Encoding; Reading; Serial order; Working memory; Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Abstract :
[en] To-be-memorized information in verbal working memory (WM) can be presented sequentially, like in oral language, and simultaneously, like in written language. Few studies have addressed the importance and implications for verbal WM processing of these two presentation modes. While sequential presentation may favor discrete, temporal encoding processes, simultaneous presentation may favor spatial encoding processes. We compared immediate serial recall tasks for sequential versus simultaneous word list presentation with a specific focus on serial position curves of recall performance, transposition gradients, and the nature of serial order errors. First, we observed higher recall performance in the simultaneous compared to the sequential conditions, with a particularly large effect at end-of-list items. Moreover, results showed more transposition errors between non-adjacent items for the sequential condition, as well as more omission errors especially for start-of-list items. This observation can be explained in terms of differences in refreshing opportunities for start-of-list items during encoding between conditions. This study shows that the presentation mode of sequential material can have a significant impact on verbal WM performance, with an advantage for simultaneous encoding of sequence information.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Ordonez Magro, Laura; Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, Aix-Marseille Université, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France. laura.ordonezmagro@gmail.com ; Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France. laura.ordonezmagro@gmail.com
Mirault, Jonathan; Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, Aix-Marseille Université, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France
Grainger, Jonathan; Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, Aix-Marseille Université, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, France ; Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, France
Majerus, Steve ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie ; Fund for Scientific Research -F.R.S.-FNRS, Bruxelles, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Sequential versus simultaneous presentation of memoranda in verbal working memory: (How) does it matter?
Publication date :
2022
Journal title :
Memory and Cognition
ISSN :
0090-502X
eISSN :
1532-5946
Publisher :
Springer, United States
Volume :
50
Pages :
1756-1771
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
This study was supported by the CHUNKED ANR project (#ANR-17-CE28-0013-02) and the ERC advanced grant (#742141). We would like to thank all participants for their time and effort invested in this study.
Abrahamse, E., van Dijck, J.-P., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2014). Finding the answer in space: The mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00932
Ahmad, J., Swan, G., Bowman, H., Wyble, B., Nobre, A. C., Shapiro, K. L., & McNab, F. (2017). Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 4785. 10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x
Barrouillet, P., Gorin, S., & Camos, V. (2021). Simple spans underestimate verbal working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 150(4), 633-665. 10.1037/xge0000957 DOI: 10.1037/xge0000957
Battacchi, M. W., Pelamatti, G. M., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects. Memory & Cognition, 18(6), 651-658. 10.3758/bf03197107 DOI: 10.3758/bf03197107
Bhatarah, P., Ward, G., & Tan, L. (2008). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: The serial nature of recall and the effect of test expectancy. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 20-34. 10.3758/MC.36.1.20 DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.1.20
Brown, G. D., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127-181. 10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.127 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.127
Brysbaert, M. (2013). LexTALE_FR: A fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, 53(1), 23-37. 10.5334/pb-53-1-23 DOI: 10.5334/pb-53-1-23
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106(3), 551-581. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.551 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.551
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 627-652. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005
Carretti, B., Lanfranchi, S., & Mammarella, I. C. (2013). Spatial-simultaneous and spatial-sequential working memory in individuals with Down syndrome: The effect of configuration. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 669-675. 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.011
Crowder, R. G. (1966). Visual presentation of stimuli in immediate memory. Psychonomic Science, 6(10), 449-450. 10.3758/BF03328085 DOI: 10.3758/BF03328085
Dalmaijer, E. S., Manohar, S. G., & Husain, M. (2018). Parallel encoding of information into visual short-term memory. BioRxiv, 398990. https://doi.org/10.1101/398990
De Belder, M., Abrahamse, E., Kerckhof, M., Fias, W., & van Dijck, J.-P. (2015). Serial Position Markers in Space: Visuospatial Priming of Serial Order Working Memory Retrieval. PLoS ONE, 10(1). 10.1371/journal.pone.0116469
Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274-290. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611406920
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., & Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 488-496. 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488 DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
Finger, H., Goeke, C., Diekamp, D., Standvoß, K., König, P. (2017). LabVanced: A unified JavaScript framework for online studies. In International Conference on Computational Social Science (Cologne).
Finley, J. R., Roediger, H. L., Hughes, A. D., Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015). Simultaneous Versus Sequential Presentation in Testing Recognition Memory for Faces. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 173-195. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0173 DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0173
Frick, R. W. (1985). Testing visual short-term memory: Simultaneous versus sequential presentations. Memory & Cognition, 13(4), 346-356. 10.3758/bf03202502 DOI: 10.3758/bf03202502
Ginsburg, V., & Gevers, W. (2015). Spatial coding of ordinal information in short- and long-term memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 8. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00008 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00008
Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A « mid-level » vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 71(2), 335-359. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
Grainger, J., Mathôt, S., & Vitu, F. (2014). Tests of a model of multi-word reading: Effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 146, 35-40. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014
Guida, A., Leroux, A., Lavielle-Guida, M., & Noël, Y. (2016). A SPoARC in the Dark: Spatialization in Verbal Immediate Memory. Cognitive Science, 40(8), 2108-2121. 10.1111/cogs.12316 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12316
Guida, A., Megreya, A. M., Lavielle-Guida, M., Noël, Y., Mathy, F., van Dijck, J.-P., & Abrahamse, E. (2018). Spatialization in working memory is related to literacy and reading direction: Culture « literarily » directs our thoughts. Cognition, 175, 96-100. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.013 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.013
Guitard, D., Saint-Aubin, J., & Cowan, N. (2021). Grouping effects in immediate reconstruction of order and the preconditions for long-term learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17470218211030824. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211030825
Hartley, T., Hurlstone, M. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2016). Effects of rhythm on memory for spoken sequences: A model and tests of its stimulus-driven mechanism. Cognitive Psychology, 87, 135-178. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.001
Henson, R. N. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End Model. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 73-137. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0685 DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0685
Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (1999). Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 923-941. 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.923 DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.923
Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339-373. 10.1037/a0034221 DOI: 10.1037/a0034221
JASP Team. (2021). JASP (Version 0.16)[Computer software].
Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3 ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 103-109. 10.3758/bf03197276 DOI: 10.3758/bf03197276
Klein, K. A., Addis, K. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2005). A comparative analysis of serial and free recall. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 833-839. 10.3758/bf03193078 DOI: 10.3758/bf03193078
LeCompte, D. C. (1992). In search of a strong visual recency effect. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 563-572. 10.3758/bf03199588 DOI: 10.3758/bf03199588
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2015). Rehearsal in serial recall: An unworkable solution to the nonexistent problem of decay. Psychological Review, 122(4), 674-699. 10.1037/a0039684 DOI: 10.1037/a0039684
Logan, G. D. (2021). Serial order in perception, memory, and action. Psychological Review, 128(1), 1-44. 10.1037/rev0000253 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000253
Mammarella, I. C., Cornoldi, C., Pazzaglia, F., Toso, C., Grimoldi, M., & Vio, C. (2006). Evidence for a double dissociation between spatial-simultaneous and spatial-sequential working memory in visuospatial (nonverbal) learning disabled children. Brain and Cognition, 62(1), 58-67. 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.007 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.007
Marcer, D. (1967). The effect of presentation method on short-term recall of CCC trigrams. Psychonomic Science, 8(8), 335-336. 10.3758/BF03331689 DOI: 10.3758/BF03331689
McClelland, J. L., & Mozer, M. C. (1986). Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: Familiarity and similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 12(1), 18-35. 10.1037//0096-1523.12.1.18 DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.1.18
Mirault, J., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2018). You That Read Wrong Again ! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1922-1929. 10.1177/0956797618806296 DOI: 10.1177/0956797618806296
Mozer, M. C. (1983). Letter migration in word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 9(4), 531-546. 10.1037//0096-1523.9.4.531 DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.4.531
Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53-81. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135131 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135131
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 36(3), 516-524. 10.3758/bf03195598 DOI: 10.3758/bf03195598
Pegado, F., & Grainger, J. (2021). On the noisy spatiotopic encoding of word positions during reading: Evidence from the change-detection task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(1), 189-196. 10.3758/s13423-020-01819-3 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01819-3
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125-157. 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125
Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 115-119. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002
Ricker, T. J., & Cowan, N. (2014). Differences between Presentation Methods in Working Memory Procedures: A Matter of Working Memory Consolidation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 417-428. 10.1037/a0034301 DOI: 10.1037/a0034301
Schönbrodt, F. D. (2016). BFDA: An R package for Bayes Factor Design Analysis, version 0.1. https://www.github.com/nicebread/bfda.
Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019). Readers Are Parallel Processors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(7), 537-546. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006
Snell, J., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2017). Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading. PloS One, 12(3), e0173720. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720
Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125(6), 969-984. 10.1037/rev0000119 DOI: 10.1037/rev0000119
Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Does articulatory rehearsal help immediate serial recall? Cognitive Psychology, 107, 1-21. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.09.002 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.09.002
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2008). Rehearsal in immediate serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 535-542. 10.3758/pbr.15.3.535 DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.535
van Dijck, J.-P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114-119. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
van Dijck, J.-P., Abrahamse, E. L., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2013). Spatial attention interacts with serial-order retrieval from verbal working memory. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1854-1859. 10.1177/0956797613479610 DOI: 10.1177/0956797613479610
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779-804. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194105
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lee, M., Lodewyckx, T., & Iverson, G. J. (2008). Bayesian versus frequentist inference. In Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses (p. 181-207). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4_9
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E.-J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58-76. 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7