[en] Travel behavior research has long been dominated by a rational perspective considering primarily objective factors such as price, travel time, and speed. Only at the end of the 1990s was attention also paid to subjective factors such as perceptions and attitudes. Since then, a growing number of studies combine objective and subjective factors in explaining travel behavior. This paper adds to this by focusing on the influence of lifestyles on mode share. To this end, an online survey was carried out in Belgium, completed successfully by 334 respondents. Lifestyles were measured based on a psychographic or value-based approach using the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) developed by Schwartz. Results of a structural equation model (SEM) indicate that using value-based lifestyles adds new insights to the analysis of mode share. Personal values have not only a direct effect on mode share but also an indirect effect because of interactions with urban residential location choices, car ownership decisions, and activity patterns. The findings suggest that public transport use could be encouraged by promoting it as an act of caring for others. At the same time, policy-makers should invest in creating positive experiences for travelers using public transport.
Disciplines :
Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)
Author, co-author :
Van Acker, Veronique; Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Sandoval, Sazkia; Department of Informatics, Simulation and Modeling, KU Leuven Campus Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Cools, Mario ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Transports et mobilité ; Department of Informatics, Simulation and Modeling, KU Leuven Campus Brussel, Brussels, Belgium ; Faculty of Business Economics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Value-Based Approach to Assess the Impact of Lifestyles on Mode Shares
Publication date :
11 January 2021
Journal title :
Transportation Research Recordv: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Ewing R., Cervero R., Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265–294.
Leck E., The Impact of Urban form on Travel Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Berkeley Planning Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2006, pp. 37–58.
Homer P. M., Kahle L. R., A Structural Equation Test of the Value-Attitude-Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1988, pp. 638–646.
Richter R., Lifestyle and Social Structure. Process of Individualization in Eastern European Countries. Revija za Sociologiju, Vol. 33, 2002, pp. 169–180.
Bootsma H., Camstra R., de Feijter H., Mol A., Leefstijl: een dynamische levensorientatie [Lifestyle: A Dynamic Life Orientation]. Rooilijn, Vol. 26, 1993, pp. 332–337.
Ferge S., Social Differentiation in Leisure Activity Choices: An Unfinished Experiment. In The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Population in Twelve Countries (Szalai A., ed.), Mouton, Den Haag, 1972, pp. 213–227.
Van Acker V. Defining, Measuring, and using the Lifestyle Concept in Modal Choice Research. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2495: 74–82.
Weber M., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft [Economy and Society]. Tübingen, Mohr, 1972.
Bourdieu P., La distinction [Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste]. Routledge, London, 1984.
Ganzeboom H., Leefstijlen in Nederland: Een Verkennende Studie [Lifestyles in The Netherlands: An Exploratory Study]. Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk, 1988.
Munters Q. J., Bestaan leefstijlen (nog) wel? [Do Lifestyles (Still) Exist?]. Sociologische Gids, 1992. Vol. 39, pp. 179–185.
Ben-Akiva M., Structure of Passenger Travel Demand Models. MIT, Department of Civil Engineering, Cambridge, 1973.
Salomon I., Ben-Akiva M.. The Use of The Lifestyle Concept in Travel Demand Models. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 15, 1983, pp. 623–638.
Van Acker V., Van Wee B., Witlox F., When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour. Transport Reviews, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2010, pp. 219–240.
Salomon I., Life Style as a Factor in Explaining Travel Behaviour. MIT, Department of Civil Engineering, Cambridge, 1981.
Kitamura R., Lifestyle and Travel Demand. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2009, pp. 679–710.
Van Acker V., Goodwin P., Witlox F., Key Research Themes on Travel Behavior, Lifestyle, and Sustainable Urban Mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2016, pp. 25–32.
Cooper J., Ryley T., Smith A., Contemporary Lifestyles and the Implications for Sustainable Development Policy: Lessons from the UK’s Most Car Dependent City; Belfast. Cities, Vol. 18, 2001, pp. 103–113.
Hildebrand E. D., Dimensions in Elderly Travel Behaviour: A Simplified Activity-Based Model using Lifestyle Clusters. Transportation, Vol. 30, 2003, pp. 285–306.
Ardeshiri A., Vi A., Lifestyles, Residential Location, and Transport Mode Use: A Hierarchical Latent Class Choice Model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 126, 2019, pp. 342–359.
Bagley M. N., Mokhtarian P. L., The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type in Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 279–297.
Van Acker V., Mokhtarian P. L., Witlox F., Going Soft: Subjective Variables Explaining Modal Choices. European Journal on Transport Infrastructure and Research, Vol. 11, 2011, pp. 115–146.
Etminani-Ghasrodashti R., Ardeshiri M., Modeling Travel Behavior by the Structural Relationships Between Lifestyle, Built Environment and Non-Working Trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 78, 2015, pp. 506–518.
Collantes G. O., Mokharian P. L., Subjective Assessments of Personal Mobility: What Makes the Difference between a Little and a Lot? Transport Policy, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 181–192.
Walker J. L., Li J., Latent Lifestyle Preferences and Household Location Decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2007. Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 77–101.
Pisman A., De Verkenning van het Leefstijlconcept in een Subjectgerichte Ruimtelijke Planningsstrategie [Exploration of the Lifestyle Concept in a Subject-Oriented Spatial Planning Strategy]. PhD dissertation. Ghent University, Ghent, 2012.
Rokeach M., The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York, 1973.
Feather N. T., Bridging the Gap Between Values and Actions: Recent Applications of the Expectancy ± Value Model. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, (Higgins E. T., Sorrenino R. M., eds.), Guilford Press, New York, 1990, pp. 151–192.
Schwartz S., Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Zanna M. P., ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, 1992, pp. 1–66.
Paulssen M., Temme D., Vij A., Walker J. L., Values, Attitudes and Travel Behavior: A Hierarchical Latent Variable Mixed Logit Model of Travel Mode Choice. Transportation, 2014. Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 873–888.
Schwartz S. H., A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations Across Nations. Core European Social Survey Questionnaire, Vol. 259, No. 290, 2003, pp. 259–319. www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2019.
Imm Ng S., Anne Lee J., Soutar G. N., Are Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s Value Frameworks Congruent? International Marketing Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2007, pp. 164–180.
Schwartz S., A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. Comparative Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2006, pp. 137–182.
Schwartz S., Bardi A., Value Hierarchies Across Cultures: Taking a Similarities Perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2001, pp. 268–290.
Byrne B. M., Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 2001.
Kline R. B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. Guilford Press, New York, 2005.
Raykov T., Marcoulides G. A., A First Course in Structural Equation Modelling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 2000.
Bentler P. M., Dudgeon P., Covariance Structure Analysis: Statistical Practice, Theory and Directions. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 47, 1996, pp. 563–592.
Nevitt J., Hancock G. R., Performance of Bootstrapping Approaches to Model Test Statistics and Parameter Standard Error Estimation in Structural Equation Modelling. Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2001, pp. 353–377.
Ory D. T., Mokhtarian P. L., The Impact of Non-Normality, Sample Size and Estimation Technique on Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Modeling: Evidence from then Empirical Models of Travel Behavior. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 44, 2010, pp. 427–445.
Nordlund A. M., Garvill J., Effects of Values, Problem Awareness, and Personal Norm on Willingness to Reduce Personal Car Use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 23, 2003, pp. 339–347.
Hunecke M., Haustein S., Böhler S., Grischkat S., Attitude-Based Target Groups to Reduce the Ecological Impact of Daily Mobility Behavior. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2010, pp. 3–43.
Nordlund A., Westin K., Influence of Values, Beliefs, and Age on Intention to Travel by A New Railway Line Under Construction in Northern Sweden. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 48, 2013, pp. 86–95.
Arroyo R., Ruiz T., Mars L., Rasouli S., Timmermans H., Influence of Values, Attitudes Towards Transport Modes and Companions on Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 71, 2020, pp. 8–22.
Steg L., Car Use: Lust and Must. Instrumental, Symbolic and Affective Motives for Car Use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, No. 2–3, 2005, pp. 147–162.
Dahl S., Intercultural Research: The Current State of Knowledge. Middlesex University Discussion Paper No. 26, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.658202.
