RRI; Research culture; Sustainable careers; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all); Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
Abstract :
[en] Research is a long process in which the collaboration between stakeholders involved in academia, industry and governments is crucial. Ideally, these stakeholders should work together to better align the innovation process with the values, needs and expectations of the research community. Reflecting on how we perform research and how our discoveries can benefit society is therefore of the utmost importance. The complete system of shared values concerning the research process is embedded in the concept of research culture, which has been gaining more attention in recent years. With the hope of increasing awareness of research culture among established scientists and early-career professionals, in this manuscript we discuss what research culture is, what it consists of and how it can positively influence scientific developments.
Chrzanowska, Anna ; Neuro-Electronic Research Flanders, VIB, 3001 Leuven, Belgium ; Biology Department, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium ; Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
Doglio, M Giulia ; VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, VIB, 9052 Ghent, Belgium ; Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Martina, Lia ; VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, 9052 Ghent, Belgium ; Department for Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Van Den Bossche, Tim ; VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, 9052 Ghent, Belgium ; Department for Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Research culture: science from bench to society.
Publication date :
2021
Journal title :
Biology Open
eISSN :
2046-6390
Publisher :
Company of Biologists Ltd, England
Volume :
10
Pages :
bio058919
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
We would like to acknowledge the support of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [grants 11C5119N and 11C5121N to AC, 1S90918N to TVDB].
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Anonymous academic (2018). Performance-driven culture is ruining science. The Guardian, 16 February.
Ashworth, P., Lacey, J., Sehic, S. and Dowd, A.-M. (2019). Exploring the value proposition for RRI in Australia. J. Responsible Innov. 6, 332-339. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1603571
Bailey, A. (1998). Privilege: Expanding on Marilyn Frye's "oppression". J. Soc. Philos. 29, 104-119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1998.tb00124.x
Bonn, N. A. and Pinxten, W. (2021a). Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) - a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 6, 1. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00104-0
Bonn, N. A. and Pinxten, W. (2021b). Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) - a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science. Res. Integr. Peer Rev. 6, 3. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00105-z
Brown, H. (2007). How impact factors changed medical publishing-and science. BMJ 334, 561-564. doi:10.1136/bmj.39142.454086.AD
CACTUS (2021). Available at https://cactusglobal.com/.
Chant, S. H. and Gutmann, M. C. (2000). Mainstreaming Men Into Gender and Development: Debates, Reflections, and Experiences. Oxfam.
Cohen, J. B., Bajanca, F., Lam, M. E., Stroobants, K., Novitzky, P., Björnmalm, M., Kismihók, G. and Loeber, A. (2019). Towards responsible research career assessment. OpenAIRE. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3560479
Deeming, S., Searles, A., Reeves, P. and Nilsson, M. (2017). Measuring research impact in Australia's medical research institutes: A scoping literature review of the objectives for and an assessment of the capabilities of research impact assessment frameworks. Health Res. Policy Syst. 15, 22. doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0180-1
Dirnagl, U. (2019). Rethinking research reproducibility. EMBO J.. 38, e101117. doi:10.15252/embj.2018101117
Dister, A., Lafontaine, M. and Moreau, M. L. (2020). THE CONVERSATION. Débat: Faut-il enseigner l'écriture inclusive? Available at https://theconversation. com/debat-faut-il-enseigner-lecriture-inclusive-147336.
Donovan, C. (2007). The qualitative future of research evaluation. Science and Public Policy 34, 585-597. doi:10.3152/030234207X256538
DORA (2012). Available at https://sfdora.org/. Downey, F. and Stroobants, K. (2019). MetisTalk. A place to share, discuss and challenge ideas around research culture. Available at https://www.metistalk.com/.
EIGE (2021). Definition of "gender equality". Available at https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus/terms/1168.
Global Diversity Practice Ltd (2020). What is diversity and inclusion? Available at https://globaldiversitypractice.com/what-is-diversity-inclusion/.
Gong, P. (2012). Cultural history holds back Chinese research. Nature 481, 411-411. doi:10.1038/481411a
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. and Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464-1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K. T., Uhlik, J. and Dörler, D. (2019). Opinion: Toward an international definition of citizen science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8089-8092. doi:10.1073/pnas.1903393116
Hill, R. (1999). Revisiting the term "research culture". In HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, pp. 12-15.
Kismihók, G., Cardells, F., Gü ner, P. B., Kersten, F., Harrison, S., Shawrav, M. M., Huber, F., Trusilewicz, L. N., Mol, S. T., Bajanca, F. et al. (2019). Declaration on Sustainable Researcher Careers.
Larivière, V., Haustein, S. and Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One 10, e0127502.
Lean In (2019). Women in the Workplace 2019. Available at https://leanin.org/women-in-the-workplace-report-2019/commitment-to-diversity.
Moore, A. P. and Jull, G. (2012). Research culture development in the workplace -The key to professional success. Man. Ther. 17, 487-488. doi:10.1016/j.math. 2012.09.008
Moore, S., Neylon, C., Eve, M. P., O'Donnell, D. P. and Pattinson, D. (2017). "Excellence R Us": University research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Commun. 3, 17010.
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Health Sciences Policy and Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments (2002). Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2019). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. Special Report NSF 19-304. Alexandria, VA. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.
Newman, C. (2014). Time to address gender discrimination and inequality in the health workforce. Hum. Resour. Health 12, 25. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-12-25
Nuffield Council of Bioethics (2014). The culture of scientific research in the UK. Available at https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/The-cultureof-scientific-research-report.pdf.
Office For National Statistics (2020). Child poverty and education outcomes by ethnicity. Available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/nationalaccounts uksectoraccounts/compendium/economicreview/february2020/childpovertyandeducationoutcomesbyethnicity#toc.
Owen, R., Bessant, J. R. and Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. John Wiley & Sons.
Raymer, K. and The Royal Society (2019). Research culture: One year on. Royal Society of Chemistry (2018a). Diversity landscape of the chemical sciences.
Royal Society of Chemistry (2018b). Breaking the barriers - Women's retention and progression in the chemical sciences.
RRI Practice (2019). What is RRI? Available at https://www.rri-practice.eu/about-rripractice/what-is-rri/.
Saenen, B., Hatch, A., Curry, S., Proudman, V. and Lakoduk, A. (2021). Reimagining Academic Career Assessment: Stories of innovation and change.
Schacht, S. P. (2001). Teaching about being an oppressor. Men Masc. 4, 201-208. Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Sci. Public Policy 40, 708-716. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct067
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. and Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 42, 1568-1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05. 008
The Royal Society (2014). A picture of the UK scientific workforce - Diversity data analysis for the Royal Society.
The Royal Society (2018). Research culture - embedding inclusive excellence.
The Royal Society (2020). Research Culture. Available at https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/research-culture/.
Tregoning, J. (2018). How will you judge me if not by impact factor? Nature 558, 345. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05467-5
TReND (2020). Teaching and research in natural sciences for development in Africa. Available at https://trendinafrica.org/.
UKRI (2021). Supporting skills and talent. Available at https://www.ukri.org/aboutus/policies-standards-and-data/good-research-resource-hub/supporting-skillsand-talent/.
UN Woman (2019). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The Gender Snapshot 2019. Available at https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/gendersnapshot. pdf.
Vos, A. D., De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. and Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior 117, 103196. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.011
Wellcome Trust (2020). What Researchers Think About the Culture They Work In.
Yoshizawa, G., Ho, C. W.-L., Zhu, W., Hu, C., Syukriani, Y., Lee, I., Kim, H., Tsai, D. F. C., Minari, J. and Kato, K. (2014). ELSI practices in genomic research in East Asia: Implications for research collaboration and public participation. Genome Med. 6, 39. doi:10.1186/gm556
Yu, H. (2016). Redefining responsible research and innovation for the advancement of biobanking and biomedical research. J Law Biosci 3, 611-635. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsw047
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
