Sciences de la terre et du cosmos; Compaction; Destructuration; Mercury intrusion porosimetry; Microstructure; Structured soil
Abstract :
[en] Soil microstructure is an important feature that controls soil behaviour at the macroscale. This microstructure depends on the sample preparation method and evolves during saturation and loading. This paper investigates the effects of compaction water content, drying techniques adopted prior to performing porosimetry, saturation and loading on the evolution of the microstructure of a silty soil. Mercury intrusion porosimetry is used to obtain the pore-size distribution at different states of soil presenting single and double porosity. It is observed that in presence of aggregates (obtained from a compaction on the dry side of optimum), the bimodal pore-size distribution is not significantly affected by the saturation process at zero stress. This feature of behaviour is quite specific to low plasticity silty soil. Conversely, loading under saturated conditions has a more significant effect on the pore-size distribution. This bimodal distribution converges into a single mode of pore size when the stress is significantly greater than the apparent preconsolidation pressure. The observed experimental results are interpreted in the light of pore-size distribution evolution during saturation and loading.
Disciplines :
Civil engineering
Author, co-author :
Oualmakran, Mohamed
Mercatoris, Benoît ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Agriculture de précision
François, Bertrand ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Urban and Environmental Engineering
Language :
English
Title :
Pore-size distribution of a compacted silty soil after compaction, saturation, and loading
Ahmed, S., Lovell, C., and Diamond, S. 1974. ore sizes and strength of compacted clay. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 100(4): 407-425. doi:10.5703/1288284314552.
Airò Farulla, C., and Rosone, M. 2012. Microstructure characteristics of unsaturated compacted scaly clay. In Unsaturated soils: research and applications. Edited by C. Mancuso, C. Jommi, and F. D’Onza. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 123-130. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31116-1_16.
Al-Mukhtar, M., Belanteur, N., Tessier, D., and Vanapalli, S.K. 1996. The fabric of a clay soil under controlled mechanical and hydraulic stress states. Applied Clay Science, 11: 99-115. doi:10.1016/S0169-1317(96)00023-3.
Alonso, E.E., Pinyol, N.M., and Puzrin, A.M. 2010. Collapse of compacted soil: Girona road embankments, Spain. In Geomechanics of failures. Advanced Topics, Springer. pp. 85-127.
Alonso, E., Pinyol, N., and Gens, A. 2013. Compacted soil behaviour: initial state, structure and constitutive modelling. Géotechnique, 63(6): 463-478. doi:10.1680/geot.11.P.134.
ASTM. 2006. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM standard D2487-06. ASTM. doi:10.1520/D2487-06.
Birle, E. 2012. Effect of initial water content and dry density on the pore structure and the soil-water retention curve of compacted clay. In Unsaturated soils: research and applications. Edited by C. Mancuso, C. Jommi, and F. D’Onza. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 145-152. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31116-1_19.
Burland, J., Rampello, S., Georgiannou, V., and Calabresi, G. 1996. A laboratory study of the strength of four stiff clays. Géotechnique, 46(3): 491-514. doi:10.1680/geot.1996.46.3.491.
Casagrande, A. 1936. The determination of the preconsolidation load and its practical significance. In Proceedings, First International Conference on Soil Mechanics, Cambridge. pp. 60-64.
Cotecchia, F., and Chandler, R.J. 1997. The influence of structure on the prefailure behaviour of a natural clay. Géotechnique, 47(3): 523-544. doi:10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.523.
Delage, P., and Lefebvre, G. 1984. Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and of its evolution during consolidation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21(1): 21-35. doi:10.1139/t84-003.
Delage, P., and Pellerin, M. 1984. Influence de la lyophilisation sur la structure d’une argile sensible du Quebec. Clay Minerals, 19: 151-160. doi:10.1180/claymin.1984.019.2.03.
Delage, P., Tessier, D., and Marcel-Audiguier, M. 1982. Use of the cryoscan apparatus for observation of freeze-fractured planes of a sensitive Quebec clay in scanning electron microscopy. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 19(1): 111-114. doi:10.1139/t82-011.
Delage, P., Audiguier, M., Cui, Y., and Howat, M.D. 1996. Microstructure of a compacted silt. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33(1): 150-158. doi:10.1139/t96-030.
Graham, J., and Li, E. 1985. Comparison of natural and remolded plastic clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111(7): 865-881. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:7(865).
Griffiths, F., and Joshi, R. 1989. Change in pore size distribution due to consolidation of clays. Géotechnique, 39(1): 159-167. doi:10.1680/geot.1989.39.1.159.
Hammad, T., Fleureau, J.-M., and Hattab, M. 2013. Kaolin/montmorillonite mixtures behaviour on oedometric path and microstructural variations. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 17: 826-840. doi:10.1080/19648189.2013.822428.
Hattab, M., Hammad, T., Fleureau, J.-M., and Hicher, P.-Y. 2013. Behaviour of a sensitive marine sediment: microstructural investigation. Géotechnique, 63(1): 71-84. doi:10.1680/geot.10.P.104.
Hattab, M., Hammad, T., and Fleureau, J.-M. 2015. Internal friction angle variation in a kaolin/montmorillonite clay mix and microstructural identification. Géotechnique, 65(1): 1-11. doi:10.1680/geot.13.P.081.
Kochmanova, N., and Tanaka, H. 2011. Microstructure formation in bentonite. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. pp. 3392-3396.
Koliji, A., Lehmann, P., Vulliet, L., Laloui, L., Carminati, A., Vontobel, P., and Hassanein, R. 2008. Assessment of structural evolution of aggregated soil using neutron tomography. Water Resources Research, 44: 2-9. doi:10.1029/2007WR006297.
Koliji, A., Vulliet, L., and Laloui, L. 2010. Structural characterization of unsaturated aggregated soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47(3): 297-311. doi:10.1139/T09-089.
Lapierre, C., Leroueil, S., and Locat, J. 1990. Mercury intrusion and permeability of Louiseville clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(6): 761-773. doi:10.1139/t90-090.
Lawrence, G., Payne, D., and Greenland, D.J. 1979. Pore size distribution in critical point and freeze dried aggregates from clay subsoils. Journal of Soil Science, 30(3): 499-516. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1979.tb01004.x.
Leroueil, S., and Vaughan, R. 1990. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Géotechnique, 40(3): 467-488. doi:10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.467.
Li, X., and Zhang, L.M. 2009. Characterization of dual-structure pore-size distribution of soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46(2): 129-141. doi:10.1139/T08-110.
Liyanapathirana, D.S., Carter, J., and Airey, D.W. 2005. Numerical modeling of nonhomogeneous behavior of structured soils during triaxial tests. International Journal of Geomechanics, 5(1): 10-23. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:1(10).
Mitchell, J. 1976. Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley.
Monroy, R., Zdravkovic, L., and Ridley, A. 2007. Fabric changes in compacted london clay due to variations in applied stress and suction. In Experimental Unsaturated Soil Mechanics. Springer Proceedings in Physics, No. 112. pp. 41-48.
Monroy, R., Zdravkovic, L., and Ridley, A. 2010. Evolution of microstructure in compacted London clay during wetting and loading. Géotechnique, 60(2): 105-119. doi:10.1680/geot.8.P.125.
Nowamooz, H., and Masrouri, F. 2010. Influence of suction cycles on the soil fabric of compacted swelling soil. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 342(12): 901-910. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2010.10.003.
Penumadu, D., and Dean, J. 2000. Compressibility effect in evaluating the poresize distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(2): 393-405. doi:10.1139/t99-121.
Romero, E., and Simms, P.H. 2008. Microstructure investigation in unsaturated soils: a review with special attention to contribution of mercury intrusion porosimetry and environmental scanning electron microscopy. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 26(6): 705-727. doi:10.1007/s10706-008-9204-5.
Romero, E., Gens, A., and Lloret, A. 1999. Water permeability, water retention and microstructure of unsaturated compacted boom clay. Engineering Geology, 54: 117-127. doi:10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00067-8.
Simms, P., and Yanful, E. 2002. Predicting soil-water characteristic curves of compacted plastic soils from measured pore-size distributions. Géotechnique, 52(4): 269-278. doi:10.1680/geot.2002.52.4.269.
Sivakumar, V., Tan, W.C., Murray, E.J., and McKinley, J.D. 2006. Wetting, drying and compression characteristics of compacted clay. Géotechnique, 56(1): 57-62. doi:10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.57.
Tarantino, A., and De Col, E. 2008. Compaction behaviour of clay. Géotechnique, 58(3): 199-213. doi:10.1680/geot.2008.58.3.199.
Tessier, D., and Berrier, J. 1978. Observation d’argiles hydratées en microscopie electronique a` balayage: Importance et choix de la technique de préparation. In Proceedings, Vth International Working-Meeting on Soil Micromorphology. Granada. pp. 117-135.
Thom, R., Sivakumar, R., Sivakumar, V., Murray, E.J., and Mackinnon, P. 2007. Pore size distribution of unsaturated compacted kaolin: the initial states and final states following saturation. Géotechnique, 57(5): 469-474. doi:10.1680/geot.2007.57.5.469.
Tovey, D., and Wong, K. 1973. The preparation of soils and other geological materials for the S.E.M. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soil Structure, Gothenburg. pp. 59-67.
Watabe, Y., Leroueil, S., and Le Bihan, J.-P. 2000. Influence of compaction conditions on pore-size distribution and saturated hydraulic conductivity of a glacial till. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(6): 1184-1194. doi:10.1139/t00-053.
Yang, C., Carter, J.P., and Sheng, D. 2014. Description of compression behaviour of structured soils and its application. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 51(8): 921-933. doi:10.1139/cgj-2013-0265.
