Sex Attractants; DNA; EC 1.2.1.9 (Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)); EC 1.9.3.1 (Electron Transport Complex IV); Animals; DNA/isolation & purification/metabolism; Electron Transport Complex IV/classification/genetics; Female; Genetic Variation; Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)/classification/genetics; Male; Mitochondria/genetics; Moths/genetics; Phylogeny; Sex Attractants/chemistry/metabolism; Barcoding; COI; Cryptic species; GADPH; Pheromone signalling; Speciation; Wingless
Abstract :
[en] Animal classification is primarily based on morphological characters, even though these may not be the first to diverge during speciation. In many cases, closely related taxa are actually difficult to distinguish based on morphological characters alone, especially when there is no substantial niche separation. As a consequence, the diversity of certain groups is likely to be underestimated. Lepidoptera -moths and butterflies- represent the largest group of herbivorous insects. The extensive diversification in the group is generally assumed to have its origin in the spectacular radiation of flowering plants and the resulting abundance of ecological niches. However, speciation can also occur without strong ecological divergence. For example, reproductive isolation can evolve as the result of divergence in mate preference and the associated pheromone communication system. We combined pheromone trapping and genetic analysis to elucidate the evolutionary relationships within a complex of primitive moth species (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae). Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers provided evidence that Eriocrania semipurpurella, as currently defined by morphological characters, includes three cryptic species in Northern and Western Europe. Male moths of these cryptic species, as well as of the closely related E. sangii, exhibited relative specificity in terms of their attraction to specific ratios of two major pheromone components, (2S,6Z)-nonen-2-ol and (2R,6Z)-nonen-2-ol. Our data suggest strong assortative mating in these species in the absence of apparent niche separation, indicating that Eriocrania moths may represent an example of non-ecological speciation. Finally, our study argues in favour of combining pheromone investigations and DNA barcoding as powerful tools for identifying and delimitating species boundaries.
Disciplines :
Entomology & pest control
Author, co-author :
Lassance, Jean-Marc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de gestion vétérinaire des Ressources Animales (DRA) > Génomique animale ; Department of Biology, Lund University, Solvegatan 37, SE-22362, Lund, ; Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 16
Svensson, Glenn P; Department of Biology, Lund University, Solvegatan 37, SE-22362, Lund,
Kozlov, Mikhail V; Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014,
Francke, Wittko; Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King
Lofstedt, Christer ; Department of Biology, Lund University, Solvegatan 37, SE-22362, Lund
Language :
English
Title :
Pheromones and Barcoding Delimit Boundaries between Cryptic Species in the Primitive Moth Genus Eriocrania (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae).
Publication date :
June 2019
Journal title :
Journal of Chemical Ecology
ISSN :
0098-0331
eISSN :
1573-1561
Publisher :
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, Us ny
Allison JD, Cardé RT (2016) Variation in moth pheromones: causes and consequences. In: Allison JD, Cardé RT (eds) Pheromone Communication in Moths: Evolution, Behavior, and Application. Univ California Press, Oakland, pp 25–41
Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya S, Wogan GOU, Swartz B, Quental TB, Marshall C, McGuire JL, Lindsey EL, Maguire KC, Mersey B, Ferrer EA (2011) Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471:51–57
Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:148–155
Brower AV (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:6491–6495
Brower AVZ, DeSalle R (1998) Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Mol Biol 7:73–82
Butlin R, Debelle A, Kerth C, Snook RR, Beukeboom LW, Cajas RFC, Diao W, Maan ME, Paolucci S, Weissing FJ, van de Zande L, Hoikkala A, Geuverink E, Jennings J, Kankare M, Knott KE, Tyukmaeva VI, Zoumadakis C, Ritchie MG, Barker D, Immonen E, Kirkpatrick M, Noor M, Garcia CM, Schmitt T, Schilthuizen M (2012) What do we need to know about speciation? Trends Ecol Evol 27:27–39
Cardé RT, Haynes KF (2004) Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths. In: Carde RT, Millar JG (eds) Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 283–332
Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659
Dasmahapatra KK, Elias M, Hill RI, Hoffman JI, Mallet J (2010) Mitochondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real, and some that are not. Mol Ecol Resour 10:264–273
Dinca V, Lukhtanov VA, Talavera G, Vila R (2011) Unexpected layers of cryptic diversity in wood white Leptidea butterflies. Nat Commun 2:324
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299
Freeman JB, Dale R (2013) Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process. Behav Res Methods 45:83–97
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Hart MW, Sunday J (2007) Things fall apart: biological species form unconnected parsimony networks. Biol Lett 3:509–512
Hartigan JA, Hartigan PM (1985) The dip test of Unimodality. Ann Stat 13:70–84
Heath J (1976) Eriocraniidae. In: Heath J (ed) the moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, vol 1. Micropterigidae - Heliozelidae. Harley Books, London, pp 156–165
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:313–321
Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14812–14817
Imada Y, Kawakita A, Kato M (2011) Allopatric distribution and diversification without niche shift in a bryophyte-feeding basal moth lineage (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:3026–3033
Kahle D, Wickham H (2013) Ggmap: spatial visualization with ggplot2
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780
Kieslich PJ, Henninger F, Wulff DU, Haslbeck JMB, Schulte-Mecklenbeck M (2019) Process and Analyze Mouse-Tracking Data
Koricheva J, Haukioja E (1995) Variations in chemical composition of birch foliage under air pollution stress and their consequences for Eriocrania miners. Environ Pollut 88:41–50
Kozlov MV (1997) Family Eriocraniidae. In: Kononenko VS (ed) Key to the Insects of Russian Far East. Vol. 5. Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. Part 1. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, pp 264–271
Kozlov MV, Zhu J, Philipp P, Francke W, Zvereva EL, Hansson BS, Löfstedt C (1996) Pheromone specificity in Eriocrania semipurpurella (Stephens) and E. sangii (wood) (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae) based on chirality of semiochemicals. J Chem Ecol 22:431–454
Larsson MC, Hallberg E, Kozlov MV, Francke W, Hansson BS, Löfstedt C (2002) Specialized olfactory receptor neurons mediating intra- and interspecific chemical communication in leafminer moths Eriocrania spp. (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae). J Exp Biol 205:989–998
Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452
Löfstedt C (1993) Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 340:167–177
Maechler M (2016) Diptest: Hartigans' dip test statistic for Unimodality - corrected
Milne I, Lindner D, Bayer M, Husmeier D, Gi MG, Marshall DF, Wright F (2009) TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analyses of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics 25:126–127
Misof B, Liu S, Meusemann K, Peters RS, Donath A, Mayer C, Frandsen PB, Ware J, Flouri T, Beutel RG, Niehuis O, Petersen M, Izquierdo-Carrasco F, Wappler T, Rust J, Aberer AJ, Aspock U, Aspock H, Bartel D, Blanke A, Berger S, Bohm A, Buckley TR, Calcott B, Chen J, Friedrich F, Fukui M, Fujita M, Greve C, Grobe P, Gu S, Huang Y, Jermiin LS, Kawahara AY, Krogmann L, Kubiak M, Lanfear R, Letsch H, Li Y, Li Z, Li J, Lu H, Machida R, Mashimo Y, Kapli P, McKenna DD, Meng G, Nakagaki Y, Navarrete-Heredia JL, Ott M, Ou Y, Pass G, Podsiadlowski L, Pohl H, von Reumont BM, Schutte K, Sekiya K, Shimizu S, Slipinski A, Stamatakis A, Song W, Su X, Szucsich NU, Tan M, Tan X, Tang M, Tang J, Timelthaler G, Tomizuka S, Trautwein M, Tong X, Uchifune T, Walzl MG, Wiegmann BM, Wilbrandt J, Wipfler B, Wong TKF, Wu Q, Wu G, Xie Y, Yang S, Yang Q, Yeates DK, Yoshizawa K, Zhang Q, Zhang R, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zhou C, Zhou L, Ziesmann T, Zou S, Li Y, Xu X, Zhang Y, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J, Kjer KM, Zhou X (2014) Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science 346:763–767
Mutanen M, Wahlberg N, Kaila L (2010) Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:2839–2848
SAS Institute (1990) SAS/STAT user's guide: version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary
Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene-sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain-reaction primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87:651–701
Smadja C, Butlin RK (2009) On the scent of speciation: the chemosensory system and its role in premating isolation. Heredity 102:77–97
Sperling F, Nazari V (2007) Mitochondrial DNA divergence and phylogeography in western Palaearctic Parnassiinae (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): how many species are there? Insect Syst Evol 38:121–138
Sutter R (2000) Contributions to the insect fauna of East Germany: Lepidoptera-Eriocraniidae (Insecta). Faunistische Abhandlungen 22:49–67
Svensson EI (2012) Non-ecological speciation, niche conservatism and thermal adaptation: how are they connected? Org Divers Evol 12:229–240
Svensson GP, Wang HL, Lassance J-M, Anderbrant O, Chen GF, Gregorsson B, Guertin C, Harala E, Jirle EV, Liblikas I, Petko V, Roques A, Rosenberg O, Strong W, Voolma K, Ylioja T, Wang YJ, Zhou XM, Löfstedt C (2013) Assessment of genetic and pheromonal diversity of the Cydia strobilella species complex (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Syst Entomol 38:305–315
Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595
van Nieukerken EJ et al (2011) Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. Zootaxa 3148:212–221
Wahlberg N (2006) That awkward age for butterflies: insights from the age of the butterfly subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Syst Biol 55:703–714
Wahlberg N, Wheat CW (2008) Genomic outposts serve the phylogenomic pioneers: designing novel nuclear markers for genomic DNA extractions of lepidoptera. Syst Biol 57:231–242
Zhu J, Kozlov MV, Philipp P, Francke W, Löfstedt C (1995) Identification of a novel moth sex pheromone in Eriocrania cicatricella (Zett.) (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae) and its phylogenetic implications. J Chem Ecol 21:29–43