Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area

Development zoning; Multifunctional landscape; Northwestern Yunnan; Synergies and trade-offs; Commerce; Conformal mapping; Cultivation; Economic and social effects; Ecosystems; Housing; Photosynthesis; Phytoplankton; Zoning; Landscape functions; Net primary productivity; Spearman's rank correlation analysis; Suburban development; Trade off; Urban agglomerations; Self organizing maps; China; Yunnan

Abstract :

[en] Multifunctional landscape has become a new discipline growth point in landscape ecology. Globally mountainous areas occupy about one fifth of Earth's surface. However, few studies focused on landscape multifunctionality in mountainous areas. Taking Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, China, as a case study area, five typical landscape functions (net primary productivity, soil retention, water yield, crop production, and residential support) were quantified and mapped. Hotspots of multiple landscape functions were identified using spatial overlap tools, interaction between each landscape function pair was discussed through Spearman's rank correlation analysis, and development zoning was conducted based on landscape function bundle. The results showed that, about 61% of the study area had at least one kind of landscape function hotspot, with only 2.7% covering three or more kinds of landscape function hotspots. Significant trade-offs or synergies existed between all pairs of landscape functions, except the pair of net primary productivity and residential support. With the application of Self-Organizing Feature Maps (SOFM) method, the study area was divided into four types of development zones (i.e. ecological shelter area, ecological transition area, suburban development area, and urban agglomeration area) which were all corresponding to different landscape function bundles. This study could provide spatial guidance for differentiated sustainable developing in mountainous areas according to local conditions of landscape multifunctionality. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.

Disciplines :

Environmental sciences & ecology

Author, co-author :

Peng, J.; Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

Hu, X.; Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

Qiu, S.; Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

Hu, Y.; Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

Meersmans, Jeroen ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Analyse des risques environnementaux

Liu, Y.; State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

Language :

English

Title :

Multifunctional landscapes identification and associated development zoning in mountainous area

Publication date :

2019

Journal title :

Science of the Total Environment

ISSN :

0048-9697

eISSN :

1879-1026

Publisher :

Elsevier B.V.

Volume :

660

Pages :

765-775

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

NSCF - National Natural Science Foundation of China [CN]

Funding number :

Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project: B14001; National Natural Science Foundation of China, NSFC: 41322004

Funding text :

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41322004), and the 111 Project (B14001).

Available on ORBi :

since 08 November 2021

Statistics

Number of views

34 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

1 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Ahern, J., Planning for an extensive open space system: linking landscape structure and function. Landsc. Urban Plan. 21:1–2 (1991), 131–145.
Amaral, S., Monteiro, A.M.V., Camara, G., Quintanilha, J.A., DMSP/OLS night-time light imagery for urban population estimates in the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27:5 (2006), 855–870.
Anderson, B.J., Armsworth, P.R., Eigenbrod, F., Thomas, C.D., Gillings, S., Heinemeyer, A., et al. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:4 (2009), 888–896.
Bai, Y., Zhuang, C., Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Jiang, B., Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecol. Complex. 8:2 (2011), 177–183.
Bastian, O., Haase, D., Grunewald, K., Ecosystem properties, potentials and services–the EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 7–16.
Bastian, O., Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R.U., Walz, U., Wende, W., Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance. Landsc. Ecol. 29:9 (2014), 1463–1479.
Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D., Gordon, L.J., Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12:12 (2009), 1394–1404.
Bernués, A., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Alfnes, F., Clemetsen, M., Eike, L.O., Quantifying the multifunctionality of fjord and mountain agriculture by means of sociocultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services. Land Use Policy 48 (2015), 170–178.
Beskow, S., Mello, C.R., Norton, L.D., Curi, N., Viola, M.R., Avanzi, J.C., Soil erosion prediction in the Grande River Basin, Brazil using distributed modeling. Catena 79:1 (2009), 49–59.
Bolliger, J., Bättig, M., Gallati, J., Kläy, A., Stauffacher, M., Kienast, F., Landscape multifunctionality: a powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Reg. Environ. Chang. 11:1 (2011), 203–206.
Brandt, J., Vejre, H., Multifunctional landscapes - motives, concepts and perceptions. Brandt, J., Vejre, H., (eds.) Multifunctional Landscapes: Volume 1 Theory, Values and History, Vol. 1, 2004, WIT Press, South Hampton, 3–32 Advances in Ecological Sciences.
Caldwell, P.V., Miniat, C.F., Elliott, K.J., Swank, W.T., Brantley, S.T., Laseter, S.H., Declining water yield from forested mountain watersheds in response to climate change and forest mesophication. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22:9 (2016), 2997–3012.
Cassatella, C., Seardo, B.M., In search for multifunctionality: the contribution of scenic landscape assessment. Rega, C., (eds.) Landscape Planning and Rural Development, 2014, SpringerBriefs in Geography, Springer, Cham.
Cowling, R.M., Egoh, B., Knight, A.T., O'Farrell, P.J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., et al. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105:28 (2008), 9483–9488.
De Groot, R., Hein, L., Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales. Mander, Ü., Helming, K., Wiggering, H., (eds.) Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services, 2007, Springer, Netherlands, 15–36.
De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., Boumans, R.M., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41:3 (2002), 393–408.
Field, C.B., Behrenfeld, M.J., Randerson, J.T., Falkowski, P., Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:5374 (1998), 237–240.
Foody, G.M., Applications of the self-organizing feature map neural network in community data analysis. Ecol. Model. 120:2–3 (1999), 97–107.
Forman, R.T., Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landsc. Ecol. 10:3 (1995), 133–142.
Fry, G.L., Multifunctional landscapes—towards transdisciplinary research. Landsc. Urban Plan. 57:3 (2001), 159–168.
Fu, B.J., Lü Y.H., Chen, L.D., Su, C.H., Yao, X.L., Liu, Y., The latest progress of landscape ecology in the world. Acta Ecol. Sin. 28:2 (2008), 798–804 (in Chinese).
Gao, Y., Feng, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, J.L., Li, S.C., Zhu, Y.K., Clustering urban multifunctional landscapes using the self-organizing feature map neural network model. J. Urban Plann. Dev., 140(2), 2014, 05014001.
Getis, A., Ord, J.K., The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24:3 (1992), 189–206.
Groot, J.C., Jellema, A., Rossing, W.A., Designing a hedgerow network in a multifunctional agricultural landscape: balancing trade-offs among ecological quality, landscape character and implementation costs. Eur. J. Agron. 32:1 (2010), 112–119.
Groten, S., NDVI-crop monitoring and early yield assessment of Burkina Faso. Int. J. Remote Sens. 14:8 (1993), 1495–1515.
Jia, X., Fu, B., Feng, X., Hou, G., Liu, Y., Wang, X., The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China. Ecol. Indic. 43 (2014), 103–113.
Jose, S., Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor. Syst. 76:1 (2009), 1–10.
Li, J., Li, C., Zhu, F., Song, C., Wu, J., Spatiotemporal pattern of urbanization in Shanghai, China between 1989 and 2005. Landsc. Ecol. 28:8 (2013), 1545–1565.
Liu, B.Y., Nearing, M.A., Risse, L.M., Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes. Trans. ASAE 37:6 (1994), 1835–1840.
Liu, C., Xu, Y.Q., Huang, A., Liu, Y.X., Wang, H., Lu, L.H., Sun, P.L., Zheng, W.R., Spatial identification of land use multifunctionality at grid scale in farming-pastoral area: a case study of Zhangjiakou City, China. Habitat Int. 76 (2018), 48–61.
Lovell, S.T., Johnston, D.M., Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:4 (2008), 212–220.
Lu, N., Fu, B.J., Jin, T.T., Chang, R.Y., Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 29 (2014), 1697–1708.
Maes, J., Paracchini, M., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M., Alkemade, R., Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 155 (2012), 1–12.
Nassauer, J.I., Opdam, P., Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc. Ecol. 23:6 (2008), 633–644.
Naveh, Z., Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 57:3 (2001), 269–284.
Noss, R.F., Landscape connectivity: different functions at different scales. Hudson, W.E., (eds.) Landscape linkages and biodiversity, 1991, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, 27–39.
O'Farrell, P., Reyers, B., Le Maitre, D., Milton, S., Egoh, B., Maherry, A., et al. Multi-functional landscapes in semi-arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 25 (2010), 1231–1246.
Opdam, P., Using ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: science is not ready to deliver. Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture, 2013, Springer, Netherlands, 77–101.
Park, Y.S., Cereghino, R., Compin, A., Lek, S., Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters. Ecol. Model. 160:3 (2003), 265–273.
Peng, J., Chen, X., Liu, Y., Lü H., Hu, X., Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Appl. Geogr. 74 (2016), 170–181.
Peng, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, Y., Mapping spatial non-stationarity of human-natural factors associated with agricultural landscape multifunctionality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017:246 (2017), 221–233.
Pilgrim, E.S., Macleod, C.J., Blackwell, M.S., Bol, R., Hogan, D.V., Chadwick, D.R., et al. 4 interactions among agricultural production and other ecosystem services delivered from European temperate grassland systems. Adv. Agron., 109, 2010, 117.
Potter, C.S., Randerson, J.T., Field, C.B., Matson, P.A., Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Klooster, S.A., Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 7 (1993), 811–841.
Qiu, J., Turner, M.G., Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:29 (2013), 12149–12154.
Queiroz, C., Meacham, M., Richter, K., Norström, A.V., Andersson, E., Norberg, J., et al. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio 44:1 (2015), 89–101.
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Bennett, E., Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107:11 (2010), 5242–5247.
Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning With the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). 703, 1997, United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook.
Rodríguez, J.P., Beard, T.D., Bennett, E.M., Cumming, G.S., Cork, S.J., Agard, J., et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc., 11(1), 2006, 28.
Roth, N.E., Allan, J.D., Erickson, D.L., Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landsc. Ecol. 11:3 (1996), 141–156.
Sal, A.G., García, A.G., A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120:1 (2007), 82–91.
Su, C.H., Fu, B.J., Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Glob. Planet. Chang. 101 (2013), 119–128.
Swallow, B.M., Sang, J.K., Nyabenge, M., Bundotich, D.K., Duraiappah, A.K., Yatich, T.B., Tradeoffs, synergies and traps among ecosystem services in the Lake Victoria basin of East Africa. Environ. Sci. Pol. 12:4 (2009), 504–519.
Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P., Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landsc. Ecol. 24:8 (2009), 1037–1052.
Turner, K.G., Odgaard, M.V., Bøcher, P.K., Dalgaard, T., Svenning, J.C., Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125 (2014), 89–104.
Vatn, A., Multifunctional agriculture: some consequences for international trade regimes. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 29:3 (2002), 309–327.
Vejre, H., Abildtrup, J., Andersen, E., Andersen, P.S., Brandt, J., Busck, A., et al. Multifunctional agriculture and multifunctional landscapes—land use as an interface. Multifunctional land use, 2007, Springer, Netherlands, 93–104.
Vreeker, R., De Groot, H.L.F., Verhoef, E.T., Urban multifunctional land use: theoretical and emprirical insights on economies of scale, scope and diversity. Built Environ. 30:4 (2004), 289–307.
Wang, J.T., Peng, J., Zhao, M.Y., Liu, Y.X., Chen, Y.Q., Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China. Sci. Total Environ. 574 (2017), 57–64.
White, C., Halpern, B.S., Kappel, C.V., Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109:12 (2012), 4696–4701.
Willemen, L., Verburg, P.H., Hein, L., Van Mensvoort, M.E., Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 88:1 (2008), 34–43.
Willemen, L., Hein, L., Van Mensvoort, M.E., Verburg, P.H., Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol. Indic. 10:1 (2010), 62–73.
Wilson, G.A., Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective. 2007, CABI International, Wallingford.
Wu, J., Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. 2007, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
Xue, H., Li, S., Chang, J., Combining ecosystem service relationships and DPSIR framework to manage multiple ecosystem services. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187:3 (2015), 1–15.
Yang, G., Ge, Y., Xue, H., Yang, W., Shi, Y., Peng, C., et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban–rural complexes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 136 (2015), 110–121.
Zhang, B., Li, W., Xie, G., Xiao, Y., Characteristics of water conservation of forest ecosystem in Beijing. Acta Ecol. Sin. 28:11 (2008), 5619–5624 (in Chinese).
Zhao, M.Y., Peng, J., Liu, Y.X., Li, T.Y., Wang, Y.L., Mapping watershed-level ecosystem service bundles in the Pearl River Delta, China. Ecol. Econ. 152 (2018), 106–117.
Zheng, H., Chen, F., Ouyang, Z., Tu, N., Xu, W., Wang, X., et al. Impacts of reforestation approaches on runoff control in the hilly red soil region of Southern China. J. Hydrol. 356:1 (2008), 174–184.
Zheng, H., Robinson, B.E., Liang, Y.C., Polasky, S., Ma, D.C., Wang, F.C., Ruckelshaus, M., Ouyang, Z.Y., Daily, G.C., Benefits, costs, and livelihood implications of a regional payment for ecosystem service program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:41 (2013), 16681–16686.
Zhou, W., Huang, G., Pickett, S.T., Cadenasso, M.L., 90 years of forest cover change in an urbanizing watershed: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landsc. Ecol. 26:5 (2011), 645–659.
Zhu, W., Pan, Y., Yang, X., Song, G., Comprehensive analysis of the impact of climatic changes on Chinese terrestrial net primary productivity. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52:23 (2007), 3253–3260.
Zhu, W.Q., Pan, Y.Z., Zhang, J.S., Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing. J. Plant Ecol. 31:3 (2007), 413–424 (in Chinese).