Article (Scientific journals)
Feasibility study combining low dose rate (192)Ir brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy aiming at delivering 80-85 Gy to prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Nickers, Philippe; Coppens, L; Beauduin, M. et al.
2000In Radiotherapy and Oncology, 55 (1), p. 41-47
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
radiotherapy and oncology 2000.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.38 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use; Brachytherapy/adverse effects/instrumentation; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Chi-Square Distribution; Feasibility Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Iridium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control; Pelvic Bones/radiation effects; Prostate/radiation effects; Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis; Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy; Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage/adverse effects/therapeutic use; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Conformal; Rectum/radiation effects; Seminal Vesicles/radiation effects; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Urethra/radiation effects
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Increasing the radiation dose to prostatic adenocarcinoma has provided higher local control rates. A total of 80 Gy seem necessary to achieve this goal but patient set-up and prostate motion remain difficult problems to solve in conformal radiotherapy. Brachytherapy which overcomes these points could be an alternative way to external beam boost fields. We wanted to transpose the irradiation models largely used in cervix cancer treatment combining external beam radiotherapy and low dose rate brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 71 patients with 19.5 and 13 ng/ml mean and median PSA levels, respectively, a dose escalation from 74 to 85 Gy was performed in four groups. RESULTS: Shifting from intraoperative placement of sources vectors (Group I) to positioning under ultrasound controls (groups II-IV), improving the implantation shape and optimizing radiation delivery to urethral bed have reduced the total dose to rectal wall under 65 Gy and to urethra under 100 Gy. Rectal/prostate dose ratio was lowered from 0.7 (Groups I-II) to 0.58 (Groups III-IV) while avoiding problems resulting from pelvic bone arch interference, prostate volume or seminal vesicles location. The mean and median follow-up periods are 28 and 18 months. In Groups III and IV 85% of patients without hormonotherapy treated with 80-85 Gy normalized PSA under 1 ng/ml within 6 months. No severe late effect has been noted for patients implanted under echographic control. CONCLUSIONS: The method described allows to deliver 85 Gy. Longer follow-up is however needed but the levels of dose delivered are not expected to induce prohibitive side effects.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Nickers, Philippe ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Centre hospitalier universitaire CHU > Radiothérapie Oncologie > Chef de clinique
Coppens, L
Beauduin, M.
Darimont, M.
de Leval, Jean ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Urologie
Deneufbourg, Jean-Marie  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Faculté de médecine Sciences cliniques > Radiothérapie Oncologie > Chargé de cours Chef de service CHU
Language :
English
Title :
Feasibility study combining low dose rate (192)Ir brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy aiming at delivering 80-85 Gy to prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Publication date :
2000
Journal title :
Radiotherapy and Oncology
ISSN :
0167-8140
eISSN :
1879-0887
Publisher :
Elsevier Scientific, Limerick, Ireland
Volume :
55
Issue :
1
Pages :
41-47
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 08 April 2022

Statistics


Number of views
52 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
53 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
11
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
11
OpenAlex citations
 
14

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi