S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Walraevens, K.; Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 - S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Van Camp, M.; Seismology-Gravimetry, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire - 3, 1180 Uccle, Belgium
Buyle, M.; Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), 2020 University of Antwerp, Belgium ; Sustainable Materials Management, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium
Audenaert, A.; Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), 2020 University of Antwerp, Belgium
Bleys, B.; Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Tweekerkenstraat 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Van Schoubroeck, S.; Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Bergmans, A.; Department of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Sint-Jacobstraat 2, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium ; Institute for Environment and Sustainable Development, University of Antwerp, Sint-Jacobstraat 2, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Goderniaux, P.; Department of Geology and Applied Geology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium
Baele, J.M.; Department of Geology and Applied Geology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium
Kaufmann, O.; Department of Geology and Applied Geology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium
Vardon, P.; Geo-Engineering Section, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Daniilidis, A.; Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geoscience, Delft University of Technology, Stewinweg 1, 2628CN Delft, The Netherlands ; Reservoir Geology and Basin Analysis, Faculty of Science, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraichers 13, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
Orban, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Hydrogéologie & Géologie de l'environnement
Dassargues, Alain ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Hydrogéologie & Géologie de l'environnement
Brouyère, Serge ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Hydrogéologie & Géologie de l'environnement
Piessens, K.; Geological Survey of Belgium, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Jennerstraat 13, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Abbasi Kamazani, M. and Aghanajafi, C. 2022. Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic evaluation of a hybrid geothermal-PVT system integrated with PCM. Energy, 240, article 122806, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122806
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R.D. and Evans, B. 2002. Exploring the nexus: bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space and Polity, 6, 77–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570220137907
Alam, S., Borthakur, A., Ravi, S., Gebremichael, M. and Mohanty, S.K. 2021. Managed aquifer recharge imple-mentation criteria to achieve water sustainability. Science of the Total Environment, 768, article 144992, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144992
Alomoto, W., Niñerola, A. and Pié, L. 2021. Social impact assessment: a systematic review of literature. Social Indicators Research, 161, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02809-1
Al Rafea, K., Elsholkami, M., Elkamel, A. and Fowler, M. 2017. Integration of decentralized energy systems with utility-scale energy storage through underground hydrogen–natural gas co-storage using the energy hub approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56, 2310–2330, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b02861
Axelsson, G., Stefánsson, V. and Xu, Y. 2002. Sustainable management of geothermal resources. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geothermal and the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, Beijing, pp. 277–283.
Aydin, O. and Caers, J. 2013. Image transforms for deter-mining fit-for-purpose complexity of geostatistical models in flow modeling. Computational Geosciences, 17, 417–429, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9340-8
Azevedo, A. and Paxson, D. 2014. Developing real option game models. European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 909–920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejor.2014.02.002
Bauer, S., Beyer, C. et al. 2013. Impacts of the use of the geological subsurface for energy storage: an investigation concept. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70, 3935–3943, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2883-0
Bautista, S., Enjolras, M., Narvaez, P., Camargo, M. and Morel, L. 2016a. Biodiesel-triple bottom line (TBL): a new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of principles criteria & indicators (PC&I) for biodiesel production. Part II-validation. Ecological Indicators, 69, 803–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016. 04.046
Bautista, S., Narvaez, P., Camargo, M., Chery, O. and Morel, L. 2016b. Biodiesel-TBL plus: a new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of PC&I for biodiesel production – part I. Ecological Indicators, 60, 84–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015. 06.020
Becker, H.A. 2001. Social impact assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 311–321, https://doi.org/10.1013/S0377-2217(00)00074-6
Bradbury, J., Ray, I., Peterson, T., Wade, S., Wong-Parodi, G. and Feldpausch, A. 2009. The role of social factors in shaping public perceptions of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US. Energy Proce-dia, 1, 4665–4672, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro. 2009.02.289
Braun, C. 2017. Not in my backyard: CCS sites and public perception of CCS. Risk Analysis, 37, 2264–2275, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12793
Bünger, U., Michalski, J., Crotogino, F. and Kruck, O. 2016. Large-scale underground storage of hydrogen for the grid integration of renewable energy and other applications. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, 4, 133–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-364-5.00007-5
Busch, T. and Hoffmann, V.H. 2009. Ecology-driven real options: an investment framework for incorporating uncertainties in the context of the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 295–310, https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-009-0043-y
Celia, M.A. and Nordbotten, J.M. 2009. Practical modeling approaches for geological storage of carbon dioxide. Groundwater, 47, 627–638, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00590.x
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R. et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260, https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Cuppen, E., Brunsting, S., Pesch, U. and Feenstra, Y. 2015. How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: a contested CCS project in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47, 1963–1978, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518×15597408
Curran, M.A., Mann, M. and Norris, G. 2005. The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 853–862, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2002.03. 001
Daly, H.E. 1990. Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R
Daly, H.E. 1992. Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustain-able. Ecological Economics, 6, 185–193, https://doi. org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90024-M
Daly, H.E. 2015. Economics for a Full World. Great Transition Initiative, http://www.greattransition.org/publi cation/economics-for-a-full-world
Daniilidis, A., Doddema, L. and Herber, R. 2016. Risk assessment of the Groningen geothermal potential: from seismic to reservoir uncertainty using a discrete parameter analysis. Geothermics, 64, 271–288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.06.014
Daniilidis, A., Nick, H.M. and Bruhn, D.F. 2020. Interde-pendencies between physical, design and operational parameters for direct use geothermal heat in faulted hydrothermal reservoirs. Geothermics, 86, article 101806, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020. 101806
Daniilidis, A., Nick, H.M. and Bruhn, D.F. 2021. Interfer-ence between geothermal doublets across a fault under subsurface uncertainty; implications for field development and regulation. Geothermics, 91, article 102041, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102041
De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A. and Boumans, R.M. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valua-tion of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408, https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
De Luca, A.I., Iofrida, N., Strano, A., Falcone, G. and Guli-sano, G. 2015. Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 11, 383–396, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1611
Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
Elkington, J. and Rowlands, I.H. 1999. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25, 42–43.
El Serafy, S. 1989. The proper calculation of income from depletable natural resources. Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development, a UNEP–World Bank Symposium.
Fajardy, M., Chiquier, S. and Mac Dowell, N. 2018. Inves-tigating the BECCS resource nexus: delivering sustainable negative emissions. Energy & Environmental Science, 11, 3408–3430, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee01676c
Ferré, T.P.A. 2017. Revisiting the relationship between data, models, and decision-making. Groundwater, 55, 604–614, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12574
Field, B., Barton, B., Funnell, R., Higgs, K., Nicol, A. and Seebeck, H. 2018. Managing potential interactions of subsurface resources. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 232, 6–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/09576 50917717628
Folke, C. and Jansson, A.M. 1992. The emergence of an ecological economics paradigm: examples from fisheries and aquaculture. In: Svedin, U. and Aniansson, B.H. (eds) Society and the Environment: a Swedish Research Perspective. Springer, the Netherlands, 69–87, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2799-8_5
Formhals, J., Feike, F., Hemmatabady, H., Welsch, B. and Sass, I. 2021. Strategies for a transition towards a solar district heating grid with integrated seasonal geothermal energy storage. Energy, 228, article 120662, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120662
Garfì, M., Ferrer-Martí, L., Bonoli, A. and Tondelli, S. 2011. Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 665–675, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.007
Gill, J.C. 2017. Geology and the sustainable development goals. Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, 40, 70–76, https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2017/v40i1/017010
Gowdy, J. and Erickson, J.D. 2005. The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge Journal of Eco-nomics, 29, 207–222, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei033
Gray, M., Gordon, J.E. and Brown, E.J. 2013. Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geosci-ence in delivering integrated environmental manage-ment. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 124, 659–673, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2013. 01.003
Greenberg, M. and Cidon, M. 1997. Broadening the defini-tion of environmental equity: a framework for states and local governments. Population Research and Policy Review, 16, 397–413, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005702430607
Griffioen, J., van Wensem, J. et al. 2014. A technical investigation on tools and concepts for sustainable management of the subsurface in the Netherlands. Science of the Total Environment, 485–486, 810–819, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.114
Gunton, R.M., Hejnowicz, A.P., Basden, A., van Asperen, E.N., Christie, I., Hanson, D.R. and Hartley, S.E. 2022. Valuing beyond economics: a pluralistic evaluation framework for participatory policymaking. Ecological Economics, 196, article 107420, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107420
Häggquist, E. and Söderholm, P. 2015. The economic value of geological information: synthesis and directions for future research. Resources Policy, 43, 91–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.001
Hermans, T., Goderniaux, P. et al. 2022. Advancing measurements and representations of subsurface heterogeneity and dynamic processes: towards 4D hydro-geology, Hydrol. Earth Systems Science Discussions. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-95
Hirata, R., Suhogusoff, A. and Fernandes, A. 2007. Groundwater resources in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil): the application of indicators. Anais da Acade-mia Brasileira de Ciências, 79, 141–152, https://doi. org/10.1590/S0001-37652007000100016
Hosseini, S.H.R., Allahham, A. and Adams, C. 2021. Techno-economic-environmental analysis of a smart multi-energy grid utilising geothermal energy storage for meeting heat demand. IET Smart Grid, 4, 224–240, https://doi.org/10.1049/stg2.12020
International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) (n.d.). IGCP’s Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals. UNESCO, https://en.unesco.org/international-geoscience-programme/sustainable-development-goals [last accessed 1 September 2022].
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. and Rehner, R. 2016. Energy justice: a conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B.K. and McCauley, D. 2018. Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: an ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy, 117, 66–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036
Konieczynśka, M., Fajfer, J., Przychodzka, M. and Lipin-ska, O. 2020. State of the Art of Subsurface Planning and Management, and Avenues for Improvement. Report of the GeoERA project GeoConnect3d. European Union, GeoERA, GeoConnect3d, https://reposi tory.europe-geology.eu/egdidocs/geoconnect3d/geo connect3d_d51_state+of+the+art+report.pdf
Krawchenko, T.A. and Gordon, M. 2021. How do we man-age a just transition? A comparative review of national and regional just transition initiatives. Sustainability, 13, article 6070, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116070
Lamban, L.J., Martos, S., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, M. and Rubio, J.C. 2011. Application of groundwater sustain-ability indicators to the carbonate aquifer of the Sierra de Becerrero (Southern Spain). Environmental Earth Sciences, 64, 1835–1848, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1016-x
Li, J.Q., Hou, Y.B., Wang, P.T. and Yang, B. 2019. A review of carbon capture and storage project investment and operational decision-making based on bibliomet-rics. Energies, 12, article 23, https://doi.org/10. 3390/en12010023
Lueddeckens, S., Saling, P. and Guenther, E. 2020. Temporal issues in life cycle assessment – a systematic review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 1385–1401, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01757-1
Lund, J.W. and Toth, A.N. 2021. Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2020 worldwide review. Geothermics, 90, article 101915, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geother mics.2020.101915
Malin, S.A., Ryder, S. and Lyra, M.G. 2019. Environmental justice and natural resource extraction: intersections of power, equity and access. Environmental Sociology, 5, 109–116, https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019. 1608420
Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. and O’Neill, J. 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26, 277–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1
Matuszewska, D., Kuta, M. and Olczak, P. 2020. Techno-economic assessment of mobilized thermal energy storage system using geothermal source in Pol-ish conditions. Energies, 13, article 3404, https://doi. org/10.3390/en13133404
McLaren, D.P. 2012. Procedural justice in carbon capture and storage. Energy & Environment, 23, 345–365, https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305x.23.2-3.345
Michael, K., Whittaker, S., Varma, S., Bekele, E., Langhi, L., Hodgkinson, J. and Harris, B. 2016. Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 18, 164–175, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EM00539F
Moore,R.V. and Tindall, C.I. 2005. An overview of the open modelling interface and environment (the OpenMI). Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 279–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.03.009
Mousavi, S.B., Ahmadi, P., Pourahmadiyan, A. and Hana-fizadeh, P. 2021. A comprehensive techno-economic assessment of a novel compressed air energy storage (CAES) integrated with geothermal and solar energy. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, article 101418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta. 2021.101418
Mouter, N., de Geest, A. and Doorn, N. 2018. A values-based approach to energy controversies: value-sensitive design applied to the Groningen gas controversy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 122, 639–648, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.020
Nemati, B., Mapar, M., Davarazar, P., Zandi, S., Davarazar, M., Jahanianfard, D. and Mohammadi, M. 2020. A sustainable approach for site selection of underground hydrogen storage facilities using Fuzzy–Delphi meth-odology. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 2020, 5–16, https://doi.org/10.24193/jsspsi.2020.6. 02
Petrescu, L., Bonalumi, D., Valenti, G., Cormos, A.M. and Cormos, C.C. 2017. Life cycle assessment for supercrit-ical pulverized coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture and storage. Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, 157, 10–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2017.03.225
Pires, A., Morato, J., Peixoto, H., Botero, V., Zuluaga, L. and Figueroa, A. 2017. Sustainability assessment of indicators for integrated water resources management. Science of the Total Environment, 578, 139–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.217
Pope, J., Annandale, D. and Morrison-Saunders, A. 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 595–616, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.001
Rafiaani, P., Dikopoulou, Z., van Dael, M., Kuppens, T., Azadi, H., Lebailly, P. and van Passel, S. 2020. Identifying social indicators for sustainability assessment of CCU technologies: a modified multi-criteria decision making. Social Indicators Research, 147, 15–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02154-4
Raworth, K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think like a 21st-Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Ringquist, E.J. 2005. Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: a meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 223–247, https://doi.org/10. 1002/pam.20088
Robinson, J. 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Eco-nomics, 48, 369–384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecole con.2003.10.017
Roefs, P., Moretti, M., Welkenhuysen, K., Piessens, K. and Compernolle, T. 2019. CO2-enhanced oil recovery and CO2 capture and storage: an environmental economic trade-off analysis. Journal of Environmental Manage-ment, 239, 167–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv man.2019.03.007
Saeid, S., Al-Khoury, R., Nick, H.M. and Hicks, M.A. 2015. A prototype design model for deep low-enthalpy hydrothermal systems. Renewable Energy, 77, 408–422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014. 12.018
Saeid, S., Wang, Y., Daniilidis, A., Khait, M., Voskov, D.V. and Bruhn, D. 2020. Lifetime and energy predic-tion of geothermal systems: uncertainty analysis in highly heterogeneous geothermal reservoirs (Nether-lands). In: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Con-gress, Reykjavik, 1–8, https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/WGC/papers/WGC/2020/22157.pdf
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B. and Nijkamp, P. 2015. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2015.09.015
Sangam, S.P.U. 2014. Evaluation of sustainability of groundwater resources in a semi-arid region of the Maharashtra state of India. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 6, 203–211, https://doi.org/10.5897/IJWREE2013.0474
Schlosberg, D. 2013. Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Poli-tics, 22, 37–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016. 2013.755387
Schüppler, S., Fleuchaus, P. and Blum, P. 2019. Techno-economic and environmental analysis of an aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) in Germany. Geothermal Energy, 7, article 11, https://doi.org/10. 1186/s40517-019-0127-6
Seo, Y., Lee, S.Y., Kim, J., Huh, C. and Chang, D. 2017. Determination of optimal volume of temporary storage tanks in a ship-based carbon capture and storage (CCS) chain using life cycle cost (LCC) including unavailabil-ity cost. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Con-trol, 64, 11–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017. 06.017
Shortall, R., Davidsdottir, B. and Axelsson, G. 2015. A sus-tainability assessment framework for geothermal energy projects: development in Iceland, New Zealand and Kenya. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 372–407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser. 2015.04.175
Simon, J., Ferriz, A.M. and Correas, L.C. 2015. HyUnder – hydrogen underground storage at large scale: case study Spain. Energy Procedia, 73, 136–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.661
Singh, R.K., Murty, H.R., Gupta, S.K. and Dikshit, A.K. 2009. An overview of sustainability assessment meth-odologies. Ecological Indicators, 9, 189–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011
Tanzil, D. and Beloff, B.R. 2006. Assessing impacts: overview on sustainability indicators and metrics. Environmental Quality Management, 15, 41–56, https://doi. org/10.1002/tqem.20101
Terwel, B.W., ter Mors, E. and Daamen, D.D.L. 2012. It’s not only about safety: beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9, 41–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.017
Tian, X. and You, F. 2019. Carbon-neutral hybrid energy systems with deep water source cooling, biomass heat-ing, and geothermal heat and power. Applied Energy, 250, 413–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 2019.04.172
Tiwari, S., Schelly, C. and Sidortsov, R. 2021. Developing a legal framework for energy storage technologies in the US: the case of pumped underground storage hydro. The Electricity Journal, 34, article 107048, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2021.107048
Trigeorgis, L. 1996. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. The MIT Press.
United Nations Secretary-General, World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/13 9811?ln=en
Van Cauwenbergh, N., Biala, K. et al. 2007. SAFE – a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Envi-ronment, 120, 229–242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agee.2006.09.006
Van Gessel, S.F., Hinsby, K., Stanley, G., Tulstrup, J., Schavemaker, Y., Piessens, K. and Bogaard, P.J. 2017. Geological services towards a sustainable use and management of the subsurface: a geoethical imper-ative. Annals of Geophysics, 60, https://doi.org/10. 4401/ag-7500
Van Ree, C. and van Beukering, P. 2016. Geosystem ser-vices: a concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface. Ecosystem Services, 20, 30–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.004
Van Schoubroeck, S., Thomassen, G. et al. 2021. An integrated techno-sustainability assessment (TSA) framework for emerging technologies. Green Chemistry, 23, 1700–1715, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC000 36E
Vidovic, J., Schavemaker, Y., Witteman, T., Tulstrup, J., van Gessel, S., Piessens, K. and Solar, S. 2020. Euro-GeoSurveys: from a non-profit association to a geological service for Europe. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 499, 129–137, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP499-2019-47
Vögele, S., Rübbelke, D., Mayer, P. and Kuckshinrichs, W. 2018. Germany’s ‘no’ to carbon capture and storage: just a question of lacking acceptance? Applied Energy, 214, 205–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 2018.01.077
Vrba, J., Lipponen, A. et al. 2007. Groundwater Resources Sustainability Indicators. UNESCO, Paris.
Wang, Y., Pan, Z., Zhang, W.X., Borhani, T.N., Li, R. and Zhang, Z.E. 2022. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: a review. Environmental Research, 207, article 112219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112219
Welsch, B., Göllner-Völker, L., Schulte, D.O., Bär, K., Sass, I. and Schebek, L. 2018. Environmental and economic assessment of borehole thermal energy storage in district heating systems. Applied Energy, 216, 73–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.011
Willems, C.J.L. and Nick, H.M. 2019. Towards optimisa-tion of geothermal heat recovery: an example from the West Netherlands Basin. Applied Energy, 247, 582– 593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.083
Willems, C.J.L., Nick, H.M., Weltje, G.J. and Bruhn, D.F. 2017. An evaluation of interferences in heat production from low enthalpy geothermal doublets systems. Energy, 135, 500–512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. energy.2017.06.129
Yapparova, A., Matthai, S. and Driesner, T. 2014. Realistic simulation of an aquifer thermal energy storage: effects of injection temperature, well placement and ground-water flow. Energy, 76, 1011–1018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.018
Zamagni, A., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Masoni, P. and Raggi, A. 2012. Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assess-ment, 17, 904–918, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x
Zhou, L., Duan, M.S. and Yu, Y.D. 2018. Exergy and economic analyses of indirect coal-to-liquid technology coupling carbon capture and storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 87–95, https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.229
