[en] Many animals avoid attack from predators through toxicity or the emission of repellent chemicals. Defensive mimicry has evolved in many species to deceive shared predators, for instance through colouration and other morphological adaptations, but mimicry hardly ever seems to involve multi-trait similarities. Here we report on a wingless parasitoid wasp that exhibits a full spectrum of traits mimicing ants and affording protection against ground-dwelling predators (wolf spiders). In body size, morphology and movement Gelis agilis (Ichneumonidae) is highly similar to the black garden ant (Lasius niger) that shares the same habitat. When threatened, G. agilis also emits a volatile chemical that is similar to an ant-produced chemical that repels spiders. In bioassays with L. niger, G. agilis, G. areator, Cotesia glomerata and Drosophila melanogaster, ants and G. agilis were virtually immune to spider attack, in contrast the other species were not. Volatile characterisation with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry identified G. agilis emissions as 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, a known insect defence semiochemical that acts as an alarm pheromone in ants. We argue that multi-trait mimicry, as observed in G. agilis, might be much more common among animals than currently realized. M imicry is widespread amongst plants and animals and involves the resemblance of one species to another, at least to the benefit of the mimic 1-4. For instance, the Malaysian orchid mantis Hymenopus coronatus visually mimics flowers such that it attracts more pollinator prey than the flowers it resembles 5. To avoid attack from shared predators, prey species may also mimic morphological features of a co-existing unpalatable or toxic model species 3 , as has long been observed and studied in hoverflies, butterflies and snakes 2,6-9. In hoverflies, which visually resemble stinging bees or wasps, colour mimicry can coincide with behavioural mimicry, such as mock stinging, wing wagging and leg waving 10,11 or activity patterns 2. Predators and prey can also be deceived via chemical mimicry: some spiders attract their lepidopteran prey through the emission of moth sex pheromones 12 but chemical mimicry appears to be less frequently adopted as an anti-predator strategy 13-15. Whilst behavioural mimicry often coincides with morphological similarity, mimicry only rarely seems to require convergence of a greater number of traits 13,16 .The secondary hyperparasitoid Gelis agilis could represent an exception, as it shows several distinct similarities to sympatric ant species. Gelis agilis is a small (3-5 mm long) wingless, asexually reproducing parasitoid wasp that attacks several host species, including the pupae of other parasitoids 17,18. Adult G. agilis first paralyze the host with venom and then oviposit a single egg onto the exterior of the host's body 18. After hatching, the G. agilis larva feeds on the moribund host, eventually consuming all of it prior to pupation. Gelis agilis is extremely abundant in grassy habitats across much of Eurasia 18 and co-occurs and shares predators with several ant species. Its potential predators include wolf spiders, which are visually foraging diurnal hunters that attack a wide range of prey types on the ground 19,20. In morphology (body size, colour) and behaviour, G. agilis (Fig. 1a) closely resembles several species of ants that occur in the same habitat, including the common black garden ant, Lasius niger (Fig. 1b). Moreover, when alarmed the parasitoid releases a pungent and distinctive odour. Here, we test the hypotheses that ant-mimicry by G. agilis acts as a defensive strategy to reduce attack by wolf spiders and that chemical mimicry is facilitated by the emission of an ant-like alarm pheromone 21 .
Disciplines :
Zoology
Author, co-author :
Malcicka, Miriama; Department of Ecological Sciences, Section Animal Ecology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam
Bezemer, Martijn T.; Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen
Visser, Bertanne ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion durable des bio-agresseurs
Bloemberg, Mark; Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen
Snart, Charles; School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
Hardy, Ian; School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, U.K
Harvey, Jeffrey; Department of Ecological Sciences, Section Animal Ecology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam ; Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen
Müller, F. Ituna and Thyridia: a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond 8, 20-29 (1897).
Howarth, B., Edmunds, M. & Gilbert, F. Does the abundance of hoverfly (Syrphidae) mimics depend on the numbers of their hymenopteran models? Evolution 58, 367-375 (2004).
Bates, H.W. XXXII. Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lon 23, 495-566 (1862).
Huang, J.N., Cheng, R.C., Li, D. & Tso, I.M. Salticid predation as one potential driving force of ant mimicry in jumping spiders. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 1356-1364 (2010).
O'Hanlon, J.C., Holwell, G.I. & Herberstein, M.E. Pollinator deception in the orchid mantis. Am. Nat 183, 126-132 (2014).
Clarke, C.A. & Sheppard, P.M. The evolution of mimicry in the butterfly Papilio dardanus. Heredity 14, 163-173 (1960).
Kunte, K. et al. Doublesex is a mimicry supergene. Nature 507, 229-232 (2014).
Greene, H.W. & McDiarmid, R.W. Coral snake mimicry: does it occur. Science 213, 1207-1212 (1981).
Kikuchi, D.W., Seymoure, B.M. & Pfennig, D.W. Mimicry's palette: widespread use of conserved pigments in the aposematic signals of snakes. Evol. & Dev 16, 61-67 (2014).
Penney, H.D., Hassall, C., Skevington, J.H., Lamborn, B. & Sherratt, T.N. The relationship between morphological and behavioral mimicry in hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae). Am. Nat 183, 281-289 (2014).
Johnstone, R.A. The evolution of inaccurate mimics. Nature 418, 524-526 (2002).
Eberhard, W.G. Aggressive chemical mimicry by a bolas spider. Science 198, 1173-1175 (1977).
Dettner, K. & Liepert, C. Chemical mimicry and camouflage. Annu. Rev. Entomol 39, 129-154 (1994).
Lorenzi, M.C., Bagnères, A.G. & Clement, J.L. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in social insects: is it the same in paper-wasps. [178-189] (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
Pasteur, G. A classification review of mimicry systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys 13, 169-199 (1982).
Lei, G.C. & Hanski, I. Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 78, 91-100 (1997).
Harvey, J.A. Comparing and contrasting development and reproductive strategies in the pupal hyperparasitoids Lysibia nana and Gelis agilis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Evol. Ecol 22, 153-166 (2008).
Nentwig, W. & Wissel, C. A comparison of prey lengths among spiders. Oecologia 68, 595-600 (1986).
Oelbermann, K. & Scheu S. Stable isotope enrichment ([[ampi]]delta;15N and [[ampi]]delta;13C) in a generalist predator (Pardosa lugubris, Araneae: Lycosidae): effects of prey quality. Oecologia 130, 337-344 (2002).
Hübner, G. & Dettner, K. Hyperparasitoid defense strategies against spiders: the role of chemical and morphological protection. Entomol. Ex. App 97, 67-74 (2000).
Raspotnig, G., Schaider, M., Stabentheiner, E., Leis, H.-J. & Karaman, I. On the enigmatic scent glands of dyspnoan harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones): first evidence for the production of volatile secretions. Chemoecology 24, 43-55 (2014).
Hölldobler, B. The ants. Harvard University Press, United States. (1990).
Samu, F., Szirányi, A & Kiss, B. Foraging in agricultural fields: local 'sit-and-move' strategy scales up to risk-averse habitat use in a wolf spider. Animal behavior 66, 939-947 (2003).
Allan, R.A., Elgar, M.A. & Capon, R. Mimicry of host cuticular hydrocarbons by salticid spider Cosmophasis bitaeniata that preys on larvae of tree ants Oecophylla smaragdina. J. Proc. R. Soc. B 263, 69-73 (1996).
Moore, B. P. & Brown, W. V. Identification of warning odour components, bitter principles and antifeedants in an aposematic beetle, Metriorrhynchus rhipidius (Coleoptera: Lycidae). Insect Biochem 11, 493-499 (1981).
Stoeffler, M., Maier, T.S., Tolasch, T. & Steidle, J.L. Foreign-language skills in rove-beetles? Evidence for chemical mimicry of ant alarm pheromones in myrmecophilous Pella beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). J. Chem. Ecol 33, 1382-1392 (2007).
Mestre, L., Bucher, R. & Entling, M.H. Trait-mediated effects between predators: ant chemical cues induce spider dispersal. J. Zool 293, 119-125 (2014).
Halaj, J., Ross, D.W. & Moldenke, A.R.Negative effects of ant foraging on spiders in Douglas-fir canopies. Oecologia 109, 313-322 (1997).
Schiestl, F.P. The evolution of floral scent and insect chemical communication. Ecol. Lett 13, 643-656 (2010).
Jumean, Z., Gries, R., Unruh, T., Rowland, E. & Gries, G. Identification of the larval aggregation pheromone of codling moth, Cydia pomonella. J. Chem. Ecol 31, 911-924 (2005).
Siljander, E., Gries, R., Khaskin, G. & Gries, G. Identification of the airborne aggregation pheromone of the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius. J. Chem. Ecol 34, 708-718 (2008).
Gatti, P., Zerba, E. & Gonzalez-Audino, P. Anatomical site of pheromone accumulation and temporal pattern of pheromone emission in the ambrosia beetle Megaplatypus mutatus. Physiol. Entom 36, 201-207 (2011).
Liepert, C. & Dettner, K. Recognition of aphid parasitoids by honeydew-collecting ants: the role of cuticular lipids in a chemical mimicry system. J. Chem. Ecol 19, 2143-2153 (1993).
Liepert, C. & Dettner, K. Role of cuticular hydrocarbons of aphid parasitoids in their relationship to aphid-attending ants. J. Chem. Ecol 22, 695-707 (1996).
Völkl, W., Hübner, G. & Dettner, K. Interactions between Alloxysta brevis (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea, Alloxystidae) and honeydew-collecting ants: How an aphid hyperparasitoid overcomes ant aggression by chemical defense. J. Chem. Ecol 20, 2901-2915 (1994).
Sherratt, T.N. The evolution of imperfect mimicry. Behav. Ecol 13, 821-826 (2002).
Penney, H.D., Hassall, C., Skevington, J.H., Abbott, K.R. & Sherratt, T.N. A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry. Nature 483, 461-464 (2012).
Aubret, F. & Mangin, A. The snake hiss: potential acoustic mimicry in a viper-colubrid complex. Biol. J. Linn. Soc 113, 1095-8312 (2014).
Goubault, M., Batchelor, T.P., Linforth, R.S., Taylor, A.J. & Hardy, I.C. Volatile emission by contest losers revealed by real-time chemical analysis. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2853-2859 (2006).