scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Baker F. B., Kim S.-H., (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
Birnbaum A., (1969). Statistical theory for logistic mental test models with a prior distribution of ability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 258-276.
Bock R. D., Mislevy R. J., (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431-444.
Breslow N. E., Clayton D. G., (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421), 9-25.
De Boeck P., Wilson M. (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Embretson S. E., Reise S. P., (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hambleton R. K., Swaminathan H., (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Li Y. H., Lissitz R. W., (2004). Applications of the analytically derived asymptotic standard errors of item response theory item parameter estimates. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 85-117.
Lord F. M., (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lord F. M., (1986). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian parameter estimation in item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 157-162.
Magis D., (2014a). Accuracy of asymptotic standard errors of the maximum and weighted likelihood estimators of proficiency levels with short tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 105-121.
Magis D., (2014b). On the asymptotic standard error of a class of robust estimators of ability in dichotomous item response models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 430-450.
Magis D., (2016). Efficient standard error formulas of ability estimators with dichotomous item response models. Psychometrika, 81,184-200.
Magis D., Barrada J. R., (2017). Computerized adaptive testing with R: Recent updates of the package catR. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(Code Snippet 1). Retrieved from https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v076c01
Magis D., Raîche G., (2012). On the relationships between Jeffreys modal and weighted likelihood estimation of ability under logistic IRT models. Psychometrika, 77, 163-169.
Magis D., Verhelst N., (2017). On the finiteness of the weighted likelihood estimator of ability. Psychometrika, 82, 637-647.
Magis D., Yan D., von Davier A. A., (2017). Computerized adaptive and multistage testing (using R packages catR and mstR). New York, NY: Springer.
Ostini R., Nering M. L., (2006). Polytomous item response theory models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Penfield R. D., (2001). Assessing differential item functioning among multiple groups: A comparison of three Mantel-Haenszel procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 235-259.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reckase M. D., (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.
Schuster C., Yuan K.-H., (2011). Robust estimation of latent ability in item response models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36, 720-735.
van der Linden W. J., Glas C. A. W. (2010). Elements of adaptive testing. New York, NY: Springer.
van der Linden W. J., Hambleton R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.
Wainer H., (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
Warm T., (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response models. Psychometrika, 54, 427-450.
Yang J. S., Hansen M., Cai L., (2011). Characterizing sources of uncertainty in item response theory scale scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 264-290.
Zimowski M. F., Muraki E., Mislevy R. J., Bock R. D., (1996). BILOG-MG: Multiple group IRT analysis and test maintenance for binary items. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.