Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Field-test economic and ecological performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) used in residential micro-combined heat and power applications (micro-CHP)
Paulus, Nicolas; Davila Valdebenito, Camila; Lemort, Vincent
2021 • In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference On Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems (ECOS2021)
Balance of emissions; Field-test; Fuel cell; Micro-CHP; Monitoring; Technico-economical assessment
Abstract :
[en] In order to ensure that we do not overcome the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2018-2100 carbon recommendations [1] in the few years to come and that we manage to limit global warming to 2°C above pre-industrial levels as agreed upon in the “Paris Agreement” [2], tremendous efforts and investments have to be made. That is why special focus is currently brought on fuel cell micro-CHP systems for residential uses. One of the latter systems, investigated in this study, is a PEMFC-gas boiler hybrid system, fed by natural gas, designed to provide all the heat demands of residential houses and to participate locally in the electrical production. Thanks to high integration levels, it combines the same PEMFC of nominal constant power of 0.75kWel and 1.1kWth with the same 220L DHW (Domestic Hot Water) tank. The gas boiler, mainly used for peak heat demands, has to be chosen between four rated power versions from 11.4 to 30.8kWth. The machine is never electrically driven.
This study is monitoring two of those installations in residential houses in Belgium. It focuses on the comparison of the actual field test performance with the targets expected for this technology.
Since the financial incitant represents a major factor in the investor’s decision towards such a needed technological change, focus is brought on an economic indicator based on an average Belgian household energy bill. Through a quite thorough analysis of emissions factors used by recognized organizations, ecological indicators are established with current emissions factor assumptions in an attempt to foresee the place of this micro-CHP technology in the energy transition challenge of today towards the carbon neutral future that everyone should aim for.
The methodologies for calculating those indicators are quite exhaustively described as they represent key parameters in the results drawn in this paper.
Disciplines :
Energy
Author, co-author :
Paulus, Nicolas ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Systèmes énergétiques
Davila Valdebenito, Camila ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Systèmes énergétiques
Lemort, Vincent ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Systèmes énergétiques
Language :
English
Title :
Field-test economic and ecological performance of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) used in residential micro-combined heat and power applications (micro-CHP)
Publication date :
01 July 2021
Event name :
34th International Conference On Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems (ECOS2021)
Event place :
Taormina, Italy
Event date :
27/06/2021 - 02/07/2021
Audience :
International
Main work title :
Proceedings of the 34th International Conference On Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems (ECOS2021)
Publisher :
ECOS2021, Taormina, Italy
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Development Goals :
7. Affordable and clean energy 11. Sustainable cities and communities 13. Climate action
Funders :
Gas.be
Commentary :
In this publication, energy consumption (established thanks to the gas volume that has been consumed and the HHV figures given by the gas provider) could be refined with S-GERG 88 (or similar) method. This would lead to different ecological and economical indicators for the systems even if the trends shown in this paper would remain. That is why this paper is only offered in private access. Please check the ECOS 2022 paper to have a similar updated and more relevant study.
IPCC - Working Group I Technical Support Unit, "Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels...," IPCC, 2018.
United Nations, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 - Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Paris, 2015.
SERVICE PUBLIC DE WALLONIE, “20 FEVRIER 2014. - Décret "Climat",” Moniteur belge.
R. Napoli, M. Gandiglio, A. Lanzini and M. Santarelli, “Techno-economic analysis of PEMFC and SOFC micro-CHP fuel cell systems for the residential sector,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 103, pp. 131-146, 2015.
A. Arsalis, “A comprehensive review of fuel cell-based micro-combined-heat-and-power systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 105, pp. 391-414, 2019.
Y. Yu, H. Li, H. Wang, X.-Z. Yuan, G. Wang and M. Pan, “A review on performance degradation of PEMFC during startup and shutdown processes…,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 205, pp. 10-23, 2012.
T. Zhang, P. Wang, H. Chen and P. Pei, “A review of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation under start-stop operating condition,” Applied Energy, vol. 223, pp. 249-262, 2018.
R. Borup, J. Meyers, B. Pivovar, Y.-S. Kim, R. Mukundan and N. Garland, “Scientific Aspects of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability and Degradation,” Chem. Rev, vol. 107, p. 3904-3951, 2007.
Y. Wang, D.-U. Sauer, S. Koehne and A. Ersoez, “Dynamic modeling of high temperature PEM fuel cell startup process,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 33, pp. 19067-1907, 2014.
A. bin Mohamad, “A Review of Experiments on Cold Start of PEM Fuel Cells,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 315, p. 851–855, 2013.
OIML R 75-, Heat meters. Part 1: General requirements, International Organization of Legal Metrology, 2002.
IEC 62053-21, Electricity metering equipment (a.c.) – Particular requirements. Part 21: Static meters for active energy (classes 1 and 2), International Electrotechnical Commission, 2003.
UK Government - Dpt. for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, “Heat meter accuracy testing,” 2016.
European Parliament, “DIRECTIVE 2012/27/EU on on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC,” 2012.
CWaPE, “Décision CD-5j18-CWaPE relative à "la définition des rendements annuels d'exploitation des installations modernes de référence, ...",” CWaPE, 2005.
I. Daoud, “Installer une Cogénération dans votre Etablissement,” Ministère de la Région wallonne. Direction Générale des Technologies, de la Recherche et de l'Energie (GGTRE), 2003.
B.-K. Sovacool, “Valuing the GHG emissions from nuclear power…,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 8, 2008.
CREG, “Analyse semestrielle de l'évolution des prix de l'énergie – 2e semestre 2020,” CREG, 2020.
J. Linn and L. Muehlenbachs, “The heterogeneous impacts of low natural gas prices on consumers and the environment,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 89, 2018.
“Mijn Energie - Injectietarieven 2021: hoeveel ontvangen nieuwe prosumenten voor te veel geproduceerde elektriciteit?,” [Online]. Available: https://www.mijnenergie.be/blog/injectietarieven-2021-hoeveelontvangen-nieuwe-prosumenten-voor-te-veel-geproduceerde-elektriciteit/. [Accessed 03 03 2021].
Gouvernement Wallon, “Arrêté ministériel déterminant les procédures et le Code de comptage de l'électricité produite à partir de sources d'énergie renouvelables et/ou de cogénération,” Gouvernement Wallon, 2007.
B. Koffi, A. Cerutti, M. Duerr, A. Iancu, A. Kona and G. Janssens-Maenhout, “CoM Default Emission Factors for the Member States of the European Union,” European Commission, 2017.
IPCC - Working Group III Technical Support Unit, “Mitigation of Climate Change - Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” IPCC, 2014.
IEA, “CO2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion - Highlights,” IEA, 2013.
A. Esser and F. Sensfuss, “Evaluation of primary energy factor calculation options for electricity,” 2016.
B.-N. Taylor and C.-E. Kuyatt, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results,” 1927.
ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010, Thermowells - Performance test codes, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2010.
P. Klason, G. Kok, N. Pelevic, M. Holmsten, S. Ljungblad and P. Lau, “Measuring temperature in pipe flow with non-homogeneous temperature distribution,” International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 35, 2014.
S. Kolpatzik, A. Hilgenstock, H. Dietrich and N. B., “The location of temperature sensors in pipe flows … in flow metering applications,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 9, no. 1, 1998.
