[en] Ordinal processing allows for the representation of the sequential relations between stimuli and is a fundamental aspect of different cognitive domains such as verbal working memory (WM), language and numerical cognition. Several studies suggest common ordinal coding mechanisms across these different domains but direct between-domain comparisons of ordinal coding are rare and have led to contradictory evidence. This fMRI study examined the commonality of ordinal representations across the WM, the number and the letter domains by using a multivoxel pattern analysis approach and by focusing on triplet stimuli associated with robust ordinal distance effects. Neural patterns in fronto-parietal cortices distinguished ordinal distance in all domains. Critically, between-task predictions of ordinal distance in fronto-parietal cortices were robust between serial order WM, alphabetical order judgment but not when involving the numerical order judgment tasks. Moreover, frontal ROIs further supported between-task prediction of distance for the luminance judgment control task, the serial order WM and the alphabetical tasks. These results suggest that common neural substrates characterize processing of ordinal information in WM and alphabetical but not numerical domains. This commonality, particularly in frontal cortices, may however reflect attentional control processes involved in judging ordinal distances rather than the intervention of domain-general ordinal codes.
Research Center/Unit :
PsyNCog - Psychologie et Neuroscience Cognitives - ULiège
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Attout, Lucie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Département de Psychologie
Leroy, Nathan ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Département de Psychologie
Majerus, Steve ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Département de Psychologie
Language :
English
Title :
The neural representation of ordinal information: domain-specific or domain-general?
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Abrahamse EL, Van Dijck J, Majerus S, Fias W. 2014. Finding the answer in space : The mentalwhiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory. 8:1-12.
Abrahamse EL, van Dijck J-P, Fias W. 2017. Grounding verbal working memory: The case of serial order. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 26:429-433.
Andersson JL, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R, Friston K. 2001. Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. NeuroImage. 13:903-919.
Asplund CL, Todd JJ, Snyder AP,Marois R. 2010. A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulusdriven attention. Nat Neurosci. 13:507-512.
Attout L, Fias W, Salmon E, Majerus S. 2014. Common neural substrates for ordinal representation in short-Term memory, numerical and alphabetical cognition. PLoS ONE. 9: e92049.
Attout L, Ordonez Magro L, Szmalec A, Majerus S. 2019. The developmental neural substrates of item and serial order components of verbal working memory. Hum Brain Mapp. 40:1541-1553.
Attout L, Ordonez Magro L, Szmalec A, Majerus S. 2020. The developmental neural substrates of Hebb repetition learning and their link with reading ability. Hum Brain Mapp. 41:3956-3969.
Attout L, Salmon E, Majerus S. 2015.Working memory for serial order is dysfunctional in adults with a history of developmental dyscalculia : evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging data. Dev Neuropsychol. 40:230-247.
Bressler DW, Silver MA. 2010. Spatial attention improves reliability of fMRI retinotopic mapping signals in occipital and parietal cortex. NeuroImage. 53:526-533.
Burges CJC. 1998. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Disc. 2:121-167.
Champod AS, Petrides M. 2010. Dissociation within the frontoparietal network in verbal working memory: A parametric functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 30:3849-3856.
Chiu YC, Yantis S. 2009. A domain-independent source of cognitive control for task sets: shifting spatial attention and switching categorization rules. J Neurosci. 29:3930-3938.
Corbetta M, Kincade JM, Ollinger JM, McAvoy MP, Shulman GL. 2000. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 3:292-297.
Corbetta M, Shulman GL. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:201-215.
Culham JC, Kanwisher NG. 2001. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11:157-163.
Dai J, Wang Y. 2012. Representation of surface luminance and contrast in primary visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 22:776-787.
Dienes Z. 2011. Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: which side are you on? Perspect Psychol Sci. 6:274-290.
Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. 2016. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113:7900-7905.
Fias W, Lammertyn J, Caessens B, Orban GA. 2007. Processing of abstract ordinal knowledge in the horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci. 27:8952-8956.
Fortin NJ, Agster KL, Eichenbaum HB. 2002. Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events. Nat Neurosci. 5:458-462.
Franklin MS, Jonides J. 2009. Order and magnitude share a common representation in parietal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 21:2114-2120.
Franklin MS, Jonides J, Smith EE. 2009. Processing of order information for numbers and months. Mem Cogn. 37:644-654.
Fulbright RK, Manson SC, Skudlarski P, Lacadie CM, Gore JC. 2003. Quantity determination and the distance effect with letters, numbers, and shapes: A functional MR imaging study of number processing. Am J Neuroradiol. 24:193-200.
Gardumi A, Ivanov D, Hausfeld L, Valente G, Formisano E, Uludag K. 2016. The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis. NeuroImage. 132:32-42.
Geisler WS, Albrecht DG, Crane AM. 2007. Responses of neurons in primary visual cortex to transient changes in local contrast and luminance. J Neurosci. 27:5063-5067.
Gillebert CR, Mantini D, Thijs V, Sunaert S, Dupont P, Vandenberghe R. 2011. Lesion evidence for the critical role of the intraparietal sulcus in spatial attention. Brain. 134:1694-1709.
Ginsburg V, Gevers W. 2015. Spatial coding of ordinal information in short-and long-Term memory. Front Hum Neurosci. 9:1-10.
Ginsburg V, van Dijck J-P, Previtali P, Fias W, Gevers W. 2014. The impact of verbal working memory on number-space associations. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 40:976-986.
Goffin C, Ansari D. 2016. Beyond magnitude: judging ordinality of symbolic number is unrelated tomagnitude comparison and independently relates to individual differences in arithmetic. Cognition. 150:68-76.
Goffin C, Ansari D. 2019. How are symbols and nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes related? Exploring bidirectional relationships in early numeracy. Mind Brain Educ. 13: 143-156.
Goffin C, Vogel SE, Slipenkyj M, Ansari D. 2020. A comes before B, like 1 comes before 2. Is the parietal cortex sensitive to ordinal relationships in both numbers and letters? An fMRI-Adaptation study. Hum Brain Mapp. 41:1591-1610.
Harvey BM, Klein BP, Petridou N, Dumoulin SO. 2013. Topographic representation of numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science. 341(80):1123-1126.
Holloway ID, Ansari D. 2010. Developmental specialization in the right intraparietal sulcus for the abstract representation of numerical magnitude. J Cogn Neurosci. 22:2627-2637.
Hsieh LT, Gruber MJ, Jenkins LJ, Ranganath C. 2014. Hippocampal activity patterns carry information about objects in temporal context. Neuron. 81:1165-1178.
Hutton C, Bork A, Josephs O, Deichmann R, Ashburner J, Turner R. 2002. Image distortion correction in fMRI: A quantitative evaluation. NeuroImage. 16:217-240.
Ischebeck A, Heim S, Siedentopf C, Zamarian L, Schocke M, Kremser C, Egger K, Strenge H, Scheperjans F,Delazer M. 2008.
Are numbers special? Comparing the generation of verbal materials from ordered categories (months) to numbers and other categories (animals) in an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 29:894-909.
Jeffreys H. 1961. Theory of probability. UK: Clarendon. Jenkins LJ, Ranganath C. 2016. Distinct neural mechanisms for remembering when an event occurred. Hippocampus. 26:554-559.
Jou J, Aldridge JW. 1999. Memory representation of alphabetic position and interval information. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 25:680-701.
Kalm K, Davis MH, Norris D. 2013. Individual sequence representations in the medial temporal lobe. J Cogn Neurosci. 25:1111-1121.
Kaufmann L, Vogel SE, Starke M, Kremser C, Schocke M. 2009. Numerical and non-numerical ordinality processing in children with and without developmental dyscalculia: evidence from fMRI. Cogn Dev. 24:486-494.
Klugkist I, van Wesel F, Bullens J. 2011. Do we know what we test and do we test what we want to know? Int J Behav Dev. 35:550-560.
Knops A, Willmes K. 2013. Numerical ordering and symbolic arithmetic share frontal and parietal circuits in the right hemisphere. NeuroImage. 84:786-795.
Kurth S, Majerus S, Bastin C, Collette F, Jaspar M, Bahri MA, Salmon E. 2016. Effects of aging on task-and stimulus-related cerebral attention networks. Neurobiol Aging. 44:85-95.
Lee CL, Estes WK.1981. Item and order information in short-Term memory: evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem. 7:149-169.
Lee MD, Wagenmakers E-J. 2014. Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Leth-steensen C, Marley AAJ. 2000. A model of response time effects in symbolic comparison. Psychol Rev. 107:62-100.
Lyons IM, Ansari D. 2015. Numerical order processing in children: from reversing the distance-effect to predicting arithmetic. Mind Brain Educ. 9:207-221.
Lyons IM, Beilock SL. 2013. Ordinality and the nature of symbolic numbers. J Neurosci. 33:17052-17061.
Lyons IM, Vogel S, Ansari D. 2016. On the ordinality of numbers: A review of neural and behavioral studies. Prog. Brain Res. 227:187-221. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.010.
Majerus S, Attout L, D Argembeau A, Degueldre C, Fias W, Maquet P, Martinez Perez T, Stawarczyk D, Salmon E, Van der Linden M, et al. 2012. Attention supports verbal shortterm memory via competition between dorsal and ventral attention networks. Cereb Cortex. 22:1086-1097.
Majerus S, Boukebza C. 2013. Short-Term memory for serial order supports vocabulary development: new evidence from a novel word learning paradigm. J Exp Child Psychol. 116:811-828.
Majerus S, Cowan N, Peters F, Van Calster L, Phillips C, Schrouff J. 2016. Cross-modal decoding of neural patterns associated with working memory: evidence for attention-based accounts of working memory. Cereb Cortex. 26:166-179.
Majerus S, D Argembeau A, Martinez Perez T, Belayachi S, Van der Linden M, Collette F, Salmon E, Seurinck R, Fias W, Maquet P. 2010. The commonality of neural networks for verbal and visual short-Term memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 22:2570-2593.
Majerus S, Peters F, Bouffier M, Cowan N, Phillips C. 2018. The dorsal attention network reflects both encoding load and top-down control during working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 30:144-159.
Majerus S, Poncelet M, Van der Linden M, Albouy G, Salmon E, Sterpenich V, Vandewalle G, Collette F, Maquet P. 2006. The left intraparietal sulcus and verbal short-Term memory: focus of attention or serial order? NeuroImage. 32:880-891.
Marshuetz C, Smith EE, Jonides J, DeGutis J, Chenevert TL. 2000. Order information in working memory: fMRI evidence for parietal and prefrontal mechanisms. J Cogn Neurosci. 12:130-144.
Matejko AA, Hutchison JE, Ansari D. 2019. Developmental specialization of the left intraparietal sulcus for symbolic ordinal processing. Cortex. 114:41-53.
McCormack T, Brown GD, Vousden JI, Henson RN. 2000. Children s serial recall errors: implications for theories of shortterm memory development. J Exp Child Psychol. 76:222-252.
Moyer RS, Landauer TK. 1967. Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature. 215:1519-1520.
Nairne JS, Riegler GL, Serra M. 1991. Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 17:702-709.
Nieder A. 2005. Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nat Rev Neurosci. 6:114-177.
PapagnoC, ComiA, RivaM, BizziA,VerniceM, CasarottiA,Fava E, Bello L. 2017. Mapping the brain network of the phonological loop. Hum Brain Mapp. 38:3011-3024.
Rasoulzadeh V, Sahan MI, van Dijck J-P,Abrahamse E,Marzecova A, Verguts T, Fias W. 2021. Spatial attention in serial order working memory: An EEG study. Cereb Cortex. 31:2482-2493.
Roberts BM, Libby LA, Inhoff MC, Ranganath C. 2018. Brain activity related to working memory for temporal order and object information. Behav Brain Res. 354:55-63.
Rypma B, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. 1999. Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. NeuroImage. 9:216-226.
Sasanguie D, Lyons IM, De Smedt B, Reynvoet B. 2017. Unpacking symbolic number comparison and its relation with arithmetic in adults. Cognition. 165:26-38.
Schrouff J, Kusse C, Wehenkel L, Maquet P, Phillips C. 2012. Decoding semi-constrained brain activity from fMRI using support vector machines and Gaussian processes. PLoS ONE. 7:e35860.
Schrouff J, RosaMJ, Rondina JM,Marquand AF, Chu C, Ashburner J, Phillips C, Richiardi J, Mourao-Miranda J. 2013. PRoNTo: pattern recognition for neuroimaging toolbox. Neuroinformatics. 11:319-337.
Sebastian A, Jung P, Neuhoff J, Wibral M, Fox PT, Lieb K, Fries P, Eickhoff SB, Tuscher O, Mobascher A. 2016. Dissociable attentional and inhibitory networks of dorsal and ventral areas of the right inferior frontal cortex: A combined task-specific and coordinate-based meta-Analytic fMRI study. Brain Struct Funct. 221:1635-1651.
Sella F, Sasanguie D, Reynvoet B. 2020. Judging the order of numbers relies on familiarity rather than activating the mental number line. Acta Psychol. 204:103014.
Serences JT, Shomstein S, Leber AB, Golay X, Egeth HE, Yantis S. 2005. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol Sci. 16:114-122.
Silver MA, Kastner S. 2009. Topographic maps in human frontal and parietal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 13:488-495.
Sommerauer G, Gras KH, Grabner RH, Vogel SE. 2020. The semantic control network mediates the relationship between symbolic numerical order processing and arithmetic performance in children. Neuropsychologia. 141:107405.
Sury D, Rubinsten O. 2012. Ordinal processing of numerical and non-numerical information. In: Breznitz Z, Rubinsten O, Molfese V, Molfese D, editors. Reading, writing, mathematics and the developing brain: listening to many voices. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 209-232.
Todd JJ, Marois R. 2004. Capacity limit of visual short-Term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 428:751-754.
Turconi E, Campbell JID, Seron X. 2006. Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison. Cognition. 98:273-285.
Turconi E, Seron X. 2002. Dissociation between order and quantity meaning in a patient with Gerstmann syndrome. Cortex. 38:911-914.
van Dijck JP, Fias W.2011.Aworking memory account for spatialnumerical associations. Cognition. 119:114-119.
Van Opstal F, Gevers W, De Moor W, Verguts T. 2008. Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders. Psychon Bull Rev. 15:419-425.
Vandenberghe R, Gillebert CR. 2009. Parcellation of parietal cortex: convergence between lesion-symptom mapping and mapping of the intact functioning brain. Behav Brain Res. 199:171-182.
Vos H, Sasanguie D, Gevers W, Reynvoet B. 2017. The role of general and number-specific order processing in adults arithmetic performance. J Cogn Psychol. 29:469-482.
Wagenmakers E-J. 2007. A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychon Bull Rev. 14:779-804.
Yantis S, Schwarzbach J, Serences JT, Carlson RL, Steinmetz MA, Pekar JJ, Courtney SM. 2002. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat Neurosci. 5:995-1002.
Zamarian L, Egger C, DelazerM. 2007. The mental representation of ordered sequences in visual neglect. Cortex. 43:542-550.
Zorzi M, Di Bono MG, Fias W. 2011. Distinct representations of numerical and non-numerical order in the human intraparietal sulcus revealed by multivariate pattern recognition. NeuroImage. 56:674-680.
Zorzi M, Priftis K, Meneghello F, Marenzi R, Umilta C. 2006. The spatial representation of numerical and nonnumerical sequences: evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia. 44:1061-1067.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.