First Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Digital Endpoint in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Impact for Patients and for Drug Development in Neuromuscular Diseases.
Digital endpoints; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Neuromuscular disease
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Functional outcome measures used to assess efficacy in clinical trials of investigational treatments for rare neuromuscular diseases like Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are performance-based tasks completed by the patient during hospital visits. These are prone to bias and may not reflect motor abilities in real-world settings. Digital tools, such as wearable devices and other remote sensors, provide the opportunity for continuous, objective, and sensitive measurements of functional ability during daily life. Maintaining ambulation is of key importance to individuals with DMD. Stride velocity 95th centile (SV95C) is the first wearable acquired digital endpoint to receive qualification from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to quantify the ambulation ability of ambulant DMD patients aged ≥5 years in drug therapeutic studies; it is also currently under review for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) qualification. SUMMARY: Focusing on SV95C as a key example, we describe perspectives of multiple stakeholders on the promise of novel digital endpoints in neuromuscular disease drug development.
Disciplines :
Neurology Pediatrics
Author, co-author :
Servais, Laurent ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques
Camino, Eric
Clement, Aude
McDonald, Craig M.
Lukawy, Jacek
Lowes, Linda P.
Eggenspieler, Damien
Cerreta, Francesca
Strijbos, Paul
Language :
English
Title :
First Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Digital Endpoint in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on the Impact for Patients and for Drug Development in Neuromuscular Diseases.
Falzarano MS, Scotton C, Passarelli C, Ferlini A. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: from diagnosis to therapy. Molecules. 2015 Oct; 20(10): 18168-84.
McDonald CM, Henricson EK, Han JJ, Abresch RT, Nicorici A, Atkinson L, et al. The 6-minute walk test in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy: longitudinal observations. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Dec; 42(6): 966-74.
Ryder S, Leadley RM, Armstrong N, Westwood M, de Kock S, Butt T, et al. The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Apr; 12(1): 79.
Verhaart IEC, Aartsma-Rus A. Therapeutic developments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Jul; 15(7): 373-86.
Straub V, Mercuri E; DMD Outcome Measure Study Group. Report on the workshop: meaningful outcome measures for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, London, UK, 30-31 January 2017. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Aug; 28(8): 690-701.
Montes J, Kaufmann P. Outcome measures in neuromuscular diseases. In: Darras B, Jones Jr HR, Ryan M, De Vivo D, editors. Neuromuscular disorders of infancy, childhood, and adolescence. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2015. p. 1078-89.
Ganea R, Jeannet PY, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Goemans NM, Piot C, Van den Hauwe M, et al. Gait assessment in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy during long-distance walking. J Child Neurol. 2012 Jan; 27(1): 30-8.
Ricotti V, Ridout DA, Pane M, Main M, Mayhew A, Mercuri E, et al. The NorthStar Ambulatory Assessment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: considerations for the design of clinical trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Feb; 87(2): 149-55.
Mercuri E, Messina S, Pane M, Bertini E. Current methodological issues in the study of children with inherited neuromuscular disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Jun; 50(6): 417-21.
European Medicines Agency. Qualification opinion on stride velocity 95th centile as a secondary endpoint in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy measured by a valid and suitable wearable device [Internet]. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www. ema. europa. eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/qualification-opinion-stride-velocity-95thcentile-secondary-endpoint-duchenne-muscular-dystrophy_en. pdf.
Alfano LN, Lowes LP, Berry KM, Yin H, Dvorchik I, Flanigan KM, et al. T. P. 1: Pilot study evaluating motivation on the performance of timed walking in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Oct; 24(9-10): 860.
Bartels B, de Groot JF, Terwee CB. The six-minute walk test in chronic pediatric conditions: a systematic review of measurement properties. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr; 93(4): 529-41.
Banihani R, Smile S, Yoon G, Dupuis A, Mosleh M, Snider A, et al. Cognitive and neurobehavioral profile in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Child Neurol. 2015 Oct; 30(11): 1472-82.
Mah JK. Current and emerging treatment strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jul; 12: 1795-807.
Coravos A, Doerr M, Goldsack J, Manta C, Shervey M, Woods B, et al. Modernizing and designing evaluation frameworks for connected sensor technologies in medicine. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar; 3: 37.
McDonald CM, Widman LM, Walsh DD, Walsh SA, Abresch RT. Use of step activity monitoring for continuous physical activity assessment in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr; 86(4): 802-8.
Heberer K, Fowler E, Staudt L, Sienko S, Buckon CE, Bagley A, et al. Hip kinetics during gait are clinically meaningful outcomes in young boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Gait Posture. 2016 Jul; 48: 159-64.
Fowler EG, Staudt LA, Heberer KR, Sienko SE, Buckon CE, Bagley AM, et al. Longitudinal community walking activity in Duchenne muscular systrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2018 Mar; 57(3): 401-6.
Haberkamp M, Moseley J, Athanasiou D, de Andres-Trelles F, Elferink A, Rosa MM, et al. European regulators' views on a wearable-derived performance measurement of ambulation for Duchenne muscular dystrophy regulatory trials. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019 Jul; 29(7): 514-6.
Le Moing AG, Seferian AM, Moraux A, Annoussamy M, Dorveaux E, Gasnier E, et al. A movement monitor based on magneto-inertial sensors for non-ambulant patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot study in controlled environment. PLoS One. 2016 Jun; 11(6): e0156696.
Lilien C, Gasnier E, Gidaro T, Seferian A, Grelet M, Vissière D, et al. Home-based monitor for gait and activity analysis. J Vis Exp. 2019 Aug; 150: e59668.
Annoussamy M, Seferian AM, Daron A, Péréon Y, Cances C, Vuillerot C, et al. Natural history of Type 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy: 2-year NatHis-SMA study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Feb; 8(2): 359-73.
Eliopoulos H, Laforet G, Narayana A, Lucas K, Duda P. Predictors of disease severity and progression in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a literature review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Jun; 21(Suppl 1): e93.
Fogel DB. Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: a review. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug; 11: 156-64.
Duchenne UK. Patient and caregiver perspectives on Duchenne clinical trials survey report [Internet]. Hammersmith: Duchenne UK; 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www. duchenneuk. org/news/patientsurvey-report.
Powers JH 3rd, Patrick DL, Walton MK, Marquis P, Cano S, Hobart J, et al. Clinician-reported outcome assessments of treatment benefit: report of the ISPOR clinical outcome assessment emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2017 Jan; 20(1): 2-14.
Servais L, Gidaro T, Seferian A, Gasnier E, Daron A, Ulinici A, et al. P. 191Maximal stride velocity detects positive and negative changes over 6-month-time period in ambulant patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019 Oct; 29(Suppl 1): S105.
Polhemus AM, Kadhim H, Barnes S, Zebrowski SE, Simmonds A, Masand SN, et al. Accelerating adoption of patient-facing technologies in clinical trials: a pharmaceutical industry perspective on opportunities and challenges. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jan; 53(1): 8-24.
Mercuri E, Muntoni F. Muscular dystrophy: new challenges and review of the current clinical trials. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013 Dec; 25(6): 701-7.
Fonseca DA, Amaral I, Pinto AC, Cotrim MD. Orphan drugs: major development challenges at the clinical stage. Drug Discov Today. 2019 Mar; 24(3): 867-72.
US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical outcome assessments (COA) qualification program DDT COA #000103: ActiMyo® [Internet]. Silver Spring: US Food and Drug Administration; 2018 Aug 30 [cited 2020 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www. fda. gov/drugs/ddt-coa-000103-actimyor.
European Medicines Agency, Human Medicines Division. Qualification of novel methodologies for medicine development [Internet]. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www. ema. europa. eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/scientific-advice-protocol-assistance/qualification-novel-methodologies-medicine-development-0.
European Medicines Agency, Human Medicines Division. Questions and answers: qualification of digital technology-based methodologies to support approval of medicinal products [Internet]. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency; 2020 [cited 2021 May 05]. Available from: https://www. ema. europa. eu/en/documents/other/questions-answersqualification-digital-technology-basedmethodologies-support-approval-medicinal_ en. pdf.
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium. Workshop: remote digital monitoring for medical product development [Internet]. Bethesda: Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 28]. Available from: https://fnih. org/whatwe-do/biomarkers-consortium/programs/digitalmonitoring.
Clay I. Impact of digital technologies on novel endpoint capture in clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Dec; 102(6): 912-3.
Perry B, Herrington W, Goldsack JC, Grandinetti CA, Vasisht KP, Landray MJ, et al. Use of mobile devices to measure outcomes in clinical research, 2010-2016: a systematic literature review. Digit Biomark. 2018 Jan-Apr; 2(1): 11-30.
Goldsack JC, Dowling AV, Samuelson D, Patrick-Lake B, Clay I. Evaluation, acceptance, and qualification of digital measures: from proof of concept to endpoint. Digit Biomark. 2021 Jan-Apr; 5(1): 53-64.