[en] Background and purpose: The purpose of the work is to analyse for Ir-192 prostate brachytherapy (BT) some of the different steps in optimizing the dose delivered to the CTV, urethra and rectum. Materials and methods: Between 07/1998 and 12/2001, 166 patients were treated with Ir-192 wires providing a low dose rate, according to the Paris system philosophy and with the 2D version of the treatment planning Isis(R). 40-45 Gy were delivered after an external beam radiotherapy of 40 Gy. The maximum tolerable doses for BT were 25 Gy to the anterior third of the rectum on the whole length of the implant (R dose) and 52 Gy to the urethra on a 1 cm length (U-max). A U-max/CTV dose ratio > 1.3 represented a pejorative value as the planned dose of 40-45 Gy could not be achieved. On the other side a ratio < 1.25 was considered optimal and the intermediate values satisfactory. A R/CTV dose ratio < 0.55 which is easily obtained was also stated as an optimal situation. From the CT Scan images performed for these implants, a theoretical study investigated the possibilities of complementary optimization afforded by a 3D treatment planning. This work was based on an inverse planning philosophy and a stepping source technology (SST) for high dose rate Ir-192 sources. Results: At the end of a learning curve reaching a plateau after the first 71 patients, 90% of the implants with Ir-192 wires were stated at least satisfactory for a total rate of 82% for the whole population. When the 3D dosimetry for SST was used, the initial values > 1.25 decreased significantly with optimization required on CTV contours and additional constraints on urethra while the R/CTV ratio was maintained under 0.55. For initial U-max/CTV > 1.3 or > 1.25 but <= 1.3 indeed, the mean respective values of 1.41 +/- 0.16 and 1.28 +/- 0.01 decreased to 1.28 +/- 0.24 and 1.17 +/- 0.09 (P < 0.001), allowing to increase the total dose to the CTV by 4 Gy. Conclusions: The Paris system which assumes a homogeneous distribution of a minimum number of catheters inside the CTV allowed to anticipate a satisfactory dosimetry in 82% of cases. However, this precision rate could be improved until 95% with an optimization approach based on an inverse planning philosophy. These new 3D optimization methods, ideally based on good quality implants at first allow to deliver the highest doses with minimal probability of creating cold spots inside the CTV or unacceptable hot spots outside. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Disciplines :
Oncology Radiology, nuclear medicine & imaging
Author, co-author :
Nickers, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Lenaerts, Eric ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
Thissen, Benedicte ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Radiothérapie
Deneufbourg, Jean-Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Radiothérapie
Language :
English
Title :
Does inverse planning applied to Iridium192 high dose rate prostate brachytherapy improve the optimization of the dose afforded by the Paris system?
D. Ash, A. Flynn, J. Batterman, Th. de Reike, P. Lavagnini, and L. Blank ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommandations on permanent seed implantation for localized prostate cancer Radiother Oncol 57 2000 315 321
C. Charra-Brunaud, I.C. Hsu, V. Weinberg, and J. Pouliot Analysis of interaction between number of implant catheters and dose-volume histograms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy using a computer model Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56 2003 586 591
M. Dattoli, K. Wallner, and R. Sorace 103Pd brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for clinically localized, high-risk prostatic carcinoma Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35 1996 875 879
A. Dosoretz, R. Stock, J. Cesaretti, and N. Stone Role of external beam radiation and hormonal therapy in low, intermediate, and high risk patients treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 2003 227
A. Dutreix, and G. Marinello The Paris System B. Pierquin J.F. Wilson D. Chassagne Modern Brachytherapy 1987 Masson Publishing USA 25 42
J. Fowler, R. Chappell, and M. Ritter Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50 2001 1021 1031
R.M. Galalae, G. Kovacs, and J. Schultze Long-term outcome after elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52 2002 81 90
R.M. Galalae, A. Martinez, and T. Mate Long-term outcome by risk factors using conformal high dose rate (HDR-BT) boost with or without neoadjuvant androgen suppression for localized prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58 2004 1048 1055
D.Y. Gelblum, L. Potters, R. Ashley, R. Waldbaum, X.H. Wang, and S. Leibel Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45 1999 59 67
G.E. Hanks, A.L. Hanlon, W.H. Pinover, E.M. Horwitz, R.A. Price, and T. Schultheiss Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 2000 823 832
P. Hoskin, P. Bownes, P. Ostler, K. Walker, and L. Bryant High dose rate afterloading brachytherapy for prostate cancer: catheter and gland movement between fractions Radiother Oncol 68 2003 285 288
ICRU REPORT 58. Dose and volume specification for reporting interstitial therapy; 1997.
C.R. King, T.A. DiPetrillo, and D.E. Wazer Optimal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: predictions for conventional external beam, IMRT and brachytherapy from radiobiologic models Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 2000 165 172
E. Lessard, and J. Pouliot Inverse planning anatomy-based dose optimization for HDR-brachytherapy of the prostate using fast simulated annealing algorithm and dedicated objective function Med Phys 28 2001 773 779
C.C. Ling, J. Humm, and S. Larson Towards multidimentional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 2000 551 560
A.A. Martinez, G. Gustafson, and J. Gonzalez Dose escalation using conformal high dose rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 2002 316 327
G.S. Merrick, W.M. Butler, R.W. Galbreath, and J.H. Lief Five-year biochemical outcome following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinical T1-T3 prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 2001 41 48
E.M. Messing, J.B. Zhang, and D.J. Rubens Intraoperative optimized inverse planning for prostate brachytherapy: early experience Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 1999 801 808
S. Nag, D. Beyer, and J. Friedland American brachytherapy society recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 1999 789 799
S. Nag, W. Bice, K. DeWyngaert, B. Prestidge, R. Stock, and Y. Yu The American brachytherapy society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 2000 221 230
S. Nag, J.P. Ciezki, and R. Cormack Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: report of the American brachytherapy society Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 2001 1422 1430
P. Nickers, L. Coppens, M. Beauduin, M. Darimont, J. de Leval, and J.M. Deneufbourg Feasibility study combining low dose rate 192 Ir brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy aiming at delivering 80-85 Gy to prostatic adenocarcinoma Radiother Oncol 55 2000 41 47
P. Nickers, N. Jansen, B. Thissen, and J.M. Deneufbourg 192 Ir LDR brachytherapy (BT) is at least as efficient as HDR options for boosting intermediate or unfavourable prostate cancers after EBRT Radiother Oncol 71 2004 124
A. Niemierko Reporting and analysing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose Med Phys 24 1997 103 110
J.E. Sylvester, J.C. Blasko, P.D. Grimm, R. Meier, and J.A. Malmgren Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival after external beam radiation and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the Seattle experience Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 2003 944 952
M.D. Terk, R.G. Stock, and N.N. Stone Identification of patients at increased risk for prolonged urinary retention following radioactive seed implantation of the prostate J Urol 160 1998 1379 1382