[en] During a 1-year compassionate use program, 156 patients with migraine self-administered a monthly dose of erenumab 140 mg with a subcutaneous autoinjector. Main inclusion criteria were: ≥ 4 migraine days/month and ≥two prior prophylactic treatment failures. The patients covered the migraine severity spectrum from episodic migraine (EM) (n = 80) to chronic migraine (CM) (n = 76). During the 3rd month of treatment, monthly headache days decreased by 45.7% in EM and 35.5% in CM. The 50% responder rate for reduction in monthly headache days was significantly higher in EM (55%) than in CM (43%) (p = 0.05). In both the migraine subgroups, the clinical improvement vs. baseline was already significant during the 1st month of treatment (p < 0.001). There were also significant reductions in mean headache severity, duration, and monthly days with acute drug intake. The 30% responder rate at 3 months was 60% in CM and 54.1% of patients reversed from CM to EM. The therapeutic effect was maintained at 12 months when 50% responder rates, considering discontinuation for lack of efficacy or adverse effects as 0% response, still were 51% in EM and 41% in CM. A total of 10 patients with EM (12.5%) and 23 patients with CM (30.3%) had discontinued treatment, considering the treatment as ineffective. At 3 months, 48% of patients reported non-serious adverse events among which the most frequent was constipation (20.5%); corresponding figures at 12 months were 30 and 15%. Discontinuation due to an adverse effect for the entire 12 month period was rare (3.8%). The lower efficacy in CM than in EM was mainly due to a very low 50% responder rate in patients with CM with continuous pain (13%) as compared to CM with pain-free periods (58%) (p < 0.001). Similarly, the 50% responder rate was lower in patients with ≥two prior prophylactic treatment failures (40.5%) compared to those with two failures (70%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant efficacy difference between low (4-7 migraine days/month, n = 22) and high frequency (8-14 days, n = 59) EM nor between patients with CM with (n = 50) or without (n = 26) acute medication overuse. Erenumab had no effect on the frequency of auras. Taken together, erenumab 140 mg monthly was highly effective for migraine prophylaxis over the whole severity spectrum of the disease, except in patients with continuous headaches. Its effect is significant after the first injection, quasi-maximal after the second injection, and does not wear off after 12 months. The most frequent adverse effect was constipation. These results are compared to those published for erenumab in the pivotal randomized placebo-controlled trials and to those reported in several recent real-world studies.
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
SCHOENEN, Jean ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de neurologie (CHR)
Timmermans, Grégory ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de neurologie (CHR)
Nonis, Romain; Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Citadelle Hospital-Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
MANISE, Maïté ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de neurologie (CHR)
FUMAL, Arnaud ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de neurologie (CHR)
GERARD, Pascale ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de neurologie (CHR)
Language :
English
Title :
Erenumab for Migraine Prevention in a 1-Year Compassionate Use Program: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Differences Between Clinical Phenotypes.
Edvinsson L Haanes KA Warfvinge K Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies - successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. (2018) 14:338–50. 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-129691490
Dodick DW. CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: evidence review and clinical implications. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:445–58. 10.1177/033310241882166231122057
Schoenen J Manise M Nonis R Gérard P Timmermans G. Monoclonal antibodies blocking CGRP transmission: an update on their added value in migraine prevention. Rev Neurol. (2020) 176:788–803. 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.04.02732758365
Forbes RB McCarron M Cardwell CR. Efficacy and contextual (placebo) effects of CGRP antibodies for migraine: systematic review and meta-analysis. Headache. (2020) 60:1542–57. 10.1111/head.1390732668023
Ashina M Goadsby PJ Reuter U Silberstein S Dodick DW Xue F et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: results from a 5-year, open-label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Neurol. (2021) 28:1716–25. 10.1111/ene.1471533400330
Raffaelli B Mussetto V Israel H Neeb L Reuter U. Erenumab and galcanezumab in chronic migraine prevention: effects after treatment termination. J Headache Pain. (2019) 20:66. 10.1186/s10194-019-1018-831159727
Buse DC Lipton RB Hallström Y Reuter U Tepper SJ Zhang F et al. Migraine-related disability, impact, and health-related quality of life among patients with episodic migraine receiving preventive treatment with erenumab. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:1622–31. 10.1177/033310241878907230086681
Ford JH Foster SA Stauffer VL Ruff DD Aurora SK Versijpt J. Patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and acute headache medication use with galcanezumab: results from a 12-month open-label study in patients with migraine. Patient Prefer Adher. (2018) 12:2413–24. 10.2147/PPA.S18256330519007
National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE). Technology Appraisal Guidance - Erenumab for Preventing Migraine. (2021). Available online at: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta682
Giannouchos TV Mitsikostas DD Ohsfeldt RL Vozikis A Koufopoulou P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of erenumab versus onabotulinumtoxinA for patients with chronic migraine attacks in Greece. Clin Drug Investig. (2019) 39:979–90. 10.1007/s40261-019-00827-z31302899
Drellia K Kokoti L Deligianni CI Papadopoulos D Mitsikostas DD. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a systematic review and likelihood to help or harm analysis. Cephalalgia. (2021) 41:851–64. 10.1177/033310242198960134521262
Goadsby PJ Reuter U Hallström Y Broessner G Bonner JH Zhang F et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:2123–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa170584834171973
Dodick DW Ashina M Brandes JL Kudrow D Lanteri-Minet M Osipova V et al. ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:1026–37. 10.1177/033310241875978629471679
Tepper S Ashina M Reuter U Brandes JL DoleŽil D Silberstein S et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:425–34. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-228460892
Reuter U Goadsby PJ Lanteri-Minet M Wen S Hours-Zesiger P Ferrari MD et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. (2018) 392:2280–87. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-030360965
Headache Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The international classification of headache disorders 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:1–211. 10.1177/033310241773820229368949
Lipton RB Cady RK Stewart WF Wilks K Hall C. Diagnostic lessons from the spectrum study. Neurology. (2002) 58(Suppl. 6):S27–31. 10.1212/WNL.58.9_suppl_6.S2712011271
Alex A Vaughn C Rayhill M. Safety and tolerability of 3 CGRP monoclonal antibodies in practice: a retrospective cohort study. Headache. (2020) 60:2454–62. 10.1111/head.1395632969035
Robblee J Devick KL Mendez N Potter J Slonaker J Starling AJ. Real-world patient experience with erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. Headache. (2020) 60:2014–25. 10.1111/head.1395132920850
Kanaan S Hettie G Loder E Burch R. Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of erenumab: a retrospective cohort study. Cephalalgia. (2020) 40:1511–22. 10.1177/033310242094672532791922
Talbot J Stuckey R Crawford L Weatherby S Mullin S. Improvements in pain, medication use and quality of life in onabotulinumtoxinA-resistant chronic migraine patients following erenumab treatment - real world outcomes. J Headache Pain. (2021) 22:5. 10.1186/s10194-020-01214-233421995
Faust E Pivneva I Yang K Betts KA Ahmed Z Joshi S et al. Real-world treatment profiles, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization of patients with migraine prescribed erenumab: a multicenter chart-review study of US headache centers. Neurol Ther. (2021) 10:293–306. 10.1007/s40120-021-00245-433856626
Eghtesadi M Leroux E Pagé G. Real-life response to erenumab in a therapy-resistant case series of migraine patients from the province of Quebec, eastern Canada. Clin Drug Investig. (2021) 41:733–39. 10.1007/s40261-021-01059-w34287786
Baraldi C Castro FL Cainazzo MM Pani L Guerzoni S. Predictors of response to erenumab after 12 months of treatment. Brain Behav. (2021) 11:e2260. 10.1002/brb3.226034268907
Salem-Abdou H Simonyan D Puymirat J. Identification of predictors of response to erenumab in a cohort of patients with migraine. Cephalalgia Rep. (2021) 4:1–8. 10.1177/25158163211026646
Scheffler A Messel O Wurthmann S Nsaka M Kleinschnitz C Glas M et al. Erenumab in highly therapy-refractory migraine patients: first German real-world evidence. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:84. 10.1186/s10194-020-01151-032620151
Lambru G Hill B Murphy M Tylova I Andreou AP. A prospective real-world analysis of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:61. 10.1186/s10194-020-01127-032487102
Ornello R Casalena A Frattale I Gabriele A Affaitati G Giamberardino MA et al. Real-life data on the efficacy and safety of erenumab in the Abruzzo region, central Italy. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:32. 10.1186/s10194-020-01102-932264820
Russo A Silvestro M Scotto di Clemente F Trojsi F Bisecco A Bonavita S et al. Multidimensional assessment of the effects of erenumab in chronic migraine patients with previous unsuccessful preventive treatments: a comprehensive real-world experience. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:69. 10.1186/s10194-020-01143-032517693
Raffaelli B Kalantzis R Mecklenburg J Overeem LH Neeb L Gendolla A et al. Erenumab in chronic migraine patients who previously failed five first-line oral prophylactics and onabotulinumtoxinA: a dual-center retrospective observational study. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:417. 10.3389/fneur.2020.0041732547474
Barbanti P Aurilia C Egeo G Fofi L Cevoli S Colombo B et al. Erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine: erenumab in Real Life in Italy (EARLY), the first Italian multicenter, prospective real-life study. Headache. (2021) 61:363–72. 10.1111/head.1403233337544
Belvís R Irimia P Pozo-Rosich P González-Oria C Cano A Viguera J et al. MAB-MIG: registry of the Spanish Neurological Society of erenumab for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. (2021) 22:74. 10.1186/s10194-021-01267-x34273947
Torres-Ferrús M Gallardo VJ Alpuente A Caronna E Gine-Cipres E Pozo-Rosich P. The impact of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in resistant migraine patients: a real-world evidence observational study. J Neurol. (2021) 268:3789–98. 10.1007/s00415-021-10523-833772636
Cheng S Jenkins B Limberg N Hutton E. Erenumab in chronic migraine: an Australian experience. Headache. (2020) 60:2555–62. 10.1111/head.1396832990364
Dodick DW Turkel CC DeGryse RE Diener HC Lipton RB Aurora SK et al. Assessing clinically meaningful treatment effects in controlled trials: chronic migraine as an example. J Pain. (2015) 16:164–75. 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.00425464159
Tassorelli C Diener HC Dodick DW Silberstein SD Lipton RB Ashina M et al. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. (2018) 38:815–32. 10.1177/033310241875828329504482
Ornello R Casalena A Frattale I Caponnetto V Gabriele A Affaitati G et al. Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine in patients treated with erenumab: real-life data from an Italian region. J Headache Pain. (2020) 21:102. 10.1186/s10194-020-01171-w32799790
Minen MT Begasse De Dhaem O Kroon Van Diest A Powers S Schwedt TJ Lipton R et al. Migraine and its psychiatric comorbidities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2016) 87:741–9. 10.1136/jnnp-2015-31223326733600
Chalmer MA Hansen TF Lebedeva ER Dodick DW Lipton RB Olesen J. Proposed new diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. (2020) 40:399–406. 10.1177/033310241987717131544467
Silvestro M Tessitore A Scotto di Clemente F Battista G Tedeschi G Russo A. Refractory migraine profile in CGRP-monoclonal antibodies scenario. Acta Neurol Scand. (2021) 144:325–33. 10.1111/ane.1347234019304
Melo-Carrillo A Schain AJ Stratton J Strassman AM Burstein R. Fremanezumab and its isotype slow propagation rate and shorten cortical recovery period but do not prevent occurrence of cortical spreading depression in rats with compromised blood-brain barrier. Pain. (2020) 161:1037–43. 10.1097/j.pain.000000000000179131895266
Kearney E Collins T Sengupta S. De novo visual aura onset in a migraineur on galcanezumab-gnlm. Headache. (2020) 60:1435–37. 10.1111/head.1385532476127
Vgontzas A Renthal W. Predicting erenumab adverse events with single-cell genomics. Lancet. (2020) 396:95–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32952-632653068
Xu D Chen D Zhu LN Tan G Wang HJ Zhang Y et al. Safety and tolerability of calcitonin-gene-related peptide binding monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of episodic migraine - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:1164–79. 10.1177/033310241982900730789292
Vo P Wen S Martel MJ Mitsikostas D Reuter U Klatt J. Benefit-risk assessment of erenumab and current migraine prophylactic treatments using the likelihood of being helped or harmed. Cephalalgia. (2019) 39:608–16. 10.1177/033310241880157930231626
Reuter U Ehrlich M Gendolla A Heinze A Klatt J Wen S et al. Erenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine - a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trial. Cephalalgia. (2021) 10.1177/0333102421105357134743579