[en] Biosecurity is a key component of any animal and public health strategy and disease prevention and control programs. This study reviewed the main findings of different studies implemented from 2015 to 2021 to analyse the biosecurity situation at Belgian cattle farms, including attitudes and behaviours of cattle farmers and rural veterinarians regarding biosecurity measures. Specifically, the objective was to perform a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of the situation and propose a new conceptual framework improving the level of biosecurity in the cattle sector. Biosecurity in cattle farming remains relatively low and faces multiple challenges. Its future improvement requires the different stakeholders to agree on shared goals and objectives and to carefully consider animal, public and environmental health, as well as socioeconomic and cultural factors. Further cost efficiency studies are required to identify the most important biosecurity measures and convince the stakeholders of their utility and benefits. Cattle farmers rely mainly on rural veterinarians for technical guidance and consider them as trustful informants. To be more effective in promoting these good practices, rural veterinarians need a proper guidance from the authorities, a proper training on biosecurity and communication, as well as an enabling environment.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Renault, Véronique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des maladies infectieuses et parasitaires (DMI) > Epidémiologie et analyse des risques appl. aux sc. vétér.
Humblet, Marie-France ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Protection et hygiène du travail (SUPHT)
Pham, Phuong N.
Saegerman, Claude ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des maladies infectieuses et parasitaires (DMI) > Epidémiologie et analyse des risques appl. aux sc. vétér.
Language :
English
Title :
Biosecurity at Cattle Farms: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats.
International Food Safety Authorities Network; World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Biosecurity: An Integrated Approach to Manage Risk to Human, Animal and Plant Life and Health; International Food Safety Authorities Network: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
European Commission. A New Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007–2013) Where “Prevention is Better than Cure”; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2007; p. 28.
Sumilo, D.; Asokliene, L.; Bormane, A.; Vasilenko, V.; Golovljova, I.; Randolph, S.E. Climate change cannot explain the upsurge of tick-borne encephalitis in the Baltics. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e500. [CrossRef]
Brennan, M.L.; Christley, R. Biosecurity on cattle farms: A study in North-West England. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e28139. [CrossRef]
Nöremark, M.; Frössling, J.; Lewerin, S.S. Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by Swedish livestock farmers. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2010, 57, 225–236. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sayers, R.; Sayers, G.; Mee, J.; Good, M.; Bermingham, M.; Grant, J.; Dillon, P. Implementing biosecurity measures on dairy farms in Ireland. Vet. J. 2013, 197, 259–267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sahlström, L.; Virtanen, T.; Kyyrö, J.; Lyytikäinen, T. Biosecurity on finnish cattle, pig and sheep farms—results from a question-naire. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 117, 59–67. [CrossRef]
Hoe, F.; Ruegg, P. Opinions and practices of wisconsin dairy producers about biosecurity and animal well-being. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2297–2308. [CrossRef]
Brandt, A.W.; Sanderson, M.W.; DeGroot, B.D.; Thomson, D.U.; Hollis, L.C. Biocontainment, biosecurity, and security practices in beef feedyards. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 232, 262–269. [CrossRef]
Fishbein, M.A.; Ajzen, I. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Philos. Rhetor. 1977, 10, 177–188.
Ritter, C.; Jansen, J.; Roche, S.; Kelton, D.F.; Adams, C.L.; Orsel, K.; Erskine, R.J.; Benedictus, G.; Lam, T.J.; Barkema, H. Invited review: Determinants of farmers’ adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 3329–3347. [CrossRef]
Abraham, C.; Sheeran, P. The Health Belief Model; Mark Conner, P.N., Ed.; McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead, UK, 2015; pp. 30–69.
Janz, N.K.; Becker, M.H. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ. Q. 1984, 11, 1–47. [CrossRef]
Sohl, S.; Moyer, A. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev. Med. 2007, 45, 252–261. [CrossRef]
Becker, M.H.; Maiman, L.A.; Kirscht, J.P.; Haefner, D.P.; Drachman, R.H. The health belief model and prediction of dietary compliance: A field experiment. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1977, 18, 348. [CrossRef]
Sarrazin, S.; Cay, A.B.; Laureyns, J.; Dewulf, J. A survey on biosecurity and management practices in selected Belgian cattle farms. Prev. Veter. Med. 2014, 117, 129–139. [CrossRef]
Cardoen, S.; Depoorter, P.; Hendrikx, P.; Hooyberghs, J.; Imberechts, H.; Dewulf, J.; Czaplicki, G.; Van Der Stede, Y.; Dierick, K.; Van Den Berg, T.; et al. Evaluation de la surveillance épidémiologique Belge en santé animale. Évaluation Surveillance Épidémiologique Belge Santé Animale 2014, 66, 27–42.
Van Winsen, F.; De Mey, Y.; Lauwers, L.; Van Passel, S.; Vancauteren, M.; Wauters, E. Determinants of risk behaviour: Effects of perceived risks and risk attitude on farmer’s adoption of risk management strategies. J. Risk Res. 2016, 19, 56–78. [CrossRef]
Renault, V.; Damiaans, B.; Sarrazin, S.; Humblet, M.-F.; Lomba, M.; Ribbens, S.; Riocreux, F.; Koenen, F.; Cassart, D.; Dewulf, J.; et al. Classification of adult cattle infectious diseases: A first step towards prioritization of biosecurity measures. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 1991–2005. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Renault, V.; Damiaans, B.; Sarrazin, S.; Humblet, M.-F.; Dewulf, J.; Saegerman, C. Biosecurity practices in Belgian cattle farming: Level of implementation, constraints and weaknesses. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 1246–1261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Renault, V.; Humblet, M.F.; Moons, V.; Bosquet, G.; Gauthier, B.; Cebrián, L.M.; Casal, J.; Saegerman, C. Rural veterinarian’s perception and practices in terms of biosecurity across three European countries. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 65, e183–e193. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Damiaans, B.; Renault, V.; Sarrazin, S.; Berge, A.C.; Pardon, B.; Ribbens, S.; Saegerman, C.; Dewulf, J. Biosecurity practices in Belgian veal calf farming: Level of implementation, attitudes, strengths, weaknesses and constraints. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 172, 104768. [CrossRef]
Renault, V.; Damiaans, B.; Humblet, M.; Ruiz, S.J.; Bocanegra, I.G.; Brennan, M.L.; Casal, J.; Petit, E.; Pieper, L.; Simoneit, C.; et al. Cattle farmers’ perception of biosecurity measures and the main predictors of behaviour change: The first European-wide pilot study. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020. [CrossRef]
Ensoy, C.; Faes, C.; Welby, S.; Van Der Stede, Y.; Aerts, M. Exploring cattle movements in Belgium. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 116, 89–101. [CrossRef]
Olbrich, K. Europe Milk Crisis Far from Being Over. Available online: https://www.cowsmo.com/news/europe-milk-crisis-far/(accessed on 6 May 2021).
Hocquette, J.-F.; Ellies-Oury, M.-P.; Lherm, M.; Pineau, C.; Deblitz, C.; Farmer, L. Current situation and future prospects for beef production in Europe—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 1017–1035. [CrossRef]
Moore, D.A.; Merryman, M.M.L.; Hartman, M.L.; Klingborg, D.J. Comparison of published recommendations regarding biosecurity practices for various prodiuction animal species and classes. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2008, 233, 249–256. [CrossRef]
Royal Decree. Arrêté Royal Relatif à la Lutte Contre la Fièvre Aphteuse; Moniteur Belge: Brussels, Belgium, 2005; p. 184.
European Comission. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Animal Health; European Comission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on Transmissible Animal Diseases and Amending and Repealing Certain Acts in the Area of Animal Health (‘Animal Health Law’); European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
Sayers, R.; Good, M.; Sayers, G. A survey of biosecurity-related practices, opinions and communications across dairy farm veterinarians and advisors. Vet. J. 2014, 200, 261–269. [CrossRef]
Gunn, G.; Heffernan, C.; Hall, M.; McLeod, A.; Hovi, M. Measuring and comparing constraints to improved biosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 84, 310–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Gauly, M.; Bollwein, H.; Breves, G.; Brügemann, K.; Dänicke, S.; Daş, G.; Demeler, J.; Hansen, H.; Isselstein, J.; König, S.; et al. Future consequences and challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate change in Central Europe—a review. Animal 2013, 7, 843–859. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toma, L.; Stott, A.W.; Heffernan, C.; Ringrose, S.; Gunn, G.J. Determinants of biosecurity behaviour of British cattle and sheep farmers—a behavioural economics analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 108, 321–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Denis-Robichaud, J.; Kelton, D.; Bauman, C.; Barkema, H.; Keefe, G.; Dubuc, J. Canadian dairy farmers’ perception of the efficacy of biosecurity practices. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 10657–10669. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brennan, M.L.; Wright, N.; Wapenaar, W.; Jarratt, S.; Hobson-West, P.; Richens, I.F.; Kaler, J.; Buchanan, H.; Huxley, J.N.; O’Connor, H.M. Exploring attitudes and beliefs towards implementing cattle disease prevention and control measures: A qualitative study with dairy farmers in Great Britain. Animals 2016, 6, 61. [CrossRef]
Rehman, T.; McKemey, K.; Yates, C.; Cooke, R.; Garforth, C.; Tranter, R.; Park, J.; Dorward, P. Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agric. Syst. 2007, 94, 281–293. [CrossRef]
Garforth, C.; McKemey, K.; Rehman, T.; Tranter, R.; Cooke, R.; Park, J.; Dorward, P.; Yates, C. Farmers’ attitudes towards techniques for improving oestrus detection in dairy herds in South West England. Livest. Sci. 2006, 103, 158–168. [CrossRef]
Renault, V.; Lomba, M.; Delooz, L.; Ribbens, S.; Humblet, M.; Saegerman, C. Pilot study assessing the possible benefits of a higher level of implementation of biosecurity measures on farm productivity and health status in Belgian cattle farms. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 67, 769–777. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Renault, V.; Hambe, H.A.; Van Vlaenderen, G.; Timmermans, E.; Mohamed, A.M.; Ethgen, O.; Saegerman, C. Economic impact of contagious caprine pleuropneumonia and cost–benefit analysis of the vaccination programmes based on a one-year continuous monitoring of flocks in the arid and semi-arid lands of Kenya. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 2523–2536. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Heffernan, C.; Nielsen, L.; Thomson, K.; Gunn, G. An exploration of the drivers to bio-security collective action among a sample of UK cattle and sheep farmers. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 87, 358–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moya, S.; Tirado, F.; Espluga, J.; Ciaravino, G.; Armengol, R.; Diéguez, J.; Yus, E.; Benavides, B.; Casal, J.; Allepuz, A. Dairy farmers’ decision-making to implement biosecurity measures: A study of psychosocial factors. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 67, 698–710. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Garforth, C. Livestock keepers’ reasons for doing and not doing things which governments, vets and scientists would like them to do. Zoonoses Public Health 2015, 62, 29–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sarrazin, S.; Damiaans, B.; Renault, V.; Saegerman, C. Transmission of cattle diseases and biosecurity in cattle farms. In Biosecurity in Animal Production and Veterinary Medicine: From Principles to Practice; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2019; pp. 357–408.
Damiaans, B.; Renault, V.; Sarrazin, S.; Berge, A.C.; Pardon, B.; Saegerman, C.; Dewulf, J. A risk-based scoring system to quantify biosecurity in cattle production. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 179, 104992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Renault, V. Factors Determining the Implementation of Measures Aimed at Preventing Professional Zoonotic Diseases in Veterinary Practices; University of Liege: Liège, Belgium, 2020.
Derks, M.; van Woudenbergh, B.; Boender, M.; Kremer, W.; van Werven, T.; Hogeveen, H. Veterinarian awareness of farmer goals and attitudes to herd health management in The Netherlands. Vet. J. 2013, 198, 224–228. [CrossRef]
Hulme, P.E. One biosecurity: A unified concept to integrate human, animal, plant, and environmental health. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2020, 4, 539–549. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Robinson, T.P.; Wertheim, H.F.L.; Kakkar, M.; Kariuki, S.; Bu, D.; Price, L.B. Animal production and antimicrobial resistance in the clinic. Lancet 2016, 387, e1–e3. [CrossRef]
De Miranda Santos, I.K.; Garcia, G.R.; Oliveira, P.S.; Verissimo, C.J.; Katiki, L.M.; Rodrigues, L.; Szabó, M.P.J.; Maritz-Olivier, C. Acaricides: Current status and sustainable alternatives for controlling the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus microplus, based on its ecology. In Ecology and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 5, pp. 91–134. ISBN 978-908-686-863-6.
Milam, J.L.F.C.D.; Farris, J.L.; Wilhide, J.D. Evaluating mosquito control pesticides for effect on target and nontarget organisms. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 39, 324–328. [CrossRef]
Lytras, S.; Xia, W.; Hughes, J.; Jiang, X.; Robertson, D.L. The animal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Science 2021, 373, 968–970. [CrossRef]
