Article (Scientific journals)
Efficient Standard Errors in Item Response Theory Models for Short Tests
Ippel, L.; Magis, David
2020In Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80 (3), p. 461–475
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
0013164419882072.pdf
Publisher postprint (351.02 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] In dichotomous item response theory (IRT) framework, the asymptotic standard error (ASE) is the most common statistic to evaluate the precision of various ability estimators. Easy-to-use ASE formulas are readily available; however, the accuracy of some of these formulas was recently questioned and new ASE formulas were derived from a general asymptotic theory framework. Furthermore, exact standard errors were suggested to better evaluate the precision of ability estimators, especially with short tests for which the asymptotic framework is invalid. Unfortunately, the accuracy of exact standard errors was assessed so far only in a very limiting setting. The purpose of this article is to perform a global comparison of exact versus (classical and new formulations of) asymptotic standard errors, for a wide range of usual IRT ability estimators, IRT models, and with short tests. Results indicate that exact standard errors globally outperform the ASE versions in terms of reduced bias and root mean square error, while the new ASE formulas are also globally less biased than their classical counterparts. Further discussion about the usefulness and practical computation of exact standard errors are outlined. © The Author(s) 2019.
Disciplines :
Education & instruction
Author, co-author :
Ippel, L.;  Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Magis, David ;  Université de Liège - ULiège
Language :
English
Title :
Efficient Standard Errors in Item Response Theory Models for Short Tests
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
Educational and Psychological Measurement
ISSN :
0013-1644
Publisher :
SAGE Publications, New York, United States - New York
Volume :
80
Issue :
3
Pages :
461–475
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
Available on ORBi :
since 29 September 2021

Statistics


Number of views
48 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
3
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
3
OpenCitations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi