IMAGE; Aurora; Lyman-alpha; doppler shift; FAST satellite; DMSP satellite; ultraviolet
Abstract :
[en] The far ultraviolet cameras on board the IMAGE satellite images the aurora in three different spectral regions. One of the channels of the spectrographic imager SI12 observes the Doppler-shifted Lyman alpha emission of precipitating protons. It makes it possible to spectrally discriminate between the proton and electron FUV aurora and to globally map the energetic protons. Its response depends on the auroral Lyman alpha. line shape which reflects the characteristics of the proton pitch angle and energy distributions. We illustrate the dependence of the SI12 count rate on the characteristic energy of the proton precipitation and the viewing geometry. Simultaneous in situ observations of the precipitated protons have been collected during a FAST satellite pass when IMAGE was observing the global north polar region. The premidnight region located at the equatorward boundary of the oval is dominated by proton precipitation with a mean energy E = 7 keV which is separated from the electron component. The prenoon crossing exhibits a softer proton energy spectrum with E = 0.9 keV. The measured proton energy distribution is used as an input to a Monte Carlo model to calculate the expected SI12 signal along the magnetic footprint of the satellite orbit. If the different spatial resolution of the two types of measurements is accounted for, a good quantitative agreement is found with the IMAGE observations. Similarly, ion flux measurements collected on board the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program F15 satellite during an overflight in the postmidnight sector provide good agreement with the SI12 observations at the footprint aurora. The comparisons confirm the reliability of the FUV IMAGE cameras to remotely discriminate between the electron and the proton precipitations. The vertical emission rate profiles of the N-2 Lyman-Birge-Hopfield and O I (1356 Angstrom) emissions are calculated in the proton-dominated premidnight region. It is shown that the protons and the electrons produce FUV emissions with contributions peaking at different altitudes. Excitation by secondary electrons dominates the production of both emissions.
Hubert, Benoît ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Labo de physique atmosphérique et planétaire (LPAP)
Meurant, M.
Shematovich, V. I.
Bisikalo, D. V.
Frey, H.
Mende, S.
Gladstone, G. R.
Carlson, C. W.
Language :
English
Title :
Observation of the proton aurora with IMAGE FUV imager and simultaneous ion flux in situ measurements
Burch, J. L., et al., Views of Earth's magnetosphere with the IMAGE satellite, Science, 291, 619, 2001.
Carlson, C. W., R. F. Pfaff, and J. G. Watszin, The Fast Auroral Snapshot (FAST) mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2013, 1998.
Davidson, G. T., Expected spatial distribution of low-energy protons precipitated in the auroral zone, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 1061, 1965.
Eather, R. H., Auroral proton precipitation and hydrogen emissions, Rev. Geophys., 5, 207, 1967.
Eather, R. H., and S. B. Mende, Airborne observations of auroral precipitation patterns, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 1746, 1971.
Frey, H. U., G. Haerendel, J. H. Clemmons, M. H. Boehm, J. Vogt, O. H. Bauer, D. D. Wallis, L. Blomberg, and H. Lühr, Freja and ground-based analysis of inverted-V events, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4303, 1998.
Frey, H. U., S. B. Mende, C. W. Carlson, J.-C. Gérard, B. Hubert, J. Spann, R. Gladstone, and T. J. Immel, The electron and proton aurora as seen by IMAGE FUV and FAST, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1135, 2001.
Galperin, Y. I., R. A. Kovrazhkin, Y. N. Ponomarev, J. Crasnier, and J. A. Sadaud, Pitch angle distribution of auroral protons, Ann. Geophys., 32, 109, 1976.
Germany, G. A., G. K. Parks, M. Brittnacher, J. Cumnock, D. Lummerzheim, J. F. Spann, L. Chen, P. G. Richards, and F. J. Rich, Remote determination of auroral energy characteristics during substorm activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 995, 1997.
Gérard, J. C., B. Hubert, D. V. Bisikalo, and V. I. Shematovich, A model of the Lyman α line profile in the proton aurora, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15,795, 2000.
Gladstone, R. G., et al., Stellar calibration of the WIC and SI imagers and the GEO photometer on IMAGE/FUV, Eos Trans. AGU, 81(48), SM72A-06, 2000.
Hardy, D. A., M. S. Gussenhoven, and D. Brautigam, A statistical model of auroral ion precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 370, 1989.
Hubert, B., J.-C. Gérard, D. V. Bisikalo, V. I. Shematovich, and S. C. Solomon, The role of proton precipitation in the excitation of auroral FUV emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 2001.
Ishimoto, M., C. I. Meng, G. R. Romick, and R. E. Huffman, Doppler shift of auroral Lyman α observed from a satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 143, 1989.
Kauristie, K., J. Weygand, T. I. Pulkkinen, J. S. Murphree, and P. T. Newell, Size of the auroral oval: UV ovals and precipitation boundaries compared, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 2321, 1999.
Kozelov, B. V., and V. E. Ivanov, Monte-Carlo calculation of proton-hydrogen atom transport in N2, Planet. Space Sci., 40, 1503, 1992.
Lorentzen, D. A., F. Sigernes, and C. S. Deehr, Modeling and observations of dayside auroral hydrogen emission Doppler profiles, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,479, 1998.
Marov, M. Y., V. I. Shematovich, D. V. Bisikalo, and J.-C. Gérard, Nonequilibrium Processes in Planetary and Cometary Atmospheres: Theory and Applications, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1997.
Mende, S. B., et al., Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft, 1, System design, Space Sci. Rev., 91, 243, 2000a.
Mende, S. B., et al., Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft, 3, Spectral imaging of Lyman alpha and OI 135.6 nm, Space Sci. Rev., 91, 287, 2000b.
Mende, S. B., H. U. Frey, M. Lampton, J.-C. Gérard, B. Hubert, S. Fuselier, G. R. Gladstone, and J. L. Burch, Global observations of proton and electron auroras in a substorm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1139, 2001.
Montbriand, L. E., The proton aurora and auroral substorm, in Radiating Atmosphere, edited by B. M. McCormac, p. 366, D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 1971.
Samson, J. C., L. R. Lyon, P. T. Newell, F. Creutzberg, and B. Xu, Proton aurora and substorm intensification, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 2167, 1992.
Shematovich, V. I., D. V. Bisikalo, and J.-C. Gérard, A kinetic model of the formation of the hot oxygen geocorona, 1, Quiet geomagnetic conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 217, 1994.
Soraas, F., K. Maseide, P. Turheim, and K. Aarsnes, Doppler-shifted auroral H3 emission: A comparison between observations and calculation, Ann. Geophys., 12, 1052, 1994.
Strickland, D. J., R. E. Daniell, Jr., J. R. Jasperse, and B. Basu, Transport-theoretic model for the electron-proton-hydrogen atom aurora, 2, Model results, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 21,533, 1993.
Synnes, S. A., F. Soraas, and J. P. Hansen, Monte-Carlo simulations of proton aurora, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 60, 1695, 1998.
Vallance-Jones, A., F. Creutzberg, R. L. Gattinger, and F. A. Harris, Auroral studies with a chain of meridian scanning photometers, 1, Observations of proton and electron aurora in magnetospheric substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 4489, 1982.