Article (Scientific journals)
Digital vs. conventional workflow for one-abutment one-time immediate restoration in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial.
Hanozin, Brieuc; Li Manni, Lou; LECLOUX, Geoffrey et al.
2022In International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8 (1), p. 7
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Digital vs. conventional workflow for one-abutment... article.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.03 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Custom-made abutment; Fully digital workflow; One-abutment one-time; Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); White esthetic score (WES); s-CAIS surgery; General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] OBJECTIVES: To compare short-term outcomes after immediate restoration of a single implant in the esthetic zone with one-abutment one-time technique comparing a conventional (control) vs. a fully digital workflow (test). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen subjects were randomly assigned to the two groups, and a digital implant planning was performed for all. In the test group, a custom-made zirconia abutment and a CAD-CAM provisional crown were prepared prior to surgery; implants were placed using a s-CAIS guide allowing immediate restoration after surgery. In the control group, the implant was placed free-handed using a conventional surgical guide, and a custom-made zirconia abutment to support a stratified provisional crown was placed 10 days thereafter, based on a conventional impression. Implant accuracy (relative to the planning), the provisional restoration outcomes, as well as PROMs were assessed. RESULTS: The implant positioning showed higher accuracy with the s-CAIS surgical guide compared to free-handed surgery (angular deviation (AD): 2.41 ± 1.27° vs. 6.26 ± 3.98°, p < 0.014; entry point deviation (CGD): 0.65 ± 0.37 mm vs. 1.27 ± 0.83 mm, p < 0.059; apical deviation (GAD): 1.36 ± 0.53 mm vs. 2.42 ± 1.02 mm, p < 0.014). The occlusion and interproximal contacts showed similar results for the two workflows (p = 0.7 and p = 0.69, respectively). The PROMs results were similar in both groups except for impression taking with intra-oral scanning preferred over conventional impressions (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Both workflows allowed implant placement and immediate/early restoration and displayed similar clinical and esthetic outcomes. The fully digital workflow was associated with a more accurate implant position relative to planning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results show that both conventional and digital workflow are predictive and provide similar clinical outcomes, with extra precision provided by digitalisation.
Research center :
d‐BRU - Dental Biomaterials Research Unit - ULiège [BE]
Disciplines :
Dentistry & oral medicine
Author, co-author :
Hanozin, Brieuc ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire
Li Manni, Lou;  Department of Periodontology, Oral and Implant Surgery, University Hospital of Liège, Domaine du Sart Tilman Bat B-35, 4000, Liège, Belgium
LECLOUX, Geoffrey ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire
BACEVIC, Miljana  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire
LAMBERT, France ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service de parodontologie, chirurgie bucco-dentaire et chirurgie implantaire
Language :
English
Title :
Digital vs. conventional workflow for one-abutment one-time immediate restoration in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial.
Publication date :
07 February 2022
Journal title :
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
eISSN :
2198-4034
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Germany
Volume :
8
Issue :
1
Pages :
7
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 14 May 2022

Statistics


Number of views
133 (10 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
42 (2 by ULiège)

OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi