Anxiety; Cognitive disorders; Critical illness; Depression; Functional capacity; Health-related quality of life; Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor; Post-intensive care syndrome; Survivors; Critical Care
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: The Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor (HABC-M) questionnaires (self-reported version and caregiver version) have been validated for post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) detection in patients surviving a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Their authors have also developed a hybrid version (HABC-M-HV) suited to the daily needs of their post-ICU follow-up clinic. The objectives of the present cross-sectional observational study were to translate the HABC-M-HV questionnaire into French (HABC-M-HV-F) according to international guidelines and to test its measurement properties.
METHODS: The HABC-M-HV was translated according to international guidelines. The measurement performances of the questionnaire were tested using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) calculation, floor and ceiling effect measurement and construct validity.
RESULTS: The validation study included 51 ICU survivors (27.5% women, 63 [55-71] years old). The questionnaire was administered by phone. The internal consistency was very good (Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.79). The intra- and inter-examinator reliabilities were excellent (Intraclass Coefficient Correlation = 0.99 and 0.97, respectively). The SEM was 0.62 and the SDC was 1.72. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The convergent validity was almost entirely confirmed with 71.4% of our hypothesis confirmed.
CONCLUSION: The HABC-M-HV-F has been shown to be a valid and reliable tool for PICS screening and follow-up in French-speaking ICU survivors. A remote administration by phone was feasible.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Horlait, Geoffrey; Intensive Care Department, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
BEAUDART, Charlotte ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
Bougard, Laurine ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'anesthésie - réanimation
BORNHEIM, Stephen ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
COLSON, Camille ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Soins intensifs chirurgie (+1D)
Misset, Benoît ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
BRUYERE, Olivier ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur
Boustani, Malaz; Sandra Eskenazi Center for Brain Care Innovation, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
ROUSSEAU, Anne-Françoise ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service des soins intensifs
Language :
English
Title :
Post-intensive care screening: French translation and validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor, hybrid version.
We want to thank Anne-Laure Van Massenhove for her valuable contribution in data collection. We also thank Jean-Pol Mangion for his help during the translation process.
Rousseau AF, Prescott HC, Brett SJ, Weiss B, Azoulay E, Creteur J, Latronico N, Hough CL, Weber-Carstens S, Vincent JL, Preiser JC. Long-term outcomes after critical illness: recent insights. Crit Care. 2021;25:108. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03535-3
Lasiter S, Oles SK, Mundell J, London S, Khan B. Critical care follow-up clinics: a scoping review of interventions and outcomes. Clin Nurse Spec. 2016;30:227–37. DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000219
Needham DM, Sepulveda KA, Dinglas VD, Chessare CM, Friedman LA, Bingham CO 3rd, Turnbull AE. Core outcome measures for clinical research in acute respiratory failure survivors. An international modified Delphi Consensus Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1122–30. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201702-0372OC
Scheunemann LP, Girard TD. Advancing telehealth-based screening for postintensive care syndrome: a coronavirus disease 2019 paradigm shift. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:1569–72. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005092
Monahan PO, Boustani MA, Alder C, Galvin JE, Perkins AJ, Healey P, Chehresa A, Shepard P, Bubp C, Frame A, Callahan C. Practical clinical tool to monitor dementia symptoms: the HABC-Monitor. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:143–57. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S30663
Monahan PO, Alder CA, Khan BA, Stump T, Boustani MA. The Healthy Aging Brain Care (HABC) Monitor: validation of the Patient Self-Report Version of the clinical tool designed to measure and monitor cognitive, functional, and psychological health. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2123–32. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S64140
Wang S, Allen D, Perkins A, Monahan P, Khan S, Lasiter S, Boustani M, Khan B. Validation of a new clinical tool for post-intensive care syndrome. Am J Crit Care. 2019;28:10–8. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2019639
Wang S, Jawed Y, Perkins A, Gao S, Seyffert S, Khan S, Boustani M, Khan B. Healthy aging brain care monitor, caregiver version: screening for post-intensive care syndrome. Am J Crit Care. 2022;31:137–44. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2022451
Nelson LA, Threatt AL, Martinez W, Acuff SW, Mayberry LS. Agile science: what and how in digital diabetes research. In: Diabetes Digital Health. Elsevier; 2020
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB: Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000, 25:3186–3191.
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Bouter LM, Vet HC, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20:105–13. DOI: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511996214
Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:142–58. DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80019-4
Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19:3–11. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539–49. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Weiss D, Marmar C. The impact of event scale—revised. In: Wilson J, Keane T, editors. Assessing Pschycological Trauma and PTSD. New York: Guilford; 1997. p. 399–411.
Gardashkhani S, Ajri-Khameslou M, Heidarzadeh M, Rajaei Sedigh S. Post-intensive care syndrome in Covid-19 Patients discharged from the intensive care unit. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2021;23:530–8. DOI: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000789
Carrozzino D, Patierno C, Guidi J, Berrocal Montiel C, Cao J, Charlson ME, Christensen KS, Concato J, De Las CC, de Leon J, et al. Clinimetric criteria for patient-reported outcome measures. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90:222–32. DOI: 10.1159/000516599
