Mobile applications; web tools; cancer risk; risk factors; health literacy
Abstract :
[en] Background: Health literacy is crucial in understanding the many risk factors for cancer. Low health literacy is associated with low adherence to medication, poor health status, and increased health care costs. Modern technology allows us to educate the general public on their risks. We focus herein on the available mobile applications and online web tools for the evaluation of cancer risk in the general public. Methods: A systematic search was performed for cancer risk calculators mobile applications on both Google Play and the App Store and for online cancer risk calculators using Google, Bing, Yahoo! and Baidu. Results: For mobile applications, out of 250 different apps found on GooglePlay, 16 Android applications were retained for evaluation in this review and for the AppStore, out of 10 different apps, 7 Android applications were retained for evaluation in this review. Only three apps were available for both Android and iOS systems. For web tools, a list of 20 tools was retained and evaluated. Conclusion: This review presents the most popular and prominent tools and their strengths and possible weaknesses are evaluated. We discuss not only its current state as it relates to general knowledge about cancer risks, but also barriers and future directions. It is imperative that as developers continue to create and improve such tools, health care providers remain aware of these efforts in order to properly guide patients towards appropriate resources and educate them on both their usefulness and limitations.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Westerlinck, Philippe ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service médical de radiothérapie
Coucke, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Unités de recherche interfacultaires > Research Unit for a life-Course perspective on Health and Education (RUCHE) ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Radiothérapie
Language :
English
Title :
Review of interactive digital solutions improving health literacy of personal cancer risks in the general public
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Nutbeam, D., Health literacy as a population strategy for health promotion. Japanese Journal of Health Education and Promotion 25:3 (2017), 210–222.
Davis, T.C., Williams, M.V., Marin, E., Parker, R.M., Glass, J., Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin., 2002 May-June;52(3):134–49.
Hart, T.L., Blacker, S., Panjwani, A., Torbit, L., Evans, M., Development of multimedia informational tools for breast cancer patients with low levels of health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 98:3 (2015 Mar), 370–377.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National statement on health literacy; 2014.
Chinese Ministry of Health, 66 tips of health: Chinese resident health literacy manual. 2008, People's Medical Publishing House, Beijing.
US Department of Health and Human Services, National action plan to improve health literacy. 2010, Office of disease prevention and health promotion, Washington DC.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organisation.
Joyce, D.D., Heslop, D.L., Umoh, J.I., Brown, S.D., Robles, J.A., Wallston, K.A., Moses, K.A., Examining the association of health literacy and numeracy with prostate-related knowledge and prostate cancer treatment regret. Urol Oncol. 38:8 (2020 Aug), 682.e11–682.e19.
Mazor, K.M., Rubin, D.L., Roblin, D.W., Williams, A.E., Han, P.K., Gaglio, B., Cutrona, S.L., Costanza, M.E., Wagner, J.L., Health literacy-listening skill and patient questions following cancer prevention and screening discussions. Health Expect. 19:4 (2016 Aug), 920–934.
Papadakos, J.K., Hasan, S.M., Barnsley, J., et al. Health literacy and cancer self-management behaviors: A scoping review. Cancer. 124:21 (2018), 4202–4210.
Nutbeam, D., McGill, B., Premkumar, P., Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress. Health Promot Int. 33:5 (2018 Oct 1), 901–911.
Austvoll-Dahlgren, A., Bjørndal, A., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Helseth, S., Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial. PLoS One., 7(5), 2012, e37715.
Jay, M., Adams, J., Herring, S.J., et al. A randomized trial of a brief multimedia intervention to improve comprehension of food labels. Prev Med. 48:1 (2009), 25–31.
Kemp, E., Trigg, J., Beatty, L., Christensen, C., Dhillon, H.M., Maeder, A., Williams, P.A.H., Koczwara, B., Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach. Health Promot J Austr. 32:Suppl 1 (2021 Feb), 104–114.
World Health Organization. eHealth at WHO. Available online: https://www.who.int/ehealth/about/en/ (Accessed: 12 Januari 2021).
World Health Organization. EB139/8, 139th session, 27 May 2016, Provisional agenda item 6.6.
World Health Organization. SEVENTY-FIRST WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY. WHA71.7 Agenda item 12.4. 26 May 2018. Digital health.
Jamnadass, E., Rai, B.P., Veneziano, D., Tokas, T., Rivas, J.G., Cacciamani, G., Somani, B., Do prostate cancer-related mobile phone apps have a role in contemporary prostate cancer management? A systematic review by EAU young academic urologists (YAU) urotechnology group. World J Urol. 38:10 (2020 Oct), 2411–2431.
Gadenz, S.D., Harzheim, E., Amaral, H.G., Drehmer, M., Development and Assessment of a Mobile Nutritional Counseling Tool for Primary Care Physicians. Telemed J E Health. 26:6 (2020 Jun), 805–811.
https://riskcalc.org/ (Accessed: 12 Januari 2021).
https://www.mskcc.org/nomograms (Accessed: 12 Januari 2021).
https://www.mdanderson.org/for-physicians/clinical-tools-resources/clinical-calculators.html (Accessed: 12 Januari 2021).
The World Bank. (17 July 2012). ‘Maximizing Mobile’ Report Highlights Development Potential of Mobile Communications. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2012/07/17/maximizing-mobile-development-potential-mobile-communications (Accessed: 12 Januari 2021).
Research and Markets. mHealth Apps Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Fitness, Lifestyle Management, Nutrition & Diet, Women's Health, Medication Adherence, Healthcare Providers/Payers), And Segment Forecasts, 2019 - 2026; June 2019.
WeAreSocial. Digital 2020 July Global Statshot Report.
Accenture. Losing Patience: Why Healthcare Providers Need to Up Their Mobile Game; 2015.
Accenture. (6 Januari 2016). ‘U.S. Hospitals Engaging Only 2 Percent of Patients via Mobile Apps, Putting as Much as $100 Million in Annual Revenue [Per Hospital] at Risk.’ Available online: https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/us-hospitals-engaging-only-2-percent-of-patients-via-mobile-apps-putting-as-much-as-100-million-in-annual-revenue-per-hospital-at-risk-accenture-finds.htm (Accessed: 12 Januari 2021).
Mohamad Marzuki, M.F., Yaacob, N.A., Bin Yaacob, N.M., Abu Hassan, M.R., Ahmad, S.B., Usable Mobile App for Community Education on Colorectal Cancer: Development Process and Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors., 6(2), 2019 Apr 16, e12103.
Wu, H.C., Chang, C.J., Lin, C.C., Tsai, M.C., Chang, C.C., Tseng, M.H., Developing screening services for colorectal cancer on Android smartphones. Telemed J E Health. 20:8 (2014), 687–695.
Levy, A.G., Sonnad, S.S., Kurichi, J.E., Sherman, M., Armstrong, K., Making sense of cancer risk calculators on the web. J Gen Intern Med. 23:3 (2008), 229–235.
Huang, C.H., Lo, Y.J., Kuo, K.M., Lu, I.C., Wu, H., Hsieh, M.T., Liu, I.T., Lin, Y.C., Lai, Y.C., Huang, R.Y., Hung, W.C., Lin, C.W., Health literacy and cancer screening behaviors among community-dwelling female adults in Taiwan. Women Health., 2021 May-Jun;61(5):408–419.
Stoyanov S, Hides L, Kavanagh D, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile App Rating Scale: A New Tool for Assessing the Quality of Health Mobile Apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3(1):e27.
Baumel, A., Birnbaum, M.L., Sucala, M., A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Published Quality Criteria Related to the Evaluation of User-Facing eHealth Programs. J Med Syst., 41(8), 2017 Aug, 128.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
