Article (Scientific journals)
ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy.
Grävare Silbernagel, Karin; Malliaras, Peter; de Vos, Robert-Jan et al.
2022In Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 52 (3), p. 613-641
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
GrävareSilbernagel2022_Article_ICON2020InternationalScientifi.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.61 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series. RESULTS: 9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. CONCLUSION: 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020156763.
Disciplines :
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine
Author, co-author :
Grävare Silbernagel, Karin
Malliaras, Peter
de Vos, Robert-Jan
Hanlon, Shawn
Molenaar, Mitchel
Alfredson, Håkan
van den Akker-Scheek, Inge
Antflick, Jarrod
van Ark, Mathijs
Färnqvist, Kenneth
Haleem, Zubair
Kaux, Jean-François  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Médecine physique, réadaptation et traumatologie du sport
Kirwan, Paul
Kumar, Bhavesh
Lewis, Trevor
Mallows, Adrian
Masci, Lorenzo
Morrissey, Dylan
Murphy, Myles
Newsham-West, Richard
Norris, Richard
O'Neill, Seth
Peers, Koen
Sancho, Igor
Seymore, Kayla
Vallance, Patrick
van der Vlist, Arco
Vicenzino, Bill
More authors (18 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy.
Publication date :
March 2022
Journal title :
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN :
0112-1642
eISSN :
1179-2035
Volume :
52
Issue :
3
Pages :
613-641
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Commentary :
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Available on ORBi :
since 20 November 2021

Statistics


Number of views
98 (6 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
3 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
11
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
2
OpenCitations
 
2

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi